The greater part of Paphlagonia is a rugged mountainous country, but it contains fertile valleys and produces a great abundance of hazelnuts and fruit – particularly plums, cherries and pears. The mountains are clothed with dense forests, notable for the quantity of boxwood that they furnish. Hence, its coasts were occupied byGreeks from an early period. Among these, the flourishing city ofSinope, founded by colonists fromMiletus in ca. 630 BC, stood pre-eminent.Amastris, a few miles east of the Parthenius river, became important under the rule of the Macedonian monarchs; whileAmisus, a colony of Sinope situated a short distance east of the Halys river (and therefore not strictly in Paphlagonia as defined by Strabo), grew to become almost a rival of its parent city.
The most considerable towns of the interior wereGangra – in ancient times the capital of the Paphlagonian kings, afterwards calledGermanicopolis, situated near the frontier ofGalatia – andPompeiopolis, in the valley of theAmnias river, near extensive mines of the mineral called by Strabosandarake (red arsenic or arsenic sulfide), largely exported fromSinope.
In the time of theHittites, Paphlagonia was inhabited by theKashka people, whose exact ethnic relation to the Paphlagonians is uncertain. It seems perhaps that they were related to the people of the adjoining country,Cappadocia,[clarification needed] who were speakers of one of theAnatolian branch of theIndo-European languages. Their language would appear, from Strabo's testimony, to have been distinctive.
King of Paphlagonia Pylaimenes II/III Euergetes. Circa 133 to 103 BC
The Paphlagonians were one of the most ancient nations ofAnatolia and were listed among the allies of the Trojans in theTrojan War (ca. 1200 BC or 1250 BC), where their kingPylaemenes and his son Harpalion perished (Iliad, ii. 851–857). According toHomer andLivy, a group of Paphlagonians, called theEnetoi in Greek, were expelled from their homeland during a revolution. With a group of defeated Trojans under the leadership of the Trojan prince Antenor, they emigrated to the northern end of theAdriatic coast and later merged with indigenousEuganei, giving the nameVenetia to the area they settled.
Detail of a 15th-century map showing Anatolia, with Paphlagonia at top
Paphlagonians were mentioned byHerodotus among the peoples conquered byCroesus, and they sent an important contingent to the army ofXerxes in 480 BC.Xenophon speaks of them as being governed by a prince of their own, without any reference to the neighboringsatraps, a freedom perhaps due to the nature of their country, with its lofty mountain ranges and difficult passes. All these rulers appear to have borne the namePylaimenes as a sign that they claimed descent from the chieftain of that name who figures in theIliad as leader of the Paphlagonians.
At a later period, Paphlagonia passed under the control of the Macedonian kings, and after the death ofAlexander the Great, it was assigned, together withCappadocia andMysia, toEumenes. However, it continued to be governed by native princes until it was absorbed by the encroaching power ofPontus. The rulers of that dynasty became masters of the greater part of Paphlagonia as early as the reign ofMithridates Ctistes (302–266 BC), but it was not until 183 BC thatPharnaces reduced theGreek city ofSinope under their control. From that time, the whole province was incorporated into thekingdom of Pontus until the fall ofMithridates (65 BC).
Pompey united the coastal districts of Paphlagonia, along with the greater part of Pontus, with the Roman province ofBithynia et Pontus, but left the interior of the country under the native princes, until the dynasty became extinct and the whole country was incorporated into theRoman Empire. The name was still retained by geographers, though its boundaries are not distinctly defined by the geographer ClaudiusPtolemy. Paphlagonia reappeared as a separate province in the 5th century AD (Hierocles,Synecdemus c. 33). In the 7th century it became part of thetheme ofOpsikion, and later of theBucellarian Theme, before being split off c. 820 to form aseparate province once again. Under the Byzantine Empire, Greeks often disparaged Paphlagonians as crooks, particularly in the 10th to 12th centuries. During this period, the high profile of Paphlagonians in positions of power, such as court eunuchs, often attracted backlash from the rest of society.[2]
^Eustath. ad Horn. II. ii. 851, ad Dion. Per. 787; Steph. B. t.v.; Const. Porph. de Them. i. 7.
^Alexandru Avram, Gocha R. Tsetskhladze, James Hargrave (2021).The Greeks and Romans in the Black Sea and the Importance of the Pontic Region for the Graeco-Roman World (7th Century BC-5th Century AD): 20 Years On (1997–2017). Archaeopress Publishing Limited. p. 176.ISBN9781789697599.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
As found in theNotitia Dignitatum. Provincial administration reformed anddioceses established byDiocletian,c. 293. Permanentpraetorian prefectures established after the death ofConstantine I. Empire permanently partitioned after 395. Exarchates ofRavenna andAfrica established after 584. After massive territorial losses in the 7th century, the remaining provinces were superseded by thetheme system in c. 640–660, although inAsia Minor and parts of Greece they survived under the themes until the early 9th century.