 | |
| Founded | November 18, 1983 (1983-11-18) |
|---|---|
| Founder | Carl Gershman Allen Weinstein[1] |
| Type | 501(c)(3)non-profit NGO |
| 52-1344831 | |
| Location |
|
| Origins | U.S. Congress resolution H.R. 2915 |
Area served | Worldwide (outside United States) |
Key people | Damon Wilson (President & CEO) Peter Roskam (Chairman) |
| Website | ned |
TheNational Endowment for Democracy (NED) is aquasi-autonomous non-governmental organization[2][3][4] or according to others agovernment-organized non-governmental organization (GONGO)[5][6][7] in the United States founded in 1983 with the stated aim of advancing democracy worldwide and counteringcommunist influence abroad by promoting political and economic institutions, such aspolitical groups,business groups,trade unions, andfree markets.[8]
The NED was created as abipartisan, private, non-profit corporation, but acts as a grant-making foundation.[2] It is funded primarily by an annual allocation from theU.S. Congress.[4][9][8] In addition to its grants program, the NED also supports and houses theJournal of Democracy, theWorld Movement for Democracy, theReagan–Fascell Fellowship Program, theNetwork of Democracy Research Institutes, and theCenter for International Media Assistance.[10][11]
Upon its founding, the NED assumed several former activities of theCentral Intelligence Agency. Political groups, activists, academics, and some governments have accused the NED of being an instrument of U.S. foreign policy helping to fosterregime change.[12][13][14] In February 2025, theDepartment of Government Efficiency underElon Musk blocked disbursement from theTreasury of the NED's congressionally-mandated funding;[15][16] in August, the NED was granted an injunction to allow access to its funds.[17]
.svg)
TheNational Security Decision Directive 77 was instrumental for the creation of Project Democracy and its offspring NED.[18]
In a 1982 speech at thePalace of Westminster,PresidentRonald Reagan proposed an initiative, before the British Parliament, "to foster the infrastructure of democracy – the system of a free press, unions, political parties, universities."[19][20] This intersected with previously formulated plans by the American Political Foundation, an NGO supported by some members of theRepublican andDemocratic parties, together with scholars based atCSIS, to create a government-funded but privately run democracy promotion foundation to support democratic civil society groups and parties. The idea was strongly championed by the State Department, which argued that a non-governmental foundation would be able to support dissident groups and organizations in the Soviet Bloc, and also foster the emergence of democratic movements in US-allied dictatorships that were becoming unstable and in danger of experiencing leftist or radical revolutions, without provoking a diplomatic backlash against the US government. After some initial uncertainty over the idea from Reagan Administration hard-liners, the U.S. government, throughUSAID, contractedThe American Political Foundation to study democracy promotion, which became known as "The Democracy Program".[21] The Program recommended the creation of a bipartisan, private, non-profit corporation to be known as the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). NED, though non-governmental, would be funded primarily through annual appropriations from the U.S. government and subject to congressional oversight.[22][non-primary source needed]
In 1983, the House Foreign Affairs Committee proposed legislation to provide initial funding of $31.3 million for NED as part of theState Department Authorization Act (H.R. 2915), because NED was in its beginning stages of development the appropriation was set at $18 million. Included in the legislation was $13.8 million for theFree Trade Union Institute, an affiliate of theAFL–CIO, $2.5 million for an affiliate of theNational Chamber Foundation, and $5 million each for two party institutes, which was later eliminated by a vote of 267–136. The conference report on H.R. 2915 was adopted by the House on November 17, 1983, and the Senate the following day. On November 18, 1983, articles of incorporation were filed in the District of Columbia to establish the National Endowment for Democracy as a nonprofit organization.[22][non-primary source needed]
An analysis by political scientist Sarah Bush found that while NED activity in the 1980s focused on direct challenges to autocrats by funding dissidents, opposition parties, and unions, the majority of 21st-century NED funding goes to technical programs that are less likely to challenge the status quo, with the proportion of NED funding for "relatively tame programs" increasing from roughly 20% of NED grants in 1986 to roughly 60% in 2009.[23] Political scientist Lindsey A. O'Rourke writes that, "Today, NED programs run in more than ninety countries. Although the number of US-backed democracy promotion programs have grown, most of today's programs pursue less aggressive objectives than their Cold War counterparts."[23]In a 1991 interview with theWashington Post, NED founder Allen Weinstein said: "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA."[24]
During the1984 Panamanian general election theAmerican Institute for Free Labor Development and the NED provided around $20,000 in support of activists involved withArdito Barletta's campaign.[25][26]
In 1984, NED began its activities in China,[27] helping to launch the Chinese-language quarterly journal The Chinese Intellectual (TCI) and funding its publications.[28] The journal, which was originally targeted at Chinese students and scholars in the West,[29] opened offices in Beijing in 1988. The TCI was forced to move back to New York following the1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre.[28][30]
The NED was active in Yugoslavia beforeits dissolution. It arranged meetings between Yugoslav dissidents and members of the U.S. Congress, U.S. government officials, and members of the media.[31] It also gave funds toFreedom House which were used to fund the Yugoslav opposition.[32]
Since 2004, NED has granted $8,758,300 USD toUyghur groups including theWorld Uyghur Congress, theUyghur Human Rights Project, theCampaign for Uyghurs andThe Uyghur Transitional Justice Database Project.[33][non-primary source needed] It has also provided extensive grants for programs pertaining to Tibet.[34][non-primary source needed]Between 2005 and 2012 it gave grants to theChina Free Press NGO[35] and in 2019 it gave about $643,000 to civil society programmes inHong Kong.[36] In response, in 2020 China imposed sanctions on NED presidentCarl Gershman and Michael Abramowitz, the president ofFreedom House.[37]
The NED played a role in supporting theArab Spring of 2011. For example, theApril 6 Youth Movement inEgypt, theBahrain Center for Human Rights and individual Yemeni activist Entsar Qadhi received training and finances from the NED.[38][39] In Egypt, between 2008 and 2012, it also supported Colonel Omar Afifi Soliman, an exiled police officer who opposed bothHosni Mubarak's andMohamed Morsi's presidencies, as well as secularist activistEsraa Abdel-Fatah'sEgyptian Democratic Academy in 2011.[40]
In 2025,Elon Musk criticized the NED as "rife with corruption" and guilty of "crimes", later calling it an "evil organization" that "needs to be dissolved".[41] He also wrote "NED is a SCAM."[42] In February 2025, Musk'sDepartment of Government Efficiency cut funding to the NED by blocking disbursement from theU.S. Department of Treasury, causing significant disruptions to the organization.[41][42][43]The Free Press believes that dismantling the NED would symbolise a momentous change in U.S. foreign policy, undermining the idea that democratic ideals foster U.S. global strength and influence, and that the Trump administration therefore no longer believes that promoting democracy in the world is in the national interest.[44] On February 12, the NED informed the organizations it funds that it would suspend payments immediately. Additionally, organizations supported by NED started laying off staff and cutting expenditures.[41][43] On March 1, NED'sInternational Forum for Democratic Studies suspended operations due to inability to access funding.[45] They also had to furlough most of the staff. On March 5, the NED filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government in theUnited States District Court for the District of Columbia.[46] On August 12, the NED was granted an injunction to allow it to access the remaining $95 million of its previously-appropriated funds for 2025.[17]
NED is a grant-making foundation, distributing funds to private non-governmental organizations for promoting democracy abroad in around 90 countries. Half of NED's funding is allocated annually to four main U.S. organizations: theAmerican Center for International Labor Solidarity (associated with theAFL–CIO), the Center for International Private Enterprise (affiliated with theUnited States Chamber of Commerce), theNational Democratic Institute for International Affairs (associated with theDemocratic Party), and theInternational Republican Institute (formerly known as the National Republican Institute for International Affairs and affiliated with theRepublican Party).[47] The other half of NED's funding is awarded annually to hundreds of non-governmental organizations based abroad which apply for support.[48] In 2011, the Democratic and Republican Institutes channeled around $100 million through the NED.[39]
The NED receives an annual appropriation from the U.S. budget (it is included in the chapter of the State Department budget allocated forUSAID) and is subject to congressional oversight even as a non-governmental organization.[49]
From 1984 to 1990 the NED received $15–18 million of congressional funding annually, and $25–30 million from 1991 to 1993. At the time the funding came via theUnited States Information Agency. In 1993 the NED nearly lost its congressional funding, after the House of Representatives initially voted to abolish its funding. The funding (of $35 million, a rise from $30 million the year before) was only retained after a vigorous campaign by NED supporters.[50]
In the financial year to the end of September 2009 NED had an income of $135.5 million, nearly all of which came from U.S. government agencies.[49] In addition to government funding, the NED has received funding from foundations, such as theSmith Richardson Foundation, theJohn M. Olin Foundation, and others. TheBradley Foundation supported theJournal of Democracy with $1.5 million during 1990–2008.[51]
In 2018, PresidentDonald Trump proposed to slash the NED's funding and cut its links to the Democratic and Republican Institutes.[52][53]
In 2006, CIMA was founded as an initiative of the National Endowment for Democracy with encouragement from Congress and a grant from the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor.[54] CIMA promotes the work of independent media and journalists abroad, with a focus on the developing world,social media,digital media, andcitizen journalism.[55] It issued its first report,Empowering Independent Media: U.S. Efforts to Foster Free and Independent Media Around the World, in 2008, and subsequently issued other reports, including a report on digital media in conflict-prone societies and a report on mobile phone use in Africa.[55]
Writing inSlate in 2004,Brendan I. Koerner wrote that, "Depending on whom you ask, the NED is either a nonprofit champion of liberty or an ideologically driven meddler in world affairs."[56]
NED has been criticized by both the right and the left.[57][58] Some on the right accuse the NED of having a pro-social democracy agenda, promoted through its labor affiliate; conversely, some on the left accuse the NED of being "a rightwing initiative" oriented toward Reagan's Cold War politics.[57] Within Latin America, critics accuse the NED of manifesting U.S. paternalism or imperialism,[57] conversely, "supporters say that it helps many groups with a social-democratic and liberal orientation across the world," providing training and support for pro-democracy groups that criticize the U.S.[57] In a 2004 article for theWashington Post,Michael McFaul argues that the NED is not an instrument of U.S. foreign policy. He said he experienced the difference between the actions of US policymakers and the actions of theNational Democratic Institute (NDI) while representing the NDI in Moscow during the last days of the Soviet Union: U.S. policymakers supported Mikhail Gorbachev while the NDI worked withDemocratic Russia, Gorbachev's opponents.[59] NED has said in public statements that democracy evolves "according to the needs and traditions of diverse political cultures" and does not necessitate an American-style model.[57]
In 1986, NED's President Carl Gershman said that the NED was created because "It would be terrible for democratic groups around the world to be seen as subsidized by the CIA. We saw that in the 1960s and that's why it has been discontinued".[60] Throughout the course of a 2010 investigation byProPublica, Paul Steiger, the then editor in chief of the publication said that "those who spearheaded creation of NED have long acknowledged it was part of an effort to move from covert to overt efforts to foster democracy" and cited as evidence a 1991 interview in which then-NED presidentAllen Weinstein said, "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA."[61]
Critics have compared the NED's funding of Nicaraguan groups (pro-U.S. and conservative unions, political parties, student groups, business groups, and women's associations) in the 1980s and 1990s in Nicaragua to the previous CIA effort "to challenge and undermine" a left-wing government in Chile.[62] (Latin Americanist scholarWilliam M. LeoGrande writes that the NED's roughly $2 million funding into Nicaragua between 1984 and 1988 was the "main source of overt assistance to the civic opposition," of which about half went to the anti-Sandinista newspaperLa Prensa.[63]) According to sociologist William Robinson, NED funds during the Reagan years were "ultimately used for five overlapping pseudo-covert activities: leadership training forpro-American elites, promotion of pro-American educational systems and mass media, strengthening the 'institutions of democracy' by funding pro-American organizations in the target state, propaganda, and the development of transnational elite networks."[64] Criticizing these activities, Robinson wrote that "U.S. policymakers claim that they are interested in process (free and fair elections) and not outcome (the results of these elections); in reality, the principal concern is outcome."[64]
Political scientist Lindsey A. O'Rourke writes that the Reagan-era NED played a key role in U.S. efforts "to promote democratic transitions in Chile, Haiti, Liberia, Nicaragua, Panama, the Philippines, Poland, and Suriname," but did so to promote the success of pro-U.S. parties, not just to promote democracy, and did not support communist or socialist opposition parties.[64] TheNorth American Congress on Latin America says that the NED engages in a "a very particular form of low-intensity democracy chained to pro-market economics--in countries from Nicaragua to the Philippines, Ukraine to Haiti, overturning unfriendly 'authoritarian' governments (many of which the United States had previously supported) and replacing them with handpicked pro-market allies."[65]
In the2020 Thai protests, pro-government groups cited NED support for protester-sympathizing groups to assert that the US government was masterminding the protests. TheUnited States Embassy in Bangkok formally denied allegations of funding or supporting protesters.[66]
In August 2021, Malaysian human rights activist andSuaram adviserKua Kia Soong criticized the opposition coalitionPakatan Harapan for accepting funding from the National Endowment of Democracy, which he described as a "CIA soft power front". Citing the US track record of supporting regime change abroad and racial discrimination againstBlack andAsian Americans, Kua urged Malaysian civil society organizations to stop accepting funding from the NED since it undermined their legitimacy, independence, and effectiveness. Kua's statement came after Daniel Twining, the president of the NED affiliateInternational Republican Institute, had made remarks in 2018 acknowledging that the NED had financially supported Malaysian opposition parties and NGOs, including Suaram since 2002 (Kua said that Suaram no longer accepts funds from NED upon realizing about the nature of NED). Following the2018 Malaysian general election Twining had also praised the newly elected Pakatan Harapan government for freezing Chinese infrastructural investments.[67][68]
Russian government officials andstate media have frequently regarded the NED as hostile to their country.[69] In 2015, the Russian state news agencyRIA Novosti blamed NED grants for theEuromaidan mass protests that forced Ukrainian presidentViktor Yanukovych from power.[69] In July 2015, the Russian government declared NED to be an "undesirable" NGO, making the NED the first organization banned under theRussian undesirable organizations law signed two months earlier by Russian presidentVladimir Putin.[69]
During the2014 Hong Kong protests, a Chinese newspaper accused the US of using the NED to fund pro-democracy protesters.Michael Pillsbury, aHudson Institute foreign policy analyst and formerReagan administration official, stated that the accusation was "not totally false".[70][71] In 2019, theChinese government sanctioned the NED in response to the passage by theU.S. Congress of theHong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act.[72] The Chinese government stated that the NED and CIA worked in tandem to covertly foment the2019–20 Hong Kong protests,[73][72] and that NED acted as a U.S. intelligence front.[72][74] NED was one of several U.S.-basedNGOs sanctioned by the Chinese government; others included theHuman Rights Watch,Freedom House, theNational Democratic Institute, and theInternational Republican Institute.[75][76] China also already tightly restricted the activities of foreign NGOs in China, particularly since 2016, and the NGOs sanctioned by China typically do not have offices on the mainland; as a result, the sanctions were regarded as mostly symbolic.[75] NED grant recipients in Hong Kong included labor advocacy and human rights groups such as theSolidarity Center andJustice Centre Hong Kong.[73] The Chinese government said that the sanctioned organizations were "anti-China" forces that "incite separatist activities for Hong Kong independence";[74] a U.S. State Department official said that "false accusations of foreign interference" against U.S.-based NGOs were "intended to distract from the legitimate concerns of Hongkongers."[76][71] NED has denied it provided aid to protestors in 2019.[36]
In August 2020, the Chinese government sanctioned NED chairman Carl Gershman, together with the heads of four other U.S.-based democracy and human rights organizations and six U.S. Republican lawmakers for supporting the Hong Kong pro-democracy movement in the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests. The unspecified sanctions were a tit-for-tat measure responding to the earlier sanctioning by the U.S. of 11 Hong Kong officials in response to the enactment of theHong Kong National Security Law in June 2020.[77]
In December 2020 China sanctioned the senior director of the NED, John Knaus, saying he "blatantly interferes in Hong Kong affairs and grossly interferes in China's domestic affairs".[78]
In May 2022, the ChineseMinistry of Foreign Affairs accused NED of funding separatists to undermine the stability of target countries, instigatingcolor revolutions to subvert state power, and meddling in other countries' politics.[79]
In 2016, India's Ministry of Home Affairs put NED on a watchlist, along with theOpen Society Foundation (OSF) andWorld Movement for Democracy. They were placed under the "prior permission" category and are not allowed to extend any financial assistance to other NGOs or individuals without explicit clearance from the ministry.[80]
Other governments that have objected to NED activity includeIran,[81]Egypt,[38]India,[82] andVenezuela.[72]
NED was founded at the initiative of a small group of Washington insiders, who believed that the United States needed a 'quango' (quasi-autonomous non-governmental organization) to promote liberal democracy and counter communist influence abroad ... .
NED is dedicated to fostering the growth of a wide range of democratic institutions abroad, including political parties, trade unions, free markets and business organizations
13: On NED and other QUANGO programs...
China, echoing such governments as Venezuela and Egypt, has previously taken aim at the NED, established in 1983 and funded by Congress to promote democracy worldwide. The Foreign Ministry in August distributed a lengthy report that named the NED as a U.S. intelligence front and listed its 20-year history of funding political groups in Hong Kong
The National Endowment for Democracy, which receives nearly all its funds from Congress, is a conduit through which the US government has given millions of dollars to political and other protest groups in countries from Albania to Haiti
Ignatius's analysis illuminates an important but understudied development in the final years of the Cold War: the rise of private democracy organizations as tools of U.S. foreign policy
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)It would be terrible for democratic groups around the world to be seen as subsidized by the CIA. We saw that in the 1960's and that's why it has been discontinued. We have not had the capability of doing this, and that's why the endowment was created.
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Academics | |
| Other | |