TheNodena phase is anarchaeological phase in easternArkansas and southeasternMissouri of the LateMississippian culture which dates from about 1400–1650 CE. The Nodena phase is known from a collection of villages along theMississippi River between theMissouri Bootheel andWapanocca Lake. They practiced extensivemaize agriculture andartificial cranial deformation and were members of a continent wide trade and religious network known as theSoutheastern Ceremonial Complex, which broughtchert,whelk shells, and other exotic goods to the area.
TheSpanishHernando de Soto Expedition is believed to have visited several sites in the Nodena phase in the early 1540s, which is usually identified as the Province ofPacaha.[1]
Nodena phase sites are found in three geographic subdistricts: theWilson-Joiner, theWapanocca Lake, and theBlytheville subdistricts.
The largest site in the Wapanocca Lake district is theBradley site (3 Ct 7). The Bradley Site and its nearby cluster of towns and villages (3 Ct 9, 3 Ct 43, 3 Ct 14, 3 Ct 17,Banks site) are considered good candidates for thePacaha capital and the other nearby villages visited by the de Soto expedition.[5]
Most pottery found at the Nodena sites is of theMississippian Bell Plain variety. It was buff colored, contains large fragments of groundmussel shell as a tempering agent, and is not as smooth and polished as other varieties. Other examples found there are much finer, with a finer ground shell as a temper, some instances being so finely ground as to look untempered. Shapes and decoration were varied in themortuary pottery, from brightly colored abstract spiral designs, to elaborateeffigy vessels depicting human heads, animals, and hunters and their prey. Pottery made by the Nodena people was built up from strips of clay, and then smoothed out by the potter, much like otherpottery in the Eastern America area where thepotters wheel was unknown. Slips usinggalena for white,hematite for red, and sometimesgraphite for black were used to paint the pottery, with a red on white swastika design being particularly popular. Sometimes incising was used (an example is the incisedraptor image on the effigy head pot pictured), although it is rare in Nodena pottery.[1] Women were probably the makers of pottery, as in most other Native American cultures. The grave of a woman at the Nodena site contained 11 polishing pebbles and a mushroom shaped pottery anvil.[1]
Nodena phase peoples traded with other groups to the west and northwest in theCrowley's Ridge andOzark Highlands areas for usable stone to make tools. Because of the conditions of thefloodplain geography where they lived, no stone was available locally.Chert,basalt, andsandstone were turned into a variety of tools such ascelts, chisels,adzes, abraders, hammerstones,hoes, drillbits,mortar and pestles, spear points, and arrow heads. A popular arrow head style is known as the Nodena point, a delicate leaf like shape. Sandstone was also ground and polished into a discoidal shape for use in the game ofchunkey.[1]
Nodena points are an exquisitely made willow leaf-shaped flint blades named for the Nodena site that are diagnostic of theLate Mississippian andProtohistoric periods over a large section of the American Midwest and South. Examples have been found inDallas phase sites inTennessee,Oneota sites inIowa andWisconsin,Caborn-Welborn culture sites inIndiana,Illinois, andKentucky, protohistoric Quapaw sites in Arkansas, as well as sites inAlabama, andFlorida. Two different types of Nodena points were made, the Nodena Elliptical and the Nodena Banks varieties. The Banks variety has a straight base, as opposed to the bi-point shape of the Nodena Elliptical. The Banks variety is named for theBanks site, near Wapanocca Lake (see illustration for distribution and diagram of types).[11]
The people of Nodena were intensely involved inmaize agriculture, as well as other food crops originating in the Americas, such asbeans,squash,sunflowers andgourds. They also gathered wild foodstuffs such aspecans andpersimmons. The de Soto chroniclers described the area as being under heavy cultivation, and the most populous they had seen inLa Florida. The Spaniards described groves of wild fruit and nut bearing trees, implying that the Nodena must have left them standing when clearing other trees for the cultivation ofmaize.[12] The hunting ofwhitetail deer,squirrel,rabbit,turkey, andmallard was practiced as well as fishing foralligator gar,catfish,drum, andmussels.[1]
The people of the Nodena phase practicedartificial cranial deformation orhead flattening. Shortly after infants were born, they were strapped to a special carrier which deformed their skulls as they grew. Many of the skeletal remains found at the Nodena site had deformed skulls, of the type defined as fronto-occipital deformation, flattening of the forehead and the back of the head. Of 123 skulls found by Dr. Hampson, only six could be considered "normal", meaning they did not show the signs of head deformation. The functioning of the brain is not affected by cranial deformation, but the overall shape of the skull bones is.[1] This practice was performed by many Native American tribes into historic times, including theChoctaw, although it later fell out of favor.
Family cemeteries with burials occurring in groups of 15 to 20 or more were found at some Nodena phase sites. Burials were in the extended position, lying on their backs, with most oriented on a north–south axis. The Nodena phase people also left grave offerings for the afterlife with their deceased. Graves included a bowl and a bottle near the heads of the deceased, usually of the finer variety of effigy pottery. Sometimes tools were also included, as one woman's grave contained pottery making implements.[1]
The peoples of Nodena were probablyTunican orSiouan speaking. It is known that theTunica were in the area at the time of the de Soto Entrada, and the related group of phases present in the region may have all been Tunican speakers, withCaddoan speakers to their west and south. But by the time of later Europeancontact in the 1670s and the beginning of the historic period, the area was occupied by theDhegiha Siouan speakingQuapaw. Attempts have been made to connect pottery styles and words from the de Soto narratives with historic tribes, but have so far been unsuccessful.[5]
Other contemporaneous groups in the area include theParkin phase,Tipton phase,Menard phase,Belle Meade phase andWalls phase. The archaeological and ethnohistorical records suggest that the groups were rival or politically allied polities, with no neutral parties, engaged in internecine conquest warfare. The presence ofpalisades, earthen embankments andmoats and the absence of isolated single-family dwellings and smaller hamlets among the local phases suggests such a state ofendemic warfare existed. According to the de Soto narratives, Pacaha had been at war for some time with a neighboring group, theCasqui. The Casqui are thought to have had their principal town at a site nearParkin at the location of the present-dayParkin Archeological State Park. Differences in pottery manufacture and burial customs found by archaeologists suggest the two groups had been isolated from each other for quite some time. The narratives record that the Pacaha and Casqui claimed they had been at war for many generations. The many years of fighting had led to a stalemate, where neither group was able to get the upper hand. Attacks were only carried out when the aggressor felt confident of success. The Pacaha controlled more territory and had a larger population than the Casqui. Chief Pacaha was younger than the Casqui chief, however, and seemingly had more to lose from the continued aggressive Casqui attacks.
Other groups mentioned in the narratives were clearlyvassal states of the Pacaha polity. Two such groups were theAquixo and theQuizquiz, now identified as the Belle Meade and Walls phase peoples.[13]
De Soto encountered the Casqui tribe first. When he pressed on to visit the Pacaha, many of the Casqui people followed him. Many of the Pacaha, seeing the approach of their enemy, fled to a fortified island in the river, with many drowning in the attempt. The Casqui who had followed de Soto proceeded to sack the village, desecrate the temple and the remains of the Pacahahonored dead, and steal everything they could. Approximately one hundred and fifty Pacaha warriors were decapitated and their heads placed on poles outside the temple, replacing the heads of Casqui warriors.[13]
De Soto contacted Chief Pacaha and convinced him that he had nothing to do with the attack and that the expedition's intentions were peaceful. De Soto even assured the Pacaha that the expedition would help the Pacaha attack the Casqui to punish them for their subterfuge. The Casqui received advance warning of the planned attack and decided to return the looted items and issue an apology in order to stave off retribution from the combined Spanish and Pacaha force. De Soto arranged a dinner for the two leaders and arranged a peace treaty between the two groups. As a gesture of gratitude for the arrangement of peace and also to outdo his rival, who had only presented a daughter to de Soto, Chief Pacaha presented de Soto with one of his wives, one of his sisters, and another woman from his tribe. The de Soto expedition stayed at Pacaha's village for approximately 40 days.
The Hernando de Soto expedition records are the only historical records of Chief Pacaha and his people. Their later history remains uncertain. By the time of the next documented European presence in the area in 1673 by theMarquette andJolliet expedition, the region was populated sparsely by theQuapaw. The introduction of European diseases such assmallpox andmeasles[14] and the upsetting of the local balance of power by the Spaniards is thought to have contributed to the depopulation of the region described by the de Soto expedition as the most populous they had seen inLa Florida.[12]
In Aquixo, and Casqui, and Pacaha, they saw the best villages seen up to that time, better stockaded and fortified, and the people were of finer quality, excepting those ofCofitachequi.
— RODRIGO RANJEL 1547–49[15]
Attempts have been made to link the Nodena people to historic groups by analyzing words recorded in the de Soto narratives and pottery from archaeological sites. Because of their presence in the area, the Quapaw were long considered a viable candidate. More recent analysis has focused on theTunica people, who were living in the LowerYazoo River valley by the late 17th century.
| Middle Mississippian |
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Appalachian Mississippian |
| ||||||||||
| Fort Walton culture | |||||||||||
| Pensacola culture | |||||||||||
| Plaquemine Mississippian | |||||||||||
| Caddoan Mississippian | |||||||||||
| Upper Mississippian cultures |
| ||||||||||
| Culture |
| ||||||||||
