"Paventia", "Cunina", and "Nundina" redirect here. For the genus of moth, seePaventia (moth). For the siphonophore genus, seeCunina (genus). For the market days of the Roman calendar, seeNundinae.
Relief from a child's sarcophagus depicting a nursing mother with the father looking on (c. 150 AD)
An extensive Greek and Latin medical literature coveredobstetrics and infant care, and the 2nd century Greek gynecologistSoranus of Ephesus advisedmidwives not to be superstitious. But childbirth in antiquity remained a life-threatening experience for both the woman and her newborn, withinfant mortality as high as 30 or 40 percent.[3] Rites of passage pertaining to birth and death had several parallel aspects.[4]Maternal death was common: one of the most famous wasJulia, daughter ofJulius Caesar and wife ofPompey. Her infant died a few days later, severing the family ties between her father and husband and hastening thecivil war that ended theRoman Republic.[5] Some ritual practices may be characterized as anxious superstitions, but the religious aura surrounding childbirth reflects the high value Romans placed on family, tradition(mos maiorum), and compatibility of the sexes.[6] Under theEmpire, children were celebrated on coins, as wasJuno Lucina, the primary goddess of childbirth, as well as in public art.[7] Funerary art, such asrelief onsarcophagi, sometimes showed scenes from the deceased's life, including birth or the first bath.[8]
Only those who died after the age of 10 were given fullfuneral and commemorative rites, which in ancient Rome were observed by families several days during the year (seeParentalia). Infants less than one year of age received no formal rites. The lack of ritual observances pertains to thelegal status of the individual in society, not the emotional response of families to the loss.[9] AsCicero reflected:
Some think that if a small child dies this must be borne with equanimity; if it is still in its cradle there should not even be a lament. And yet it is from the latter that nature has more cruelly demanded back the gift she had given.[10]
The most extensive lists of deities pertaining to the conception-birth-development cycle come from theChurch Fathers, especiallyAugustine of Hippo andTertullian. Augustine in particular is known to have used the now-fragmentary theological works ofMarcus Terentius Varro, the 1st century BC Roman scholar, who in turn referenced thebooks of the Roman pontiffs. The purpose of thepatristic writers was to debunk traditional Roman religion, but they provide useful information despite their mocking tone.[11] Scattered mentions occur throughoutLatin literature.
The following list of deities is organized chronologically by the role they play in the process.[12]
The gods of the marriage bed(di coniugales) are also gods of conception.[13]Juno, one of the threedeities of theCapitoline Triad, presides over union and marriage as well, and some of the minor deities invoked for success in conceiving and delivering a child may have beenfunctional aspects of her powers.
Jugatinus is a conjugal god, fromiugare, "to join, yoke, marry."[14]
Cinxia functions within thebelt(cingulum) that the bride wears to symbolize that her husband is "belted and bound"(cinctus vinctusque) to her.[15] It was tied with theknot of Hercules, intended to be intricate and difficult to untie.[16] Augustine calls this goddessVirginiensis (virgo, "virgin"), indicating that the untying is the symbolic loss of virginity.[17] Cinxia may have been felt as present during a ritual meant to easelabor. The man who fathered the child removes his own belt(cinctus), binds it(cinxerit) around the laboring woman, then releases it with a prayer that the one who has bound her in labor should likewise release her: "he should then leave."[18] Women who had experiencedspontaneous abortions were advised to bind their bellies for the full nine months with a belt(cingulum) of wool from a lamb fed upon by a wolf.[19]
Subigus is the god(deus) who causes the bride to give in to her husband.[20] The name derives from the verbsubigo, subigere, "to cause to go under; tame, subdue," used of the active role in sexual intercourse, hence "cause to submit sexually".[21]
Prema is the insistent sex act, from the verbprimo, primere, to press upon. Although the verb usually describes the masculine role, Augustine calls Premadea Mater, a mother goddess.[22]
Inuus ("Entry"), the phallic godMutunus Tutunus, andPertunda enable sexual penetration. Inuus, sometimes identified withFaunus, embodies the mammalian impulse toward mating. The cult of Mutunus was associated with the sacredfascinum.[23] Both these gods are attested outside conception litany. Pertunda is the femalepersonification[24] of the verbpertundere, "to penetrate",[25] and seems to be a name for invoking a divine power specific to this function.
Janus, the forward- and backward-facing god of doorways and passages, "opened up access to the generative seed which was provided bySaturn," the god of sowing.[26]
Consevius orDeus Consevius, alsoConsivius, is the god of propagation and insemination,[27] fromcon-serere, "to sow." It is a title of Janus as a creator god or god of beginnings.[28]
Child's sarcophagus (150-160 AD) depicting the festivities attending the birth ofDionysus; the basin at far left represents the baby's first bath
Liber Pater ("Father Liber") empowers the man to release his semen,[29] whileLibera does the same for the woman, who was regarded as also contributingsemina, "seed."[30]
Mena orDea Mena with Juno assuredmenstrual flow,[31] which is redirected to feed the developing child.[32]
Fluonia orFluvionia, fromfluo, fluere, "to flow," is a form of Juno who retains the nourishing blood within the womb.[33] Women attended to the cult of Juno Fluonia "because she held back the flow of blood (i.e., menstruation) in the act of conception."[34] Medieval mythographers noted this aspect of Juno,[35] which marked a woman as amater rather than avirgo.[36]
Alemona feeds the embryo[37] or generally nourished growthin utero.[38]
Vitumnus endows the fetus withvita, "life" or the vital principle or power of life (see alsoquickening).[39] Augustine calls him thevivificator, "creator of life," and links him with Sentinus (following) as two "very obscure" gods who are examples of the misplaced priorities of the Roman pantheon. These two gods, he suggests, should merit inclusion among thedi selecti, "select" or principal gods, instead of those who preside over physical functions such as Janus, Saturn, Liber and Libera.[40] Both Vitumnus and Sentinus were most likely names that focalized the functions of Jove.[41]
Sentinus orSentia givessentience or the powers of sense perception(sensus).[42] Augustine calls him thesensificator, "creator of sentience."[43]
TheParcae are the three goddesses of fate(tria fata):Nona,Decima, andParca (singular ofParcae), also known asPartula in relation to birthing. Nona and Decima determine the right time for birth, assuring the completion of the nine-month term (ten in Romaninclusive counting).[44] Parca or Partula overseespartus, birth as the initial separation from the mother's body (as in English '"postpartum").[45] At the very moment of birth, or immediately after, Parca establishes that the new life will have a limit, and therefore she is also a goddess of death called Morta (English "mortal").[46] Theprofatio Parcae, "prophecy of Parca," marked the child as a mortal being, and was not a pronouncement of individual destiny.[47] The first week of the child's life was regarded as an extremely perilous and tentative time, and the child was not recognized as an individual until thedies lustricus.
The primary deity presiding over the delivery wasJuno Lucina, who may in fact be a form ofDiana. Those invoking her aid let their hair down and loosened their clothing as a form of reversebinding ritual intended to facilitate labor.[48] Soranus advised women about to give birth to unbind their hair and loosen clothing to promote relaxation, not for any magical effect.[49]
Egeria, the nymph, received sacrifices from pregnant women in order to bring out(egerere) the baby.[50]
Levana lifts the baby, who was ceremonially placed on the ground after birth in symbolic contact with Mother Earth. (In antiquity,kneeling orsquatting was a more commonbirthing position than it is in modern times; seedi nixi.[55]) The midwife then cut the umbilical cord and presented the newborn to the mother, a scene sometimes depicted onsarcophagi. A grandmother or maternal aunt next cradled the infant in her arms; with a finger covered inlustral saliva, she massaged the baby's forehead and lips, a gesture meant to ward off theevil eye.[56]
Statina (alsoStatilina,Statinus orStatilinus) gives the baby fitness or "straightness,"[57] and the father held it up to acknowledge his responsibility to raise it. Unwanted children might be abandoned at the Temple of Pietas or theColumna Lactaria. Newborns with serious birth defects might be drowned or smothered.[58]
A goddess suckling a toddler and seated in the wicker chair characteristic ofGallo-Roman goddesses (2nd or 3rd century, Bordeaux)
Lucina as a title of the birth goddess is usually seen as a metaphor for bringing the newborn into the light(lux, lucis).[59]Luces, plural ("lights"), can mean "periods of light, daylight hours, days."Diespiter, "Father of Day," is thus her masculine counterpart; if his name is taken as a doublet for Jupiter, then Juno Lucina and Diespiter can be understood as a male-female complement.[60]
Diespiter, however, is also identified in Latin literature with the ruler of the underworld,Dis pater. The functions of "chthonic" deities such as Dis (orPluto) and his consortProserpina are not confined to death; they are often concerned with agricultural fertility and the giving of nourishment for life, since plants for food grow from seeds hidden in the ground. In themystery religions, the divine couple preside over the soul's "birth" or rebirth in the afterlife. The shadowy goddessMana Genita was likewise concerned with both birth and mortality, particularly of infants, as wasHecate.[61]
In contrast to the vast majority of deities, both birth goddesses and underworld deities received sacrifices at night.[62] Ancient writers conventionally situate labor and birth at night; it may be that night is thought of as the darkness of the womb, from which the newborn emerges into the (day)light.
The cyclical place of the goddessCandelifera, "She who bears the candle",[63] is uncertain. It is sometimes thought that she provides an artificial light for labor that occurs at night. A long labor was considered likely for first-time mothers, so at least a part of the birthing process would occur at night.[64] According toPlutarch,[65] light symbolizes birth, but the candle may have been thought of as less a symbol than an actual kindling of life,[66] or a magic equivalent to the life of the infant.[67] Candelifera may also be the nursery light kept burning against spirits of darkness that would threaten the infant in the coming week.[68] Even in the Christian era, lamps were lit in nurseries to illuminate sacred images and drive away child-snatching demons such as theGello.[69]
Tombrelief fromOstia showing mother and child (ca. 50 AD)
Once the child came into the light, a number of rituals were enacted over the course of the following week.[70] An offerings table received congratulatory sacrifices from the mother's female friends.[71] Three deities—Intercidona, Pilumnus, and Deverra—were invoked to drive awaySilvanus, the wild woodland god of trees:[72] three men secured the household every night by striking the threshold (limen; seeliminality) with an axe and then a pestle, followed by sweeping it.
Drawing of a scene from an Etruscan mirror, in which Uni (Juno) suckles the adult Hercle (Hercules) before he ascends to immortality
In theatrium of the house, a bed was made up for Juno, and a table set forHercules.[73] In theHellenized mythological tradition, Juno tried to prevent the birth of Hercules, as it resulted from Jupiter's infidelity.Ovid has Lucina crossing her knees and fingers to bind the labor.[74]Etruscan religion, however, emphasized the role that Juno (asUni) played in endowingHercle with his divine nature through the drinking of her breast milk.
Intercidona provides the axe without which trees cannot be cut(intercidere).
Pilumnus orPicumnus grants the pestle necessary for making flour from grain.
Deverra gives the broom with which grain was swept up(verrere) (compareAverruncus).
Juno in her bed represents the nursing mother.[75]
Hercules represents the child who requires feeding.
Rumina promotes suckling.[76] This goddess receivedlibations of milk, an uncommon liquid offering among the Romans.[77]
Inwell-to-do households, children were cared for by nursemaids (nutrices, singularnutrix, which can mean either awet nurse who might be a slave or a paid professional of free status, or more generally anynursery maid, who would be a household slave). Mothers with a nursery staff were still expected to supervise the quality of care, education, and emotional wellbeing of children. Ideally, fathers would take an interest even in their infant children;Cato liked to be present when his wife bathed andswaddled their child.[81] Nursemaids might make their own bloodless offerings to deities who protected and fostered the growth of children.[82] Most of the "teaching gods" are female, perhaps because they themselves were thought of as divine nursemaids. The gods who encourage speech, however, are male.[83] The ability to speak well was a defining characteristic of the elite citizen. Although women were admired for speaking persuasively,[84]oratory was regarded as a masculine pursuit essential to public life.[85]
Head of a child from theAntonine eraRoman boy wrapped in his cloak (1st century AD)
Potina (Potica orPotua) from the nounpotio "drink" (Bibesia in some source editions, cf verbbibo,bibere "drink") enables the child to drink.[86]
Edusa, from the verbedo, edere, esus, "eat," also asEdulia,Edula,Educa,Edesia etc., enables the taking of nourishment.[87] The variations of her name may indicate that while her functional focus was narrow, her name had not stabilized; she was mainly a divine force to be invokedad hoc for a specific purpose.[88]
Ossipago builds strong bones;[89] probably a title of Juno, fromossa, "bones," +pango, pangere, "insert, fix, set." Alternativereadings of the text include Ossipagina, Ossilago, Opigena, Ossipanga, Ossipango, and Ossipaga.[90]
Carna makes strong muscles, and defends the internal organs from witches orstrigae.
Cunina protects the cradle from malevolent magic.[91]
Cuba helps the child transition from cradle to a bed.
Paventia orPaventina averts fear(pavor) from the child.[92]
James Joyce mentions a few Roman birth deities by name in his works. In the "Oxen of the Sun" episode ofUlysses, he combines an allusion toHorace(nunc est bibendum) with an invocation of Partula and Pertunda (per deam Partulam et Pertundam) in anticipation of the birth of Purefoy. Cunina, Statulina, and Edulia are mentioned inFinnegans Wake.[101]
^Giulia Sissa, "Maidenhood without Maidenhead: The Female Body in Ancient Greece," inBefore Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World (Princeton University Press, 1990), p. 362, translating the German termAugenblicksgötter which was coined byHermann Usener.
^Mary Beard, J.A. North, and S.R.F. Price,Religions of Rome: A Sourcebook (Cambridge University Press, 1998), vol. 2, p. 33.
^M. Golden, "Did the Ancients Care When Their Children Died?"Greece & Rome 35 (1988) 152–163; Keith R. Bradley, "Wet-nursing at Rome: A Study in Social Relations," inThe Family in Ancient Rome: New Perspectives (Cornell University Press, 1986, 1992), p. 202; Beryl Rawson,Children and Childhood in Roman Italy (Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 104.
^Anthony Corbeill, "Blood, Milk, and Tears: The Gestures of Mourning Women," inNature Embodied: Gesture in Ancient Rome (Princeton University Press, 2004), pp. 67–105.
^Rawson,Children and Childhood in Roman Italy, p. 103.
^Rawson,Children and Childhood in Roman Italy, p. 99.
^Rawson,Children and Childhood in Roman Italy, p. 64.
^Rawson,Children and Childhood in Roman Italy, pp. 101–102.
^Rawson,Children and Childhood in Roman Italy, p. 104.
^Cicero,Tusculan Disputations 1.93,as cited by Rawson,Children and Childhood in Roman Italy, p. 104.
^The order is based on that of Robert Turcan,The Gods of Ancient Rome (Routledge, 2001; originally published in French 1998), pp. 18–20, andJörg Rüpke,Religion in Republican Rome: Rationalization and Ritual Change (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002), pp. 181–182.
^Beard,Religions of Rome: A Sourcebook, vol. 2, pp. 32–33; Rüpke,Religion of the Romans, p. 79.
^Augustine,De Civitate Dei 6.9.Ludwig Preller,Römische Mythologie (Berlin, 1881), vol. 1, p. 211.
^Festus 55 (edition of Lindsay); Karen K. Hersch,The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 101, 110, 211.
^William Warde Fowler,The Roman Festivals of the Period of the Republic (London, 1908), p. 142.
^For an extensive look at the knot of virginity, primarily in early Christian culture, see S. Panayotakis, "The Knot and the Hymen: A Reconsideration ofNodus Virginitatis (Hist. Apoll. 1),"Mnemosyne 53.5 (2000) 599–608.
^Pliny,Natural History 28.42; Anthony Corbeill,Nature Embodied: Gesture in Ancient Rome (Princeton University Press, 2004), pp. 35–36.
^J.N. Adams,The Latin Sexual Vocabulary (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982), pp. 155–156. The verb is used in the satiric verses chanted by the soldiers at thetriumph of Julius Caesar, where he is said to have caused the Gauls to submit (seeGallic Wars), and to have submitted himself toNicomedes. Asubigitatrix was a woman who took the active role in fondling (Plautus,Persa 227).
^Adams,Latin Sexual Vocabulary, p. 182; Augustine,De Civitate Dei 6.9.
^The cult of this god was either misunderstood or deliberately misrepresented byChurch Fathers as a ritual deflowering during marriage rites; no Roman source describes such a thing. SeeMutunus Tutunus.
^Fowler,Roman Festivals, p. 289.Macrobius,Saturnalia `1.9, listsConsivius among the titles of Janus from the act of sowing(a conserendo), that is, "the propagation of the human race," with Janus as theauctor ("increaser," source, author). Macrobius says that the titleConsivia also belongs to the goddessOps.
^Turcan,The Gods of Ancient Rome, p. 18, citing Augustine,De Civitate Dei 6.9.3.
^Turcan,The Gods of Ancient Rome, p. 18, citing Augustine,De Civitate Dei IV.11:dea Mena, quam praefecerunt menstruis feminarum ("The goddess Mena, who was in charge of menstruation"). This may seem illogically placed in the sequence; Roman girls were not married until they were ready for childbearing, so menstruation would mark the bride as old enough to marry, and conception would halt the flow.
^Tertullian,Ad nationes 2.11.3; Turcan,The Gods of Ancient Rome, p. 18.
^Excerpts from Paulus in Festus, p. 82 (edition of Lindsay):mulieres colebant, quod eam sanguinis fluorem in conceptu retinere putabant.
^Juno "is called Fluonia, from the flowing(fluoribus) of seed, because she frees women in childbirth," according to theThird Vatican Mythographer, as translated by Ronald E. Pepin,The Vatican Mythographers (Fordham University Press, 2008), p. 225.Fluoribus might also be translated as "emissions, discharge." The Berlin Commentary to theDe nuptiis ofMartianus Capella (2.92) compares this moisture to the dew that drips from the air and nourishes seeds; Haijo Jan Westra and Tanja Kupke,The Berlin Commentary on Martianus Capella'sDe Nuptiis Philologie et Mercurii, Book II (Brill, 1998), p. 93.
^In his commentary on theDe nuptiis ofMartianus Capella,Remigius of Auxerre "explains Fluvonia from the contraceptive use of the discharges of seeds to free women from childbirth"; see Jane Chance,Medieval Mythography from Roman North Africa to the School of Chartres, A.D. 433–1177 (University Press of Florida, 1994), p.286.
^Tertullian,De anima 37.1(Alemonam alendi in utero fetus); Turcan,The Gods of Ancient Rome, p. 18.
^Augustine,De Civitate Dei 7.3.1; Rüpke,Religion in Republican Rome, p. 181.
^Augustine's point is that a monotheistic concept of deity obviates the need for dispersing these functions and for a divine taxonomy that is based on knowledge rather than faith. One view of the success of Christianity is that it was simple to understand and required a less complex theology; see Preller,Römische Mythologie, p. 208, and Michael Lipka,Roman Gods: A Conceptual Approach (Brill, 2009), pp. 84–88.
^Festus p. 67 (edition of Lindsay):Egeriae nymphae sacrificabant praegnantes, quod eam putabant facile conceptum alvo egere; Turcan,The Gods of Ancient Rome, p. 18.
^Pierre Grimal,The Dictionary of Classical Mythology (Blackwell, 1986, 1996, originally published 1951 in French), pp. 311–312; Charles J. Adamec, "Genu, genus,"Classical Philology 15 (1920),p. 199;J.G. Frazer,Pausanias's Description of Greece (London, 1913), vol. 4,p. 436;Marcel Le Glay, "Remarques sur la notion deSalus dans la religion romaine,"La soteriologia dei culti orientali nell' imperio romano: Études préliminaires au religions orientales dans l'empire romain, Colloquio internazionale Roma, 1979 (Brill, 1982),p. 442.
^Persius 2.31–34; Robert Turcan,The Gods of Ancient Rome (Routledge, 2001; originally published in French 1998), p. 20.
^Tertullian,De anima 39.2; Augustine,De Civitate Dei 4.21.
^Ovid provides an alternate derivation as the "goddess of the grove"(lucus), but in ancient etymology the wordlucus itself was thought to derive fromluc-, "light": thelucus as a "sacred grove" was actually the creation of a clearing (i.e., the letting in of light) within a grove to make a sacred place. The sacred grove of Lucina was located on theEsquiline Hill.
^Celia E. Schultz,Women's Religious Activity in the Roman Republic (University of North Carolina Press, 2006), pp. 79–81; Michael Lipka,Roman Gods: A Conceptual Approach (Brill, 2009), pp. 141–142
^H.J. Rose,The Roman Questions of Plutarch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924, 1974), p. 192; David and Noelle Soren,A Roman Villa and a Late Roman Infant Cemetery («L'Erma» di Bretschneider, 1999), p. 520.
^Lipka,Roman Gods, p. 154, especially note 22. The animal sacrifices offered to most deities are domestic herd animals normally raised for food; the deity honored is given a portion, and the rest of the roasted flesh is shared by humans in a communal meal. Both birth goddesses and chthonic deities, however, typically receive an inedible victim, often puppies or bitches, in the form of aholocaust or burnt offering, with no shared meal.
^The passage in Tertullian has a problematic point that may specify first births;Gaston Boissier,Étude sur la vie et les ouvrages de M.T. Varron (Hachette, 1861), pp. 234–235.
^H.J. Rose,The Roman Questions of Plutarch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924, 1974), p. 170.
^Eli Edward Burriss,Taboo, Magic, Spirits: A Study of Primitive Elements in Roman Religion (1931; Forgotten Books reprint, 2007), p. 34.
^Rose,The Roman Questions of Plutarch, pp. 79, 170.
^According toLeo Allatios,De Graecorum hodie quorundam opinationibus IV (1645), p. 188 as cited by Karen Hartnup,On the Beliefs of the Greeks: Leo Allatios and Popular Orthodoxy (Brill, 2004), p. 95.
^Varro,Logistorici frg. 9 (Bolisani), as cited by Lora L. Holland, "Women and Roman Religion," inA Companion to Women in the Ancient World (Blackwell, 2012), p. 212.
^Joseph Farrell,Latin Language and Latin Culture (Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 74–75; Richard A. Bauman,Women and Politics in Ancient Rome (Routledge, 1992, 1994), pp. 51–52.
^Michael Lipka,Roman Gods: A Conceptual Approach (Brill, 2009), pp. 126–127.
^Arnobius,Adversus Nationes 4.7–8:Ossipago quae durat et solidat infantibus parvis ossa. Turcan,The Gods of Ancient Rome, p. 20.
^George Englert McCracken, commentary on Arnobius'sThe Case Against the Pagans (Paulist Press, 1949), p. 364;W.H. Roscher,Ausführliches Lexikon der griechischen und römischen Mythologie (Leipzig: Teubner, 1890–94), vol. 2, pt. 1, p. 209.
^Tertullian,Ad nationes 2.11;Augustine of Hippo,De civitate Dei 4.11;Gerardus Vossius,De physiologia Christiana et theologia gentili 8.6:Paventia ab infantibus avertebat pavorem, 7.5; Lipka,Roman Gods, p. 128.
^Augustine of Hippo,De Civitate Dei 4.11; Christian Laes,Children in the Roman Empire: Outsiders Within (Cambridge University Press, 2011, originally published 2006 in Dutch), p. 68.
