| Pataliputra capital | |
|---|---|
 Pataliputra palace capital (front and left-side view), earlyMaurya Empire period, 3rd century BCE.Another modern photograph of the capital. | |
| Material | Unpolished buffsandstone |
| Size | Height: 85 cm Width: 123 cm Weight: 1,800lbs (900kg) |
| Period/culture | 3rd Century BCE |
| Discovered | 25°36′07″N 85°10′48″E |
| Place | Bulandi Bagh,Pataliputra,India. |
| Present location | Patna Museum,India |
| Location | |
ThePataliputra capital is a monumental rectangularcapital withvolutes andClassical Greek designs, that was discovered in the palace ruins of the ancientMauryan Empire capital city ofPataliputra (modernPatna, EasternIndia). It is dated to the 3rd century BCE.
The monumental capital was discovered in 1895 at the royal palace inPataliputra, India, in the area ofBulandi Bagh inPatna, byarchaeologistL.A. Waddell in 1895. It was found at a depth of around 12 feet (3.7 meters), and dated to the reign ofAshoka or soon after, to the 3rd century BCE.[2] The discovery was first reported in Waddell's book "Report on the excavations at Pataliputra (Patna)".[3] "The capital is currently on display in thePatna Museum.[4]
The capital is made of unpolished buffsandstone. It is quite massive, with a length of 49 inches (1.2 meters), and a height of 33.5 inches (0.85 meters).[2] It weighs approximately 1,800lbs (900kg). During the excavations it was found next to a thick ancient wall and a brick pavement.[5]
The Pataliputra capital is generally dated to the earlyMaurya Empire period, 3rd century BCE. This would correspond to the reign ofChandragupta, his sonBindusara or his grandson Ashoka, who are all known to have welcomed Greek ambassadors at their court (respectivelyMegasthenes,Deimachus andDionysius), who may well have come to Pataliputra with presents and craftsmen as suggested by classical sources.[6][7] TheIndo-Greeks again possibly had a very direct presence in Pataliputra about a century later, circa 185 BCE, when they may have captured the city, although briefly, from theSungas after the fall of the Maurya Empire.[8][9][10]
The top is made of a band ofrosettes, eleven in total for the fronts and four for the sides. Below that is a band ofbead and reel pattern, then under it a band of waves, generally right-to-left, except for the back where they are left-to-right. Further below is a band ofegg-and-dart pattern, with eleven "tongues" or "eggs" on the front, and only seven on the back. Below appears the main motif, aflame palmette, growing among pebbles.
The front and the back of the Pataliputra capital are both highly decorated, although the back has a few differences and is slightly coarser in design. The waves on the back are left-to-right, that is reverse of the waves on the front. Also, the back only has seven "eggs" in the egg-and-dart band (4th decorative band from the top), compared to eleven for the front. Lastly, the bottom pebble design is simpler on the back, with less pebbles being shown, and a small plinth or band visually supports them.[11]
The capital is decorated withClassical Greek designs, such as the row of repeatingrosettes, theovolo, thebead and reel moulding, thewave-likescrolls as well as the centralflame palmette and thevolutes with central rosettes. It has been described as quasi-Ionic,[12] displaying definiteNear Eastern influence,[13] or simply Greek in design and origin.[14]
TheArchaeological Survey of India, anIndian government agency attached to theMinistry of Culture that is responsible forarchaeological research and the conservation and preservation of cultural monument in India, straightforwardly describes it as "a colossal capital in the Hellenistic style".[15]
The Pataliputra capital may reflect the influence of theSeleucid Empire or the neighboringGreco-Bactrian kingdom on early India sculptural art. In particular the city ofAi-Khanoum being located at the doorstep of India, interacting with the Indian subcontinent, and having a rich Hellenistic culture, was in a unique position to influence Indian culture as well. It is considered that Ai-Khanoum may have been one of the primary actors in transmitting Western artistic influence to India, for example in the creation of the manufacture of the quasi-Ionic Pataliputra capital or the floral friezes of thepillars of Ashoka, all of which were posterior to the establishment of Ai-Khanoum.[16] The scope of adoption goes from designs such as thebead and reel pattern, the centralflame palmette design and a variety of othermoldings, to the lifelike rendering of animal sculpture and the design and function of the Ionicanta capital in the palace of Pataliputra.[16]
Achaemenid influence has also been noted, especially in relation to the general shape, and the capital has been called a "Persianizing capital, complete with stepped impost, side volutes and central palmettes", which may be the result of the formative influence of craftsmen fromPersia following the disintegration of theAchaemenid Empire after the conquests ofAlexander the Great.[17] Some authors have remarked that the architecture of the city of Pataliputra seems to have had many similarities with Persian cities of the period.[18]
These authors stress that they are no known precedents in India (baring the hypothetical possibility of now-lost wooden structures), and that therefore the formative influence must have come from the neighbouring Achaemenid Empire.[17]
However, according toart historianJohn Boardman, everything in the capital goes back toGreek influence: the "pilaster capitals with Greek florals and a form which is of Greek origin go back toLate Archaic."[19]
For him, the Pataliputra capital is ananta capital (a capital at the top of the front edge of a wall), with Greek shape and Greek decorations.[21] The general shape of flat, slaying capital is well known among Classical anta capitals, and the rolls or volutes on the side are also a common feature, although more generally located at the top end of the capital.[22] He gives several examples of Greek anta capitals of similar designs from the Late Archaic period.[16]
This type of anta capital with side volutes are considered as belonging to theIonic order, starting from thearchaic period. They are generally characterized by various moldings on the front, arranged in a rather flat manner in order not to protrude from the wall, with superposedvolutes on curved sides broadening upwards.[23]
The central motif of the Pataliputra capital is theflame palmette, the first appearance of which goes back to the floralakroteria of theParthenon (447–432 BCE),[24] and slightly later at theTemple of Athena Nike,[25] and which spread to Asia Minor in the 3rd century BCE, and can be seen at the doorstep ofIndia inAi-Khanoum from around 280 BCE, inantefix andmosaic designs.[16]
| Central "flame palmette" designs in Greek art | |
| |
Since both sides of the Pataliputra capital are decorative (there is no blank side corresponding to a wallabutment), it is normally notstructurally ananta capital, but rather a pile or pillar capital: the capital of an independent supporting column of square, rectangular or possibly round section.[26] Such capitals, if set on a square column, typically retain the design of an anta capital, but are decorated in all directions, whereas an anta capital is only decorated on the three sides that do not connect to the wall. If set on a round column such as one similar to a pillar of Ashoka, an intermediary piece of round section would be placed between the pillar and the capital, such as a lotus-shaped bulbus capital as those seen on the Ashoka pillars. Rather similar arrangements can be seen, for example, at theAjanta cave. The Pataliputra capital has two holes on the top, which would imply a mode of fixation with a structural element overhead.[27]
According to architectural historian Dr. Christopher Tadgell, the Pataliputra capital is similar to the capitals which are visible in the reliefs ofSanchi andBharhut, dated to the 2nd century BCE.[28] The Bharhut pillars are formed of a cylindrical or octagonal shaft, a bell capital and a crowning capital oftrapezoid shape crisscrossed with incisions to achieve a decorative illusion (or a floral composition in more detailed examples), and often ended with a volute in each top corner. To him, the main characteristic of the Pataliputra capital would be that it has vertically arranged volutes, and clear motifs of west-Asiatic origin.[28]
An actual Bharhut capital, used to support the main Bharhut gateway, and presently in theKolkotaIndian Museum, uses a similar, if more complex arrangement, with four joined pillars instead of one, and incumbent lions on the top, sitting around a central crowning capital which has much similarity in design to the Pataliputra capital, complete with central palmette design, rosettes, and bead and reel motifs.[29]
The site where the Pataliputra capital was excavated is marked by Waddell as the top-right corner of the area known today asBulandi Bagh, northwest of the main excavation site.[30]
According to the reconstitution of the city of Pataliputra by Prof. Dr. Dieter Schlingloff, the pillared hall discovered at the other excavation site ofKumhrar was located outside of the city wall, on the banks of the formerSona river (called Erannoboas byMegasthenes). It is located about 400 meters to the South of the portions of the wooden palissade that have been excavated, and just north of the former banks of the Sona river. Therefore, the pillared hall could not have been the Mauryan palace, but rather "a pleasure hall outside the city walls".[31]
By the same reconstitution, the site of Bulandi Bagh where the Pataliputra capital was found, straddles the old wooden city palissades, so that the Pataliputra capital was probably located in a stone structure just inside the old city palissade, or possibly on a stone portion or a stone gate of the palissade itself.[32]
The designs used in the Pataliputra capital are echoed by other known examples of Maurya architecture, especially the pillars of Ashoka. Many of these design elements can also be found in the decoration of the animal capitals of the Pillars of Ashoka, such as the palmettes or rosette designs. Various foreign influences have been described in the design of these capitals.[33] The animal on top of a lotiform capital reminds ofAchaemenid column shapes. The abacus also often seems to display a stronginfluence of Greek art: in the case of theRampurva bull or theSankassa elephant, it is composed ofhoneysuckles alternated with stylizedpalmettes and smallrosettes, as well as rows ofbeads and reels.[34] A similar kind of design can be seen in the frieze of the lost capital of theAllahabad pillar, as well as theDiamond throne built by Ashoka inBodh Gaya.
Similarities have been found in the designs of thecapitals of various areas of northern India from the time of Ashoka to the time of theSatavahanas at Sanchi: particularly between the Pataliputra capital at the Mauryan Empire capital of Pataliputra (3rd century BCE), the pillar capitals at theSunga Empire Buddhist complex of Bharhut (2nd century BCE), and the pillar capitals of the Satavahanas at Sanchi (1st centuries BCE/CE).[28]
The earliest known example in India, the Pataliputra capital (3rd century BCE) is decorated with rows of repeatingrosettes,ovolos andbead and reel mouldings,wave-likescrolls and sidevolutes with central rosettes, around a prominent centralflame palmette, which is the main motif. These are quite similar toClassical Greek designs, and the capital has been described as quasi-Ionic.[12][13] Greek influence,[14] as well asPersianAchaemenid influence have been suggested.[17]
TheSarnath capital is a pillar capital discovered in the archaeological excavations at the ancientBuddhist site ofSarnath.[35] The pillar displaysIonic volutes andpalmettes.[36][37] It has been variously dated from the 3rd century BCE during the Mauryan Empire period,[38][35] to the 1st century BCE, during the Sunga Empire period.[36] One of the faces shows a galopping horse carrying a rider, while the other face shows an elephant and itsmahaut.[36]
The pillar capital in Bharhut, dated to the 2nd century BCE during the Sunga Empire period, also incorporates many of these characteristics,[39][40] with a centralanta capital with many rosettes, beads-and-reels, as well as a central palmette design.[28][41][42] Importantly, recumbent animals (lions, symbols of Buddhism) were added, in the style of the pillars of Ashoka.
The Sanchi pillar capital is keeping the general design, seen at Bharhut a century earlier, of recumbent lions grouped around a central square-section post, with the central design of a flame palmette, which started with the Pataliputra capital. However, the design of the central post is now simpler, with the flame palmette taking all the available room.[43] Elephants were later used to adorn the pillar capitals (still with the central palmette design), and lastly,Yakshas (here the palmette design disappears).
Another capital in India has been identified as having the same compositional structure as the Pataliputra capital, theSarnath capital. It is fromSarnath, at a distance of 250 km from Pataliputra. This other capital is also said to be from the Mauryan period. It is, together with the Pataliputra capital, considered as "stone brackets or capitals suggestive of the Ionic order".[44]
This capital is smaller in size however, at 33 cm high, and 63 cm wide when complete.[45] A similar capital with an elephant as the central motif has also been found in Sarnath.
A pillar capital inBharhut,[46] dated to the 2nd century BCE during theSunga Empire period, is an amalgam of the lions of thePillars of Ashoka and a central anta capital with many Hellenistic elements (rosettes, beads-and-reels), as well as a central palmette design similar to that of the Pataliputra capital.[47][41] Monumental capitals with a central palmette design can still be found several centuries later in examples such as theMathura lion capital (1st century CE).
A later capital found inMathura dating to the 2nd or 3rd century (Kushan period) displays a central palmettes with side volutes in a style described as "Ionic", in the same kind of composition as the Pataliputra capital but with a coarser rendering. (photograph).[48]
The Corinthian order later became overwhelmingly popular in theGreco-Buddhist art ofGandhara, during the first centuries of our era. Various designs involving central palmettes with volutes are closer to the later GreekCorinthian anta or pilaster capital. Many such examples ofIndo-Corinthian capitals can be found in the art ofGandhara.
![Temple 17 at Sanchi: a Gupta period tetrastyle prostyle temple with pillar capital arrangement of Classical appearance. 5th century CE[49]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=https%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aSanchi_temple_17.jpg)
The existence of such an Hellenistic capital so far east in the capital of theMaurya Empire suggests at the very least the presence of a Greek or Greek-inspired stone structure in the city. Although Pataliputra was originally built of wood, various accounts describeAshoka as a remarkable builder of stone buildings, and he is known for certain to have built manystone pillars.[50][51] Ashoka is often credited with the beginning of stone architecture in India, possibly following the introduction of stone-building techniques by theGreeks after Alexander the Great[52] (a Greek ambassador namedDionysius is reported to have been at the court of Ashoka, sent byPtolemy II Philadelphus[53]). Before Ashoka's time, buildings were probably built in non-permanent material, such as wood,bamboo orthatch.[52][54] Ashoka may have rebuilt his palace inPataliputra by replacing wooden material by stone,[50] and may also have used the help of foreign craftmen.[51]
The 4th century Chinese pilgrimFa-Hien also commented admiringly on the remains of the palace of Ashoka in Pataliputra:
It was the work not of men but of spirits which piled up the stones, reared the walls and gates, and executed elegant carvings and in-laid sculptured works in a way which no human hand of this world could accomplish.[55]
The influence of Greek art is also well attested in some of thePillars of Ashoka, such as theRampurva capital with its Hellenistic floral scrolls. It is also known that Ashoka redacted some of hisstone edicts in excellent Greek inKandahar, on the doorstep to the neighboringSeleucid Empire andGreco-Bactrian kingdom: theKandahar Bilingual Rock Inscription and theKandahar Greek Edict of Ashoka.
The presence in Pataliputra of Greek diplomats such asMegasthenes is well known, but the capital raises the possibility of simultaneous artistic influence and even the possibility that foreign artists were present in the capital.[51]
According to Boardman, such foreign influence on India was important, just as many other Old World empires have been influenced by foreign cultures as well:
The visual experience of many Ashokan and later city dwellers in India was considerably conditioned by foreign arts, translated to an Indian environment, just as the archaic Greek had been by the Syrian, the Roman by the Greek, and the Persian by the arts of their whole empire.[56]
"The Diffusion of Classical Art in Antiquity"John Boardman, Princeton University Press, 1993
"The Greeks in Asia" by John Boardman, Thames and Hudson, 2015Online version
25°36′07″N85°10′48″E / 25.60194°N 85.18000°E /25.60194; 85.18000
![[32]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=https%3a%2f%2fweb.archive.org%2fweb%2f20161104022537%2fhttp%3a%2f%2fstudydroid.com%2fimageCards%2f0f%2ftv%2fcard-16711094-front.jpg){kind=link}