Ölvir Rósta | |
|---|---|
| Known for | Appearing in theOrkneyinga saga |
| Parent(s) | Þorljót (father); Steinnvör 'the Stout' (mother) |
| Relatives | Ljótr 'Villain' (maternal grandfather); Frakökk (maternal grandmother); Moddan (father of Frakökk) |
| Notes | |
Relations and residences are all according to theOrkneyinga saga | |
Olvir Rosta (Old Norse:Ölvir Rósta, andÖlvir Þorljótsson), also known asAulver Rosta, is a character within the mediaevalOrkneyinga saga, who is purported to have lived during the early 12th century. His Old Norsebyname,rósta, means "brawl", "riot". His name, and byname, appear variously in Englishsecondary sources.
Ölvir appears in the saga as the son of Þorljót, and Steinnvör 'the Stout'. The mother of Steinnvör is Frakökk, who has been described as one of the great villains of the entire saga. One of Frakökk's sisters, Helga, is theconcubine of EarlHákon Pálsson. Part of the saga relates of how theEarldom of Orkney is for a time jointly run by half-brothers—Haraldr Hákonsson andPáll Hákonsson, who are both sons of Earl Hákon. With the death of Earl Haraldr, son of Helga, Frakökk's family falls out of favour, and are forced to leave Orkney. In time, Frakökk conspire with the father of EarlRögnvaldr, and agrees to a plan to take the Orkney by force and split it with Earl Rögnvaldr. She and Ölvir eventually make their way to theSuðreyjar, and may their return in a bid to win half of the earldom. However, their small fleet of ships are defeated in battle against Earl Páll. The saga also tells of how Ölvir kills an Orkney chieftain who fought against him during the sea-battle—by burning the man to death within his house. The chieftain's vengeful son later tracks down Ölvir and Frakökk, at their own home inSutherland. After a short battle behind their homestead, Ölvir's men are routed and Frakökk is burned to death within her house; Ölvir flees from the scene, making for theSuðreyjar, and is not heard from again.
Ölvir has also been associated with several places in Sutherland, some of which may bear his name. It has been proposed that Ölvir Rosta may be an ancestor of either one of twoScottish clans from theOuter HebrideanIsle of Lewis. In 1962 a runestone was uncovered in theInner Hebrides which bore the nameÖlvir. It has been suggested that the men mentioned on this stone were family relations of Ölvir.


Ölvir Rósta, is a character in the mediaevalOrkneyinga saga. His name inOld Norse isÖlvir rósta. The 17th-centuryIcelandic historianÞormóður Torfason, who wroteLatin histories which covered events theNorthern Isles and north-east ofScotland, rendered Ölvir's name asAulver Rosta.[1] Ölvir'sbyname,rósta, means "brawl", "riot".[2] Both his name and byname are represented various ways in Englishsecondary sources.[note 1] The saga describes him as "the tallest of men, and strong in limb, exceedingly overbearing, and a great fighter".[13][14]
TheOrkneyinga saga states that Ölvir was the son of Þorljót, fromRekavík. The 19th-century historian Joseph Anderson was of the opinion thatRekavík likely refers toRackwick on the island ofHoy,Orkney; or possibly, but less likely, to Rackwick on the island ofWestray, Orkney. The saga states that Ölvir's mother was Þorljót's wife, Steinnvör 'the Stout'.[11] Ölvir's parents had several other children in the saga: sons Magnús, Ormr, Moddan, Eindriði; and daughter Auðhildr.[8] Steinnvör's mother is given as Frakökk; her father was Frakökk's husband, Ljótr 'Villain', fromSutherland.[11] The saga states that Frakökk was a daughter of Moddan, a wealthy and noble farmer fromi Dali, "Dale". According to 21st-century historian Gareth Williams, this probably refers to a dale within the "Dales of Caithness". The 21st-century historian Barbara Crawford stated that the Dales of Caithness refer to "that part of Caithness which includes the river valleys running down towards thePentland Firth".[15] The saga records that another daughter of Moddan's was Helga, who was theconcubine of theOrcadian earl,Hákon Pálsson, and the mother of the earl's son, EarlHaraldr Hákonsson.[11] According to the saga, Frakökk's brothers included: Engus 'the Generous'; and Earl Óttarr, fromThurso, who is described as "a man worthy of honour". The saga declares that the descendants of Moddan "were high-born and thought a lot of themselves",[8] and Williams suggested that they could be related to a powerful dynasty in theIrish Sea zone that included anÓttarr who seized control of theKingdom of Dublin in 1142.[16] Williams noted that Frakökk appears as one of the greatvillains of theOrkneyinga saga. Williams noted that while some of Moddan's descendants had legitimate claims for the earldom, Frakökk did not—however, she made a claim on behalf of her descendants, specifically Ölvir.[8]
Williams was of the opinion that the power base of Moddan, and his son Earl Óttarr, was inCaithness andSutherland, not in Orkney.[8] The saga states that Frakökk held lands, which according to Williams, were located near the modern town ofHelmsdale, Sutherland. Williams noted that the saga specifically states that Frakökk's husband was from Sutherland. and in consequence, Williams considered that these lands probably passed to her through her marriage. The size of these lands is unknown. Crawford suggested that they covered most of Sutherland: that after the Frakökk's death, and the departure of Ölvir, the lands were inherited by her relative Eiríkr 'Stay-brail' (see illustrated family tree), and in turn by his son, before passing into the possession of thede Moravia family. In Williams' opinion, Crawford may have exaggerated the extent of these lands somewhat. Williams observed that another base of power for Frakökk and Ölvir may have been theSuðreyjar ("Southern Islands")—which can include both theHebrides, and theIsle of Man. The saga states at one point, Frakökk and Ölvir travelled to theSuðreyjar to gather ships and men; later theSuðreyjar are the destination of Ölvir in his last appearance in the saga. Williams noted that theSuðreyjar appear many times in the sagas as a target for raids, and conquests, for Orcadian earls; as well as being the source for attacks on the earldom itself. Williams also noted that it is possible that saga's association of Frakökk and Ölvir with theSuðreyjar may be ared-herring. He stated that "if there was an Orcadian tradition of the Suðreyjar as a haunt of ne’er-do-wells, this would provide an alternative explanation for the references within Orkneyinga saga, including those to do with Moddan's family". Even so, Williams considered that the saga seems to imply that the family had dynastic connections with important individuals of theSuðreyjar, including'Óláfr 'Titbit',King of Mann and the Isles.[15]

The main source for the life of Ölvir is theOrkneyinga saga, which was compiled sometime around 1200 by an unknownIcelander. The saga is thought to have been based upon poetry,oral tradition, and other written material. The original version ended with the death ofSveinn Ásleifarson (who is portrayed as an enemy of Ölvir and Frakökk). The saga is considered to become more accurate as events approach the writer's own time.[18] In the late 14th century, the saga was revised and edited and included in the IcelandicFlateyarbók. The saga can be summed up as an account of the lives of many of the earls of Orkney, from the 9th to 13th centuries. According toresearch fellow Ian Beuermann, the saga is useful not for the specific events it describes, but rather for the ability to learn of "the ideas shaping the texts during the periods of composition or revision". For example, it is possible that even one of the main characters of the saga, Sveinn Ásleifarson, never existed; or at least it is quite possible that the historical Sveinn was different from the saga's portrayal of him.[19] Another source which mentions Ölvir isÞormóður Torfason's 17th-century history of Orkney, which follows theOrkneyinga saga.
TheOrkneyinga saga relates how after the death of Earl Hákon Pálsson, his sons, Haraldr Hákonsson, andPáll Hákonsson, divided the earldom between themselves. However, the half-brothers soon began to disagree with one another, and theirvassals divided into competing factions. The saga relates how one day Frakökk, and her sister Helga (mother of Earl Haraldr), weresewing a snow-white garment embroidered with gold. This garment was enchanted, and the two sisters had intended it for Earl Haraldr's half-brother, Earl Páll. Unfortunately for the sisters, Earl Haraldr noticed the beautiful garment and, despite their protestations, put the garment on and soon after died. The saga states that Earl Páll immediately took control of his deceased half-brother's possessions, and that he was highly suspicious of the two sisters. In consequence, Frakökk and Helga were no longer welcome in the earldom, and they left for Caithness, and from there move to Sutherland where Frakökk had an estate. In time, several of Frakökk's descendants were brought up in Sutherland—including her daughter, Steinnvör 'the Stout', and grandson, Ölvir.[11]
The saga relates of how, during an earlier time,Kali Kolsson assistedHaraldr Gille in being recognised as anillegitimate son of the deceased Norwegian king,Magnús 'Barefoot'.[20] In consequence, the reigning king,Sigurðr Magnússon, was Haraldr Gille's half-brother. The Norwegian king, appointed Kali as an earl of one half of Orkney, and also had Kali's name changed toRögnvaldr (aftera prominent earl from the past).[21] On the death of Sigurðr, his son,Magnús Sigurðarson, succeeded to the kingdom. When Haraldr Gille learned of Sigurðr's death he gathered his supporters and successfully underwent anordeal to prove his paternity, and was accepted as king of one half of the kingdom. For three years the joint-kings maintained an uneasy peace with one another, but on the fourth year hostilities finally broke out. A battle was fought where the vastly outnumbered Haraldr Gille was defeated; in consequence he fled to the protection of theKing of Denmark. The following Yule-tide, Haraldr Gille returned to Norway, captured Magnús andmaimed him. Haraldr Gille then became king of the entire kingdom. That spring, in recognition for Rögnvaldr's assistance, the king renewed the grant of islands and the title of earl to Rögnvaldr.[22] James Gray, who summarised the events depicted within the saga, dated the death of Sigurðr Magnússon to the year 1126; he dated the capture and mutilation of Magnús Sigurðarson to 1135.[23]
According to the saga, sometime after Haraldr Gille's victory over Magnús Sigurðarson, Earl Rögnvaldr's father, Kolr, sent messengers to Earl Páll, demanding that Earl Páll hand over the lands which the Norwegian king had granted to Earl Rögnvaldr. When Earl Páll refused this, Kolr's messengers proceeded to Caithness, where Frakökk lived. The messengers related to Frakökk of Kolr's proposal—that if she and Ölvir were to defeat Earl Páll, half of the earldom would be theirs. Frakökk agreed to the plan, saying that she would attack in mid-summer; she promised that during upcoming winter she would gather forces from her kinsmen, friends, and connections in Scotland and theSuðreyjar for the task. The next winter Earl Rögnvaldr and two of his chiefs, Sölmundr and Jón, gathered a force of men and about five or six ships for their expedition. The following summer their forces sailed from Norway to Shetland, where they were well received by the localbondsmen. Meanwhile, Frakökk and Ölvir assembled a small fleet of twelve ships in theSuðreyjar—although the saga describes the ships as small and poorly manned. At the middle of summer, Frakökk and Ölvir sailed for Orkney to fulfil their pledge of wresting the earldom from Earl Páll.[24]
According to theOrkneyinga saga, when Earl Páll herd of Earl Rögnvaldr's arrival in Shetland, he held council and decided to immediately gather forces and attack Earl Rögnvaldr before he could be reinforced by the incoming men he knew were coming from theSuðreyjar. That night Earl Páll was joined by five chieftains, with four ships—this brings his total forces to five ships. The fleet sailed toRousay, where they arrive at sunset. During the night the force is further strengthened by arriving men. In the morning, as the fleet is about to set out for Shetland to meet Earl Rögnvaldr, about ten or twelve ships were spotted coming from thePentland Firth. Earl Páll and his men were certain these ships were those of Frakökk and Ölvir; in consequence, the earl ordered the fleet to intercept. The saga states that when Ölvir's ships were east of Tankerness, they then sailed west from Mulls Head, Deerness. By this time, Earl Páll was further strengthened by a chieftain from Tankerness. The earl then ordered his ships to be bound together, and for a bondi to gather stones for the upcoming battle. When the earl and his troops have fully prepared themselves, the saga states that Ölvir's forces made their attack.[25]
Although the saga states that the forces of Ölvir were superior in numbers to those of Earl Páll, it also notes that Ölvir's ships were smaller. Ölvir brought his own ship up next to the earl's, where the fighting was the fiercest. One of the earl's chieftains, Ólafr Hrólfsson, attacked Ölvir's smallest ships, and cleared three of them in a short time. Ölvir urged his men forward and was the first to board Earl Páll's own ship. When he spotted Earl Páll, Ölvir threw a spear at him, and although it was blocked by a shield, the force of the blow knocked the earl onto the deck. With the fall of Earl Páll, a great shout goes up; but just at that moment, one of the earl's best men, Sveinn 'Breastrope', hurled a large stone at Ölvir, hitting him square in the chest and knocked him overboard. Although Ölvir's men dragged him from the water, it was unclear to the battlers whether he lived or not. Ölvir's disheartened men were driven off the earl's ship, and began to withdraw. Ölvir eventually recovered his wits, but was unable to rally his troops—the battle was lost. Earl Páll pursued Ölvir's fleeing fleet into the Pentland Firth, before giving up the chase. Five of Ölvir's ships were left behind, and were captured and manned by the forces loyal to Earl Páll. The earl is later further strengthened by twolongships, and his forces swells to twelve ships. The next day, Earl Páll sailed to Shetland, where he destroyed Earl Rögnvaldr's fleet. Although, Earl Rögnvaldr's forces remained in Shetland itself, Earl Páll successfully held onto the earldom.[25] Gray stated that these battles were fought in the year 1136.[26]
TheOrkneyinga saga states that three days beforeYule, Ölvir, and his band of men, arrived in Duncansby.[27] Williams stated that the farm ofDuncansby, located near the Dales of Caithness, was then in hands of an Orkney chieftain, Óláfr Hrólfsson.[8] Joshua Prescott stated that Óláfr appears to have been Earl Páll's main supporter in Caithness;[28] according to Williams, Óláfr appears to have held these lands directly from the Earls of Orkney, rather than as a family possession.[8] The saga relates of how at Duncansby, Ölvir and his party surprised Óláfr within his own house. They then set fire to the house, and burn Óláfr to death within. Ölvir and his men took all themovable property they could get their hands on, before leaving the scene. When Earl Páll heard of what has happened, he takes-in the slain chieftain's son, Sveinn Óláfsson. With the death of his father, Sveinn Óláfsson becomes known asSveinn Ásleifarson—after his mother.[27] Such house-burnings—in which individuals are burnt to death, or slain as they flee the fire—are found throughout the sagas as a part ofblood feuds.[7] The saga states that some time later, Sveinn, who has spent time in theSuðreyjar andAtholl, returned to Orkney. On his way, Sveinn he stopped at Thurso, where his accomplice,Ljótólfr, negotiated a truce between Sveinn and Frakökk's brother, Earl Óttarr. The earl paid Sveinn compensation for the death of Óláfr, and promised his friendship. In return, Sveinn promised to aid Earl Óttarr's relative,Erlendr Haraldsson, in a possible bid for the earldom of Orkney.[29]
The saga states that some time later, Sveinn approached Earl Rögnvaldr, and asked the earl for men and ships to take vengeance upon Ölvir and Frakökk who were involved in the burning of his father. The earl consented to this request, and gave Sveinn two ships. Sveinn travelled south toBorgarfiörd, and then west to the trading place ofDúfeyrar. According to Anderson,Borgarfiörd may refer to theMoray Firth; andDúfeyrar likely refers to the shore in the parish ofDuffus, on the coast ofMoray. The saga states that fromDúfeyrar, Sveinn travelled toEkkialsbakki, and from there went to Atholl, where he met Earl Maddaðr.[30] Anderson stated thatEkkialsbakki, in this case, likely refers to the coast on the Moray Firth, next to Atholl;[31] The 19th-century historianWilliam Forbes Skene agreed with this, specifically locating it toFindhorn, where ships could enter an estuary and follow a route into Atholl.[32] However,Hermann Pálsson and Paul Geoffrey Edwards, in their 1981 translation of the saga, identified the town ofBanff withDúfeyrar, and theRiver Oykel withEkkialsbakki.[33]
The saga then relates how the Earl Maddaðr gave Sveinn guides, and how Sveinn travelled through the interior of the country—over mountains, and through woods, away from inhabited areas—until he came upon Strath Helmsdale, near where Ölvir and Frakökk lived.[30] Williams stated that since the saga records that Sveinn approached the area by land, the site of Ölvir and Frakökk's estate was probably located somewhere in the dale of Helmsdale—not wherethe modern village is situated on the coast. Williams also noted that this area was quite remote from Orkney, and that it may have been outside of the control of the earldom.[8] The saga states that Ölvir and Frakökk had spies on the lookout; however, because of the route taken by Sveinn, they were unaware of his presence until Svienn occupied a certain slope behind their homestead. The saga states that Ölvir and sixty of his men confronted Sveinn,[30] although Þormóður Torfason's account of the incident gives forty.[1] After a short clash, the saga states that, Ölvir's men soon gave way, and many were killed in the ensuing rout. Ölvir survived the clash, and fled up Helmsdale river. Meanwhile, Sveinn and his men continued on towards the houses. The area was plundered, and the houses were burnt to the ground with their inmates still inside—and in this way Frakökk perished. The saga states that Sveinn and his men committed many ravages in Sutherland before returning home. Upon reaching the river, Ölvir fled through the mountains, and is last heard making for theSuðreyjar; he is not mentioned again within theOrkneyinga saga.[30][note 2] Later on within the saga, another of Frakökk's grandsons,Þórbjörn 'Clerk', who is abrother-in-law and close friend of Sveinn, has two of Sveinn's men killed for their part in the burning.[37]
While the saga records that Frakökk was killed to avenge the burning of Óláfr, recently scholars Angelo Forte,Richard Oram, and Frederick Pedersen, stated that her fate was actually sealed by her support of Erlendr Haraldsson's bid for the earldom, over the claim ofHaraldr Maddaðarson. Haraldr was the son of Earl Maddaðr, and Margrét Hákonardóttir (married in about 1134). Margrét was aniece of Frakökk, and Earl Maddaðr was possibly a cousin of theDavid I. The union between Earl Maddaðr and Margrét benefited theScottish Crown by increasing Scottish influence in the north at the expense of Norwegian influence. Also, in the 1120s and 1130s, David I had faced challenges to his authority. A large part of the support for these challengers came fromMoray andRoss—these lands were directly between the northern lands of Caithness and Orkney, and David's strength to the south. According to the Forte, Oram, and Pedersen, the prospect of having the son of one of his northern supporters as the earl of Caithness was too good for the king to pass up—especially since Haraldr was still a minor, and would thus be under the direction of an appointed tutor. As it turned out, the installation of Haraldr as an earl of Orkney and Caithness was a triumph for the Scottish Crown: in the 1140s, Sutherland and Caithness were further integrated into the kingdom, and the Norwegian influence in Orkney was neutralised.[38][note 3]
Several writers have noted a place which is said to be the location of the burning. TheHistoric Environment Scotland website states that a supposed castle in which Frakökk was burned may be located atgrid referenceNC8728, nearKinbrace, within the parish of Kildonan.[39] In 1769,Thomas Pennant noted the episode of the burning, and stated that certain ruins at Kinbrace were called "Cairn Shuin"; and that these were the remnants of the homestead that Sveinn burnt.[40]Rev. Sage, in his account of the parish in the(Old) Statistical Account of Scotland, noted the ruins mentioned by Pennant; he called them "Cairn-Suin", and translated this to "Old Cairns". Sage, however noted Þormóður Torfason's account of the burning, and suggested that a possibly more accurateetymology is "Suenes Field".[41] Pennant stated that "though the ruins are great, yet no man can tell of what kind they were; that is, whether round likePictish houses, or not". According to the Historic Environment Scotland website, Pennant may have been referring to any of thechambered cairns in the area.[39] The site of the supposed castle was visited by theOrdnance Survey in 1961, but no evidence of it was found.[39] In the mid-19th century, Alexander Pope noted "Carn Suin", and stated that nearby there were certain ruins called "Shu Carn Aulver". Pope also stated that to the south-west of this location there was a part of Helmsdale river called "Avin Aulver". Another location he connected with Ölvir was a hill, in the forest of "Sletie", called "Craggan Aulver".[35]
According to Williams, it is possible that after Sveinn defeated Ölvir and Frakökk, Ölvir may have fled to kinsmen of his in theSuðreyjar. Williams suggested that theblood feud between the families may be a reason for Sveinn's military activities in the Hebrides and the Isle of Mann, afterwards; although Sveinn had other interests in the area, since he is stated to have married the window of a Manx king.[42] In the late 19th century,antiquaryF.W.L. Thomas speculated that the memory of Ölvir may have been preserved in the Hebrides. Thomas stated that within the mythological history of theOuter HebrideanIsle of Lewis, the island clan ofMacaulays were said to be the descendants of a man namedAmhlaebh, who was one of the twelve sons, or near relations, of a man namedOliver, among whom Lewis was divided. ThisOliver was said to have been the eldest son of the Norse king who was given the Isles andHighlands by a son ofKenneth MacAlpin, for his assistance in driving his own brother from Scotland.[9] Thomas speculated thatOliver could represent Ölvir Rósta; meaning that he was the progenitor of the Macaulays.[9][43][44]

It has also been suggested that Ölvir may be an ancestor of theMacLeods. Until quite recently, it was commonly believed by historians that theeponymous ancestor of the MacLeods,Leod, was the son ofOlaf the Black, King of Mann and the Isles. In the late 20th century, William Matheson proposed that the MacLeods descended in the male line from Ölvir Rósta, rather than Olaf the Black. Matheson proposed that, within several Gaelic pedigrees which record ancestors of Leod, the great-grandfather of Leod has Gaelic names which very likely represent the Old Norse nameÖlvir.[14] These Gaelic names are considered to equate to other Gaelic names found within the early bardic poetry of the MacLeods.[12] About a century before, Thomas had noted the similarity in these names, when discussing Ölvir, but he did not pursue a specific link between Ölvir and the MacLeods.[45] Matheson speculated that Leod's great-grandfather would have flourished at roughly the same time as when Ölvir is said to have fled to theSuðreyjar. Matheson noted that Leod's name is derived from the Old Norse nameLjótr: a name which Matheson considered to be rare inScandinavia andIceland, and even more so in Scotland. In consequence, he considered it significant that Ölvir's maternal grandfather (Ljótr 'Villain') also had this name. When comparing the relevant Gaelic pedigrees, Matheson noted that they were inconsistent in the generations preceding Leod's great-grandfather. In lieu of this, Matheson proposed that these inconsistencies may show that the Leod's great-grandfather was a newcomer to the Hebrides, like Ölvir.[14]
Later, historianW.D.H. Sellar noted Matheson's proposed link between the MacLeods and Ölvir, but commented that the evidence Matheson used was entirelycircumstantial. Sellar was of the opinion thatÖlvir was not such a rare name as Matheson had previously thought. Sellar also noted that the genealogy and family of Ölvir, recorded in theOrkneyinga saga, has no similarity with the line recorded in the Gaelic genealogies concerning the ancestry of Leod.[45] Matheson's association of Ölvir to the Macleods was also attacked by clan historian Alick Morrison. Morrison commented that the nameLjotr was also not as rare as Matheson had proposed. Morrison noted that, in the previous century, Thomas had considered another saga character to be an eponymous ancestor of the MacLeods—this character wasLjótólfr (mentioned earlier in the article), who would have lived on Lewis about a century before Leod's time.[46][47] In fact, Morrison did not consider Ölvir's name—and the singled-out Gaelic names—to be anything but other forms ofÓláfr.[46][note 4] However,Óláfr andÖlvir are considered by others to be quite different names, with separate origins.[12] Morrison, and Sellar, also noted that the bynames of Ölvir, and Leod's great-grandfather, do not appear to match up[45][46]—in three of the relevant Gaelic pedigrees, the byname of Leod's great-grandfather appears assnoice,snaige, andsnáithe.[45] Thomas considered these bynames to mean "hewer";[9] although, both Matheson and Sellar disagreed with this translation.[14][45] Morrison considered these to equate tosnaith, "white";'[46] however, Sellar noted that Morrison gave no further explanation for this assertion. Sellar, himself, proposed that the byname may be not be Gaelic, but Norse in origin. He suggested that it may refer to some sort of deformity to the man's nose; another suggestion forwarded to him was that it may refer to acleft palate.[45] Later, A.P. MacLeod noted that the Gaelicsnatha—which has a secondary meaning of "grief", and "trouble"[48]—may be anominative form of thegenitivesnaithe, and thus may equate to Ölvir's byname.[12]

In 1962, on theInner Hebridean island ofIona, close to Reilig Odhraingrid referenceNM286245, a fragment of a carved stone bearing the runic inscription of a man namedÖlvir was found.[49] It is one of only three examples of rune-stones found in the west of Scotland.[50] The fragment is about half the size of the original stone,[51] which would have measured 1.11 by 0.77 metres (3.6 by 2.5 ft). The stone is decorated with a crudeknotted cross;[52] therunes are located on the side, along the border. At the end of the inscription there are a few runes missing, due to the corner having been broken off.[51] The full inscription translates into English: "Kali, son of Ölvir, laid this stone over Fugl his brother". These three men do not appear in any other sources, and it is unknown who they were. In the 1980s, Norwegianrunologist Aslak Liestøl proposed that the stone is evidence that the two brothers wereScandinavian speakers, who were members of a leading family in the district, who had thesocial status to be buried near Reilig Odhrain.[51] The runic inscriptions, and artwork, suggests that the stone dates to the late 10th century, or 11th century.[49]
Liestøl suggested that the three men were somehow related to Ölvir. Liestøl noted that three names were those of characters in theOrkneyinga saga, which all had connections with the Hebrides.Kali was the original name of Earl Rögnvaldr, whom Ölvir fought for. The earl was named after his grandfather, Kali Sæbjörnarson, who according to the saga, accompanied Magnús 'Barefoot' to the Hebrides, and died there of wounds he received onAnglesey.[51] According to Liestøl, the nameFugl, in a West Norse context, is only found on this inscription and of a minor character in the saga.[51] This character was the son of Ljótólfr, from Lewis, who negotiated a truce between Sveinn Ásleifarson and Earl Óttarr. In 1922, historianAlan Orr Anderson noted that the mediaevalChronicle of Man records that Fogolt,sheriff of Man, died in 1183, and Anderson stated that it is possible that Ljótólfr's son was the mentioned sheriff.[53] Concerning the nameLjótólfr, Liestøl also noted that the saga names Ölvir's fatherÞorljót, and his maternal-grandfatherLjótr. He concluded that the men mentioned on the stone likely lived around the year 1000, about four to six generations before their namesakes in the saga. In consequence, Liestøl suggested that Kali Sæbjörnarson would have been a contemporary of the children of the rune-stone's Kali Ölvisson.[51] The stone, among many others, is housed in the museum atIona Abbey.[49]
| Script, and languages | Inscription, transliteration, and translations |
|---|---|
| Runic inscription[54][note 5] | ᚴᛆᛚᛁ᛫ᚮᚢᛚᚢᛁᛌ᛫ᛌᚢᚿᚱ᛫ᛚᛅᚦᛁ᛫ᛌᛐᛅᚿ᛫ᚦᛁᚿᛌᛁ᛫ᚢᚭᛁᚱ᛫ᚠᚢᚴᛚ᛫ᚭᚱᚢᚦᚢᚱ |
| Latin script transliteration[55] | kali᛫auluis᛫sunr᛫laþi᛫stan᛫þinsi᛫ubir᛫fukl᛫bruþur [᛫sin][note 6] |
| Old Norse translation[54] | Kali Ölvissonr lagþi stein þenna yfir Fugl broður [sinn] |
| English translation[49] | Kali, son of Ölvir, laid this stone over Fugl his brother |