Nicos Poulantzas | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | (1936-09-21)21 September 1936 |
| Died | 3 October 1979(1979-10-03) (aged 43) Paris, France |
| Education | University of Athens (LL.B., 1957) University of Munich[1] University of Heidelberg[1] University of Paris (PhD, 1964) |
| Era | 20th-century philosophy |
| Region | Western philosophy |
| School | Continental philosophy Western Marxism Structural Marxism |
| Institutions | University of Paris VIII |
Main interests | Political philosophy |
Notable ideas | The relative autonomy of the state from the capitalist class |
Nicos Poulantzas (Greek:Νίκος Πουλαντζάς[ˈnikospulanˈd͡zas]; 21 September 1936 – 3 October 1979) was a Greek-French Marxistpolitical sociologist and philosopher. In the 1970s, Poulantzas was known, along withLouis Althusser, as a leadingstructural Marxist; while at first aLeninist, he eventually became a proponent of the "democratic road to socialism."[2][3] He is best known for his theoretical work on the state, but he also offeredMarxist contributions to the analysis offascism,social class in the contemporary world, and the collapse of dictatorships in Southern Europe in the 1970s, such asFrancisco Franco's rule in Spain,António de Oliveira Salazar's in Portugal, andGeorgios Papadopoulos' in Greece.
Poulantzas studied law in Greece and moved to France in 1961; there he completed a doctorate in the philosophy of law[4] under the titleThe rebirth of natural Law in Germany (La renaissance du droit naturel en Allemagne) in 1964.[1] He taught sociology at theUniversity of Paris VIII from 1968 until his death. He was married to the French novelistAnnie Leclerc [fr] and had one daughter. He committed suicide in 1979 by jumping from the window of a friend's flat in Paris.[5]
 | This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(May 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Poulantzas's theory of the state reacted to what he saw as simplistic understandings within Marxism.Instrumentalist Marxist accounts held that the state was simply an instrument in the hands of a particularclass. Poulantzas disagreed with this because he saw the capitalist class as too focused on its individual short-term profit, rather than on maintaining the class's power as a whole, to simply exercise the whole of state power in its own interest. Poulantzas argued that the state, though relatively autonomous from the capitalist class, nonetheless functions to ensure the smooth operation of capitalist society, and therefore benefits the capitalist class. In particular, he focused on how an inherently divisive system such as capitalism could coexist with the social stability necessary for it to reproduce itself—looking in particular to nationalism as a means to overcome the class divisions within capitalism. Poulantzas has been particularly influential over the Marxist state theorist,Bob Jessop.
Borrowing fromAntonio Gramsci's notion ofcultural hegemony, Poulantzas argued that repressing movements of the oppressed is not the sole function of the state. Rather, state power must also obtain the consent of the oppressed. It does this through class alliances, where the dominant group makes an "alliance" with subordinate groups as a means to obtain the consent of the subordinate group. In his later works, Poulantzas analysed the role of what he termed the "new petty bourgeoisie" in both consolidating the ruling classeshegemony and undermining the proletariat's ability to organise itself. By occupying a contradictory class position—that is to say, by identifying with itsde facto oppressor—this fraction of the working class throws its lot in with the bourgeois whose fate it (wrongly) believes it shares. The fragmentation (some would argue the demise) of the class system is, for Poulantzas, a defining characteristic of late capitalism, and any politically useful analysis must tackle this new constellation of interests and power. A highly abbreviated example of this can be seen in a Poulantzas-influenced analysis of theNew Deal in theUnited States: the American ruling class, by acceding to some of the demands oflabour (things likeminimum wage,labour laws, etc.), helped cement an alliance between labour and a particular fraction of capital and the state (Levine 1988). This was necessary for the continued existence of capitalism, for if the ruling class had simply repressed the movements and avoided making any concessions, it could have led to asocialist revolution.
| This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Nicos Poulantzas" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(May 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Poulantzas provides a nuanced analysis of class structure in an era when the internationalisation of production systems (today "globalisation") was shifting power from labour to capitalist classes. In many areas, he foresaw the current debate on the critical Marxian language of class, bourgeoisie, and hegemony finds little echo in contemporary political science, where its positivism requires researchers to focus on putative measurable and objective entities.
The officialthink-tank ofSYRIZA, a left-wing Greek political party, is called theNicos Poulantzas Institute.[6]
Formulated by Poulantzas, the "democratic road to socialism" refers to a form ofdemocratic socialism that commits to pluralistrepresentative democracy alongside an extension ofparticipatory democracy. This understanding breaks from some forms of socialism that perceived traditional representative democracy as inherentlybourgeois, instead recognizing political liberties in representative democracies as "the result of popular struggles." The democratic road to socialism maintains that representative democracy "helps reproduce the capitalist state regime, but it also reaffirms social rights."[7]:23 Furthermore, the democratic road to socialism extends participatory democracy through the expansion of trade unions, territorial assemblies, andsocialist communitarianism.[7]:24
