 | This articlepossibly containsoriginal research. Pleaseimprove it byverifying the claims made and addinginline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.(September 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
TheOregontax revolt is a political movement inOregon which advocates for lower taxes. This movement is part of a larger anti-tax movement in thewesternUnited States which began with the enactment ofProposition 13 in California. The tax revolt, carried out in large part by a series ofcitizens' initiatives andreferendums, has reshaped the debate abouttaxes and public services in Oregon.
The leaders of the tax revolt include Don McIntire, president of the Taxpayer Association of Oregon, andBill Sizemore, leader ofOregon Taxpayers United. Much of the money spent to promote these anti-tax measures were provided by out-of-state backers includingAmericans for Tax Reform headed byGrover Norquist.[1]
Tim Knopp, a Republican lawmaker from Bend, was the main author of the “kicker” tax rebate and the later successful effort to place it in the Oregon Constitution. He is the former House majority leader and as of 2024, Senate Minority Leader.
Oregon voters placed limits toproperty tax in theOregon Constitution in 1990 with the passage ofMeasure 5. A majority of voters were frustrated by the increase in property taxes attributed to rapidly rising property values in thePortland area. Some attribute this home price inflation to an influx of population in thePortland metro, which is surrounded by anurban growth boundary that limits the supply of developable land. Others observe that the situation was much more complex, pointing to the loose monetary policy pursued byAlan Greenspan, including adjustments to the CPI that measured homeowners equivalent rent instead of actual home price, a recovering economy in the region, and numerous other factors.[original research?]
Measure 5 shifted the source ofschool funding to the state. Instead of property taxes, funding had to come from the General Fund. Oregon does not have a sales tax, so money had to be drawn from the General Fund - primarily via the state income tax).[2]
Measure 5 also equalized school funding throughout the state, which meant that schools in rural areas benefited while schools in Portland saw budgets reduced.[2][3]
Measure 47, which attempted to cap the annual rate at which property taxes could rise. This was partly to moderate fast growing house prices in Portland.[3] Measure 47 also instituted Oregon'sdouble majority rule, in which local tax levies could only pass in minor elections when voter turnout surpassed half of the registered voters. In November 1996, Measure 47 was passed by the Oregon voters 52.3% to 47.7%.[4] Problems with the legal wording of Measure 47 caused theOregon Legislature to sendMeasure 50 to voters in 1997, which clarified Measure 47. During a special election in May 1997, Measure 50 was approved by the voters 55.7% to 44.3%.[5]
The tax revolt manifested itself in a series of budget battles in the Oregon Legislature about school funding, theOregon Health Plan, and other spending priorities during the late 1990s. ThenGovernorJohn Kitzhaber and theRepublican leadership in the legislature clashed repeatedly over budget priorities.[citation needed]
In 2000, Don McIntire helped place Measure 8 on Oregon's ballot, which would have limited state spending to 15 percent of personal income for the previous biennium. Measure 8 was defeated by a margin of 43.5% to 56.5%.[6] However, in the same election Oregonians enshrined the so-called "kicker"—a rebate to taxpayers when state tax revenues were 2% over forecasts—into the state constitution withMeasure 86 which passed 62% to 38%.[7] Oregon is the only state with a”kicker.”[8] Originally sent to taxpayers as a check, it is now returned as a credit toward state income tax returns. In 2024, the “kicker” will be a record $5.6 billion.[9]
Anti-tax activists defeated two proposals in 2003 and 2004 (Measure 28 andMeasure 30), which were referred to voters by the Oregon State Legislature to increase income taxes temporarily.[citation needed]
Sizemore's group ran into legal problems in 2002. Sizemore sparked the ire of several public employeesunions with a series of initiatives aimed at reducing public employeepensions and reducing their political power. The unions responded with theVoter Education Project, which tracked signature gatherers hired by Sizemore to place measures on the ballot. After documenting instances offraud by signature gatherers, theOregon Education Association, a teachers' union, successfully sued Sizemore's organization underracketeering laws in 2003.[10] The $2.3 million judgment against Oregon Taxpayer's United severely hurt Sizemore's ability to put measures on the ballot. The fraud allegations also led to the passage of Measure 26 in 2002, which prohibits the payment of signature gatherers on a per-signature basis, and was approved by voters 75% to 25%.[11]
Tax activists generally claim that Oregon's government is wasteful and inefficient, arguing that the government could do better with less. They often highlight programs that they feel are unnecessary.[12] Opponents of the tax revolt argue that passing tax decreases via ballot measure leads to short-sighted policy making, in which voters are enticed to vote with the revolt by lower tax bills and without thinking about the budget problems caused by reduced revenues.[citation needed]
Modernhistory of Oregon (1890–present) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Topics |  | |
| Events | ||
| Places | ||
| Politicians | ||
| Other Oregonians | ||
