 | This articleis anorphan, as no other articleslink to it. Pleaseintroduce links to this page fromrelated articles.(January 2026) |
| NUSAF | |
| Founded | 2003 |
|---|---|
| Founder | Government of Uganda |
| Type | Development Fund |
| Focus | Post-conflict reconstruction, poverty reduction, community development |
| Location | |
Area served | Northern Uganda |
| Method | Community-driven development |
Parent organization | Office of the Prime Minister |
| Funding | World Bank, Government of Uganda |
| Website | opm |
TheNorthern Ugandan Social Action Fund (NUSAF) is a post-conflict reconstruction and poverty reduction program implemented by theGovernment of Uganda with support from theWorld Bank. Established in 2003, NUSAF aims to restore and rebuild communities in northern Uganda that were devastated by over two decades of civil conflict, primarily involving theLord's Resistance Army (LRA).[1]
The program was conceived in response to the humanitarian crisis in northern Uganda, where prolonged conflict had displaced nearly two million people and destroyed social and economic infrastructure. The first phase of NUSAF began in 2003 with a focus on emergency recovery and basic service restoration in the most affected districts. The program operates under a community-driven development approach, empowering local communities to identify, plan, and implement their own development priorities.[2]
NUSAF has evolved through multiple phases, with each iteration building upon lessons learned from previous implementations. The program's design emphasizes direct community participation and ownership, recognizing that sustainable development requires local engagement andcapacity building. The fund operates on the principle that communities best understand their own needs and priorities, making them the primary drivers of their development agenda.[3]
NUSAF operates across 55 districts in northern Uganda, coordinated by theOffice of the Prime Minister. The program utilizes a three-tier targeting mechanism to ensure resources reach the most vulnerable populations. Geographic targeting identifies the most affected districts and sub-counties, while community-based targeting selects the poorest and most vulnerable households within these areas. This approach ensures that support reaches those who need it most while building local capacity for sustainable development.[4]