Inkinematics, theparallel motion linkage is asix-bar mechanical linkage invented by the Scottish engineerJames Watt in 1784 for thedouble-actingWatt steam engine. It allows a rod moving practically straight up and down to transmit motion to a beam moving in an arc, without putting significant sideways strain on the rod.
In previous engines built byNewcomen and Watt, thepiston pulled one end of the walking beam downwards during the power stroke using achain, and the weight of the pump pulled the other end of the beam downwards during the recovery stroke using a second chain, the alternating forces producing the rocking motion of the beam. In Watt's new double-acting engine, the piston produced power on both the upward and downward strokes, so a chain could not be used to transmit the force to the beam. Watt designed the parallel motion to transmit force in both directions whilst keeping the piston rod very close to vertical. He called it "parallel motion" because both the piston and the pump rod were required to move vertically, parallel to one another.
In a letter to his son in 1808 describing how he arrived at the design, James Watt wrote "I am more proud of the parallel motion than of any other invention I have ever made."[1] The sketch he included actually shows what is now known asWatt's linkage which was a linkage described in Watt's 1784 patent but it was immediately superseded by the parallel motion.[2]
The parallel motion differed from Watt's linkage by having an additional pantograph linkage incorporated in the design. This did not affect the fundamental principle but it allowed the engine room to be smaller because the linkage was more compact.[2]
The Newcomen engine's piston was propelled downward by the atmospheric pressure. Watt's device allowed live steam to be used for direct work on both sides of the piston, thus almost doubling the power, and also delivering the power more evenly through the cycle, an advantage when converting the reciprocating motion to rotary motion (whether through a crank or through aSun and planet gear system).
See the diagram on the right.A is the journal (bearing) of the walking beamKAC, which rocks up and down aboutA.H is the piston, which is required to move vertically but not horizontally. The heart of the design is the four-bar linkage consisting ofAB,BE andEG and the base link isAG, both joints on the framework of the engine. As the beam rocks, pointF (which is drawn to aid this explanation, but is not a marked point on the machine itself) describes an elongated figure-eight (more precisely, alemniscate of Bernoulli) in mid-air. Since the motion of the walking beam is constrained to a small angle,F describes only a short section of the figure-eight, which is quite close to a vertical straight line. The figure-eight is symmetrical as long as armsAB andEG are equal in length, and straightest when the ratio ofBF toFE matches that ofAB toEG. If the stroke length (that is, the maximum travel ofF) isS, then the straight section is longest whenBE is around⅔S andAB is1.5S.[3]
It would have been possible to connectF directly to the piston rod (the "Watt's linkage" design), but this would have made the machine an awkward shape, withG a long way from the end of the walking beam. To avoid this, Watt added the parallelogram linkage▱BCDE to form apantograph. This guarantees thatF always lies on a straight line betweenA andD, and therefore that the motion ofD is a magnified version of the motion ofF.D is therefore the point to which the piston rodDH is attached. The addition of the pantograph made the mechanism shorter and so the building containing the engine could be smaller.
As already noted, the path ofF is not a perfect straight line, but merely an approximation. Watt's design produced a deviation of about one part in 4000 from a straight line. Later, in the 19th century, perfect straight-line linkages were invented, beginning with thePeaucellier–Lipkin linkage of 1864.
