
Inscience andengineering, theparts-per notation is a set of pseudo-units to describe the small values of miscellaneousdimensionless quantities, e.g.mole fraction ormass fraction.
Since thesefractions are quantity-per-quantity measures, they are pure numbers with no associatedunits of measurement. Commonly used are
This notation is not part of theInternational System of Units (the SI system) and its meaning is ambiguous. In chemistry, ambiguity arises because parts-per notation is able to be used to refer to amole fraction and amass fraction, which are unequal depending on themolar mass of the substance.
Parts-per notation is often used describing dilute solutions inchemistry, for instance, the relative abundance of dissolved minerals or pollutants inwater. The quantity "1 ppm" can be used for a mass fraction if a water-borne pollutant is present at one-millionth of agram per gram of sample solution. When working withaqueous solutions, it is common to assume that the density of water is 1.00 g/mL. Therefore, it is common to equate 1 kilogram of water with 1 L of water. Consequently, 1 ppm corresponds to 1 mg/L and 1 ppb corresponds to 1 μg/L.
Similarly, parts-per notation is used also inphysics andengineering to express the value of various proportional phenomena. For instance, a special metal alloy might expand 1.2 micrometers permeter of length for everydegree Celsius and this would be expressed as"α = 1.2 ppm/°C". Parts-per notation is also employed to denote the change, stability, oruncertainty in measurements. For instance, the accuracy of land-survey distance measurements when using alaser rangefinder might be 1 millimeter per kilometer of distance; this could be expressed as "Accuracy = 1 ppm."[a]
Parts-per notations are all dimensionless quantities: in mathematical expressions, the units of measurement always cancel. In fractions like "2 nanometers per meter"(2 nm/m = 2 × 10−9 = 2 ppb = 2 ×0.000000001), so thequotients are pure-numbercoefficients with positive values less than or equal to 1. When parts-per notations, including thepercent symbol (%), are used in regular prose (as opposed to mathematical expressions), they are still pure-number dimensionless quantities. However, they generally take the literal "parts per" meaning of a comparative ratio (e.g. "2 ppb" would generally be interpreted as "two parts in a billion parts").[1]
Parts-per notations may be expressed in terms of any unit of the same measure. For instance, theexpansion coefficient of somebrass alloy,α = 18.7 ppm/°C, may be expressed as 18.7 (μm/m)/°C, or as 18.7 (μin/in)/°C; the numeric value representing a relative proportion does not change with the adoption of a different unit of length.[b]Similarly, ametering pump that injects a trace chemical into the main process line at the proportional flow rateQp = 12 ppm, is doing so at a rate that may be expressed in a variety of volumetric units, including125 μL/L,125 μgal/gal, 125 cm3/m3, etc.
Innuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR),chemical shift is usually expressed in ppm. It represents the difference of a measured frequency in parts per million from the reference frequency. The reference frequency depends on the instrument's magnetic field and the element being measured. It is usually expressed inMHz. Typical chemical shifts are rarely more than a few hundred Hz from the reference frequency, so chemical shifts are conveniently expressed in ppm (Hz/MHz). Parts-per notation gives a dimensionless quantity that does not depend on the instrument's field strength.
| 1 of → = ⭨ of ↓ | per cent (%) | per mille (‰) | per myriad (‱) | per cent mille (pcm) | per million (ppm) | per billion (ppb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | 1 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.0001 | 10−7 |
| ‰ | 10 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 10−6 |
| ‱ | 100 | 10 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 10−5 |
| pcm | 1,000 | 100 | 10 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.0001 |
| ppm | 10,000 | 1,000 | 100 | 10 | 1 | 0.001 |
| ppb | 107 | 106 | 105 | 10,000 | 1,000 | 1 |

Although theInternational Bureau of Weights and Measures (an international standards organization known also by itsFrench-language initials BIPM) recognizes the use of parts-per notation, it is not formally part of theInternational System of Units (SI).[1] Note that although "percent" (%) is not formally part of the SI, both the BIPM and theInternational Organization for Standardization (ISO) take the position that "in mathematical expressions, the internationally recognized symbol % (percent) may be used with the SI to represent the number 0.01" for dimensionless quantities.[1][4] According toIUPAP, "a continued source of annoyance to unit purists has been the continued use of percent, ppm, ppb, and ppt".[5][6] AlthoughSI-compliant expressions should be used as an alternative, the parts-per notation remains nevertheless widely used in technical disciplines. The main problems with the parts-per notation are set out below.
Because thenamed numbers starting with a "billion" have different values in different countries, the BIPM suggests avoiding the use of "ppb" and "ppt" to prevent misunderstanding. The U.S.National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) takes the stringent position, stating that "the language-dependent terms [...] are not acceptable for use with the SI to express the values of quantities".[7]
Although "ppt" usually means "parts per trillion", it occasionally means "parts per thousand". Unless the meaning of "ppt" is defined explicitly, it has to be determined from the context.[6]
Another problem of the parts-per notation is that it may refer tomass fraction,mole fraction orvolume fraction. Since it is usually not stated which quantity is used, it is better to write the units out, such as kg/kg, mol/mol or m3/m3, even though they are all dimensionless.[6] The difference is quite significant when dealing with gases, and it is very important to specify which quantity is being used. For example, the conversion factor between a mass fraction of 1 ppb and a mole fraction of 1 ppb is about 4.7 for the greenhouse gasCFC-11 in air (Molar mass of CFC-11 / Mean molar mass of air = 137.368 / 28.97 = 4.74). For volume fraction, the suffixV orv is sometimes appended to the parts-per notation (e.g. ppmV, ppbv, pptv).[8] To distinguish the mass fraction from volume fraction or mole fraction, the letterm (for mass, but is ambiguous with mole fraction) orw (standing for weight) is sometimes added to the abbreviation (e.g. ppmw, ppbw).[6]
SI-compliant units that can be used as alternatives are shown in the chart below. Expressions that the BIPM explicitly does not recognize as being suitable for denoting dimensionless quantities with the SI are marked with!.
| Measure | SI units | Named parts-per ratio (short scale) | Parts-per abbreviation or symbol | Value in scientific notation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Astrain of... | 2cm/m | 2 parts per hundred | 2%[9] | 2 × 10−2 |
| A sensitivity of... | 2mV/V | 2 parts per thousand | 2 ‰! | 2 × 10−3 |
| A sensitivity of... | 0.2 mV/V | 2 parts per ten thousand | 2 ‱! | 2 × 10−4 |
| A sensitivity of... | 2μV/V | 2 parts per million | 2 ppm | 2 × 10−6 |
| A sensitivity of... | 2nV/V | 2 parts per billion! | 2 ppb! | 2 × 10−9 |
| A sensitivity of... | 2pV/V | 2 parts per trillion! | 2 ppt! | 2 × 10−12 |
| A mass fraction of... | 2 mg/kg | 2 parts per million | 2 ppm | 2 × 10−6 |
| A mass fraction of... | 2 μg/kg | 2 parts per billion! | 2 ppb! | 2 × 10−9 |
| A mass fraction of... | 2 ng/kg | 2 parts per trillion! | 2 ppt! | 2 × 10−12 |
| A mass fraction of... | 2 pg/kg | 2 parts per quadrillion! | 2 ppq! | 2 × 10−15 |
| A volume fraction of... | 5.2 μL/L | 5.2 parts per million | 5.2 ppm | 5.2 × 10−6 |
| A mole fraction of... | 5.24 μmol/mol | 5.24 parts per million | 5.24 ppm | 5.24 × 10−6 |
| A mole fraction of... | 5.24 nmol/mol | 5.24 parts per billion! | 5.24 ppb! | 5.24 × 10−9 |
| A mole fraction of... | 5.24 pmol/mol | 5.24 parts per trillion! | 5.24 ppt! | 5.24 × 10−12 |
| A stability of... | 1 (μA/A)/min | 1 part per million per minute | 1 ppm/min | 1 × 10−6/min |
| A change of... | 5 nΩ/Ω | 5 parts per billion! | 5 ppb! | 5 × 10−9 |
| An uncertainty of... | 9 μg/kg | 9 parts per billion! | 9 ppb! | 9 × 10−9 |
| A shift of... | 1 nm/m | 1 part per billion! | 1 ppb! | 1 × 10−9 |
| A strain of... | 1 μm/m | 1 part per million | 1 ppm | 1 × 10−6 |
| Atemperature coefficient of... | 0.3 (μHz/Hz)/°C | 0.3 part per million per °C | 0.3 ppm/°C | 0.3 × 10−6/°C |
| A frequency change of... | 0.35 × 10−9 ƒ | 0.35 part per billion! | 0.35 ppb! | 0.35 × 10−9 |
Note that the notations in the "SI units" column above are for the most partdimensionless quantities; that is, the units of measurement factor out in expressions like "1 nm/m" (1 nm/m =1 × 10−9) so theratios are pure-numbercoefficients with values less than 1.
Because of the cumbersome nature of expressing certain dimensionless quantities per SI guidelines, theInternational Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP) in 1999 proposed the adoption of the special name "uno" (symbol: U) to represent the number 1 in dimensionless quantities.[5] In 2004, a report to theInternational Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) stated that the response to the proposal of the uno "had been almost entirely negative", and the principal proponent "recommended dropping the idea".[10] To date, the uno has not been adopted by anystandards organization.