State Rights and Free Trade Party | |
|---|---|
| Other name | |
| Manager | James Hamilton Jr. |
| Founders |
|
| Founded | 1830; 195 years ago (1830) |
| Dissolved | 1840; 185 years ago (1840) |
| Split from | Jackson Party |
| Merged into | Democratic Party |
| Ideology | |
| National affiliation |
|
| U.S. Senate | 2 / 48 (1833, peak) |
| U.S. House | 7 / 240 (1833, peak) |
TheState Rights and Free Trade Party, commonly known as theNullifier Party, was apolitical party inAntebellum South Carolina. It was one oftwo main political parties inSouth Carolina during the 1830s, alongside the Union Party.[4] The party defended the legal theory ofnullification, which held thatstates could unilaterally declarefederallawsunconstitutional.[5]
John C. Calhoun anonymously published theSouth Carolina Exposition and Protest in response to theTariff of Abominations, which dramatically increased the rate of tax on imported raw materials.[6] The Exposition went beyond the earlierKentucky and Virginia Resolutions in asserting the right of the states to nullify unconstitutional laws. Calhoun claimed that the severe harm done by the tariff to South Carolina'splantation economy justified the step of nullification. Calhoun's ideas were notable for theirproslavery emphasis; likeminded contemporaries portrayed the tariff as anabolitionistconspiracy and a vital threat to theplanter class. While Calhoun made a formal distinction between nullification andsecession, opponents accused him of advocating disunion.[7]
Nullifiers outperformed expectations in the 1830 legislative elections, holding the Unionists to narrow majorities in six contestedCharleston districts.[8] Local associations were established in every district andparish the following year, largely through the efforts of Calhoun's associateJames Hamilton Jr., themanager of the state party.[3] Nullifiers held a more than two-thirdssupermajority in theSouth Carolina General Assembly after the 1832 elections, which were marked by significantpolitical violence.[9] The party was strongest in theSouth Carolina Lowcountry.[10] In Charleston, Nullifiers drew support from planters outside the economic and politicalestablishment, as well asmerchants,brokers, andlaborers employed ineconomic sectors tied to the export trade. New voters after 1830 overwhelmingly favored the Nullifiers, reflecting the party's appeal withyoung voters.[11]
Nullifier control of the legislature was important during thenullification crisis, enabling Hamilton to call the state convention that nullified the tariffs of 1828 and1832.[12] The party subsequently sought legislation to require that state officialsswear "primary and paramount allegiance" to South Carolina.[13] Nullifiers articulated a "proslavery,antidemocratic discourse" that was foundational toSouthernnationalism in subsequent decades.[10]Congressional Nullifiers were instrumental in securing adoption of thegag rule by theUnited States House of Representatives; Calhoun rejected the measure as insufficiently extreme and helped to drive its author,Henry L. Pinckney, out of the Nullifier Party.[14] Fear ofslave rebellions propelled by the growth of the abolitionist movement in theNorthern United States led Nullifiers to demand further suppression of antislavery literature in the later part of the 1830s.[15]
Nullifiers first aligned with theWhig Party in the formation of theSecond Party System.[16] South Carolina was the only state to appoint itselectors by a vote of thelegislature during the 1830s; the Nullifier-controlled General Assembly declined to endorse eithermajor party presidential candidate in1832 and1836, instead castingprotest votes forJohn Floyd ofVirginia andWillie P. Mangum ofNorth Carolina.[17] After 1837, Calhoun and other leading Nullifiers switched their allegiance to theDemocrats.[18] The Nullifier and Union parties merged in 1840 amidst the decline of Unionism in South Carolina preceding theAmerican Civil War.[19]
| Election | Ticket | Electoral results[20] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presidential nominee | Running mate | Popular vote | Electoral votes | Change | Result | |
| 1832 | John Floyd | Henry Lee | 0.00% | 11 / 286 | Lost | |
| 1836 | No candidate[a] | John Tyler | 0.00% | 11 / 294 | Lost | |
| Congress | House of Representatives[22] | Senate[23] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Election | Seats | Change | Percent | Election | Seats | Change | Percent | |
| 22nd | 1830–31 | 4 / 213 | 1.88 | 1830–31 | 2 / 48 | 4.17 | ||
| 23rd | 1832–33 | 7 / 240 | 2.92 | 1832–33 | 2 / 48 | 4.17 | ||
| 24th | 1834–35 | 7 / 241 | 2.90 | 1834–35 | 2 / 52 | 3.85 | ||
| 25th | 1836–37 | 2 / 242 | 0.82 | 1836–37 | 0 / 52 | 0.00 | ||