TheOrganization of American States (OAS orOEA;Spanish:Organización de los Estados Americanos;Portuguese:Organização dos Estados Americanos;French:Organisation des États américains) is aninternational organization founded on 30 April 1948 to promote cooperation among its member states within theAmericas.
Headquartered in Washington, D.C., United States, the OAS is a "multilateral regional body focused on human rights, electoral oversight, social and economic development, and security in the Western Hemisphere", according to theCouncil on Foreign Relations.[2] As of November 2023,32 states in the Americas are OAS members.[3][4]
The notion of an international union in the American continent was first put forward during the liberation of America byJosé de San Martín andSimón Bolívar[8] who, at the 1826Congress of Panama, still being part ofColombia, proposed creating a league of American republics, with a common military, a mutual defense pact, and a supranational parliamentary assembly. The meeting was attended by representatives ofGran Colombia, comprising the present-day countries ofColombia,Ecuador,Panama, andVenezuela,Argentina,Peru,Bolivia, theUnited Provinces of Central America, and Mexico but the grandly titled "Treaty of Union, League, and Perpetual Confederation" was ultimately ratified only by Gran Colombia. Bolívar's dream soon floundered with civil war in Gran Colombia, the disintegration of Central America, and the emergence ofnational rather than New World outlooks in the newly independent American republics. Bolívar's dream of inter-American unity was meant to unify Hispanic American nations against external powers.
Founding of the International Union of American Republics
The pursuit of regional solidarity and cooperation again came to the forefront in 1889–1890, at the FirstInternational Conference of American States. Gathered together in Washington, D.C., 18 nations resolved to found the International Union of American Republics, served by a permanent secretariat called the Commercial Bureau of the American Republics (renamed the International Commercial Bureau at the Second International Conference in 1901–1902). These two bodies, in existence as of 14 April 1890, represent the point of inception to which the OAS and itsGeneral Secretariat trace their origins.
In the mid-1930s, U.S. PresidentFranklin Delano Roosevelt organized an inter-American conference in Buenos Aires. One of the items at the conference was a "League of Nations of the Americas", an idea proposed by Colombia, Guatemala, and the Dominican Republic.[9] At the subsequent Inter-American Conference for the Maintenance of Peace, 21 nations pledged to remain neutral in the event of a conflict between any two members.[10] The experience of World War II convinced hemispheric governments that unilateral action could not ensure the territorial integrity of the American nations in the event of external aggression. To meet the challenges of global conflict in the postwar world and to contain conflicts within the hemisphere, they adopted a system ofcollective security, theInter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance (Rio Treaty) signed in 1947 inRio de Janeiro.
The transition from the Pan American Union to OAS would have been smooth if it had not been for the assassination of Colombian leaderJorge Eliécer Gaitán. The Director General of the Pan American Union,Alberto Lleras Camargo, became the Organization's firstSecretary General.
The OAS conducted an audit of the2019 Bolivian general election, which opposition supporters argued was fraudulent. The OAS report contended that the results were marred by "clear manipulation" and significant irregularities leading to the2019 Bolivian political crisis. Bolivian presidentEvo Morales resigned soon after, having lost the confidence of the country's military in what he described as a coup.[12] Some media outlets debated whether it should be referred to as a coup.[13] On 21 December, the Technical Mission of Electoral Experts sent by the European Union published a 67-page report which made similar observations and conclusions to that of the OAS. They noted that "there were minutes with an unusually high number of null votes, blank votes and a hundred percent participation of voters in a series of polling stations" and highlighted the general failure of the TSE to declare these irregularities.[14][15] Studies commissioned by the Americanleft-leaning[16][17][18] think tankCEPR argued that the OAS report's statistical analysis was inaccurate and unreliable.[19] The author of the OAS's vote return analysis stated that the CEPR's explanation of the results was implausible.[20] The organization has been criticized by Mexico[21] and the CEPR[22][better source needed] for their perception of interference into the internal affairs of Bolivia.[23] The OAS observed the subsequent2020 Bolivian general election stating there was no evidence of fraud.[24]The New York Times concluded that there was some fraud, but that it was unclear how much or if it was sufficient to change the result of the election, and suggested the initial analysis by the OAS was flawed.[25]
In November 2021, OAS condemned the outcome of theNicaraguan general election.[26] In April 2022, Nicaragua reported the completion of its withdrawal process from the OAS initiated in November 2021. The OAS stated that, due to the terms of treaty, the withdrawal would not take effect until 2023.[27] The move was completed on 19 November that year.[28]
1991: Adoption of Resolution 1080, which requires the Secretary General to convene thePermanent Council within ten days of acoup d'état in any member country.
2021:Nicaragua submitted a formal request to leave the OAS, following condemnation from the OAS General Assembly of Foreign Ministers of the outcome of the2021 election.[36]
2023: Nicaragua completed its withdrawal from the OAS.[37]
In the words of Article 1 of the Charter, the goal of the member nations in creating the OAS was "to achieve an order of peace and justice, to promote their solidarity, to strengthen their collaboration, and to defend their sovereignty, their territorial integrity, and their independence." Article 2 then defines eight essential purposes:
To strengthen thepeace and security of the continent.
Toeradicate extreme poverty, which constitutes an obstacle to the full democratic development of the peoples of the hemisphere.
To achieve an effective limitation of conventional weapons that will make it possible to devote the largest amount of resources to the economic and social development of the member states.
Over the course of the 1990s, with the end of theCold War, the return to democracy in Latin America, and the thrust towardglobalization, the OAS made major efforts to reinvent itself to fit the new context. Its stated priorities now include the following:
Strengthening democracy: Between 1962 and 2002, the Organization sent multinational observation missions to oversee free and fair elections in the member states on more than 100 occasions. The OAS also works to strengthen national and local government and electoral agencies, to promote democratic practices and values, and to help countries detect and defuse official corruption.
Working for peace: Special OAS missions have supported peace processes inNicaragua,Suriname,Haiti, andGuatemala. The Organization has played a leading part in the removal of landmines deployed in member states and it has led negotiations to resolve the continents' remaining border disputes (Guatemala/Belize;Peru/Ecuador). Work is also underway on the construction of a common inter-American counter-terrorism front.
Defending human rights: The agencies of the inter-American human rights system provide a venue for the denunciation and resolution of human rights violations in individual cases. They also monitor and report on the general human rights situation in the member states.
Fighting the drugs trade: The Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission was established in 1986 to coordinate efforts and cross-border cooperation in this area.
Promotingsustainable development: The goal of the OAS's Inter-American Council for Integral Development is to promote economic development and combating poverty. OAS technical cooperation programs address such areas as river basin management, the conservation of biodiversity, preservation of cultural diversity, planning for global climate change,sustainable tourism, and natural disaster mitigation.
The Organization of American States is composed of a General Secretariat, thePermanent Council, the Inter-American Council for Integral Development, and a number of committees.
The General Secretariat of the Organization of American States consists of sixsecretariats.
TheGeneral Assembly is the supreme decision-making body of OAS. It convenes once every year in a regular session. In special circumstances, and with the approval of two-thirds of the member states, thePermanent Council can convene special sessions.
The Organization's member states take turns hosting the General Assembly on a rotating basis. The states are represented at its sessions by their chosen delegates: generally, their ministers of foreign affairs, or their appointed deputies. Each state has one vote, and most matters are settled by a majority vote, except for those for which the Charter or the General Assembly's own rules of procedure specifically require a two-thirds majority.
The General Assembly's powers include setting the OAS's general course and policies by means of resolutions and declarations; approving its budget and determining the contributions payable by the member states; approving the reports and previous year's actions of the OAS's specialized agencies; and electing members to serve on those agencies.
The Organization'sofficial languages areSpanish,Portuguese,French, andEnglish. The Charter, the basic instrument governing OAS, makes no reference to the use of official languages. These references are to be found in the Rules of Procedure governing the various OAS bodies. Article 51 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly,[39] the supreme body of the OAS, which meets once a year, states that English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish are the four official languages. Article 28 stipulates that a Style Committee shall be set up with representatives of the four official languages to review the General Assembly resolutions and declarations. Article 53 states that proposals shall be presented in the four official languages. The Rules of Procedure and Statutes of other bodies, such as the Inter-American Council for Integral Development (CIDI), the Permanent Executive Committee of the Inter-American Council for Integral Development (CEPCIDI), theInter-American Commission of Women (CIM), the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD), theInter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) and the Inter-American Juridical Committee (CJI), technical bodies of the OAS, also mention the four official languages in which their meetings are to be conducted. Policy is therefore dictated through these instruments that require use of the four official languages at meetings.[40]
Although a number of other languages have official status in one or more member states of OAS (Dutch in Suriname;Haitian Creole alongside French in Haiti;Quechua andAymara in Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia;Guaraní in Paraguay), they are not official languages of the Organization.
The OAS has two funds, one for the General Secretariat, and one for specific programs and initiatives. The General Assembly asks for contributions from each member country based on its capacity to pay. In 2018 the General Secretariat's budget was $85 million of which the US contributed $50 million. In 2017 the US contributed $17 million to the fund for specific programs which was almost a third of the total contributions for that year.[41]
The OAS Office of the Inspector General (OIG) conductsforensicinternalperformance audits, to assess the General Secretariat in achieving the objectives recommended in administration and operations of the OAS and its safeguarding of resources used to undertake programs across Latin America and the Caribbean. The OIG's internal audit reports[42] are presented to the OAS Audit Committee, and the Secretary General as well as member states of the OAS upon request. The OIG maintainswhistleblower provisions to report irregular activity to the OIG for review.[43]
Under General Assembly Resolution 123, adopted on April 14, 1973Financial audits of the accounts of the OAS are published annually.[44] The annual reports are presented to the General Secretariat by The Audit Committee (formerly The OAS Board of External Auditors.) The Committee members are composed of three members elected by the OAS's General Assembly.
The later expansion of the OAS included Canada and the newly independent nations of the Caribbean. Members with later admission dates (sorted chronologically):
Although admission into OAS's predecessor, the Pan American Union, was initially restricted to republics, several overtures were still made for Canada to join the organization in 1928, 1933, 1936, and 1938. During the 1936 Pan American Union Conference, the organization extended its membership from only "American republics" to "American states" to accommodate Canada's admission as a constitutional monarchy.[47] However, U.S. opposition to Canadian membership prevented their admittance, with the U.S. fearing the admittance of Canada to the OAS would bring with it British influence that could impede its freedom of action within the organization. The U.S. reversed its position on Canadian membership in 1947.[48] However, by that time, Canadian foreign policy had adopted anAtlanticist position with a European focus;[49] resulting in the Canadian government seeing little value in pursuing OAS membership.[48]
From the 1960s to the 1980s, the Canadian government expressed some interest in joining the OAS, having successfully applied for permanent observer status in 1972 to evaluate potential membership.[50] In the 1980s, the Canadian government incrementally increased its participation in OAS activities.[51] Canada signed the Charter of the Organization of American States in 1989. Canada's membership in the OAS was formalized when the decision was ratified in 1990.[52]
Sanctions against the Dominican Republic during Trujillo regime
During the 6th Conference of Foreign Ministers of the Organization of American States (OAS) inCosta Rica, from 16 to 20 August 1960, a conviction against the State of the Dominican Republic was agreed to unanimously. The penalty was motivated because the foreign ministers checked the veracity of the claim that theRafael Trujillo regime had sponsored an attack againstRómulo Betancourt, at that time the constitutional president of Venezuela. The meeting was attended by foreign ministers from 21 American nations, includingCuba, which at that time had not yet been expelled from the inter-American system.
All countries, including the United States andHaiti, broke off diplomatic relations with the Dominican Republic. Additionally an economic blockade that affected the exports of sugar was applied, which at that time was the pillar of the Dominican economy.
As of 31 January 2014, there are 69 permanent observer countries including the four countries with territory or territories in the Americas—Denmark, France, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom; as well as theEuropean Union and India.[53][54][55]
The current government of Cuba was excluded from participation in the Organization under a decision adopted by the Eighth Meeting of Consultation inPunta del Este,Uruguay, on 31 January 1962. The vote was passed by 14 in favor, with one against (Cuba) and six abstentions (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, and Mexico). The operative part of the resolution reads as follows:
That adherence by any member of the Organization of American States to Marxism-Leninism is incompatible with the inter-American system and the alignment of such a government with the communist bloc breaks the unity and solidarity of the hemisphere.
That the present Government of Cuba, which has officially identified itself as a Marxist-Leninist government, is incompatible with the principles and objectives of the inter-American system.
That this incompatibility excludes the present Government of Cuba from participation in the inter-American system.[57][58]
This meant that the Cuban nation was still technically a member state, but that the current government was denied the right of representation and attendance at meetings and of participation in activities. The OAS's position was that although Cuba's participation was suspended, its obligations under the Charter, theAmerican Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, etc. still hold: for instance, theInter-American Commission on Human Rights continues to publish reports on Cuba's human rights situation and to hear individual cases involving Cuban nationals. However, this stance was occasionally questioned by other individual member states.
The resolution to exclude Cuba was controversial when it was adopted, and the reintegration of Cuba into the Inter-American system has remained a frequent source of contention among the countries of the hemisphere ever since.[59] Cuba's position was stated in an official note sent to the Organization "merely as a courtesy" by Minister of Foreign AffairsRaúl Roa on 4 November 1964: "Cuba was arbitrarily excluded ... The Organization of American States has no juridical, factual, or moral jurisdiction, nor competence, over a state which it has illegally deprived of its rights."[60] The reincorporation of Cuba as an active member regularly arose as a topic within the inter-American system – for instance, it was intimated by the outgoing ambassador of Mexico in 1998[61] – but most observers did not see it as a serious possibility while the present government remained in power. Since 1960, the Cuban administration had repeatedly characterized the OAS as the "Ministry of Colonies" of the United States of America.[62][63]Fidel Castro and his brotherRaúl attacked the OAS as a "Yankee bordello" and "instrument of imperialist domination" and vowed that Cuba would never join, although OAS rescinded the nation's expulsion in 2009 and invited it to apply for readmission.[64][65]Venezuelan PresidentHugo Chávez promised to veto any final declaration of the 2009Summit of the Americas due to Cuba's exclusion.[66]
On 17 April 2009, after a "trading of warm words" between the administrations of U.S. PresidentBarack Obama and Cuban leaderRaúl Castro, OAS Secretary GeneralJosé Miguel Insulza said he would ask the 2009 General Assembly to annul the 1962 resolution excluding Cuba.[67]
On 3 June 2009, foreign ministers assembled inSan Pedro Sula,Honduras, for the OAS's 39thGeneral Assembly, passed a vote to lift Cuba's suspension from the OAS. The United States had been pressuring the OAS for weeks to condition Cuba's readmission to the group on democratic principles and commitment to human rights. Ecuador's Foreign MinisterFander Falconí said there will be no such conditions. "This is a new proposal, it has no conditions—of any kind", Falconí said. "That suspension was made in theCold War, in the language of the Cold War. What we have done here is fix a historic error."[68] The suspension was lifted at the end of the General Assembly, but, to be readmitted to the Organization, Cuba will need to comply with all the treaties signed by the Member States, including theInter-American Democratic Charter of 2001.[69] A statement issued by the Cuban government on 8 June 2009 said that while Cuba welcomed the Assembly's gesture, in light of the Organization's historical record, "Cuba will not return to the OAS".[70]
Followingthe expulsion of its PresidentManuel Zelaya, Honduras' membership of the Organization was suspended unanimously at midnight on 5 July 2009.[71] Thede facto government had already announced it was leaving the OAS hours earlier; this was not, however, taken into account by the OAS, which did not recognize that government as legitimate.[72] An extraordinary meeting had been conducted by the OAS in Washington, D.C., with Zelaya in attendance.[71][73][74] The suspension of Honduras was approved unanimously with 33 votes (Honduras did not vote).[71][74] This was the first suspension carried out by the OAS since that of Cuba in 1962.[71][74]
After Zelaya's return to Honduras in 2011, the country was re-admitted to the Organization on 1 June 2011 with 32 votes in favor and 1 (Ecuador) against. Venezuela expressed some reservations.[75]
On 7 November 2021, Nicaragua held ageneral election which saw PresidentDaniel Ortega re-elected to a fourth term in office.[76] In a vote by the OAS Permanent Council, 25 member states voted in favour of a resolution condemning the election. Seven countries, including Mexico, Honduras and Bolivia, abstained. The motion stated that the election was "not free, fair or transparent and lack[s] democratic legitimacy" and also instructed the Permanent Council to undertake an assessment of the situation and "take appropriate action".[77]
In response to this statement, Nicaraguan Foreign MinisterDenis Moncada [es] announced on 19 November that Nicaragua would leave the OAS.[46] Moncada called the bloc "an instrument of interference and intervention" and accused it of "facilitating the hegemony of the United States with its interventionism over the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean."[78][79] According to Article 143 of the OAS Charter, the process to withdraw from the organization takes two years after its announcement.[80]
In April 2022, Nicaragua announced that it had completed its withdrawal from the OAS. It said the OAS offices in Managua had been closed. The OAS stated that, due to the terms of treaty, the withdrawal would not take effect until 2023.[81] Nicaragua eventually completed its withdrawal from the OAS on 19 November that year.[82]
On 28 April 2017, Venezuela notified the OAS of its denunciation of the Charter of the OAS, which as per Article 143 would lead to the withdrawal of Venezuela from the OAS effective two years from the date of notification.[29] During this period, the country did not plan on participating in the OAS.[83]
During the2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis, thePresident of the National Assembly of VenezuelaJuan Guaidó, who was recognized by theNational Assembly as the acting president,[84] sent a letter to the OAS Secretary General annulling the previous denunciation of the OAS Charter,[citation needed] and expressing his desire for Venezuela to remain a member of the OAS.[29] The National Assembly designated a special envoy as representative to the OAS, lawyerGustavo Tarre Briceño, who the OAS voted to recognize as Venezuela's delegate in April.[30][31][32] In October 2022, a bloc of leftist OAS member states led a motion to remove Tarre's representation in the organization. Out of 35 members, 19 nations voted in favor of the motion and 4 against. The motion fell short of the 24 votes required for a two-thirds majority.[85]
^abOn 28 April 2017, Venezuela notified the OAS of its denunciation of the Charter of the OAS, which as per Article 143 would lead to the withdraw of Venezuela from the OAS effective two years from the date of notification.[29] During the2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis, thePresident of the National Assembly of VenezuelaJuan Guaidó, who was recognized by theNational Assembly as the acting president, sent a letter to the OAS Secretary General annulling the previous denunciation of the OAS Charter, and expressing his desire for Venezuela to remain a member of the OAS.[29] The National Assembly designated a special envoy as representative to the OAS, who the OAS voted to recognize as Venezuela's delegate in April.[30][31]
^Suspended from 1962 to 2009, however the Cuban government has stated it does not intend to resume participation in the organization. SeeCuba–OAS relations.
^On 19 November 2021, Nicaragua announced its intention to withdraw from the OAS. Per the terms of the charter, the process became effective two years following notification, on 19 November 2023.[46] SeeStatus of Nicaragua below.
^catalog, International bureau of the American republics, Washington, D. C. [from old; Book, Start this,Cacao, retrieved13 October 2021{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Rosenberg, Tina (4 November 2007)."The Perils Of Petrocracy".The New York Times. Retrieved5 October 2014.… Mark Weisbrot, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a left-wing Washington policy group.
^Solis, Marta (26 April 1972)."Castro admits problems in education".Siempre. Latin American Network Information Center, University of Texas at Austin. pp. 40–41.
_-_disputed_version.svg)
_(IA_cacao00inte)_(page_1_crop).jpg){kind=logo}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
