Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Pagus of Brabant

Coordinates:50°45′N3°59′E / 50.75°N 03.99°E /50.75; 03.99
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Historical region
This article is about the oldest known geographical entity called Brabant. For other uses, seeBrabant.
This article includes a list ofgeneral references, butit lacks sufficient correspondinginline citations. Please help toimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(May 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

50°45′N3°59′E / 50.75°N 03.99°E /50.75; 03.99Thepagus of Brabant (Latin:Pagus Bracbantensis;Dutch:Brabantgouw) was a geographical region in theearly Middle Ages, located in what is nowBelgium. It was the first region known to have been called Brabant, and it included the modern capital of Belgium,Brussels. It was divided between the neighbouring counties ofFlanders,Hainaut andLouvain (Leuven) in the eleventh century. It was the eastern part, which went to theCounts of Louvain, which kept the name in use, becoming the primary name of their much larger lordship. This led to other regions later being named Brabant - in particular, the French and Dutch-speaking areas east of theDyle, includingLeuven andWavre, which are still known as "Brabant"; and secondly theprovince ofNorth Brabant in theNetherlands.

The area of the oldpagus of Brabant is and was multi-lingual, divided betweenDutch (Flemish) speakers in the north, andFrench (includingPicard) speakers in the south. Today the region includes not only bi-lingual Brussels, but also parts of the modern Dutch-speakingBelgian provinces ofFlemish Brabant andEast Flanders, and the French-speaking provinces ofHainaut andWalloon Brabant.

Geographical definition

[edit]
The medievalpagi of Hainaut (pink dots) and Brabant (purple dots) are compared to the modern provinces of Belgium. Blue is modern Flemish Brabant; Green is modern Walloon Brabant; but much of early medieval Brabant is now in East Flanders (mauve) and Hainaut (yellow). The green markers were in theSilva Carbonaria.

It lay between the riversScheldt,Rupel,Dyle,Lasne andHaine.[1]

This means the territory included not onlyBrussels but also much of what is now modern Hainaut and Eastern Flanders, includingAalst. Louvain, which later came to be seen as part of Brabant, was, likeGhent in Flanders, just outside the originalpagus.

The modernDutch province ofNorth Brabant was not originally part of Brabant but acquired the name because it was integrated politically.

In the modern Belgianprovince of Antwerp,Klein-Brabant is geographically in the originalpagus of Brabant.

Etymology

[edit]

In its earliest forms such as those collected by Nonn, the first part of the name was written with variants such as brac-, brag-, brach-, braim, and brei. According to Deru, this element could derive fromGermanic *brakti implying fallow land, or *braki implying marshy land (related to modern Dutch "broek"). These would both be derived from reconstructed Proto-Germanic*brekaną "to break".[2]

The second element of the name -bant is found in several other Frankishpagus names in this region, such as nearby Oosterbant, and Swifterbant and Teisterbant, to the north, and is believed to be connected to the medieval concept of a "ban", relating to areas of duty and authority.

Pre-history

[edit]

As demonstrated by Deru, thepagus of Brabant between the Scheldt, Haine, Lasne and Rupel rivers, corresponds closely with the northern extension of theBelgicNervii, both in terms of archaeological evidence such as Nervian coin finds, and also because it lay within theRoman eracivitas of the Nervians, and its successor, the medievalbishopric of Cambrai - both of which had their main centres in the south, in the areas ofHainaut andCambrai.

History

[edit]

The oldest records of Brabant come from theLiber Traditionem ofSaint Peter's Abbey inGhent, beginning around 750. Though it was on the opposite side of the Scheldt from Brabant, St Peter's had a strong involvement in lands between the Scheldt and Dender.[3]

In 870, in theTreaty of Meerssen Brabant was mentioned as containing four counties (in Bracbanto comitatus IIII), but the definitions of these political entities can now only be speculated upon. Much of its history in theEarly Middle Ages (before 1000) is difficult to reconstruct. AlthoughLeon Vanderkindere (in 1901) and Paul Bonenfant (in 1935) both attempted it, these attempts have been criticized by later historians. What can be said is limited:[4]

  • There was a count named John in 978, who had a county, itself called Brabant, which included Sint-Kwintens-Lennik. Vanderkindere equated him with one or two other Johns, not described as count, mentioned in a 966 record of benefices made to Nivelles Abbey, and granting land at Lupoigne and Tongrines.[5]
  • Among places named as being within a county, not just apagus, named Brabant were Gooik and Lennik (877 and 897). Possibly also Wambeek, Tubize and Ittre (see Nonn note 494); Meslin-l'Evéque andLessines, both nearAth (946); Dikkele (991). That John's county may have been so widespread has been taken by de Waha to suggest that his county encompassed the wholepagus.
  • There was a county within western Brabant named Biest (Bisuth,Bisit), which included places betweenOudenaarde and Aalst: Herzele and Walsegem. This was the part of Brabant which would later come under Flemish control, and is still part of East Flanders province. It was named in only two texts, in 971 and 1011, and no count of Biest was named.
  • There was a count named Egbert associated with Chièvres around 1010 (wrongly dated by Vanderkindere according to de Waha). This was in the southern, Romance-speaking, part of Brabant which would later come under Hainaut control.

After 925 the boundary between the major Frankish kingdoms became permanently fixed along the Scheldt river, making Brabant a frontier province or"March" of what would become theHoly Roman Empire, and eventuallyGermany. On the western side of that boundary lay the expansionistCounts of Flanders, who were within the western Frankish kingdom that would becomeFrance. They developed the fortified city ofGhent upon this river frontier.

In response to this situation, the emperors in Germany established their own March on their side of the Scheldt. One of the first frontier lordships named was atEname in Brabant, and there were alsoValenciennes to the south andAntwerp to the north.

As the 11th century progressed, three large parts of Brabant became permanently politically connected to their powerful neighbours.

  • The western part of Brabant, including Aalst and stretching from the Scheldt to theDender, became part of the Flanders, making the lords of Flanders major land-holders in the Holy Roman Empire. This is referred to as "Imperial Flanders" in contrast to "Crown Flanders" (under the French king).
  • The southeastern part of Brabant came under the control of theCounty of Hainaut.
  • An eastern part of Brabant including Brussels became a lordship of theCounts of Leuven, who then referred to themselves as Counts of both Leuven and Brussels.

The remaining part of Brabant between Brussels and the Flemish part of Brabant also came into the hands of the counts of Leuven and Brussels at some point, and from at least 1085 they referred to themselves also asLandgraves of Brabant, indicating a higher status than a normalCount. Van Droogenbroeck has argued that the counts of Leuven acquired this title to Brabant only after their relativeHermann II, Count Palatine of Lotharingia died in 1085.[6]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Vanderkindere Vol.2 p.102: "au nord et à l'ouest l'Escaut, au sud la Haine, à l'est la Forêt charbonnière et la Dyle". Nonn, p.113: ""Bonenfant, der die sicher identifizierten Orte sorgfältig verkartet hat, bestätigt im wesentlichen die von Vanderkindere angenommenen natülichen Grenzen des Gaus: im Westen und Norden die Schelde, im Osten die Dyle, im Süden die Haine."
  2. ^Deru 2009, p. 190.
  3. ^Nonn 1983, p. 111.
  4. ^Vanderkindere p.106;Nonn (1983, pp. 110–111);de Waha (1998, pp. 28–34). Nonn p.116: "Wir können lediglich festhalten: 1. Zum Zeitpunkt des Meersener Vertrages existierten im Gebiet des Groẞgaus Brabant vier Comitate. 2. Einer dieser Comitate mit dem Namen Brabant umfaẞte Orte in den Dekenaten Brüssel und Halle. 3. Im nordwestlichen Teil des Groẞgaus ist Ende des X./Anfang des XI. Jahrhunderts ein comitatus Biest belegt; ob er schon 870 als einer der vier Grafschaften existierte, läẞt sich nicht entscheiden." De Waha p.33: "Les quatre comtés brabançons ne nous sont connus que par les quelques textes citant le comté de Brabant, la mention d'un comte Jean dont on peut déduire qu'il en était le comte en 978, par deux textes situant des biens dans le comté de Biest et par l'évocation à Chiévres d'un compte Egbert, qui doit être reportée non à 928-939, mais vers 1010."
  5. ^A modern critical edition of the 966 charter ishere.
  6. ^Van Droogenbroeck 2007.

Bibliography

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pagus_of_Brabant&oldid=1274664099"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp