Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Nomen dubium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Doubtful name in taxonomy

Gadus callarias, an example ofnomen dubium, now considered a potentialsynonym or asubspecies ofG. morhua.

Inbinomial nomenclature, anomen dubium (Latin for "doubtful name", pluralnomina dubia) is a scientific name that is of unknown or doubtful application.

Zoology

[edit]

In case of anomen dubium, it may be impossible to determine whether a specimen belongs to that group or not. This may happen if the original type series (i.e.holotype,isotype,syntype orparatype) is lost or destroyed. The zoological and botanical codes allow for a new type specimen, orneotype, to be chosen in this case.

preserved specimen ofTritonellium barthiValenciennes, 1858 (nomen dubium)

A name may also be considered anomen dubium if itsname-bearing type is fragmentary or lacking important diagnostic features (this is often the case for species known only as fossils). To preserve stability of names, theInternational Code of Zoological Nomenclature allows a new type specimen, or neotype, to be chosen for anomen dubium in this case.

75.5. Replacement of unidentifiable name-bearing type by a neotype. When an author considers that the taxonomic identity of a nominal species-group taxon cannot be determined from its existing name-bearing type (i.e. its name is anomen dubium), and stability or universality are threatened thereby, the author may request the Commission to set aside under its plenary power [Art. 81] the existing name-bearing type and designate a neotype.[1]

For example, thecrocodile-likearchosaurian reptileParasuchus hislopiLydekker, 1885 was described based on apremaxillaryrostrum (part of the snout), but this is no longer sufficient to distinguishParasuchus from its close relatives. This made the nameParasuchus hislopi anomen dubium. In 2001 a paleontologist proposed that a new type specimen, a complete skeleton, be designated.[2] TheInternational Commission on Zoological Nomenclature considered the case and agreed in 2003 to replace the original type specimen with the proposed neotype.[3]

Bacteriology

[edit]

Inbacteriological nomenclature,nomina dubia may be placed on the list of rejected names by the Judicial Commission. The meaning of these names is uncertain. Other categories of names that may be treated in this way (rule 56a) are:[4]

  • ambiguous names,nomina ambigua, have been used with more than one meaning
  • names causing confusion,nomina confusa, are based on a mixed culture
  • perplexing names,nomina perplexa, confusingly similar names
  • perilous names,nomina periculosa, names that may lead to accidents endangering life or health or with potential serious economic consequences

Botany

[edit]

Inbotanical nomenclature the phrasenomen dubium has no status, although it is informally used for names whose application has become confusing. In this regard, its synonymnomen ambiguum is of more frequent use.[5] Such names may be proposed forrejection.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^International Code of Zoological NomenclatureArchived 24 May 2009 at theWayback Machine (4th edition, 1999)
  2. ^Case 3165,Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 58:1Archived 28 September 2007 at theWayback Machine, 30 March 2001.
  3. ^Opinion 2045,Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 60:2Archived 28 September 2007 at theWayback Machine, 30 June 2003.
  4. ^SP Lapage; PHA Sneath; EF Lessel; VBD Skerman; HPR Seeliger; WA Clark, eds. (1992). "Rules of Nomenclature with Recommendations".International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria: Bacteriological Code, 1990 Revision. ASM Press.
  5. ^"Type Definitions".Linnean Society. Retrieved20 October 2025.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nomen_dubium&oldid=1319373024"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp