| Nakh | |
|---|---|
| Geographic distribution | CentralCaucasus |
| Linguistic classification | Northeast Caucasian
|
| Subdivisions | |
| Language codes | |
| Glottolog | nakh1246 |
 Nakh | |
TheNakh languages are a group of languages within theNortheast Caucasian family, spoken chiefly by theChechens andIngush in theNorth Caucasus.
Bats is the endangered language of theBats people, an ethnic minority in Georgia.The Chechen, Ingush and Bats peoples are also grouped under the ethno-linguistic umbrella ofNakh peoples.
The Nakh languages were historically classified as an independentNorth-Central Caucasian family, but are now recognized as a branch of theNortheast Caucasian family.
The separation of Nakh from common Northeast Caucasian has been tentatively dated to theNeolithic (ca. 4th millennium BC).[1]
The Nakh languages are relevant to theglottalic theory of Indo-European, because the Vainakh branch has undergone the voicing of ejectives that has been postulated but widely derided as improbable in that family. In initial position, Bats ejectives correspond to Vainakh ejectives, but in non-initial position to Vainakh voiced consonants. (The exception is*qʼ, which remains an ejective in Vainakh.)
| Bats | Chechen | gloss | Dagestanian cognate |
|---|---|---|---|
| nʕapʼ | naːb | 'sleep' | |
| ʃwetʼ | ʃad | 'whip' | Gigatil Chamalal:tsatʼán |
| pʰakʼal | pʰaɡal | 'hare' | Andi:tɬʼankʼala |
| dokʼ | dwoɡ | 'heart' | Andi:rokʷʼo |
| matsʼ | mezi | 'louse' | Chadakolob Avar:natsʼ |
| ʕartsʼiⁿ | ʕärʒa- | 'black' | Gigatil Chamalal:-etʃʼár |
| jopʼqʼ | juqʼ | 'ashes' |
A similar change has taken place in some of the other Dagestanian languages.[5]
Many obscure ancient languages or peoples have been postulated by scholars of the Caucasus as Nakh, many in the South Caucasus. None of these have been confirmed; most are classified as Nakh on the basis of placenames.
| Èrsh | |
|---|---|
| Region | Caucasus, modernArmenia |
| Ethnicity | Èrs people |
| Era | Antiquity |
Northeast Caucasian?
| |
| Language codes | |
| ISO 639-3 | None (mis) |
| Glottolog | None |
The Èrsh language, language of the Èrs who inhabited Northern Armenia, and then, (possibly) later, mainlyHereti in Southeast Georgia and NorthwestAzerbaijan. This is considered to be more or less confirmed as Nakh.[6] They were assimilated eventually, and their language was replaced by Georgian or Azeri.
The language of theMalkhs[6] (whose name, malkh, refers to the sun) in the North Caucasus, who lived in modern dayKabardino-Balkaria,Karachay–Cherkessia, and once briefly conqueredUbykhia andAbkhazia, is believed to be of Nakh affiliation. They were conquered first by Scythian-speaking Alan tribes and then by Turkic tribes, and seem to have largely abandoned their homeland and found shelter among theChechens, leading to the formation of ateip named after them. Those who stayed behind were either wiped out or assimilated.
The language of theDvals is thought to be Nakh by many historians,[6][7][8][9] though there is a rivaling camp arguing for its status as a close relative ofOssetic.[9] Various backing for the Nakh theory (different scholars use different arguments) includes the presence of Nakh placenames in former Dval territory,[9] evidence of Nakh–Svan contact which probably would've required the Nakh nature of the Dvals or people there before them,[6] and the presence of a foreign-origin Dval clan among the Chechens,[10] seemingly implying that the Dvals found shelter (like the Malkhs are known to have done) among the Chechens from the conquest of their land by foreign invaders (presumably Ossetes).
According to Georgian scholars I. A. Javashvili andGiorgi Melikishvili, theUrartian state ofSupani was occupied by the ancient Nakh tribe Tsov, whose state is called Tsobena in ancient Georgian historiography.[11][12][13] The Tsov language was the dominant language spoken by its people, and was thought by these Georgian historians (as well as a number of others) to be Nakh. Tsov and its relatives in the area may have contributed to theHurro-Urartian substratum in theArmenian language.
The proposedNorth Caucasian language family comprises theNortheast andNorthwest Caucasian language families. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Northwest (Pontic) |
|  | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Northeast (Caspian) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Italics indicateextinct languages | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Caucasian (areal) |
|  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indo- European |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Turkic |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Others | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
