This article includes a list ofgeneral references, butit lacks sufficient correspondinginline citations. Please help toimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(March 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |

Anoutwash plain, also called asandur (plural:sandurs[1]),sandr[2] orsandar,[3] is aplain formed ofglaciofluvial deposits due tomeltwater outwash at theterminus of aglacier. As it flows, the glacier grinds the underlying rock surface and carries the debris along. The meltwater at the snout of the glacier deposits its load ofsediment over the outwash plain, with larger boulders being deposited near the terminalmoraine, and smaller particles travelling further before being deposited. Sandurs are common in Iceland where geothermal activity accelerates the melting of ice flows and the deposition of sediment by meltwater.
Sandurs are found in glaciated areas, such asSvalbard,Kerguelen Islands, andIceland. Glaciers andicecaps contain large amounts ofsilt and sediment, picked up as theyerode the underlying rocks when they move slowly downhill, and at the snout of the glacier, meltwater can carry this sediment away from the glacier and deposit it on a broad plain. The material in the outwash plain is often size-sorted by the water runoff of the melting glacier with the finest materials, like silt, being the most distantly re-deposited, whereas larger boulders are the closest to the original terminus of the glacier.
An outwash plain might contain surficialbraided stream complexes that rework the original deposits. They may also containkettle lakes, locations where blocks of ice have melted, leaving a depression that fills with water. The flow pattern of glacial rivers across sandar is typically diffuse and unchannelized, but in situations where the glacial snout has retreated from the terminalmoraine, the flow is more channelized.
Sandurs are most common in Iceland, wheregeothermal activity beneath ice caps speeds up the deposition of sediment by meltwater. As well as regular geothermal activity,volcanic activity gives rise to largeglacial bursts several times a century, which carry down large volumes of sediment.
TheGaspé Peninsula that makes up the essential part of southernQuebec (Lower St-Lawrence and Gaspé areas) also contains several examples of paleo-sandar, dating from thePleistocene ice melt.


One of the sandurs from which the general name is derived isSkeiðarársandur, a broad sandy wasteland along Iceland's south-eastern coast, between theVatnajökull icecap and the sea. Volcanic eruptions under the icecap have given rise to many large glacial bursts (jökulhlaups inIcelandic), most recently in 1996, when theRing Road was washed away (minor floods have also occurred since then). This road, which encircles Iceland and was completed in 1974, has since been repaired. The 1996jökulhlaup was caused by the eruption of theGrímsvötn volcano, with peak flow estimated to be 50,000 m3/s (1,800,000 cu ft/s) compared to the normal summer peak flow of 200 to 400 m3/s (7,100–14,100 cu ft/s). Net deposition of sediment was estimated to be 12,800,000 m3 (450,000,000 cu ft).
The main braided channels ofSkeiðarársandur are theGígjukvísl andSkeiðará rivers, which incurred net gains of 29 and 24 cm (11.4 and 9.4 in) respectively during the 1996 jökulhlaup. In the Gígjukvísl there was massive sediment deposition of up to 12 m (39 ft), which occurred closest to the terminus of the glacier. The erosional patterns ofSkeiðarársandur can be seen by looking at the centimetre-scale elevation differences measured with repeat-pass laser altimetry (LIDAR) flown in 1996 (pre-flood), 1997, and 2001. Of the overall deposition during the 1996 jökulhlaup, nearly half of the net gain had been eroded 4 years after the flood. These two rivers on the sandur display drastically different erosional patterns. The difference in sediment erosion can be attributed to the 2 km (1.2 mi) wide trench near the terminus where the Gígjukvísl flows, in contrast with theSkeiðará, which has braided flows directly onto the outwash plain. The Gígjukvísl river is where some of the highest level of sediment deposit occurred and also where the largest erosion happened afterward. This indicates that these massive jökulhlaup deposits may have a large geomorphic impact in the short term, but the net change on the surface relief could be minimal after a couple of years to a decade.
The observed change ofSkeiðarársandur from a diffuse to a channelized distributary system where it has the most observed sediment deposit has a significant impact on the development of the fluvial succession in the proximal zone. However, in order to have sustained active accretion across the entire sandur there needs to be a diffuse, multipoint distribution system. The system of accumulation onSkeiðarársandur, which is a product of glacier retreat, can be seen as multiple regions of differingchannel patterns that distribute sediment across the plain in dynamic configurations.
Fossil sandar (i.e. no longer active) are found in areas which were formerly glaciated. An example would be theUsk Valley of SouthWales where, towards the end of thelast ice age, the receding Usk valley glacier left behind a series ofrecessional moraines and sandar deposits down-valley of them. Many of the sandar surfaces are still visible, albeit degraded over succeeding millennia.[5] Extensive sandar are also recorded in the eastern part of theCheshire Plain and beneathMorecambe Bay, both in northwestEngland. 'Valley sandur' deposits are recorded from various localities in that same region.[6]