Process of creating new atomic nuclei from existing nucleons
"Nucleogenesis" redirects here. For the song by Vangelis, seeAlbedo0.39.
Diagram illustrating the creation of new elements by thealpha process
Nucleosynthesis is the process that creates newatomic nuclei frompre-existingnucleons (protonsand neutrons) and nuclei. According to current theories, the first nuclei were formed a fewminutes after theBig Bang through nuclear reactions in a process calledBigBang nucleosynthesis.[1] After about 20minutes, the universe had expanded and cooled to a point at which thesehigh-energy collisions among nucleons ended, so only the fastest and simplest reactions occurred, leaving our universe containinghydrogen andhelium, traces of other elements, such aslithium, and the hydrogenisotopedeuterium. Nucleosynthesis in stars and stellar events such asnovas andsupernovas later produced the variety of elements and isotopes that we have today, in a process called cosmic chemical evolution. The amounts of totalmass in elements heavier than hydrogen and helium (called "metals" byastrophysicists) remain small (afew percent), so that theuniverse still has approximately the same composition.
Starsfuse light elements to heavier ones in theircores, giving off energy in the process known asstellar nucleosynthesis. Nuclear fusion reactions create many of the lighter elements, up to and includingiron andnickel in the most massive stars. Products of stellar nucleosynthesis remain trapped in stellar cores and remnants except if ejected throughstellar winds and explosions. Theneutron capture reactions of ther-process ands-process create heavier elements, from iron upwards.
Supernova nucleosynthesis within exploding stars is largely responsible for the elements betweenoxygen andrubidium: from the ejection of elements produced during stellar nucleosynthesis; through explosive nucleosynthesis during the supernova explosion; and from ther-process (absorption of multiple neutrons) during the explosion.
Neutron star mergers are a recently-identified major source of elements produced in ther-process. When two neutronstars collide, a significant amount ofneutron-rich matter may be ejected which then quickly forms heavy elements.
Cosmic ray spallation is a process whereincosmic rays impact nuclei and fragment them. It is a significant source of the lighter nuclei, particularly3He,9Be and10,11B, that are not created by stellar nucleosynthesis. Cosmicray spallation can occur in theinterstellar medium, onasteroids andmeteoroids, or on Earth in theatmosphere or in the ground. This contributes to the presence on Earth ofcosmogenic nuclides.
Periodic table showing the currently believed origins of each element. Elements fromcarbon up tosulfur may be made in stars of all masses by charged-particle fusion reactions.Iron group elements originate mostly from the nuclear-statistical equilibrium process in thermonuclearsupernova explosions. Elements beyond iron are made inhigh-mass stars with slow neutron capture(s-process), and by rapid neutron capture in ther-process, with origins being debated among rare supernova variants andcompact-star collisions. Note that this graphic is a first-order simplification of an active research field with many open questions.
It is thought that the primordial nucleons themselves were formed from thequark-gluon plasma around13.8 billion years ago during theBig Bang, as it cooled below twotrillionkelvins. A fewminutes afterwards, starting with onlyprotons andneutrons, nuclei up tolithium andberyllium (both withmass number 7) were formed, but hardly any other elements. Someboron may have been formed at this time, but the process stopped before significantcarbon could be formed, as this element requires a far higher product of helium density and time than were present in the short nucleosynthesis period of the BigBang. That fusion process essentially shut down at about 20minutes, due to drops in temperature and density as the universe continued to expand. This first process,BigBang nucleosynthesis, was the first type of nucleogenesis to occur in the universe, creating theso-calledprimordial elements.
A star formed in the early universe(aPopulation III star) produces heavier elements by combining its lighter nuclei – hydrogen,helium, lithium,beryllium, and boron – which were found in the initial composition of the interstellar medium and hence the star.Interstellar gas therefore contains declining abundances of these light elements, which are present only by virtue of their nucleosynthesis during the BigBang, and alsocosmicray spallation. These lighter elements in the present universe are therefore thought to have been produced through thousandsof millionsof years of cosmicray-mediated breakup of heavier elements in interstellargas and dust. The fragments of thesecosmic-ray collisions includehelium-3 and the stable isotopes of the light elements lithium, beryllium, and boron. Carbon was not made in the BigBang, but was produced later in larger stars via thetriple-alpha process.
The subsequent nucleosynthesis of heavier elements( Z ≥ 6; carbon and heavier elements) requires the extreme temperatures and pressures found withinstars andsupernovae. These processes began as hydrogen and helium from the BigBang collapsed into the first stars after about500 million years. Starformation has been occurring continuously in galaxies since that time. The primordial nuclides were created byBigBang nucleosynthesis,stellar nucleosynthesis,supernova nucleosynthesis, and by nucleosynthesis in exotic events such asneutronstar collisions. Other nuclides, such as40Ar, formed later through radioactive decay. OnEarth, mixing and evaporation has altered the primordial composition to what is called the natural terrestrial composition. The heavier elements produced after the BigBang range inatomic numbers fromZ = 6 (carbon) toZ = 94 (plutonium). Synthesis of these elements occurred through nuclear reactions involving the strong and weak interactions among nuclei, and callednuclear fusion (including both rapid and slow multiple neutron capture), and include alsonuclear fission and radioactive decays such asbeta decay. The stability of atomic nuclei of different sizes and composition(i.e., numbers of neutrons and protons) plays an important role in the possible reactions among nuclei. Cosmicnucleosynthesis, therefore, is studied among researchers of astrophysics and nuclear physics ("nuclear astrophysics").
The first ideas on nucleosynthesis were simply that thechemical elements were created at the beginning of the universe, but no rational physical scenario for this could be identified. Gradually it became clear that hydrogen and helium are much more abundant than any of the other elements. All the rest constituteless than 2% of the mass of theSolar System, and of other star systems as well. At the same time it was clear that oxygen and carbon were the nexttwo mostcommon elements, and also that there was a general trend toward high abundance of the light elements, especially those with isotopes composed of whole numbers ofhelium-4 nuclei(alpha nuclides).
Arthur Stanley Eddington first suggested in1920 that stars obtain their energy by fusing hydrogen into helium and raised the possibility that the heavier elements may also form in stars.[2][3] This idea was not generally accepted, as the nuclear mechanism was not understood. In the years immediately beforeWorld War II,Hans Bethe first elucidated those nuclear mechanisms by which hydrogen is fused into helium.
Fred Hoyle's original work on nucleosynthesis of heavier elements in stars, occurred just afterWorld War II.[4] His work explained the production of all heavier elements, starting from hydrogen. Hoyle proposed that hydrogen is continuously created in the universe from vacuum and energy, without need for universal beginning.
Hoyle's work explained how the abundances of the elements increased with time as the galaxy aged. Subsequently, Hoyle's picture was expanded during the1960s by contributions fromWilliamA. Fowler,Alastair G. W. Cameron, andDonaldD. Clayton, followed by many others. Theseminal1957 "B2FH"review paper byE. M. Burbidge,G. R. Burbidge, Fowlerand Hoyle[5] is awell-known summary of the state of the field in1957. That paper defined new processes for the transformation of one heavynucleus into others within stars, processes that could be documented by astronomers.
The Big Bang itself had been proposed in1931, long before this period, byGeorges Lemaître, a Belgian physicist, who suggested that the evident expansion of the Universe in time required that the Universe, if contracted backwards in time, would continue to do so until it could contract no further. This would bring all the mass of the Universe to a single point, a "primeval atom", to a state before which time and space did not exist. Hoyle is credited with coining the term "BigBang" during a 1949BBC radio broadcast, saying thatLemaître's theory was "based on the hypothesis that all the matter in the universe was created in one bigbang at a particular time in the remotepast". It is popularly reported that Hoyle intended this to bepejorative, but Hoyle explicitly denied this and said it was just a striking image meant to highlight the difference between the twomodels.Lemaître's model was needed to explain the existence of deuterium and nuclides between helium and carbon, as well as the fundamentally high amount of helium present, not only in stars but also ininterstellar space. As it happened, both Lemaître and Hoyle's models of nucleosynthesis would be needed to explain the elemental abundances in the universe.
The goal of the theory of nucleosynthesis is to explain the vastly differing abundances of the chemical elements and their several isotopes from the perspective of natural processes. The primary stimulus to the development of this theory was the shape of a plot of the abundances versus the atomic number of the elements. Those abundances, when plotted on a graph as a function of atomic number, have a jaggedsawtooth structure that varies by factors up to tenmillion. Avery influential stimulus to nucleosynthesis research was an abundance table created byHans Suess andHarold Urey that was based on the unfractionated abundances of thenon-volatile elements found within unevolvedmeteorites.[6] Such a graph of the abundances is displayed on alogarithmic scale(see graph, below), where the dramatically jagged structure is visually suppressed by the many powers often spanned in the vertical scale of this graph.
Abundances of the chemical elements in the SolarSystem. Hydrogen and helium are most common, residuals within the paradigm of the BigBang.[7] The next three elements(Li, Be, B) are rare because they are poorly-synthesized in the BigBang and also in stars. The two general trends in the remaining stellar-produced elements are: (1) an alternation of abundance of elements according to whether they haveevenor odd atomic numbers, and (2) a general decrease in abundance, as elements become heavier. Within this trend is apeak at abundances of iron and nickel, which is especially visible on a logarithmic graph spanning fewer powers often, say betweenlogA = 2(A = 100) andlogA = 6(A = 1,000,000).
Heavier elements can be assembled within stars mainly by the slow neutron capture process known as thes-process or in explosive environments, such assupernovae andneutronstar mergers, by ther-process, which involves rapid neutron captures (faster than thehalf-lifes of the intermediate isotopes). There is also a minor contribution from processes involving proton capture, such as therp-process, and thep-process. These processes allow the synthesis of some proton-rich isotopes that cannot be created by neutron capture and subsequentbeta-decays.[8]
Big Bang nucleosynthesis[9] occurred within the first three minutes of the beginning of the universe and is responsible for much of the abundance of1 H (protium),2 H (D,deuterium),3 He (helium-3), and4 He (helium-4). Although4 He continues to be produced by stellar fusion andalpha decays and trace amounts of1 H continue to be produced byspallation and certain types of radioactive decay, most of the mass of the isotopes in the universe are thought to have been produced in the BigBang. The nuclei of these elements, along with some7 Li and7 Be are considered to have been formed between 100and 300seconds after the BigBang when the primordialquark–gluon plasma froze out to form protons and neutrons. Because of the very short period in which nucleosynthesis occurred before it was stopped by expansion and cooling (about 20minutes), no elements heavier thanberyllium (or possiblyboron) could be formed. Elements formed during this time were in theplasma state, and did not cool to the state of neutral atoms until much later.[citation needed][10]
Stellar nucleosynthesis is the nuclear process by which new nuclei are produced. It occurs in stars duringstellar evolution. It is responsible for the galactic abundances of elements from carbon to iron. Stars are thermonuclear furnaces in which hydrogen and helium are fused into heavier nuclei by increasingly high temperatures as the composition ofthecore evolves.[11] Of particular importance is carbon because its formation from He is a bottleneck in the entire process. Carbon is produced by thetriple-alpha process in all stars. Carbon is also the main element that causes the release of free neutrons within stars, giving rise to thes-process, in which the slow absorption of neutrons converts iron into elements heavier than iron and nickel.[12][13]
The products of stellar nucleosynthesis are generally dispersed into theinterstellar gas through massloss episodes and thestellar winds oflow-mass stars. The massloss events can be witnessed today in theplanetary nebula phase oflow-mass star evolution, and the explosive ending of stars, calledsupernovae, of those with more than eight times the mass of the Sun.
The first direct proof that nucleosynthesis occurs in stars was the astronomical observation that interstellargas has become enriched with heavy elements as time passed. As a result, stars that were born from it late in the galaxy, formed with much higher initial heavy element abundances than those that had formed earlier. The detection oftechnetium in the atmosphere of ared giant star in1952,[14] byspectroscopy, provided the first evidence of nuclear activity within stars. Because technetium is radioactive, with ahalf-life much less than the age of the star, its abundance must reflect its recent creation within that star. Equally convincing evidence of the stellar origin of heavy elements is the large overabundances of specific stable elements found instellar atmospheres ofasymptotic giant branch stars. Observation ofbarium abundances some20–50times greater than found in unevolved stars is evidence of the operation of thes-process within such stars. Many modern proofs of stellar nucleosynthesis are provided by theisotopic compositions ofstardust, solid grains that have condensed from the gases of individual stars and which have been extracted from meteorites. Stardust is one component ofcosmic dust and is frequently calledpresolar grains. The measured isotopic compositions in stardust grains demonstrate many aspects of nucleosynthesis within the stars from which the grains condensed during the star'slate-lifemass-loss episodes.[15]
Supernova nucleosynthesis occurs in the energetic environment in supernovae, in which the elements betweensilicon andnickel are synthesized in quasiequilibrium[16] established during fast fusion that attaches by reciprocating balanced nuclear reactions to28Si. Quasiequilibrium can be thought of asalmost equilibrium except for a high abundance of the28Si nuclei in the feverishly burning mix. This concept[13] was the most important discovery in nucleosynthesis theory of theintermediate-mass elements since Hoyle's 1954paper because it provided an overarching understanding of the abundant and chemically important elements between silicon( A = 28 ) and nickel( A = 60 ). It replaced the incorrect althoughmuch-citedalpha process of theB2FH paper, which inadvertently obscured Hoyle's 1954theory.[17] Further nucleosynthesis processes can occur, in particular ther-process (rapid process) described by theB2FH paper and first calculated by Seeger, Fowler and Clayton,[18] in which the mostneutron-rich isotopes of elements heavier than nickel are produced by rapid absorption of free neutrons. The creation of free neutrons byelectron capture during the rapid compression of the supernova core along with the assembly of someneutron-rich seed nuclei makes ther-process aprimary process, and one that can occur even in a star of pure H and He. This is in contrast to the B2FH designation of the process as asecondary process. This promising scenario, though generally supported by supernova experts, has yet to achieve a satisfactory calculation ofr-process abundances. The primaryr-process has been confirmed by astronomers who had observed old stars born when galacticmetallicity was still small, that nonetheless contain their complement ofr-process nuclei; thereby demonstrating that the metallicity is a product of an internal process. Ther-process is responsible for our natural cohort of radioactive elements, such as uranium and thorium, as well as the mostneutron-rich isotopes of each heavy element.
Therp-process (rapid proton) involves the rapid absorption of free protons as well as neutrons, but its role and its existence are less certain.
Explosive nucleosynthesis occurs too rapidly for radioactive decay to decrease the number of neutrons, so that many abundant isotopes with equal and even numbers of protons and neutrons are synthesized by the silicon quasi-equilibrium process.[16] During this process, the burning of oxygen and silicon fuses nuclei that themselves have equal numbers of protons and neutrons to produce nuclides which consist of whole numbers ofhelium nuclei,up to 15 (representing60Ni). Such multiple-alpha-particle nuclides are totally stable up to40Ca (made of 10helium nuclei), but heavier nuclei with equal and even numbers of protons and neutrons are tightly-bound but unstable. The quasi-equilibrium produces radioactiveisobars44Ti,48Cr,52Fe, and56Ni, which (except44Ti) are created in abundance but decay after the explosion and leave the most stable isotope of the corresponding element at the sameatomic weight. The most abundant and extant isotopes of elements produced in this way are48Ti,52Cr, and56Fe. These decays are accompanied by the emission ofgamma rays (radiation from the nucleus), whosespectroscopic lines can be used to identify the isotope created by the decay. The detection of these emission lines was an important early product ofgamma-ray astronomy.[19]
The most convincing proof of explosive nucleosynthesis in supernovae occurred in1987 when thosegamma-ray lines were detected emerging fromsupernova 1987A.Gamma-ray lines identifying56Co and57Co nuclei, whosehalf-lives limit their age to about a year, proved that their radioactive cobalt parents created them. This nuclear astronomy observation was predicted in1969[19] as a way to confirm explosive nucleosynthesis of the elements, and that prediction played an important role in the planning for NASA'sCompton GammaRay Observatory.
Other proofs of explosive nucleosynthesis are found within the stardust grains that condensed within the interiors of supernovae as they expanded and cooled. Stardust grains are one component of cosmic dust. In particular, radioactive44Ti was measured to be very abundant within supernova stardust grains at the time they condensed during the supernova expansion.[15] This confirmed a 1975prediction of the identification of supernova stardust ("SUNOCONs"), which became part of the pantheon ofpresolar grains. Other unusual isotopic ratios within these grains reveal many specific aspects of explosive nucleosynthesis.
Another type of explosive nucleosynthesis through ther-process was suggested in the flaring ofmagnetars. Some direct evidence for this was published in2025. It is estimated that this kind of event has created~1%–10% of the heavier elements in the universe.[20]
As of the mid-2020s, themerger of binary neutronstars(BNSs) is believed to be the main source ofr-process elements.[21] Beingneutron-rich by definition, mergers of this type had been suspected of being a source of such elements, but definitive evidence was difficult to obtain. In2017 strong evidence emerged, whenLIGOTooltip Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory,Virgo, theFermiGamma-ray SpaceTelescope andINTEGRALTooltip INTErnational Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory, along with a collaboration of many observatories around the world, detected bothgravitational wave and electromagnetic signatures of a likely neutronstar merger,GW170817, and subsequently detected signals of numerous heavy elements such as gold as the ejecteddegenerate matter decayed and cooled.[22] The first detection of the merger of a neutronstar andblack hole (NSBHs) came in July2021 and more after but analysis seem to favorBNSs overNSBHs as the main contributors to heavy metal production.[23][24]
Cosmic ray spallation process reduces the atomic weight of interstellar matter by the impact withcosmic rays, to produce some of the lightest elements present in the universe (though not a significant amount ofdeuterium). Most notably spallation is believed to be responsible for the generation of almost all of3He and the elementslithium,beryllium, and boron, although some7 Li and7 Be are thought to have been produced in the BigBang. The spallation process results from the impact of cosmicrays (mostly fastprotons) against theinterstellar medium. These impacts fragment carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen nuclei present. The process results in the light elements beryllium, boron, and lithium in the cosmos at much greater abundances than they are found withinstellar atmospheres. The quantities of the light elements1H and4He produced by spallation are negligible relative to their primordial abundance.
Beryllium and boron are not significantly produced by stellar fusion processes, since8Be has an extremely shorthalf-life of8.2×10−17seconds.[32]
Theories of nucleosynthesis are tested by calculatingisotope abundances and comparing those results with observed abundances. Isotope abundances are typically calculated from the transition rates between isotopes in a network. Often these calculations can be simplified as a few key reactions control the rate of other reactions.[citation needed]
Tiny amounts of certain nuclides are produced on Earth by artificial means. Those are our primary source, for example, of technetium. However, some nuclides are also produced by a number of natural means that have continued after primordial elements were in place. These often act to create new elements in ways that can be used to date rocks or to trace the source of geological processes. Although these processes do not produce the nuclides in abundance, they are assumed to be the entire source of the existing natural supply of those nuclides.
These mechanisms include:
Radioactive decay may lead toradiogenicdaughter nuclides. The nuclear decay of manylong-lived primordial isotopes, especiallyuranium-235,uranium-238, andthorium-232 produces many intermediate daughter nuclides before they too finally decay toisotopes of lead. The Earth's natural supply of elements likeradon andpolonium is via this mechanism. The atmosphere's supply ofargon-40 is due mostly to the radioactive decay ofpotassium-40 in the time since the formation of the Earth. Little of the atmospheric argon is primordial.Helium-4 is produced by alpha decay, and the helium trapped in Earth's crust is also mostlynon-primordial. In other types of radioactive decay, such ascluster decay, larger species of nuclei are ejected (forexample,neon-20), and these eventually become newly-formed stable atoms.
Radioactive decay may lead tospontaneous fission. This is notcluster decay, as the fission products may be split among nearly any type of atom.Thorium-232,uranium-235, anduranium-238 are primordial isotopes that undergo spontaneous fission. Natural technetium andpromethium are produced in this manner.
Nuclear reactions: Naturally-occurring nuclear reactions powered byradioactive decay give rise toso-callednucleogenic nuclides. This process happens when an energetic particle from radioactive decay, often analpha particle, reacts with a nucleus of another atom to change the nucleus into another nuclide. This process may also cause the production of further subatomic particles, such as neutrons. Neutrons can also be produced in spontaneous fission and byneutron emission. These neutrons can then go on to produce other nuclides via neutron-induced fission, or byneutron capture. For example, some stable isotopes such asneon-21 andneon-22 are produced by several routes of nucleogenic synthesis, and thus only part of their abundance is primordial.
Nuclear reactions due tocosmic rays: By convention, these reaction products are not termed "nucleogenic" nuclides, but rathercosmogenic nuclides. Cosmicrays continue to produce new elements on Earth by the same cosmogenic processes discussed above that produce primordial beryllium and boron. One important example iscarbon-14, produced fromnitrogen-14 in the atmosphere by cosmicrays.Iodine-129 is another example.
^Actually, before the war ended, he learned about the problem of spherical implosion ofplutonium in theManhattan Project. He saw an analogy between the plutonium fission reaction and the newly discovered supernovae, and he was able to show that exploding supernovae produced all of the elements in the same proportion as existed on Earth. He felt that he had accidentally fallen into a subject that would make his career.Autobiography William A. Fowler
Meneguzzi, M.; Audouze, J.; Reeves, H. (1971). "The Production of the Elements Li, Be, B by Galactic Cosmic Rays in Space and Its Relation with Stellar Observations".Astronomy and Astrophysics.15:337–359.Bibcode:1971A&A....15..337M.