New Zealand First | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Abbreviation | NZ First NZF |
| Leader | Winston Peters |
| President | Julian Paul[1] |
| Secretary | Holly Howard[2] |
| Deputy Leader | Shane Jones |
| Founded | 18 July 1993; 32 years ago (18 July 1993) |
| Split from | National Party |
| Ideology | |
| Colours | Black |
| House of Representatives | 8 / 123 |
| Website | |
| nzfirst | |
New Zealand First (Māori:Aotearoa Tuatahi), commonly abbreviated toNZ First[3] orNZF, is aright-wing populistpolitical party in New Zealand, founded and led byWinston Peters, who has served three times asdeputy prime minister. The party has formedcoalition governments with both major political parties in New Zealand: with theNew Zealand National Party from 1996 to 1998 and 2023 to present, and with theNew Zealand Labour Party from 2005 to 2008 and 2017 to 2020. New Zealand First currently serves in a coalition government with both National andACT New Zealand as part of theSixth National government, having won 6.08% of the total party vote in the2023 New Zealand general election.
New Zealand First was formed shortly before the1993 New Zealand general election, following the resignation of Winston Peters as the National Party MP forTauranga after criticising the party'sneoliberaleconomic policies.[4] The party gained support from National Party and Labour voters alike disenchanted with the support of both parties for extensivederegulation. New Zealand First entered theNew Zealand House of Representatives shortly after its formation. The party had 17members of parliament (MPs) at its peak, following the1996 New Zealand general election, the first to usemixed-member proportional representation. That election the party swept theMāori seats, leading to the "Tight Five" of New Zealand First MPs from those electorates. The party had gained considerable support among socially conservativeMāori voters,[5][6][7] an association still visible today.[8][9] By the end of their first term, however, the New Zealand First caucus had fallen to nine MPs due tointernal conflict over the coalition government with the National Party.
After agreeing aconfidence and supply with Labour in2005, the party left parliament following the2008 New Zealand general election in which it failed to gain enoughparty votes to retain seats. However, in the2011 New Zealand general election, New Zealand First gained 6.59% of the total party vote, entitling it to eight MPs. The party increased its number of MPs to eleven at the2014 New Zealand general election. During the2017 election, the party's number of MPs dropped to nine members.[10] In the weeks following the 2017 election, New Zealand First formed acoalition government with the Labour Party.[11] In the2020 election New Zealand First's share of the party vote fell to 2.6%, with all incumbent MPs, including Peters, losing their seats in Parliament.[12] The party returned to parliament in 2023.[13]
New Zealand First distinguishes itself from the mainstreampolitical establishment through its use ofpopulist rhetoric, and supports bindingreferendums on major social and political issues.
In June 1992, Winston Peters, a formerMinister of Māori Affairs in theNational Party government ofJim Bolger, was told that he would not be allowed to run for another term as National Party Member of Parliament forTauranga in the1993 election.[14][15] Peters had previously been dismissed from the Cabinet in 1991, after he publicly criticised National's economic policy, colloquially dubbedRuthanasia.[14] Spearheaded by Minister of FinanceRuth Richardson, National arguably had gone beyond theextensive deregulation started by theNew Zealand Labour Party in the 1980s, enacting widespread austerity and slashing benefits in theMother of All Budgets of 1991. The budget cut spending on many of thewelfare state institutions established in the 1930s by theFirst Labour Government. The unemployment benefit was cut by $14.00 a week, sickness benefit by $27.04, families benefit by $25.00 to $27.00 and universal payments for family benefits were completely abolished.[16] After the death of protectionist former Prime MinisterRobert Muldoon – who resigned from hisTamaki constituency in protest – Peters became Ruthanasia's leading opponents, and National's most prominent dissenter.[14]
By late 1991, the National Party had become the most unpopular governing party since theGreat Depression, with one poll result putting themas low as 22%. After his sacking, Peters decided to capitalise on National's unpopularity.[17] On 19 March 1993, Peters resigned from the National Party.[14][18] He also resigned from Parliament, triggeringa by-election in his electorate on 17 April 1993 in which he stood as anindependent, winning with 90.8% of votes due to neitherLabour nor National running a candidate.[19] On 18 July 1993, shortly beforethe writs were issued forthat year's general election, Peters formed New Zealand First as a political grouping.[20][21] At the time of its formation, New Zealand First's policy platform was broadlyconservative andreactionary in that it opposed bothLabour and National, the majorcentre-left andcentre-right parties respectively. Peters claimed to be reviving National policies from which theBolger government had departed.[20]
Variably dubbed asocial conservative,economic nationalist, orright-wing populist,[22] Peters' rise was fuelled by the enormous financial changes New Zealand underwent during the 1980s and 90s, during which time the economy was thoroughlyderegulated by both the Labour Party and the National Party. A fierce opponent of bothneoliberalism andprogressivism, Peters gained support from both National Party and Labour voters disenchanted with the support of both parties foreconomic liberalisation.[23] As Peters was aMāori conservative,[24][5][25] he gained strong support particularly from socially conservativeMāori voters who had voted Labour consistently until they began enforcing neoliberal policies, colloquially calledRogernomics. The party was soon widely regarded as having a distinct Māori character or even being "pro-Māori".[26]
In the April 1993special by-election,Tauranga voters re-elected Peters as an independent. At the general election six months later, New Zealand First received 8.4% of the total vote.[27] Peters easily retainedTauranga, andTau Henare, another New Zealand First candidate, won theNorthern Māori seat, giving the party a total of two MPs. This did much to counter the perception of New Zealand First as merely a personality-driven vehicle for Peters.
With the switch to themixed-member proportional (MMP) electoral system for the1996 election, smaller parties could gain a share of seats proportional to their share of the vote. Before the election, New Zealand First was polling unprecedentedly highly due to the popularity of its leader, Winston Peters. At its peak, New Zealand First was polling at 29% support on 16 May 1996.[28]
This enabled New Zealand First to win 13% of the vote and 17 seats, including all fiveMāori electorates. New Zealand First's five Māori MPs—Tau Henare (the party's deputy leader),Tuku Morgan,Rana Waitai,Tu Wyllie andTuariki Delamere—became known as the "Tight Five".[29]
The election result put New Zealand First in a powerful position just three years after its formation. Neither of the two traditional major parties (National andLabour) had enough seats to govern alone, and only New Zealand First had enough seats to become a realisticcoalition partner for either. This placed the relatively new party in a position where it was the kingmaker, a position which allowed the party to effectively choose the nextPrime Minister of New Zealand.
New Zealand First entered into negotiations with both major parties. Before the election, most people (including many New Zealand First voters) had expected Peters to enter into coalition withLabour. In fact, he harshly attacked his formerNational colleagues during the campaign, and appeared to promise that he would not even consider going into coalition with them.[30]
To the surprise of the electorate, which had apparently voted for New Zealand First to get rid of National, New Zealand First decided to enter a coalitionwith National, enabling and becoming part of the third term of thefourth National government. The most common explanation for this decision involved National's willingness to accept New Zealand First's demands (and/or Labour's refusal to do so). However,Michael Laws (a former National Party MP who served as a New Zealand First campaign manager) claims that Peters had secretly decided to go with National significantly before this time, and that he merely used negotiations with Labour to encourage more concessions from National.[31]
Whatever the case, New Zealand First exacted a high price from Bolger in return for allowing him to stay in power. Under the terms of a detailed coalition agreement, Peters would serve asDeputy Prime Minister, and would also hold the specially created office ofTreasurer (senior to theMinister of Finance). National also made considerable concessions on policy. Unusually for a junior coalition partner in a Westminster system (especially one as new as New Zealand First), Peters was free to select the ministers from his own party, without Bolger's oversight.[32]
New Zealand First had a relatively smooth coalition relationship with National at first. Despite early concerns about the ability of Peters to work with Bolger, who had sacked him from cabinet during his time asMinister of Māori Affairs in 1991,[14][15] the two did not have major problems. New Zealand First had graver concerns about the behaviour of some of its MPs. A particularly damaging scandal involvedTuku Morgan, which consisted of him allegedly spending $4000 in public funds on clothing,[33] though theSerious Fraud Office later did not find him guilty offraud.[34]
Gradually, however, the coalition tensions became more significant than problems of party discipline. This became increasingly the case afterTransport MinisterJenny Shipley gained enough support within the National party room to force Bolger's resignation[35] and to subsequently become New Zealand's first woman Prime Minister on 8 December 1997. The tensions between the two parties also rose as New Zealand First adopted a more aggressive approach to promoting its policies (including those National would not implement). This new attitude probably fed off New Zealand First's poor performance inopinion polls, which (to Peters) indicated that the party's success rested on its confrontational style. Many commentators believe that Peters performs better inopposition than in government.
On 14 August 1998, Shipley sacked Peters fromCabinet. This occurred after an ongoing dispute about the sale of the government's stake inWellington International Airport,[36] directly in conflict with New Zealand First's general commitment to not sell off state assets.
Peters immediately tore up the coalition agreement. However, several other MPs, unwilling to follow Peters into opposition and wanting to continue to support a National-led government, tried to replace Peters as Leader of New Zealand First withTau Henare, the then-Deputy Leader. This caucus-room coup failed, and Henare eventually led four other New Zealand First MPs in forming a new party,Mauri Pacific, which was a self-proclaimedmulticultural party. Three others established themselves asindependents. All eight departing MPs continued to support a National-ledminority government. Many of these MPs had come under public scrutiny for their behaviour.[citation needed] Until the dissolution ofParliament in 1999, they provided Shipley with enough parliamentary support to stay in government without New Zealand First.[37]
In the1999 election New Zealand First lost much of its support, receiving only 4% of the party vote.[38] Some voters had not forgiven Peters for forming a coalition with National after being led to believe that a vote for him would help get rid of National, and others likely changed their vote due to the instability within the party's ranks. Whatever the case, New Zealand First's support tailed off enough that it was nearly ejected from parliament. Under New Zealand's MMP system, a party must either win an electorate seat or 5% of the vote to qualify for list seats. Peters held his Tauranga electorate by a mere 63 votes after losing almost 20 percent of his vote from 1996, and New Zealand First received five seats in total.[39]
By the2002 New Zealand general election, however, the party had rebuilt much of its support. This occurred largely because of Peters' three-point campaign for sensible immigration, scrutinising Treaty costs, and reducing crime.[citation needed] The party won 10.38% of the vote, which was a considerable improvement on its previous performance (although not as good as its performance in 1996), and New Zealand First won thirteen seats in parliament.[40] Peters' campaign slogan "Can We Fix It? Yes We Can"[41] attracted much media attention, as the same line appears in theme music for the children's television programmeBob the Builder. Party activists stated they were unaware the chant came from a children's cartoon.[42] In the end, New Zealand First gained 8 seats inParliament after the election, earning 13 MPs in total (including 1 electorate MP): Winston Peters,Peter Brown,Brian Donnelly,Ron Mark,Doug Woolerton,Barbara Stewart,Pita Paraone,Craig McNair,Jim Peters,Dail Jones,Edwin Perry,Bill Gudgeon, andBrent Catchpole.
It appears that New Zealand First had hoped to play in 2002 a similar role to the one it had in 1996, where it found itself able to give power to either Labour or National depending on which offered the best deal. However,National's support, under the leadership of futurePrime MinisterBill English, had collapsed to its worst result in the party's history, to the extent that it could not form a government even with New Zealand First's support, depriving the party of its hoped kingmaker position. In the end, however, this proved irrelevant, as Labour refused to consider an alliance with New Zealand First in any case[citation needed]. Instead, Labour relied on support from the newly significantUnited Future.
After the 2002 election, in light ofNational's decreased strength, New Zealand First attempted to gain more prominence inOpposition, frequently attacking theLabour-ledCoalition government on a wide range of issues. Speculation has occurred on efforts to create a more united front linking New Zealand First, theNew Zealand National Party, andACT New Zealand, but Peters has rejected this scenario, saying that the New Zealand voters will decide what alliances are necessary. Unlike the classical-liberalACT New Zealand, which portrays itself as a naturalcoalition partner for theNew Zealand National Party, New Zealand First welcomed the potential for acoalition government with any parliamentarypolitical party.
For a period in early 2004 New Zealand First experienced a brief decline in the polls afterDon Brash became leader of theNational Party, a change which hugely revived National's fortunes after the controversial but highly popularOrewa Speech. The votes that had apparently switched to New Zealand First from National seemed to return to supportDon Brash, and many commentators predicted that New Zealand First would lose a number of its seats in the next election[citation needed]. By 2005, however, the proportions had changed again, and as the campaign for the September 2005 election got under way, New Zealand First had again reached the 10% mark inopinion polling for the 2005 election.
Pre-election polls put New Zealand First ahead of the other minor parties. Some thought it likely that in the event of aNational minority orplurality, unlessACT's fortunes dramatically improved, Don Brash would have to form a second coalition or seek a support agreement with New Zealand First to be able to form agovernment. Peters promised to support the party that won the most seats, or at least abstain inno-confidence motions against it. However, he also said he would not support anygovernment that included theGreens withinCabinet.
In the2005 election, however, the smaller political parties (including New Zealand First) suffered a severe mauling. Though it remained the third-largest party in the House, New Zealand First took only 5.72% of the vote, a considerable loss from 2002, and just enough to cross theMMP proportionality quota of 5%. In addition, Peters narrowly lost his previouslysafe constituency seat ofTauranga by 730 votes to National'sBob Clarkson, and became alist MP. New Zealand First lost six seats inParliament, earning 7 MPs, all elected on theparty list: Winston Peters, Peter Brown,Dail Jones,Ron Mark,Doug Woolerton,Barbara Stewart andPita Paraone.
Following the2005 election, New Zealand First agreed to asupply-and-confidence agreement with the New Zealand Labour Party (along withUnited Future) in return for policy concessions including theSuperGold Card and the portfolio ofForeign Affairs outsideCabinet for Winston Peters. Peters becomingMinister of Foreign Affairs detected a change in his attitude since Peters' "Rotorua speech" on 7 September 2005 at a public address at the Rotorua Convention Centre had spoken of New Zealand First sitting on thecross-benches (and thus staying out ofgovernment) and eschewing "the baubles of office".[43] Peters' coalition partnership with the centre-left Labour Party was in spite of his increasingly right-wing populist rhetoric aroundemigration from Asia (which was at odds with Labour's policies).[44][45] Peters has previously warned of an "Asian invasion" ofAsian migrants (against the evidence suggested by statistical trends). In 2005 he called New Zealand "the last Asian colony",[44] and referred to Asian immigration as an “imported criminal activity” that would cause "chaos" to race relations.[46]
Soon after the2005 New Zealand general election, Winston Peters launched a legal challenge againstBob Clarkson, alleging that he had spent more than the legal limit allowed for campaign budgets during elections in New Zealand. This legal bid failed, with a majority of the judges in the case declaring thatBob Clarkson had not overspent during the campaign for theTauranga electorate. In the2005 election funding controversy, theAuditor-General found that all the parties in parliament except theProgressive Party had misspent parliamentary funding. New Zealand First was the only party that did not repay the misspent funding.[47]
New Zealand First achieved many policy initiatives during this term, most notably the introduction of the SuperGold Card, a policy which was unpopular among many political leaders due to its high cost. The SuperGold Card was targeted towards seniors, and included free off-peak travel, and discounts from thousands of New Zealand businesses. AsMinister of Foreign Affairs,Minister for Racing and Associate Minister for Senior Citizens, Peters secured additional funding for "New Zealand to expand its international presence" in the2007 budget,[48] as well as in the2008 budget additional benefits for SuperGold Card holders including funding forhearing aids, investments into the Pacific Cooperation Foundation and Asia-New Zealand Foundation, additional funding for prize money in the racing industry totalling $9m, and a large funding increase for theMinistry of Foreign Affairs and Trade once again.[49]
AsMinister of Foreign Affairs, Winston Peters' most notable actions included a diplomatic mission toPapua New Guinea and meeting withUnited States Secretary of StateCondoleezza Rice.[50][51]
In the months before the2008 general election, New Zealand First became embroiled in a dispute over donations to the party from billionaireOwen Glenn, the Vela family andBob Jones. This resulted in an investigation into party finances by theSerious Fraud Office on the 28th of August 2008 and an investigation into Peters by thePrivileges Committee.[52] On 29 August 2008 Peters stood down from his ministerial roles after significant pressure, while the investigations by theSerious Fraud Office andPrivileges Committee proceeded.[53] Although theSerious Fraud Office and the police found that Peters was not guilty of any wrongdoing, thePrivileges Committee decided that Peters knowingly misled Parliament by not declaring the donation,[54] and censured Peters, which he called a "useless facade."[54] The whole scandal harmed New Zealand First's polling in the lead-up to the election, and is widely attributed to its defeat.[55]
During the scandal, thenLeader of the OppositionJohn Key took the opportunity to rule out working with Peters and New Zealand First, which likely contributed further to the party's defeat. As expected,Prime MinisterHelen Clark did not rule out working with New Zealand First.
On election night it was clear that Peters had not regainedTauranga after his last loss of the electorate in the2005 election, and that the party had not met the 5% threshold needed for parties to be elected without an electorate seat. In what some journalists described as a 'gracious' concession speech, Peters said that 'it's not over yet. We'll reorganise ourselves in the next few months. And we'll see what 2011 might hold for all us.''[56]
At a post-election meeting held to discuss the party's future in February 2009, long-serving Deputy LeaderPeter Brown stepped down.[57]
At the beginning of the election campaign New Zealand First was polling at around 2% in most major polls and was effectively written off by most political commentators. Prime MinisterJohn Key had once again ruled out working with Peters and New Zealand First, however thenLeader of the OppositionPhil Goff had stated he was open to working with New Zealand First post-election provided they made it back into Parliament.[citation needed]
Peters received a significant amount of media attention towards the end of the campaign at the height of theTea Tape scandal which arose during the campaign. Peters had criticised the arrangement in theseat of Epsom between National andACT in which National encouraged its supporters to vote for the ACT candidate for their electorate MP. He railed against National for alleged negative remarks made about the then ACT leaderDon Brash and New Zealand First's elderly supporters.[citation needed]
Peters appeared on a TVNZ minor parties leaders debate and won the debate convincingly in the subsequent text poll, with a plurality of 36% of the respondents saying Peters had won.[58]
New Zealand First won 6.6% of the party vote on election night.[59] Many political experts credit theTea tape scandal for the re-entry of New Zealand First into Parliament; however, Peters himself credits the return to Parliament to the hard work undertaken by the Party over the three years it was not represented in Parliament.
In 2012 the party sacked MPBrendan Horan after allegations he stole money from his dying mother to gamble.[60]
In 2012, New Zealand First stated their intent to work in coalition with parties that would buy the privatised state assets back after the2014 general election.[61]
New Zealand First entered the 2014 general election campaign without providing a clear indication as to their coalition preferences. However, Peters did raise late in the campaign the prospect of a Labour-New Zealand First coalition or confidence and supply arrangement, and express some respect for the National Party, in particular the Finance MinisterBill English.[62]
New Zealand First increased its party vote to 8.66% at the election, which took the party's representation in Parliament to 11 seats. Peters was highly critical of the conduct of theLabour andGreen parties, who he blamed for the Opposition's loss.[63]
In 2015 Peters contested theNorthland by-election, which was held as a result of the resignation of the incumbentMike Sabin on 30 January 2015 amid allegations of assault. Peters won the traditionally safe National seat with a majority of 4,441 over the National candidate Mark Osborne. It was the first time a New Zealand First MP held an electorate seat since Peters lostTauranga in 2005. The win also resulted in New Zealand First acquiring a new List MP,Ria Bond, which increased the party's parliamentary representation to 12 seats.
On 3 July 2015Ron Mark was elected Deputy Leader of New Zealand First, replacingTracey Martin who had held the post since 2013.[64]
Peters has said that he will continue on as the Leader of New Zealand First. New Zealand First launched its campaign inPalmerston North on 25 June 2017. Policies include ring-fencing GST to the regions it is collected from and writing off student loans of people willing to work outside major centres, and recruiting 1,800 extra police officers.[65] New Zealand First is also campaigning on increasing the minimum wage to $17.[66] They would later increase it to $20.[67] On 28 June 2017, New Zealand First changed their logo that they have used since its formation in 1993, giving the new design the name "A Fresh Face".[68]
In early July 2017, theGreen Party co-leaderMetiria Turei criticised New Zealand First for its alleged racist attitude towards immigration.[69] Her criticism was echoed by fellow Green MPBarry Coates, who claimed that the Greens would call for a snap election in response to a Labour–New Zealand First coalition government.[70] In response, Peters and Deputy LeaderTracey Martin warned that Turei and Coates' comments could affect post-election negotiations between the two parties. Though Turei did not apologise for her remarks, Greens co-leaderJames Shaw later clarified that Coates' statement did not represent official Green Party policy.[69][71]
During the party's convention in South Auckland on 16 July, Peters vowed that a New Zealand First government would hold two binding referendums on whether Maori electorates should be abolished and whether the number of MPs should be reduced to 100. Other New Zealand First policies included reducing immigration to 10,000 a year (from 72,300 in the June 2017 year),[72] and bringing the country's banks back into Kiwi ownership, starting with makingKiwibank the New Zealand government's official trading bank.[73][74]
During the2017 general election, New Zealand First's share of the vote dropped to 7.2% with the party's representation in Parliament being reduced to 9 MPs.[10] Under Peters' leadership, New Zealand First entered into talks to form coalitions with the National Party and the Labour Party. National Party leader and caretaker Prime MinisterBill English signalled an interest in forming a coalition with New Zealand First, while Labour leaderJacinda Ardern considered a three-way coalition with New Zealand First and the Greens. Peters stated that he would not make his final decision until the special votes results were released on 7 October 2017.[75][76] During negotiations with Ardern, Peters indicated that he would be willing to consider dropping his call for a referendum on abolishing the Māori electorates in return for forming a coalition with Labour; a bone of contention in New Zealand race relations.[77]
On 19 October, Labour and New Zealand First decided to form a coalition government and a confidence and supply agreement with the Green Party.[11][78] On 26 October, Peters was appointedDeputy Prime Minister,Minister of Foreign Affairs, Minister for State-owned enterprises, andMinister for Racing. Deputy LeaderRon Mark was given theMinister of Defence and Veterans portfolios.Tracey Martin was given the Children,Internal Affairs, and Senior Citizens portfolios as well as being made Associate Minister of Education.Shane Jones was made Minister of Forestry, Infrastructure, Regional Economic Development, and Associate Minister of Finance and Transport.[79]
During the post-election negotiations, New Zealand First managed to secure several policies and concessions including a Regional Development Fund, the re-establishment of theNew Zealand Forest Service, increasing theminimum wage to $20 per hour by 2020, a comprehensive register of foreign-owned land and housing, free doctors' visits for all under-14-year-olds, free driver training for all secondary students, a new generation SuperGold smartcard containing entitlements and concessions, a royalty on the exports of bottled water, a commitment to re-entry of thePike River Mine, and Members of Parliament being allowed to vote in a potential referendum oneuthanasia.[80] In return, New Zealand First agreed to drop its demand for referendums onoverturning New Zealand's anti-smacking ban and abolishing theMāori electorates.[81][82]
In 2019, New Zealand First's Internal Affairs minister, Tracey Martin participated in negotiations with the Labour Party to pass theAbortion Legislation Bill to reform the country'sabortion laws. While Martin had ruled out supporting a referendum, she was overruled by the party leader Peters who demanded a binding referendum on the proposed legislation. He also ruled out giving New Zealand First MPs a conscience vote on the issue. While the party would support the bill at first reading, Peters warned that they would withdraw support if the proposed law was not put to a public referendum.[83][84][85] In response,Justice MinisterAndrew Little rebuffed Peters' demands for a referendum on the grounds that Parliament would decide the legislation.[84][86] In March 2020, seven of the 9 NZ First MPs voted against the Bill while the two female MPs voted in favour of the Bill at its final reading—Tracey Martin andJenny Marcroft.[87][88]
In late 2019, New Zealand First won a parliamentary vote to hold aeuthanasia referendum, as the party threatened to vote down the legislation if it did not go to a referendum.[89] The decision to go to a referendum passed 63–57.[90]
During the2020 New Zealand general election, New Zealand First's party vote dropped to 75,021 (2.6%), causing the party to lose all of its seats in Parliament since it fell below the five percent threshold needed to enter Parliament through the party list alone. All NZ First MPs also lost the seats they were contesting.[12][91][92][93] Two months after the election, both its president and secretary resigned. Former MPDarroch Ball became interim president; he claimed that the resignations were "always a planned retirement after the election for both roles".[94]
On 20 June 2021, Winston Peters confirmed that he would continue leading the party for the2023 general election. Peters also made a speech attacking the Labour, National and Green parties that touched upon various issues including transportation infrastructure in Auckland, the increasing use of theMāori language in official reports and public life, the Government'sCOVID-19 vaccination rollout, purchase ofIhumātao land, elimination of referendums onMāori wards and constituencies, and so-calledwokeness in New Zealand society. This speech marked his first major public appearance since the 2020 general election.[95][96]
In mid-February 2020, theSerious Fraud Office (SFO) announced that it was investigating the NZ First Foundation in response to allegations that the party had created a slush fund. Between 2017 and 2019, New Zealand First officials had allegedly channelled half a million dollars of donations into the NZ First Foundation's bank account to cover various party-related expenses such as the party's headquarters, graphic design, an MP's legal advice, and even a $5000 day at the Wellington races. The amount of donations deposited into the foundation and used by the party was at odds with its official annual returns.[97][98] Peters has denied any wrongdoing, while fellow MP Shane Jones, theMinister for Infrastructure, has denounced allegations that the party was offering policy for cash as "conspiracy theories."[98][99]
In late September 2020, the Serious Fraud Office announced that they would be laying charges against two persons as a result of their investigation into the NZ First Foundation.[100][101]
On 7 June 2022, the trial of two men charged with stealing NZ$746,881 worth of donations from New Zealand First between September 2015 and February 2020 began. At the time, the defendants had been granted name suppression. Prosecutor Paul Wicks QC argued that the defendants had deceived about 40 donors, the NZ First party secretary and theElectoral Commission into believing that their donations were going to the party. In fact, the money had gone into one of the defendants' bank accounts and the NZ First Foundation's bank account. Under the Electoral Act, funds donated to the NZ First Foundation between 2017 and 2020 should have been treated as party donations. According to the prosecution, the NZ First Foundation's funds were being used as a "slush fund" to cover party expenses including leasing and furnishing office space for the party's Wellington headquarters, election campaigning, and fundraisers. Wicks claimed that the defendants rather than the party's leadership controlled these funds.[102]
On 23 June, the Crown concluded its closing arguments against the defendants. The defence concluded its closing arguments on 27 June.[103] On 20 July, High Court Justice Pheroze Jagose permanently suppressed the names of the two defendants in the NZ First Foundation fraud case.[104] On 22 July, the two defendants were acquitted by Justice Jagose.[105]
In response to the NZ First Foundation trial verdict,Justice MinisterKiri Allan announced that the Government would be introducing new electoral donation amendment bill to widen the definition of political donations to include those donated to third-party entities and making it an offence not to pass political donations to a party's secretary. Other proposed measures include lowering the donation disclosure threshold from NZ$15,000 to NZ$5,000.[106]
Before the2023 New Zealand general election, Winston Peters said that NZ First would not join a coalition Government with Labour.[107][108][109][110] In late March 2023, Peters announced that if elected into government, NZ First would removeMāori names from government departments and bring backEnglish names.[111][112][113][114] The party opposed raising the superannuation eligibility age from 65 to 67 years.[115] It opposed vaccine mandates and proposed that gang affiliation should automatically serve as an aggravating factor in crime sentencing.[115]
On 23 July, NZ First launched its election campaign with the slogan "Take our country back." Peters announced that the party would campaign on five key issues: combating "racist separatism," fighting Australian-owned banks and the "supermarket duopoly," investing in health, social services, and elderly care, and adopting "tough on crime" policies including designating all gangs as terrorist organisations.[116] On 30 July, NZ First campaigned on moving thePorts of Auckland and theRoyal New Zealand Navy'sDevonport base toNorthport, extending theNorth Island Main Trunk Line toMarsden Point, a new four-lane alternative highway through theBrynderwyn Range, and establishing a full inquiry into the Government's handling of theCOVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand.[117][118]
On 13 August,Stuff reported that several NZ First candidates including property and commercial lawyer Kirsten Murfitt, Auckland consultant Janina Massee,Matamata-Piako district councillor Caleb Ansell, and Kevin Stone had expoused various controversial views including COVID-19vaccine hesitancy and "plandemic" conspiracy theories,New World Order conspiracy theories,climate skepticism,Qanon, and support for Uganda'sAnti-Homosexuality Act, 2023. In response, Peters stated that NZ First's candidate list was provisional and defended the party's candidate selection process.[119]
On 16 August, NZ First released its policies ontransgender people on bathrooms and sports; which included introducing legislation requiring public bodies to have "clearly demarcated" unisex and single-sex toilets, restricting toilet access to individuals from the opposite sex, and requiring sporting bodies to have an "exclusive biological female category."[120] On 20 August, NZ First released a policy of promotingEnglish to the status of anofficial language of New Zealand and withdrawing from theUnited Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People.[121]
During the 2023 election, New Zealand First was returned to Parliament with 6.08% of the total party vote and eight list seats.[13]
Following coalition talks, NZ First entered into acoalition agreement with the National andACT parties.[122][123] As part of the NZ First-National coalition agreement, National would no longer proceed with its proposed foreign buyer tax but would instead fund tax cuts via reprioritisation and other forms of revenue gathering. The new Government would also scrap the previous Labour Government's fair pay agreements, proposed hate speech legislation,co-governance policies,Auckland light rail,Three Waters reform programme, andMāori Health Authority. In addition, fees-free tertiary education would be shifted from the first to last year of tertiary study.[123][124][125][126]
The Government also agreed to adopt NZ First's policy of establishing a NZ$1.2 billion Regional Infrastructure Fund, establishingEnglish as an official language, and requiring government departments to use English for their primary names and communications, except for those dealing withMāori people. The Government also adopted NZ First's policy of halting all work related to theHe Puapua report and confirming that theUnited Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples has no legal basis in New Zealand law. The Government also agreed to restore the right tolocal referendum on the establishment or ongoing use of Māori wards.[125][127][128]
As part of the NZ First-National coalition agreement the Government also agreed to end all remaining COVID-19 vaccine mandates and to hold an independent inquiry into how the COVID-19 pandemic was handled in New Zealand. This proposed independent inquiry is expected to examine the use of multiple lockdowns, vaccine procurement and efficacy, social and economic impacts on both national and regional levels, and whether decisions and actions taken by the Government were justified.[129][130] While the outgoing Labour Government had commissioned aRoyal Commission of Inquiry into COVID-19 Lessons Learned, Peters claimed the inquiry's terms of reference were "too limited" during election campaigning.[130]
Within the National-led coalition government, Peters assumed the positions ofDeputy Prime Minister (until 31 May 2025), Minister of Foreign Affairs and Minister of Racing. Shane Jones becameMinister for Oceans and Fisheries, Regional Development, and Resources.Casey Costello becameMinister of Customs and Minister for Seniors. In addition,Mark Patterson became Minister for Rural Communities and AssociateMinister of Agriculture whileJenny Marcroft became Under-Secretary to theMinister for Media and Communications.[131]
On 10 May 2024, the party introduced its Fair Access toBathrooms Bill into Parliament, which would require all public buildings to provide clearly demarcated, unisex and single sex bathrooms. The proposed bill would also fine anyone using a single-sex toilet "who is not of the sex for which that toilet has been designated."[132] In early July 2024, NZ First invoked its "agree to disagree" provision in its coalition agreement with National after the Government decided to allow theRoyal Commission of Inquiry into COVID-19 Lessons Learned to complete its first phase and retain its chairTony Blakely.[133]
In early February 2025, NZ First introduced a member's bill seeking tobar banks from refusing to provide servicesbased on environmental or social concerns.[134] On 7 March 2025, NZ First introduced a member's bill seeking to remove so-called "wokeDEI" regulations from the Public Service Act 2020. It was noted that NZ First helped pass these laws in 2020.[135] On 22 April,Radio New Zealand reported that NZ First had withdrawn its proposed Bathrooms legislation. Peters also introduced a new member's bill pushing for the term women to be defined in New Zealand law as "an adult human biological female."[136]
On 30 June 2025, Goldsmith confirmed that the National-led Government would introduce specificcoward punching legislation as part of his party's coalition agreement with New Zealand First.[137] A day earlier, Goldsmith proposed legislation introducing higher penalties for those assaultingcorrectional officers and first responders. This was also in the coalition agreement with New Zealand First.[138] In 1 August 2025, NZ First announced a member's bill that would set the country's official name of "New Zealand" in law.[139]
During the NZ First's annual conference held atPalmerston North on 7 September 2025, Peters proposed increasing compulsoryKiwiSaver contributions to ten percent, lowering taxes and requiring migrants to sign a values statement if the party was re-elected at the 2026 general election. He also announced that Cabinet had agreed to introduce NZ First's legislation to make English an official language.[140] On 17 September, Shane Jones was elected by the New Zealand First parliamentary caucus as the party's deputy leader.[141] On 23 September, Peters invoked the "agree to disagree" clause of NZ First's coalition agreement with National after the Government confirmed plans to introduce two new work residency pathways. Peters said that these pathways would encourage immigrants to use New Zealand as a "stepping stone" towards immigrating to Australia.[142]
On 4 November 2025, Peters stated that NZ First would oppose the Government's Gene Technology Bill unless major changes were made to improve protections for humans and the environment.[143] That same day, Peters announced that NZ First would introduce a member's bill seeking to ban the sale, manufacture and importation of fireworks for private use, citing the impact of fireworks on pets and farm animals, and emergency services.[144]
On 13 November, NZ First voted in favour of the Government's contentiousRegulatory Standards Act 2025 during its third reading, allowing it to pass into law. On 20 November, Peters announced that NZ First would repeal the legislation if re-elected in 2026, stating that the party had opposed the Regulatory Standards Bill but had reluctantly supported it due to ACT's coalition agreement with National. In response, ACT leaderDavid Seymour accused Peters of acting in bad faith and seeking to form a coalition with the Labour Party.[145]
In late December 2025, Peters criticised a proposed Indian-New Zealandfree trade agreement, saying that it disadvantaged New Zealand's dairy industry and boosted Indian immigration to New Zealand. He also invoked New Zealand First's "agree to disagree" provision of its coalition agreement with the National Party.[146]
| This article is part ofa series on |
| Conservatism in New Zealand |
|---|
 |
History |
Historically in the 1990s and the 2000s the party was often labelled as simplypopulist.[147][148][149] From the 2010s onwards the party has been referred to asright-wing populist.[150][151][152] Over the years the party has also variously been described asnationalist[153][154]centrist,[155][156][157]conservative,[158]socially conservative,[159]centre-right,[160][161] andright-wing.[162][163][164][165][166] Conversely, academic Todd Donovan argued in 2020 that "radical right / right-wing populist" is a misclassification of New Zealand First because it is neitherradical nor right-wing.[167]
New Zealand First takes a broadly centrist andinterventionist position oneconomic issues and asocially conservative position on moral issues.[168] The party distinguishes itself from the mainstreampolitical establishment through its use ofpopulist rhetoric, and supports bindingreferendums for major social and political change. The party is alsoanti-immigration[169][170] andanti-globalisation,[171] while also supportive ofprotectionism[172][173] andpensioners' interests.[158] The party'ssupport base is mostly composed of middle-aged to elderly, rural and Māori voters.[168][174]
The party has long advocateddirect democracy in the form of "binding citizen initiated referenda", to create "a democracy that is of the people and for the people", while forcing government "to accept the will of the people".[175] Peters has also usedanti-establishment and anti-elite rhetoric,[176][177] such as criticising what he regards as the "intellectually arrogant elite in government and bureaucratic circles".[175]
At the core of New Zealand First's policies are its "Fifteen Fundamental Principles"; the first being "To put New Zealand and New Zealanders First".[178] They largely echo the policies that Winston Peters, the party's founder, has advocated during his career.[179] NZ First seeks to "promote and protect the customs, traditions and values of all New Zealanders".[180] Commentators have described the party, and Peters himself, asnationalist.[154][153][181] Former party official and parliamentary researcher Josh Van Veen has characterised the party as culturally conservative due to its emphasis on preserving heritage and respect for national symbols. Van Veen opines that New Zealand First's emphasis on an inclusive national identity has led to a marriage betweenliberal values and progressive nationalism.[92]
New Zealand First has been closely associated with its policies regarding thewelfare ofsenior citizens[158] and itsanti-immigration stance.[179][182] The party has frequently criticised immigration on economic, social and cultural grounds. It proposes an annual immigration cap of between 7,000 and 15,000 "seriously qualified" migrants, who would be expected toassimilate into New Zealand culture.[183]
Peters has on several occasions characterised the rate ofAsian immigration into New Zealand as too high; in 2004, he stated: "We are being dragged into the status of an Asian colony and it is time that New Zealanders were placed first in their own country".[184] On 26 April 2005, he said: "Māori will be disturbed to know that in 17 years' time they will be outnumbered by Asians in New Zealand", an estimate disputed byStatistics New Zealand, the government's statistics bureau, which stated that with a 145% increase from 270,000 to 670,000, the Asian community would still be smaller in 2021 than the Māori, who would increase by 5% to 760,000 over the same timeframe. Peters quickly rebutted that Statistics New Zealand has underestimated the growth rate of the Asian community in the past, as the Bureau had corrected its estimation by a 66,000 increase between 2003 and 2005.[185] In April 2008, Deputy LeaderPeter Brown drew widespread attention after voicing similar views and expressing concern at the growth of New Zealand's ethnic Asian population: "If we continue this open door policy there is real danger we will be inundated with people who have no intention of integrating into our society … They will form their own mini-societies to the detriment of integration and that will lead to division, friction and resentment".[186]
New Zealand First also espouses a mixture of economic policies. Peters has called foreconomic nationalism.[187] The party supports raising the minimum wage to aliving wage,[188] opposes theprivatisation of state assets (particularly to overseas buyers) and advocates buying back formerstate-owned enterprises.[61] These policies align it with views generally found on theleft of New Zealand politics.[189][20] On the other hand, it favours reducing taxation and reducing the size of government (policies typical of the New Zealandright) and espouses bothsocial conservatism[158] andwelfare chauvinism.[171] New Zealand First provided for its strong support among elderly voters[155] by its repeal of the surtax onsuperannuation, institution of a superannuation level of 66% of the net average wage,[190] and introduction of the SuperGold Card.[191] The party opposes any raising of theretirement age.[192]
"Law and order" issues feature heavily in the party's policy platform.[20][193] New Zealand First advocates a stricter criminal code, longer judicialsentences, and the lowering of theage of criminal responsibility.[194] In 2011, at its annual convention, New Zealand First vowed to repeal the controversialCrimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Act 2007 (which it characterised as the "anti-smacking law"), which a vast majority of voters rejected in a non-binding2009 citizen-initiated referendum.[195] In the2017 general election campaign, the party again vowed to repeal the Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Act; it also ruled out aconfidence and supply arrangement orcoalition with any party which opposed the policy.[196]
In 2013, all seven NZ First MPs voted against the third reading of theMarriage Amendment Bill, which permitted same sex marriage in New Zealand.[197][198] Peters had called for a referendum on the issue.[199][198]
The SuperGold Card, a discounts and concessions card for senior citizens and veterans,[200] has been a major initiative of the party.[201]
As a condition of the 2005 confidence and supply agreement[202] between New Zealand First and theLabour Government, Peters launched the SuperGold Card in August 2007.[203] The card is available to all eligible New Zealanders over the age of 65. A Veterans' SuperGold Card also exists for those who have served in theNew Zealand Defence Force in a recognised war or emergency.[204]
Winston Peters isMāori. At its high-water mark after the 1996 election, the party won allMāori electorates (the five MPs were nicknamed the "Tight Five"). It continued to receive significant support from voters registered in Māori electorates for some years afterward.[205] New Zealand First no longer supports the retention of the Māori electorates and has declared[when?] that it will not stand candidates in the Māori electorates in the future. It did not stand candidates in the Māori electorates in the2002,2005, or2008 general elections.[206]
New Zealand First is further characterised by its strong stance on theTreaty of Waitangi.[20] The party refers to the Treaty as a "source of national pride" but does not support it becoming a part ofconstitutional law.[207] Peters has criticised what he refers to as a Treaty "Grievance Industry"—which profits from making frivolous claims of violations of the Treaty—and the cost of Treaty negotiations andsettlement payments.[208][209] The party has called for an end to "special treatment" of Māori.[210]
On 19 July 2017, Peters promised that a New Zealand First government would hold two binding referendums on whether Maori electorates should be abolished and whether the number of MPs should be reduced to 100.[73] Following the2017 general election, Peters indicated that he would be willing to consider dropping his call for a referendum on abolishing the Māori electorates during coalition-forming negotiations with Labour leaderJacinda Ardern.[77] In 2026 the party returned to campaigning on a referendum to abolish the seats.[211]
In 2023, Peters expressed disapproval of the utilisation ofte reo Māori names for government departments, describing them as "incomprehensible" to the majority of New Zealanders and criticising "tokenism". Thecoalition government, which New Zealand First has joined, has agreed to rename departments to "have their primary name in English, except for those specifically related to Māori".[212]
| Election | Leader | Votes | % | Seats | +/– | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Winston Peters | 161,481 | 8.40% | 2 / 99 |  2 | Opposition | |
| 1996 | 276,603 | 13.35% | 17 / 120 | 15 | Coalition(1996–1998) | ||
| Opposition(1998–1999) | |||||||
| 1999 | 87,926 | 4.26% | 5 / 120 |  12 | Opposition | ||
| 2002 | 210,912 | 10.38% | 13 / 120 | 8 | Opposition | ||
| 2005 | 130,115 | 5.72% | 7 / 121 | 6 | Confidence and supply | ||
| 2008 | 95,356 | 4.07% | 0 / 122 | 7 | No seats | ||
| 2011 | 147,544 | 6.59% | 8 / 121 | 8 | Opposition | ||
| 2014 | 208,300 | 8.66% | 11 / 121 | 3 | Opposition | ||
| 2017 | 186,706 | 7.20% | 9 / 120 | 2 | Coalition | ||
| 2020 | 75,021 | 2.60% | 0 / 120 | 9 | No seats | ||
| 2023 | 173,425 | 6.08% | 8 / 123 | 8 | Coalition | ||
| Source:Electoral Commission | |||||||
| Election | Seats | +/– |
|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 1 / 4 | 1 |
| 1996 | 5 / 5 | 4 |
| 1999 | 0 / 6 | 5 |
| Leader | Deputy Leader | President |
|---|---|---|
| Winston Peters 18 July 1993 – present | Tau Henare 18 July 1993 – 19 December 1998 | Doug Woolerton 1993–2005 |
| Peter Brown 19 December 1998 – 14 February 2009 | ||
| Dail Jones 2005–2008 | ||
| George Groombridge 2008–2010 | ||
| Vacant 2009–2013 | ||
| Kevin Gardiner 2010–2013 | ||
| Tracey Martin 23 October 2013 – 3 July 2015 | Anne Martin 2013–2015 | |
| Ron Mark 3 July 2015 – 27 February 2018 | Brent Catchpole 2015–2018 | |
| Fletcher Tabuteau 27 February 2018 – 2020 | Lester Gray 2018–2019 | |
| Kristin Campbell Smith 2019–2020 | ||
| Vacant 2020 – 17 September 2025 | Julian Paul 2021–present | |
| Shane Jones 17 September 2025 – present |
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)Two October opinion polls showed support for her ruling coalition, formed with the right wing New Zealand First Party, at its lowest since 2017.
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Other | |
