3.7 cm Pak 36 | |
---|---|
![]() A Pak 36 in Northern France, 1944 | |
Type | Anti-tank gun |
Place of origin | Germany |
Service history | |
In service | 1936–1945 |
Used by | Germany SeeOperators |
Wars | World War II Second Italo-Ethiopian War Spanish Civil War Second Sino-Japanese War |
Production history | |
Designer | Rheinmetall |
Designed | 1934 |
Manufacturer | Rheinmetall |
Unit cost | 900 man-hours 5,730RM |
Produced | 1933–1943 |
No. built | 20,000[1] |
Specifications | |
Mass | Travel: 450 kg (990 lb) Combat: 327 kg (721 lb) |
Barrel length | 1.66 m (5 ft 5 in) L/45[2] |
Width | 1.65 m (5 ft 5 in) |
Height | 1.17 m (3 ft 10 in) |
Crew | 5 (Commander, gunner, loader, two ammunition bearers)[3] |
Shell | 37×249mmR |
Caliber | 37 mm (1.45 in) |
Elevation | -5° to +25° |
Traverse | 30° right and left |
Rate of fire | 13 rpm |
Muzzle velocity | 762 m/s (2,500 ft/s) |
Maximum firing range | 5,484 m (5,997 yds) |
ThePak 36 (Panzerabwehrkanone 36) is a 3.7 cm / 37mmcaliberGermananti-tank gun used during theSecond World War. It was the main anti-tank weapon ofWehrmachtPanzerjäger units until 1942. Developed byRheinmetall in 1933, it was first issued to the GermanArmy in 1936, with 9,120 being available by the beginning of the war in September 1939 and a further 5,339 produced during the war. As the predominant anti-tank gun design in the world during the late 1930s, demand was high for the Pak 36, with another 6,000 examples produced forexport and the design being copied by theSoviet Union as the45 mm anti-tank gun M1932 (19-K) and by other nations such asJapan.[1]
It first saw service during theSpanish Civil War in 1936, where it performed well against thelight tanks of the conflict. It was first used during the Second World War againstPoland in 1939 and had little difficulty with any of thePolish tanks. TheBattle of France in 1940 revealed its inadequate penetration capability against French and British heavier tanks, particularly theChar B1, and especially theMatilda II, receiving the derisive nicknames "Heeresanklopfgerät" ("army door-knocking device") or "PanzerAnklopfKanone" ("tank door-knocking cannon") from its crews, but it sufficed to defeat the bulk of theAllied armor in the campaign. Theinvasion of the Soviet Union brought the Pak 36 face to face with large numbers ofT-34 andKV-1 tanks, which were invulnerable to its fire. However, 91% of the Soviet tank forces in 1941 consisted of lighter types that lacked sufficient armor to defeat the gun, and the Pak 36 knocked out thousands of such tanks.[4]
The Pak 36 began to be replaced from late 1940 onward by the5 cm Pak 38 anti-tank gun and from November 1941 by the7.5 cm Pak 40. This process was accelerated by the engagements with the modern Soviet tanks, and Pak 36 production ceased entirely in early 1943. The introduction in 1942 of theStielgranate 41shaped charge gave it the ability to punch through the armor of any Allied tank, but the ammunition's short range made the Pak 36 crews vulnerable to enemy fire and could not solve the gun's basic obsolescence. Germanparatroopers employed the gun due to its low weight and consequent high maneuverability. The Pak 36 was also used byAxis-allied, second-line,garrison and training units until the end of the war.[2]
Design of a horse-drawn, 3.7 cm anti-tank gun (designated3.7 cm Pak L/45) byRheinmetall commenced in 1924 and the first guns were issued in 1928.[5] By the early 1930s, it was apparent that horse-drawn artillery was obsolescent, and the gun was modified for motorized transport by substituting magnesium-alloy wheels and pneumatic tires for the original spoked wooden wheels, allowing it to be towed at highway speeds. Re-designated the3.7 cm Pak 35/36, it began to replace the 3.7 cm Pak L/45 in 1934 and first appeared in combat in 1936 during theSpanish Civil War. It formed the basis for many other nations' anti-tank guns during the first years of World War II. TheKwK 36 L/45 was the same gun, but used as the main armament on several tanks, most notably the early models of thePanzer III. The Soviets copied the Pak 36 carriage design for their45 mm M1937 AT gun.[1]
During the May 1940Western Campaign, the Pak 36, being a relatively small-calibre weapon, was found to be inadequate against heavy Allied tanks like the BritishMk II Matilda and the FrenchChar B1 andSomua S35, although it was effective against the most commonlight tanks of the era, such as the FrenchR35 which represented the majority of the armoured vehicles during theBattle of France.[1]
In June 1941, Soviet tank forces consisted of 10,661T-26, 2,987T-37/T-38/T-40/T-50s, 59T-35, 442T-28, 7,659BT, 957T-34, and 530KVs for a combined total of approximately 23,295 tanks. Thus, during the initial phases ofOperation Barbarossa, the Pak 36 could still penetrate the armour of the majority of Soviet AFVs at ranges up to 1000 m from the front, with the notable exception of the T-28s and T-35s, which it could penetrate only at under 100 m; the Pak 36 could not penetrate the relatively thick armour of the T-34s and KV-1s. By late 1941, the widespread introduction of the T-34 on the Eastern Front made the Pak 36 obsolete, considering its poor performance against it. This led to the Pak 36 being nicknamed "Heeresanklopfgerät" (lit. 'army door-knocking device') by German anti-tank crews for its inability to affect the T-34 aside from notifying its presence by futilely bouncing rounds off its armour, regardless of the angle or distance.[6]
The addition oftungsten-core shells (Pzgr. 40) slightly improved the armour penetration of the Pak 36, finally enabling it to damage the T-34, but only by a direct shot to the rear or side armour from point-blank range – an unlikely and dangerous scenario. However, despite its continued impotence against the T-34, it remained the standard anti-tank weapon for many units until 1942. The advantages of the Pak 36 were its relative ease of handling and mobility (it could be brought into action very rapidly by as few as two men since it weighed only 432 kg); good quality optics/aiming devices; ease of concealment due to its small size; and high rate of fire.
The Pak 36 began to be replaced by the new5 cm Pak 38 in mid-1941. As it was gradually replaced, many were removed from their carriages and added toSd.Kfz. 251 halftracks for use as light anti-armour support. The guns were also passed off to the forces of Germany's allies fighting on the Eastern Front, such as the3rd and4th Romanian Army. This proved particularly disastrous during the Soviet encirclement (Operation Uranus) at theBattle of Stalingrad when the Romanian forces, already demoralized and understrength, bore the brunt of the main Soviet armored thrust and were unable to stop the Soviet advances due to their grossly inadequate anti-tank weaponry. The Pak 36 also served with the armies of Italy,[7] Finland, Hungary, andSlovakia.
Although the Pak 36 quickly became ineffectual in the European and Russian theatres, in China the gun was still viable as an effective anti-tank gun. It could destroy the JapaneseType 95 Ha-Go andType 97 Chi-Ha tanks, since their armour protection was quite weak. For example, during theBattle of Taierzhuang, Chinese Pak 36s destroyed a good number of Japanese tanks.[8]
![]() | This sectionpossibly containsoriginal research. Pleaseimprove it byverifying the claims made and addinginline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.(November 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
This was a type of tungsten-core ammunition, being lighter and with a higher muzzle velocity, produced in small quantities.
Range | Penetration | in training | in combat |
---|---|---|---|
100 m | 64 mm | 100% | 100% |
500 m | 31 mm | 100% | 100% |
1000 m | 22 mm | 100% | 85% |
1500 m | 20 mm | 95% | 61% |
2000 m | - mm | 85% | 43% |
Penetration figures given for Pzgr 40 and an armoured plate 30 degrees from the horizontal.
In February 1942,[10] the introduction of theStielgranate 41[11]shaped charge meant that the Pak 36 could now penetrate most armour, although the low velocity of the projectile limited its range. The Pak 36s, together with the new shaped charges, were issued toFallschirmjäger units and other lightly equipped troops. The gun's low weight meant that it could be easily moved by hand, and this mobility made it ideal for their purpose.
Ammunition type | Muzzle velocity | Penetration | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 m | 250 m | 500 m | 750 m | 1000 m | 1250 m | 1500 m | 1750 m | 2000 m | 2500 m | 3,000 m (9,800 ft) | ||
Pzgr. APHE | 745 m/s | 49 mm (1.9 in) | 45 mm (1.8 in) | 40 mm (1.6 in) | 35 mm (1.4 in) | 30 mm (1.2 in) | 27 mm (1.1 in) | 23 mm (0.91 in) | 20 mm (0.79 in) | 18 mm (0.71 in) | 14 mm (0.55 in) | 11 mm (0.43 in) |
This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(November 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |