Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
United States law

TheNewspaper Preservation Act of 1970 was an Act of theUnited States Congress, signed by PresidentRichard Nixon, authorizing the formation of joint operating agreements among competingnewspaper operations within the samemedia market area. It exempted newspapers from certain provisions ofantitrust laws. Its drafters argued that this would allow the survival of multiple daily newspapers in a given urban market where circulation was declining. This exemption stemmed from the observation that the alternative is usually for at least one of the newspapers, generally the one published in the evening, to cease operations altogether.

In practice two daily newspapers published in the same city or geographic area combine business operations while maintaining separate—and competitive—news operations.

History

[edit]

The first joint operating agreement was betweenAlbuquerque Tribune (then theNew Mexico State Tribune) and theAlbuquerque Journal inAlbuquerque, New Mexico, signed on February 20, 1933. Their agreement became typical of the type—both papers were printed on the same presses at different times of day.Classified advertising sales were consolidated, as were distributionagents. A joint entity to perform these functions was created, with equal representation on its board from both papers. Newsgathering and editorial operations remained completely separate, although located under one roof in different portions of the same building.

Arrangements similar to this allowed most medium-sized United States cities to have two daily newspapers until fairly recently. The number of joint operating agreements, as well as the number of evening-published daily newspapers, has declined considerably in recent years, due to the ongoing consolidation of the newspaper industry as a whole, and the decline in readership and interest in evening newspapers in particular, which many observers have attributed to television and the internet, of which the former seems to be magnified by the presence of several 24-hour-a-day news operations oncable television. There have been 28 Joint Operating Agreements to date. TheChattanooga Times and theChattanooga News-Free Press's joint operating agreement became the first to be terminated on August 27, 1966.[1][2]

The Newspaper Preservation Act was touted as a relief measure to allow multiple newspapers competing in the same market to cut costs, thus ensuring that no one paper could have supremacy in the market by driving the other(s) out of business. However, mounting evidence suggests the passage of the Act was less about protecting editorial diversity within community newspaper markets than about inflating the profit margins of national newspaper chains.[3] Large newspaper chains were able to sustain high profits while driving independent newspapers out of business, or forcing them to sell their stake to a chain.[3] In fact, PresidentRichard M. Nixon initially opposed the passage of the act (as had his predecessor,Lyndon B. Johnson) as being antithetical to the essential practices and character offree marketcapitalism.

He reversed himself upon receiving a letter from Richard E. Berlin, CEO of theHearst chain of newspapers and magazines.[4] In the 1969 letter, Berlin intimated that failure of the law to pass would carry political consequences and hinted that support from Nixon would conversely help the President and his allies. TheNixon Administration supported the Act's passage, and in the1972 Presidential Campaign, every Hearst newspaper endorsed Nixon for reelection.[3][4]

Cities with newspaper joint operating agreements

[edit]

Cities with terminated newspaper joint operating agreements

[edit]

See also

[edit]
  • Stephen Barnett—law professor who campaigned against the Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970

References

[edit]
  • Busterna, John C.; Picard, Robert G. (1993).Joint Operating Agreements: The Newspaper Preservation Act and Its Application. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.ISBN 9780893919948.
  1. ^"Newspaper Marks 10 Years Since Sales, Merger".Chattanooga Times Free Press. January 4, 2009. RetrievedJune 26, 2012.
  2. ^"Choice Now In Chattanooga".Tuscaloosa News. August 28, 1966. RetrievedJune 26, 2012.
  3. ^abcBagdikian, Ben H. (2004).The New Media Monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press. pp. 204–217.ISBN 9780807061879.
  4. ^abWoodward, Tali; Redmond, Tim (May 10, 2000)."The Publishers' Six Big Lies: A Federal Trial Shows How SF's Daily Newspapers Have Misled the Public for Decades"(Word).San Francisco Bay Guardian. RetrievedJune 26, 2012.
  5. ^Richman, Dan; James, Andrea (March 16, 2009)."Seattle P-I to publish last edition Tuesday".The Seattle Post-Intelligencer. RetrievedMarch 16, 2009.
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(May 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Statutes and
regulations
Supreme Court
case law
Sherman Antitrust Act
Section 1 case law
Sherman Antitrust Act
Section 2 case law
OtherSherman
Antitrust Act
cases
Interstate Commerce Act
case law
Clayton Antitrust Act
case law
FTC Act case law
Robinson–Patman Act
case law
Other cases
Other federal
case law
Ongoing
litigation ‡
Related topics
‡ date of filing
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Newspaper_Preservation_Act_of_1970&oldid=1294311911"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp