| Northern Powerhouse Rail | |
|---|---|
 Map, originally envisaged in 2017, showing suggested improvements in the Northern Powerhouse framework, partly labelled HS3. | |
| Overview | |
| Owner | Network Rail |
| Locale | Northern England |
| Website | transportforthenorth.com |
| Service | |
| Type | High speed railway |
| System | National Rail |
| Technical | |
| Track gauge | 1,435 mm (4 ft 8+1⁄2 in)standard gauge |
| Electrification | 25 kV AC overhead |
Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR), sometimes referred to unofficially asHigh Speed 3, is a proposed major rail programme designed to substantially enhance the economic potential of theNorth of England.[1][2][3] The phrase was adopted in 2014 for a project featuring new and significantly upgraded railway lines in the region.[4] The aim is to transform rail services between the major towns and cities, requiring the region's biggest single transport investment since theIndustrial Revolution.[5][6][7][8] The original scheme would have seen a newhigh-speed rail line fromLiverpool to Warrington continuing to join theHS2 tunnel which it would share intoManchester Piccadilly station. From there, the line would have continued toLeeds with a stop atBradford.[9] The line was intended to improve journey times and frequency between major Northern cities as well as creating more capacity for local service on lines that express services would have been moved out from.
However, in 2021, theJohnson government significantly curtailed the scheme in theIntegrated Rail Plan for the North and Midlands (IRP). Instead of building a dedicated high speed line from Liverpool to Leeds via Bradford, the curtailed scheme would use the existing main line from Liverpool Lime Street to Ditton then an upgraded freight line pastFiddlers Ferry power station to Warrington, then new line via Manchester toMarsden, West Yorkshire, where the line would join the upgradedTransPennine line to Leeds viaHuddersfield.[10]
In July 2022, theHouse of Commons Transport Committee expressed concern that the evidence base for the IRP was insufficient and made a number of specific comments. These included that
A full analysis of the wider economic impacts of the different Northern Powerhouse Rail options is needed, and BCR [benefit-cost ratio] analyses must be produced for all NPR options. Upgrading lines will bring modest benefits, but not to the transformative extent needed to end regional imbalances.[11]
In October 2022, early on in her short-livedPremiership,Liz Truss said that her government's plans for Northern Powerhouse Rail meant a full new high-speed rail line all the way from Liverpool toHull with a stop at a new station in Bradford.[12] The succeeding government said in its November 2022 financial statement that only the 'core' parts of NPR would be funded.[13] The project is classified as anEngland and Wales project, facing criticism from some Welsh politicians.
NPR forms part of High Speed North, the overarching proposal that includes improvements to both roads and rail.[14][15][16] These developments are designed to improve transport connections between major northern English cities and transport hubs, including Liverpool,Manchester,Manchester Airport, Leeds, Bradford, Huddersfield,Doncaster,Sheffield,York,Newcastle and Hull, as well as other significant economic centres.
The High Speed North project aims to improve public transport journey times between the major cities in the North of England. Present-day rail connections between cities such as Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds are slow compared to commuter journeys acrossGreater London.[17] By improving transport connections, it is proposed that commuters will be able to travel to work more freely, allowing these cities to compete together as one large single economy, rather than competing against one another.[18] The NPR scheme is promoted by the combined public transport authorityTransport for the North (TfN) and, according to analysis by TfN, currently fewer than 10,000 people in the North can access four or more of the North's largest economic centres within 60 minutes. This could rise to around 1.3 million once High Speed North is fully delivered.[19]
A plan to improve rail journey times in northern England, theNorthern Hub,[20] or, as currently called, the Great North Rail Project,[21] was developed from a 2009 scheme to improve the rail network around Manchester. Schemes to improve the Leeds–Manchester line speed by 2014 were included inNetwork Rail's CP5 improvements, with an aim to reduceManchester–Leeds journey times by 15 minutes.[22] In 2011, the approximately £290 million electrification of the trans-Pennine Manchester–Leeds line was given funding.[23][24] Work started on the electrification in 2013.[25]
| Route | Journey time (hr:min) | Service frequency (trains per hour) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before HSN | With HSN | Before HSN | With HSN | |
| Manchester–Liverpool | 0:37–0:57 | 0:26 | 4 | 6 |
| Manchester–Leeds | 0:46–0:58 | 0:25 | 4 | 6 |
| Manchester–Sheffield | 0:49–0:57 | 0:40 | 2 | 4 |
| Sheffield–Hull | 1:20–1:26 | 0:50 | 1 | 2 |
| Sheffield–Leeds | 0:39–0:42 | 0:28 | 1 | 4 |
| Leeds–Hull | 0:57 | 0:38 | 1 | 2 |
| Leeds–Newcastle | 1:28–1:35 | 0:58 | 3 | 4 |
NPR has often been referred to in the press as "High Speed 3" or "HS3", in reference to the development ofhigh-speed rail in the United Kingdom. The first high-speed railway line to be built in Britain wasHigh Speed 1 (HS1), the route connecting London to theChannel Tunnel, which opened 2003–2007.[27] The southern phase of a second high-speed line namedHigh Speed 2 (HS2) is currently being constructed and is scheduled to come into service in the late 2020s.[28] The HS3 designation implies the development of a third high-speed rail route.
Historically, the use of the term High Speed 3 has been loose—the House of Lords'Economic Affairs Committee (March 2015) stated that there was no firm definition of the route implied by HS3:
Improvements to east-west links in the north of England have often been referred to as "HS3". This term has been used interchangeably to mean the connection between Leeds and Manchester or a longer route running from Liverpool to Hull via Manchester and Leeds. Such a railway would not necessarily need to be high-speed. [..] We refer to "east-west links" rather than "HS3" in this report as there is no clear indication yet what form or route the proposals might take or if the trains will be "high speed" in the same sense as HS2.
— The Economics of High Speed 2, Economic Affairs Committee (2015)[29]
In June 2014, at a speech given at theManchester Museum of Science and Industry, the incumbentChancellor of the Exchequer,George Osborne, proposed a high speed rail link between Leeds and Manchester; the line would utilise the existing route between Leeds and Manchester, with additional tunnels and other infrastructure. Osborne argued that the northern cities' influence was comparatively less than London's and that the link would promoteeconomies of agglomeration.[30][31][32]
Osborne suggested the line should be considered as part of a review of the second phase of High Speed 2.[30][33] Initial estimates suggested a rail line with a 140 miles per hour (230 km/h) line speed, and Leeds–Manchester journey times reduced to 30 minutes.[30] Osborne estimated the cost to be less per mile than that of HS2, giving a cost of under £6 billion.[34] Initial responses to the proposal were mixed: Jeremy Acklam of theInstitution of Engineering and Technology (IET) suggested that planners should look at connecting other northern cities such as Liverpool, and potentiallyNorth East England via York;[34] commentators noted that the proposal could be viewed as an attempt to gain political support in the north of England in the run-up to the2015 general election:[31][32] theInstitute of Economic Affairs characterised the proposal as a "headline grabbing vanity project designed to attract votes". TheBritish Chambers of Commerce,Confederation of British Industry and others were cautiously positive about the proposal, but emphasised the need to deliver on existing smaller scale schemes.[35]
On 5 August 2014, an alliance of six city councils—Leeds, Liverpool, Hull, Manchester, Newcastle upon Tyne andSheffield—unveiled an initial regional transport plan linking their cities called 'One North'.[36] This plan incorporated a new 125 miles per hour (201 km/h) trans-Pennine high speed rail link connecting to the northern branches of HS2 at Manchester and Leeds (30-minute journey time), together with other regional rail developments, and the bringing forward of the construction of the northern part of HS2, as part of a regional transport plan including other road, intermodal port, and rail freight improvements. The estimated cost of the high-speed Manchester–Leeds rail link was circa over £5bn, with a proposed completion date of 2030; the entire project was costed at £10bn to £15bn.[37] George Osborne attended the project launch, and provided his backing for the project.[38] A reportRebalancing Britain published byHigh Speed Two Limited in late 2014 also acknowledged the need for improved east–west transportation links in northern England, and recommended the progressing of the schemes in the 'One North' report.[39][40]
On 20 March 2015, the Department of Transport published plans for transport infrastructure improvements in the north of England, including proposals by the TfN working group;[41][42] the TransNorth report proposed a number of options for improved rail links between Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield, Newcastle and Hull with line speeds up to 140 miles per hour (230 km/h). The proposals included new-build routes between the major northern cities, with cost estimates from £5bn to £19bn, and estimated journey times of one half to two thirds of current routes; alternative upgrades of existing routes were costed in the £1bn to £7bn range, and had lesser journey time reductions, of the order of 10–15 minutes; the proposals were in addition to existingHigh Speed 2 route options for Liverpool and Sheffield-Leeds. The development options were planned forNetwork Rail Control Period 6 (2019–24).[43][44]
In March 2016, the newly established governmental advisory body, theNational Infrastructure Commission (NIC), chaired byLord Adonis, reported on transport infrastructure projects in the north of England. It recommended bringing forward HS3 proposals, beginning with the Manchester–Leeds section.[45][46] The NIC's report,High Speed North stated that "It takes longer to get from Liverpool to Hull by train than to travel twice the distance from London to Paris". It also recommended collaboration between TfN and HS2 Ltd on the design of the northern parts of HS2; and on the design of the improved Manchester Piccadilly station, together withManchester City Council and other rail bodies.[47] The Report suggested the development of a HS3 link after the completion of Network Rail's £2bn trans-Pennine electrification upgrade (scheduled to take place between 2015 and 2022, leading to 40-minute journey times).[48] A report byArup commissioned by the NIC studied additional improvements on the Manchester–Leeds route, focussing on theDiggle route (viaHuddersfield) utilising disused track plus new-build tunnels, and identified potential journey time savings of between 1 and 10 minutes.[49] A preliminary study by Network Rail did not rule out that the aspirational Leeds–Manchester journey time of 30 minutes could be achieved on theCalder Valley route.[50] TfN's aspirational Manchester–Manchester Airport and Leeds–Sheffield journey times were identified as being achievable by the HS2 scheme, with modifications to through running to Sheffield city centre.[51] At the2016 Budget, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, endorsed the general proposals by the National Infrastructure Commission for a high speed line between only Manchester and Leeds, with an aim of reducing journey times to 30 minutes between the two destinations.[52][53][54]
In August 2016, theInstitute of Public Policy Research urged the Government to prioritise HS3 over HS2.[55]
In August 2017, the former chancellor, George Osborne called for the Government to commit to NPR following backing ofCrossrail 2 and scrapping of electrification schemes in July 2017.[56]
Transport for the North is developing the NPR programme and is considering how the network forms part of the existing and future rail network of the north. £60M of funding was provided to generate plans for a route by 2017.
In October 2017, the then ChancellorPhilip Hammond allocated £300M to future-proof junctions between NPR and HS2, to allow east–west services to use HS2 infrastructure.[58] Later in the same month, it was proposed that an underground station forManchester Piccadilly should be built to accommodate the new services of up to eight trains per hour; an underground station would require less building work and still provide good links to HS2.[59]
In December 2017, TfN announced a proposal for a new project called NPR.[60] On 16 January 2018, TfN released their draft 30-year Strategic Transport Plan of staged developments for northern England.[61][62][63] It included NPR with proposals for
The outcome of the consultation on the draft Strategic Transport Plan should be an Outline Business Case, that was to have been submitted by the end of 2018.[65]
At Manchester Piccadilly, it is likely a new NPR station will be needed and options include a new underground station or a new surface turnback station. Between Manchester and Sheffield, TfN is currently looking at whether it can upgrade the existing line or whether a new line will be needed. Again, a Strategic Outline Business Case for NPR was to have been completed by the end of 2018, which was then delayed until 2020.[66] This was then further delayed until the publishing of the Integrated Rail Plan (IRP) in November 2021.[67]
NPR is being developed in addition to planned improvements including the Great North Rail Project.[68] HS2 Ltd and Network Rail have been commissioned by TfN to prepare engineering and costing studies on a range of rail infrastructure options. This could involve new and upgraded rail infrastructure. In addition to serving the six previously identified centres, work is also underway to develop options to serve Other Significant Economic Centres (OSECs). Options for NPR stations will also promote and integrate with masterplans and wider spatial plans, including Leeds Station and Manchester Piccadilly.[69]
In March 2019, it was announced a new commission had been established to plan a new £6bn city centre station in Liverpool to accommodate HS2 and NPR services.[70][71]
In July 2019, the then Prime MinisterBoris Johnson pledged to fund the Leeds to Manchester section of the NPR route as a first stage of NPR. It was also revealed that the plans would be published in the Autumn 2019, after the review of HS2 had concluded.[72] However, in September 2019, the NPR ministerJake Berry MP stated that a possible underground interchange at Manchester Piccadilly would inflate the cost of the project and lead to an offset of spend somewhere else on the project: "...spending an extra £6bn on that [Manchester Piccadilly underground] means we have to find £6bn that we won’t spend somewhere else - and that might be putting in the parkway station in Bradford. The people of Bradford, if they want to get to Leeds or Manchester, [would] have to get in their car and what we have to absolutely be doing is stopping people getting in their car."[73]
The site of anew through station at Bradford has been earmarked to be located on the current St James' Market, itself built upon the formerAdolphus Street station site. The current food market, which is said to have outgrown the site, would be moved elsewhere. There has been no detail of exactly how the railway lines would access the station, however, the railway part ofBradford Interchange would close.[74][75]
On 17 March 2023, the project was classified byHM Treasury as an "England and Wales" project, although no infrastructure for the project would be inWales. As a result of the classification, Wales would not receive aBarnett consequential of funding, estimated to be £1 billion, unlike Scotland and Northern Ireland. The UK Government said it would state the benefits in "due course" and it is "responsible for heavy rail infrastructure across England and Wales", therefore it spends the money directly for Wales rather than provide funds to the Welsh Government.Plaid Cymru described the decision as a push of "blatant lies", that the project "harms the Welsh economy" and that rail infrastructure should bedevolved to Wales. TheWelsh Liberal Democrats stated it is "very clearly not [an] England and Wales" project. The Welsh Government stated it should be classed as "England-only" and the current classification was "wrong".[76][77]
In the Technical Annex to the IRP the TfN proposals that had been considered were summarised as three options.[78]
• Option 1 was a mixture of new-build high-speed line, covering roughly half the route from Liverpool to Leeds, and upgrades to the existing lines into Leeds (via Huddersfield) and Liverpool (via Warrington Bank Quay) for the rest of the route.
• Option 2 was for an entirely new-build high-speed line between Leeds and Manchester, including a new station on the outskirts of Bradford; a new line from Warrington to Liverpool (with a parkway station at Warrington); and an underground Piccadilly station with a connection allowing it to be used for Sheffield services.
• Option 3 was the same as Option 2, but with a new central station underground at Warrington (still offering less convenient interchange to Bank Quay), and an underground station in the vicinity of the existing Bradford Interchange station.
The IRP chose Option 1.
In November 2021, the proposals were substantially curtailed with the publication of theIntegrated Rail Plan for the North and Midlands (IRP). It contained the proviso that:
In line with the Government's existing approach to rail enhancements, commitments will be made only to progress individual schemes up to the next stage of development, subject to a review of their readiness.
It announced the cancellation of the eastern leg of the HS2 project, and that NPR would be slimmed down.[94] The NPR line would now be built as a new high-speed line between Warrington, Manchester andMarsden. The rest of the line would be developed on existing routes, from Liverpool to Warrington via Ditton and the Fiddlers Ferry freight line and from Marsden to Leeds using theTransPennine line.[95]
The benefits of this plan compared to the previous proposals are stated as being that it would:
This announcement met with anger and disappointment from the Board of Transport for the North. However, they expressed a desire to work with the government. They laid out a number of criticisms.[96]
Doubt has been cast on the magnitude of the reduction in journey times claimed.[97]
7. HS3 between Leeds and Manchester : £60 million has been announced to develop plans to cut journey times to around 30 minutes between Leeds and Manchester, as well as improving transport connections between other cities in the north.
These trains will be able to run at speeds of 125 miles per hour but they also have the capability of running at 140 miles per hour if the network allows for it in the future.
Use the overlay slider to see the current site versus the Adolphus Street station site
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)| Africa |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asia |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Europe |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| America |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oceania | None | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* An asterisk indicates overlap with conventional services. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
