Nolo contendere (/ˌnoʊloʊkənˈtɛndəri/) is a type of legal plea used in some jurisdictions in the United States. It is also referred to as aplea ofno contest orno defense. It is a plea where thedefendant neither admits nor disputes acharge, serving as an alternative to a pleading ofguilty ornot guilty. A no-contest plea means that defendants refuse to admit guilt but accept punishment as if guilty, and is often offered as a part of aplea bargain.[1]
The plea is recognized in United States federal criminal courts, and many state criminal courts. In many jurisdictions, a plea ofnolo contendere is not a typicalright and carries various restrictions on its use.Nolo contendere originated from theLatin phrase for "I do not wish to contend" (nōlō contendere,Latin pronunciation:[ˈnoːɫoːkɔnˈtɛndɛrɛ]).
In the United States, state law determines whether, and under what circumstances, a defendant may plead no contest in state criminal cases. In federal court, theFederal Rules of Criminal Procedure only allow anolo contendere plea to be entered with the court's consent; before accepting the plea, the court is required to "consider the parties' views and the public interest in the effective administration of justice".[2]
Anolo contendere plea has the sameimmediate effects as a plea of guilty, but may have differentresidual effects or consequences in future actions. For instance, a conviction arising from anolo contendere plea is subject to any and all penalties, fines, and forfeitures of a conviction from a guilty plea in the same case, and can be considered as an aggravating factor in future criminal actions. However, unlike a guilty plea, a defendant in anolo contendere plea may not be required toallocute the charges. This means that anolo contendere conviction typically may not be used to establish eithernegligenceper se,malice, or whether the acts were committed at all in later civil proceedings related to the same set of facts as the criminal prosecution.[3]
Under theFederal Rules of Evidence,[3][4] and in those states whose rules of evidence are similar or identical to them,nolo contendere pleas may not be used to defeat thehearsay prohibition if offered as an "admission by [a] party-opponent".[5] Assuming the appropriate gravity of the charge, and all other things being equal, a guilty plea to the same charge would cause the reverse effect: An opponent at trial could introduce the plea, over a hearsay objection, as evidence to establish a certain fact.[4]
Nolo contendere plea is similar to anAlford plea (also known as a "best interest plea"). An Alford plea allows a criminal defendant to formally record an admission of guilt for the charges, yet—at the same time— declare their innocence regarding those charges. Under an Alford plea, the defendant agrees to accept all the consequences of a guilty verdict—such as accepting punishment. An Alford plea bypasses the full process of a criminal trial.[6] The primary distinction between an Alford plea and anolo contendere plea is that, in an Alford plea, the defendant pleads guilty (in a formal sense) yet in anolo contendere plea, the defendant does not assert innocence or guilt. A formal admission of guilt under an Alford plea can be used against the defendant in future civil suits, whereas nolo contendere pleas cannot.[6]
InAlaska, a criminal conviction based on anolo contendere plea may be used against the defendant in futurecivil actions. TheAlaska Supreme Court ruled in 2006 that a "conviction based on a no contest plea will collaterallyestop the criminal defendant from denying any element in a subsequent civil action against him that was necessarily established by the conviction, as long as the prior conviction was for a serious criminal offense and the defendant in fact had the opportunity for a full and fair hearing".[7][8]
InCalifornia, anolo contendere plea is known as aWest plea after a seminal case involving plea bargains,People v. West (1970) 3 Cal.3d 595. The state Board of Pharmacy considers a plea ofnolo contendere to be deemed a conviction with regard to issuing licenses for pharmacies, pharmacists and drug wholesalers.
Anolo contendere plea to any felony is considered exactly equivalent to a guilty plea for the purposes of civil actions; this plea to any non-felony is not admissible to a civil action.[9]
InFlorida, theSupreme Court held in 2005 that no-contest convictions may be treated as prior convictions for the purposes of future sentencing.[10]
InMichigan, "Anolo contendere plea does not admit guilt, it merely communicates to the court that the criminal defendant does not wish to contest the state's accusations and will acquiesce in the imposition of punishment."[11] Anolo contendere plea may be appropriate "where the defendant would not be able to supply a sufficient factual basis for a guilty plea because he or she was intoxicated on the night of the incident, where there is the possibility of future civil litigation resulting from the offense, or where a defendant cannot remember the events which led to his or her being charged with a crime".[12]
A no contest plea prevents the court from eliciting a defendant's admission of guilt, but the result of the defendant's plea not to contest the charges against him or her is the same as if the defendant had admitted guilt. If a defendant pleads no contest to a charged offense, with the exception of questioning the defendant about his or her role in the charged offense, the court must proceed in the same manner as if the defendant had pleaded guilty.[13] A plea of no contest to a felony offense requires the court's consent.[14]
A defendant's no contest plea to criminal charges does notestop that defendant from denying responsibility in a later civil action arising from the same conduct.[15]
According toSouth Carolina code, the defendant in any misdemeanor case in any of the courts may enter a plea ofnolo contendere with the consent of the court. The plea of guilty will be recorded on defendant records and will not affect sentencing.[16]
InTexas, the right to appeal the results of aplea bargain taken from a plea of eithernolo contendere or "guilty" is highly restricted. Defendants who have entered a plea ofnolo contendere may only appeal the judgment of the court if the appeal is based on written pretrial motions ruled upon by the court.[17]
TheVirginia Rules of Evidence differ from the parallel federal rules in that anolo contendere plea entered in a criminal case is admissible in a related civil proceeding.[18]
In theCommonwealth countries—such as England and Wales, Scotland, Canada, and Australia—the plea ofnolo contendere is not permitted. The defendant must enter a plea of "guilty" or "not guilty". If a defendant refuses to enter a plea, the court will record a plea of "not guilty".[19]
Criminal procedure (investigation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criminal investigation | ||
| Criminal prosecution | ||
| Charges and pleas | ||
| Related areas | ||
