Nezak Huns 𐭭𐭩𐭰𐭪𐭩nycky | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 484–665 CE | |||||||||||||
 Royal Bull's-head crown of the Nezak kings | |||||||||||||
The Nezak Huns and contemporary continental Asian polities c. 500 CE. | |||||||||||||
| Capital | Ghazna Kapisa | ||||||||||||
| Common languages | Pahlavi script(written)[1] Middle Persian(common)[1] | ||||||||||||
| Religion | Buddhism Hinduism | ||||||||||||
| Government | Nomadic empire | ||||||||||||
| Nezak Shah | |||||||||||||
• 653 - 665 | Ghar-ilchi | ||||||||||||
| Historical era | Late Antiquity | ||||||||||||
• Established | 484 | ||||||||||||
• Disestablished | 665 CE | ||||||||||||
| Currency | HunnicDrachm | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Today part of | Afghanistan Pakistan | ||||||||||||
TheNezak Huns (Pahlavi: 𐭭𐭩𐭰𐭪𐭩nycky), alsoNezak Shahs,[1] was a significant principality in the south of theHindu Kush region of South Asia from circa 484 to 665 CE. Despite being traditionally identified as the last of the four Hunnic states inSouth Asia, their ethnicity remains disputed and speculative. The dynasty is primarily evidenced by coinage inscribing a characteristic water-buffalo-head crown and an eponymous legend.
The Nezak Huns rose to power after theSasanian Empire's defeat by theHephthalites. Their founder Khingal may have been from a Hunnic group, allied to the Hephthalites, or an indigenous ruler who accepted tributary status. Little is known about the rulers who followed him; they received regular diplomatic missions from theTang dynasty, and some coexisted with theAlchon Huns from about the mid-sixth century.
The polity collapsed in the mid-seventh century after experiencing increasingly frequent invasions from the Arab frontier; the last ruler was Ghar-ilchi. A vassal Barha Tegin usurped the throne and established theTurk Shahis. Half-a-century later, two rulers in Western Tokharistan, who used the appellation "Nezak Tarkhan", played significant roles in opposing a Governor of the Umayyad Caliphate; their links with the Nezak Huns remain speculative.
In contemporary sources, the word "Nezak" appears either as the Arabicnīzak or thePahlavinyčky.[2] The former was used only to describe theNezak Tarkhans — rulers in Western Tokharistan — while the latter was used in the coinage of the Nezak Huns.[2] The etymology remains disputed; historian-cum-archaeologistFrantz Grenet sees a possible — yet not firmly established — connection with Middle Persiannēzag ("spear") while linguistJános Harmatta traces back to the unattestedSaka *näjsuka- "fighter, warrior" from *näjs- "to fight".[2][3]
TheMiddle Chinese wordsNasai (捺塞) andNishu (泥孰) have also been proposed as probable transcriptions of Nezak, but these have phonetic dissimilarities.[4] Nonetheless, from a review of Chinese chronicles, Minoru Inaba, a historian of medieval Central Asia atKyoto University, concludesNishu to have been both a personal name and titular epithet across multiple Turkic tribes.[5]
The Nezak Huns ruled over the State ofJibin, mostly referred to asKapisi — formerly Cao —[6][a] by contemporaneous Buddhist pilgrims.[8] Kapisi composed eleven vassal-principalities during Xuanzang's visit inc. 630, includingLampā,Varṇu,Nagarahāra, andGandhara; Taxila had been only recently lost to Kashmir.[9][10][b]
The earliest mention of Kapisi is fromJñānagupta, a Buddhist pilgrim; he stayed there in 554 CE while travelling to Tokharistan.[11] Dharmagupta, a South-Indian Buddhist monk, would visit the polity in the early seventh century, but his biography by Yan Cong is not extant.[12]
Xuanzang, a Chinese Buddhist monk who visited Kapisi in about 630, provides the most detailed description of the Nezaks, even though he never mentions the name of the ruling dynasty. Xuanzang met the king inUdabhandapura and then traveled with him toGhazni andKabul.[7] The king is described as a fierce and intelligent warrior, belonging to theshali (刹利) /suli (窣利) race —Kshatriyas (?) —[c] and commanding rude subjects.[13]
TheCefu Yuangui — an 11th-century Chinese encyclopedia — andOld Book of Tang — a 10th-century Chinese history — record thirteen missions from Jibin to the Tang Court from 619 to 665;[d] while neither of them, like Xuanzang, mentions the name of the ruling dynasty, historians assume a reference to the Nezaks.[11][14] The most-comprehensive listing among them, dating from 658, is the record of the thirteenth mission, which declared Jibin as the "Xiuxian Area Command" and gave an account of a local dynasty of twelve rulers starting fromXinnie and ending withHexiezi:[15]
In the third year of theXianqing reign [658 CE], when [Tang envoys] investigated the customs of this state [Jibin], people said: "From Xinnie, the founder of the royal house, up to the present [King] Hexiezi, the throne has been passed from father to son, [and by now] there have been twelve generations." In the same year, the city was established as Xiuxian Area Command.
The names of the ten intermediary rulers remain unknown — Waleed Ziad, a historian of Islam and numismatist specializing in South Asia, however, cautions the reference to twelve generations was probably not intended in the literal sense.[18][19] The last mention of the dynasty is in 661 when the chronicles record the king of Jibin received a formal investiture from the Chinese court as Military Administrator and Commander-in-Chief of Xiuxian Area and eleven prefectures.[16][17][e]
Various compilations of the Tang dynasty would continue to mention the erstwhile Kings of Jibin, emphasizing that they wore a bull-head crown.[20][f] This invocation of the crown allows historians to link the Kingdom of Jibin with the Nezak Huns whose coinage features the same motif.[22]
The Nezaks started to mint their coins on the model ofSasanian coinage but incorporated Alchon iconography alongside their distinctive styles.[23] The result was unique, as Xuanzang noted.[22] There were four types ofdrachms andobols in circulation.[23] Coins exhibit progressive debasement as silver decrease in favour of alloys incorporating increasing quantities of copper.[18]
The obverse depicts a male bust occupying the centre; the facial profile varies.[24] The figure always adorns a symmetrically winged crown — derived from Sasanian rulerPeroz I's third phase of mints (c. 474 – c. 484) under Hephthalite captivity —[g] which is supplemented on top with awater buffalo-head;[23][h] this "buffalo-crown" became the defining characteristic of the Nezaks.[25][i] A wing-shaped vegetal appendage, borrowed from Alchon coinage, is found just beneath the bust.[28] The figure also wears a necklace with two flying ribbons of slightly varying shapes and an earring with two beads;[29] some samples include aBrahmiakshara of uncertain significance beneath the ribbons.[30] Circumscribed on the right is a Pahlavi legend meaning "King of the Nezak", which leads to the dynastic nomenclature.[1][j] An "ā" (𐭠) or a "š" (𐭮), perhapscorresponding to the mints of Ghazni and Kabul, follows.[31][k]
On the reverse, the Sasanian-type, consisting of the litZoroastrian fire-altar with two attendants carryingbarsom bundles,[l] was adopted, but unique "sun-wheels" were added above their heads.[32] The flame shape widely varies between a triangle, feather and bush.[33] Two Brahmiaksharas are occasionally present.[34]
) within double border on the reverse.[35] Alram believes the "double border" design to have been borrowed fromKhosrow II (r. 590-628 CE) or later Sassanians.[35][36] However, the design was onlyreintroduced by Khosrow II; it was first used byBalash (r. 484-488 CE).[36] NUMH 231; copper; half-drachm (?).[37]Hoards containing Alchon overstrikes against Nezak flans byToramana II have been discovered around Kabul.[38][39] Further, a class of drachms and unprecedented coppers — termed the Alchon-Nezak crossover — have Nezak busts adorned in Alchon-styled crescent crowns alongside a contracted version of the Pahlavi legend and the Alchontamgha () on the obverse.[40][41]
These crossovers evolved into a series in which a new legend (Śri Sāhi), either inBactrian or Brahmi, replaces the Pahlavi legend.[42][m] Finds from around the Sakra region — a sacred complex in ancient Gandhara —[n] feature votive coins of these two kinds as well as derivatives where the structures on the reverse and the Alchon tamgha lose their meaning and degenerate into geometrical motifs but the design of the Nezak-inspired bust remains largely conserved.[45] Whether these coins were issued by the later Nezaks or the earlyTurk Shahis remains debated.[46][o]
The Nezaks are traditionally identified as the last of the fourHunnic states in South Asia, their predecessors being, in chronological order; theKidarites, theHephthalites, and theAlchons.[47][p] They took control ofZabulistan after the defeat and eventual death of Sassanian Emperor Peroz I (r. 459–484) by the Hephthalites.[22][25] Their capital was at modern-dayBagram.[48]
The name of their founder was only recorded by the Chinese chronicles of the thirteenth diplomatic mission (658) asXinnie — which has since been reconstructed as "Khingal" — who may have been identical withKhingila (430-495) of theAlchon Huns.[18] The presence of the Nezak bull-head on some Alchon coins minted at Gandhara supports a link between the two groups too.[28] However,Shōshin Kuwayama — primarily depending on Xuanzang's recording the rulers of Kapisi as Kshatriya, about two centuries later, the absence[q] of Hunnic identifiers in Nezak coinage, and the lack of sources attesting to Hephthalite presence south of the Hindukush — rejects that the Nezaks were a Hunnic polity and instead, ascribes an indigenous origin to the dynasty.[49] There remains no consensus among scholars in the regard — while Klaus Vondrovec, a numismatist specializing in ancient Central Asia, finds Kuwayama's arguments to be unpersuasive and cites the usage of Turkish titles, Inaba argues that the Nezaks could have indeed been indigenous and had to accept Turkish titles since they started out as a tributary state of the Hephthalites.[50][51] Ziad and Matthias Pfisterer reject the existence of any means to speculate on the ethnic identity of the Nezaks—Khingila was a very common name in the history of Asia Minor, that was probably a title that commanded respect; and Hindu societies had a history of absorbing foreign warriors within the Kshatriya fold.[52][53]
Between 528 and 532, the Alchons had to withdraw from mainland India intoKashmir and Gandhara underMihirakula.[50] A few decades later, they migrated further westward — via theKhyber Pass — intoKabulistan and encountered the Nezaks, as evidenced by the Alchon-Nezak crossover mints.[54][r] Whether the Alchons co-ruled with the Nezaks, submitted to them, or nominally subdued them remains speculative.[44]
Around the same time (c. 560), theSasanian Empire underKhosrow I had allied with theWestern Turks to defeat the Hepthalites and took control ofBactria — they may also have usurped Zabulistan from the Nezaks, as suggested by the creation of Sasanian coin mints in the area ofKandahar during the reign ofOhrmazd IV (578-590).[55] However, the Alchon-Nezaks (?) appear to have recaptured Zabulistan by the end of the sixth century.[35]
These interactions left little long-lasting influence on the territorial extents of the Nezaks; when Xuanzang visited them in about 630, they were arguably in their prime.[44] In 653, a Tang diplomatic mission recorded that the crown prince had acceded to the throne of Jibin; scholars assume this prince to be Ghar-ilchi, who five years later would be recorded as the twelfth Nezak ruler in the thirteenth diplomatic mission.[17]
In 654, an army of around 6,000 Arabs led byAbd al-Rahman ibn Samura of theRashidun caliphate attacked Zabul and laid seize toRukhkhaj andZamindawar, eventually conqueringBost and Zabulistan—while records do not mention the names and dynastic affiliations of the subdued rulers, it is plausible that the Nezaks suffered severe territorial losses.[56] In 661, an unnamed ruler — possibly, Ghar-Ilchi — was confirmed as Governor of Jibin under the newly formed Chinese Anxi Protectorate, and would broker a peace treaty with the Arabs, who were reeling from theFirst Fitna and lost their gains.[56][57] In 665, Abd al-Rahman ibn Samura occupied Kabul after a months-long siege but was soon ousted; the city was reoccupied after another year-long siege.[s] The Nezaks were mortally weakened though their ruler — who is not named in sources but might have been Ghar-ilchi — was spared upon converting toIslam.[60]
They were replaced by the Turk Shahis, probably first in Kabul and later throughout the territory.[61] According toHyecho, a Korean Buddhist monk, who visited the region about 50 years after the events, the first Turk Shahi ruler of Kapisi — namedBarha Tegin byAl-Biruni — was a usurper who served as a military commander (or vassal) in the service of the preceding king.[62][63][t] Xuanzang, returning via Kapisa in 643, had noted Turks[u] ruling over Vrijsthana/Fulishisatangna — a polity between Kapisi and Gandhara that was likely located in the region of modern-day Kabul — and Barha Tegin might have had belonged to them.[67]Al-Baladhuri notes of the "Kabul Shah" to have purged all Muslims out of Kabul — whether he refers to the city or the region is unclear—in 668, drawing Arab forces into a renewed offensive;[68] if the "Kabul Shah" alludes to the last Nezak, the resulting conflict might have provided the ground for the rise of Turk Shahis.[69][70]
According to Kuwayama, the Nezaks probably survived as a local chieftaincy centred in or around the town of Kapisi for a few more decades; archaeological evidence obtained from the excavation of Begram points to a gradual decline.[71]
During Xuanzang's visit,Buddhism was the dominant religion. The region had over a hundred monasteries, especially around the capital; the ruler commissioned an 18-foot (5.5 m)-high image of the Buddha every year and held an assembly for dispensing alms. Nevertheless, Buddhism had declined south of the capital — monasteries in Gandhara bore a deserted look — and religious pluralism was evident in the hundreds of temples for the "Devas" (Hindu deities) and many "heretical" (non-Buddhist) ascetics.[67][72][73][v] Kuwayama interpretsXibiduofaluo-ci — a town mentioned by Xuanzang as lying to the south of the Capital — as the "town where the shrine for Svetasvatara was"[w] and goes on to identify it withTapa Skandar, from where a statue of Uma-Mahesvara had been excavated.[75]
Further South, laid Mt. Aruna — Xuanzang, reproducing local lore, noted Aruna to have been envious of the riches of the God of one Mt. Zhunahira, in Zabul, esp. since he had once refused to cohabit with Zhuna.[76][77] Kuwayama notes that the contemporaneous Annals of the Sui Dynasty — probably deriving from the now-lost accounts of aSui ambassador c. 606 — noted one Mt. Congling as the shrine of Śunā/Zhuna, the principal deity of the Cao region;[x] thus, he reads Xuanzang's account as alluding to a recent conflict where the adherents ofSurya (Aruna), the solar God, had wrested over the site from the worshippers of Zhuna.[76][77] He identifies the site withKhair Khaneh, a religious complex; excavations show that the complex had two phases of construction and statues of Surya have been recovered only from the later phase.[78]
At least two rulers inWestern Tokharistan used the appellationNezak Tarkhan; like Shah,Tarkhan too was a popular title among rulers in Central Asia.[2][79] One of these Nezak Tarkhans played an essential role in leading a revolt againstQutayba ibn Muslim — a commander of theUmayyad Caliphate who consolidated Muslim rule in Transoxania — in around 709 to 710 and was even promised aid by the Turk Shahis.[2][18] Historians have speculated about possible relations with the Nezak Huns.[1]
FromKashmir I travelled further northwest. After one month's journey across the mountains I arrived at the country ofGandhara. The king and military personnel are all Turks. The natives areHu people; there areBrahmins. The country was formerly under the influence of the king ofKapisa. A-yeh [alternatively read as "The father", than a personal name, referring to Barha Tegin, father of then-KingTegin Shah}] of the Turkish King took a defeated cavalry [alternatively "led an army and a tribe"or "led troops of his entire tribe"[64]] and allied himself to the king of Kapisa. Later, when the Turkish force was strong, the prince assassinated the king of Kapisa [possiblyGhar-ilchi] and declared himself king. Thereafter, the territory from this country to the north was all ruled by the Turkish king, who also resided in the country.
.png)
.png)
_Vertical_layout.jpg)
