French Army Quartermaster Corps Palladium Boots René Elissabide
Designed
1947
Manufacturer
French Army Quartermaster Corps Palladium Boots SAS Pataugas Marck & Balsan Wissart Aigle Au Coq Bonusage Morvan Paraflac Paul Boyé Vernon Bata Shoes (Canada) Mafipro (Portugal) Teva Naot (Israel) Sturm MIL-TEC (Germany) Farm Blue (United States)
ThePatauga jungle boot orFrench Army bush boot (French:chaussure de brousse orchaussure de brousse de l'armée française), commonly known as the "splasher" (Patauga), is a lightweight cotton canvas and rubber boot worn by the members of theFrench Armed Forces when deployed overseas. First introduced in the late 1940s, the Patauga boot, along with theFrench M1949 Bush Hat, became an icon associated with France's decolonization wars inIndochina andAlgeria throughout the 1950s and 1960s. The Pataugas boots were popular not only among members of the French military, but also among civilians engaging in outdoor activities. Its design was subsequently copied and adopted by severalmilitaries worldwide.
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(May 2025)
Modern civilian iteration of the Palladium "Pampa" boot, 2018.Palladium "Pallabrousse" boot, 2024.
In the aftermath ofWorld War II, the French began to reassert their lost influence over their colonies inFrench Indochina, comprisingVietnam,Cambodia andLaos, which had been occupied by theImperial Japanese Army late in the War and were now vying for independence. The troops of theFrench Far East Expeditionary Corps (CEFEO) that was sent by theFrench Army to participate in the reoccupation of the Indochinese territories in September 1945 wore on the field a mixture of French regulation and American surplus footwear, including French M1917, M1941, M1945 brown (or black) leather hobnailed ankle boots (French:Brodequins modéle 1917, modéle 1941, modéle 1945), brown leather US 1941 Type II Service Shoes, 1943 Type III Service Shoes, 1943 Service Shoes Reverse Uppers,dual-buckled M1943 Combat Service Boots, and calf-lengthUS M1942 "Corcoran" paratrooper boots, but they had no specifically-designed footwear for tropical climates.
ThePortuguese Army and thePortuguese Marine Corps adopted in the early 1960s theCanvas boot model 1964 (Portuguese:Bota de lona m/964), whose design appears to have been based on the French Army Mle 1954 Patauga boot used during theAlgerian War. As per in the French model, the Portuguese Model 1964 boot is characterised by his double colour construction, with the upper and the heel counter being made of olive green canvas and the toe in black canvas. The low-top upper has 5 lace eyelets made of stainless steel and is reinforced by metal rivets at the base of the lacing system. The tongue is not sewn to the top of the boot by side stitches and although this provides better ventilation, it also allows the infiltration of humidity and small pebbles into the boot. In contrast to the French original, the Portuguese version features built-in double round eyelets at the inner shank of the boot, intended for both fast drainage and ventilation, allowing the circulation of air on the inside.[57][58]
Introduced in the late 1950s, theItalian Army's version of the Patauga boot consisted of high-top khaki or olive canvas uppers provided with 4 metal lace eyelets and 5 speed-lace eyelets, a toe cap and black rubber outsole, and was produced in two variants: one basic model lacking built-in ventilation eyelets (Italian:Stivaletti) and a second model, designated "landing boots" (Italian:Stivaletti da sbarco,Scalfarotti), in which the outsoles were provided with 5 fast drainage eyelets – 3 on the inner shank and 2 on the outside –, and a slip-resistant "ripple" pattern tread. Also known as the "Amphibians, Lagoon, Italian Army" (Italian:Anfibi Lagunari Esercito Italiano), the landing boots were issued to the soldiers of theLagunari Regiment "Serenissima", an Italian Army amphibious infantry unit formed in 1957 at Venice, who wore them while operating in the marshy ground environment typical of the coastallagoons in the northernAdriatic Sea – theVenetian Lagoon, theMarano Lagoon, and theGrado Lagoon. The Landing boots were also provided to theItalian Navy's1st San Marco Naval Infantry Regiment.[59]
Developed by theU.S. Army Natick Laboratories inNatick, Massachusetts in the early 1960s, the Indigenous Combat Boot was an American-designed jungle boot derived from the French Patauga boot for use inVietnam. It consisted of high-top black canvas uppers provided with 8 metal lace eyelets, a toe cap and outsole made of rubber in the same colour that contained an anti-Punji stick metal plate on the inside. Other features that distinguished the Indigenous Combat Boot from the original French model were the two screened drainage eyelets on the inner shank and the plain round rubberized ankle reinforcements lacking the manufacturer's markings. Like theVibram-soled U.S. ArmyJungle boots, the tread gave poor traction and tended to get clogged with mud. In addition, since they were produced in Japan using Japanesefoot lasts, most South Vietnamese soldiers often found the indigenous boots to be ill-suited to the local conditions and uncomfortable to wear.[60]
In response to the complaints regarding the indigenous combat boot, the Canadian-basedBata Shoes Company began developing in 1968 a new, improved jungle boot that used anthropometric Vietnamese foot lasts produced by Natick Laboratories, bringing it closer to the French Patauga design favoured by the South Vietnamese. Like its predecessor, the new jungle boot consisted of cotton canvas uppers, sometimes reinforced by metal rivets at the base of the lacing system, and a toe cap and outsole made of black rubber with a horizontal triple-ribbed midsole; it also retained the screened drainage eyelets on the inner shank and the (Bata-marked) round rubberized ankle reinforcements, though the latter was often absent in the high-top version. Made under contract inCanada, the improved Bata Jungle Boots were produced in three sizes (6-eyelets, 7-eyelets, and 11-eyelets), being also available in khaki and olive green versions.[61][62]
First adopted in 1950 by the General Logistics Department of the ChinesePeople's Liberation Army (PLA), theType 50 combat sneaker, best known as the "liberation shoe", is a Chinese-designed canvas-and-rubber low-riseplimsoll-type shoe that was used by both the PLA during theKorean War and the Vietnamese communistViet Minh regular guerrilla forces fighting in the northernTonkin region ofFrench Indochina during theFirst Indochina War, which were trained, armed and supplied since 1949 by thePeople's Republic of China.[63] It consists ofreed green canvas uppers provided with four aluminium eyelets and a tan or black rubber vertically-ribbed outsole and toe cap; the thick outsole has a simple "ripple" or zigzag pattern tread and lacks a raised heel cap.[64] Simple and cheap to produce, the "liberation shoes" were provided in large quantities to the Viet Minh and its successor, thePeople's Army of Vietnam (PAVN) of theDemocratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV) throughout the 1950s, 1960s and the early 1970s, eventually becoming their standard footwear throughout the Indochina andVietnam Wars.[65]
These plimsoll shoes were not hardwearing, however, and tended to disintegrate through operational use, especially during the long journey from North Vietnam down theHo Chi Minh trail into South Vietnam. As they marched through the rugged hot and wet jungle terrain ofLaos, North Vietnamese soldiers quickly realized that their Chinese-made shoes were not designed for a tropical environment, since they retained humidity and perspiration due to a lack of proper ventilation, took a long time to dry, and if not removed regularly, they were prone to causing malodorous fungal and bacterial infections such asTrench foot andAthlete's foot that ruined the wearer's feet. Moreover, the shoes offered limited ankle support, though most North Vietnamese had grown up barefoot or wearing sandals, so this presented few problems. Eventually, the "liberation shoes" lasted no more than two months in the field, so replacements were constantly sought. One quick solution for PAVN soldiers was to remove the Bata boots, Indigenous Combat Boots and US-style jungle boots from any dead South VietnameseCIDG militiamen orARVN regular soldier they encountered and use these to replace their worn-out footwear, although the preferred option taken by most North Vietnamese infantrymen was to exchange at first opportunity their rotten and smelly Chinese shoes for the famous, locally producedHo Chi Minh sandals (Vietnamese:dép lốp or "tire sandal") made of black rubber soles cut from discarded truck tires and held on by inner-tube straps.[66][67]
Despite their shortcomings, the Type 50 "liberation shoes" remained standard issue with Chinese PLA troops andPeople's Armed Police (PAP) personnel until 2015, when they began to be replaced by a new, better-designed model of anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and odour resistant black combat trainers.[68][69]
Although almost completely dependent on Chinese logistical support, with PAVN combat footwear being all imported from PLA sources, the North Vietnamese did developed their own model of jungle combat boot after 1954, based upon captured French Patauga jungle boots.[70] Known as thePAVN jungle boot, its design appears to have been directly inspired by the Palladium "Pampa" and "Pallabrousse" models, consisting of khaki, reed green or (rarely) black cotton canvas uppers provided with a pull loop at the backstay[71] and a black or slightly brownish rubber vertically-ribbed outsole, a (slightly) raised heel cap and toe cap. The PAVN jungle boot is manufactured locally in two high-cut versions, one with just six metal eyelets and another with nine metal eyelets, whilst the upper incorporates a single diagonal reinforcement stripe along the side, as per in the Palladium models. Early production batches of the PAVN jungle boot had khaki uppers andVibram-type rubber soles, though khaki canvas had ceased to be used for the uppers several years before the end of the Vietnam War and a distinctive rubber sole tread pattern incorporating notches, V- and crescent-shaped lugs and small raised "commas" under the studs became standard.[72][73] Unlike the Chinese plimsolls, the PAVN jungle boots were better adapted to the tropical climate and dried quickly when wet.[74] The Chinese soon produced their own version of the PAVN jungle boot, theType 65 combat boot, which featured high-rise reed green canvas uppers – with or without the reinforcement strap at the side and lacking the pull loop at the backstay – provided with six aluminium eyelets and a black or olive-brown rubber outsole (either vertically-ribbed or smooth) and toe cap; sometimes a rubber heel counter was added at the back. Eventually, the Type 65 jungle boot was adopted as standard combat footwear by the Chinese PLA, being also provided as military aid to North Vietnam.[75]
The PAVN jungle boot has proved so popular that eventually Vietnam started exporting its canvas-and-rubber boot to East European armies in the early 1990s.[76][77]
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(July 2025)
A patrol ofPopular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) guerrillas inJordan, early 1969, wearing khaki or olive green Pataugas boots of the low-top, high-top and double-buckle ankle cuff variants.A squad of fivePAIGC/FARP guerrillas, with three of them wearing khaki Pataugas boots and one at the centre wears Chinese reed green Type 65 jungle boots, manning a checkpoint in Guinea-Bissau, 1974.
Bassel Abi-Chahine,The People's Liberation Army through the eyes of a lens, 1975–1991, Éditions Dergham, Jdeideh (Beirut) 2019.ISBN978-614-459-033-1
Benjamin Lai and Adam Hook,The Chinese People's Liberation Army since 1949 – Ground Forces, Elite series 194, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 2012.ISBN978 1 78096 056 2
Chris McNab,20th Century Military Uniforms (2nd ed.), Grange Books, Kent 2002.ISBN978-1-84013-476-6
Chris McNab and Johnny Shumate,US Air Cavalry Trooper versus North Vietnamese Soldier: Vietnam 1965–68, Combat series 51, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 2020.ISBN9781472841759
Edward J. Emering,Weapons and Field Gear of the North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong, Schiffer Publishing Ltd., Atglen, PA 1998.ISBN0-7643-0583-2
Frédéric Serra,L'armée nord-vietnamienne, 1954–1972 : Uniformes et équipements (1re partie), Militaria Magazine No. 320, March 2012, Histoire & Collections, Paris, pp. 70–75.ISSN0753-1877 (inFrench)
Frédéric Serra,L'armée nord-vietnamienne, 1954–1972 : Uniformes et équipements (2e partie), Militaria Magazine No. 322, May 2012, Histoire & Collections, Paris, pp. 34–39.ISSN0753-1877 (InFrench)
Gordon L. Rottman and Ramiro Bujeiro,Army of the Republic of Vietnam 1955–75, Men-at-arms series 458, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 2010.ISBN978-1-84908-182-5
Gordon L. Rottman and Brian Delf,North Vietnamese Army Soldier 1958–75, Warrior series 135, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 2009.ISBN978-184603-371-1
Helmoed-Romer Heitman and Paul Hannon,Modern African Wars (3): South-West Africa, Men-at-arms series 242, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1991.ISBN978-1-85532-122-9
John Laffin and Mike Chappell,Arab Armies of the Middle East Wars 1948–73, Men-at-Arms series 128, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1982.ISBN0-85045-451-4
Kenneth Conboy and Don Greer,War in Laos 1954–1975, Squadron/Signal Publications, Inc., Carrollton, Texas 1994.ISBN0-89747-315-9
Kenneth Conboy and Simon McCouaig,The War in Laos 1960–75, Men-at-arms series 217, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1989.ISBN978-0-85045-938-8
Kenneth Conboy and Simon McCouaig,The NVA and Viet Cong, Elite series 38, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 1992.ISBN9781855321625
Kenneth Conboy, Kenneth Bowra and Mike Chappell,War in Cambodia 1970–75, Men-at-arms series 209, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1989.ISBN0-85045-851-X
Ken Conboy,The Erawan War – Volume 3: The Royal Lao Armed Forces 1961–1974, Asia@War Volume 37, Helion & Company Limited, Warwick UK 2022.ISBN978-1-804512-87-6
Lee E. Russell and Mike Chappell,Armies of the Vietnam War (2), Men-at-arms 143, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1983.ISBN0-85045-514-6
Samuel M. Katz, Lee E. Russel and Ron Volstad,Armies in Lebanon 1982–84, Men-at-Arms series 165, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1985.ISBN0-85045-602-9
Samuel M. Katz and Ron Volstad,Arab Armies of the Middle East Wars (2), Men-at-Arms series 194, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1988.ISBN0-85045-800-5
Patrice Pivetta,Soldats d'Algérie, 1954–1962, Armes Militaria Magazine No. 200, March 2002, Histoire & Collections, Paris, pp. 13–54.ISSN0753-1877 (InFrench)
Peter Abbott, Manuel Ribeiro Rodrigues and Ron Volstad,Modern African Wars (2): Angola and Mozambique 1961–74, Men-at-Arms series 202, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1988.ISBN0-85045-843-9
Philip S. Jowett and Raffaele Ruggeri,Modern African Wars (5): The Nigerian-Biafran War 1967–70, Men-at-arms series 507, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 2016.ISBN978 1 4728 1609 2
Martin Windrow, Wayne Braby and Kevin Lyles,French Foreign Legion Paratroops, Elite series 6, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1985.ISBN9780850456295
Martin Windrow and Mike Chappell,The Algerian War 1954–1962, Men-at-arms series 312, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 1997.ISBN1-85532-658-2
Martin Windrow and Mike Chappell,The French Indochina War 1946–1954, Men-at-arms series 322, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 1998.ISBN1-85532-789-9
Martin Windrow and Johnny Shumate,French Foreign Légionnaire versus Viet Minh Insurgent: North Vietnam 1948–52, Combat series 36, Osprey Publishing Ltd., Oxford 2018.ISBN9781472828910
Manuel A. Ribeiro Rodrigues,The Overseas Campaigns 1961–1974 – Guinea-Angola-Mozambique – Army (I), Edições Destarte Lda., Lisbon 2000.ISBN972-8496-14-1 (Bi-lingual edition)
Phillip Katcher and Mike Chappell,Armies of the Vietnam War 1962–1975, Men-at-arms series 104, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1980.ISBN9780850453607
Robert Pitta, Jeff Fannell and Simon McCouaig,South African Special Forces, Elite series 47, Osprey Publishing Ltd., London 1993.ISBN185532-295-1