![]() The NO to AV logo | |
| Type | Political |
|---|---|
| Legal status | Campaign |
| Purpose | To oppose the UK switching to an Alternative Vote (AV) electoral system at the 2011 referendum |
| Headquarters | London |
Region served | United Kingdom |
Official language | English |
President | Margaret Beckett |
| Website | No to AV (Archived) |
NOtoAV was apolitical campaign in theUnited Kingdom whose purpose was to persuade the public to vote against theAlternative Vote (AV) in thereferendum on 5 May 2011. The opposition to switching to AV was successful, with the "No" vote to switching to AV receiving 67.9% of votes cast in the 2011 referendum.[1][2]
The Labour NotoAV campaign group was launched on 2 March 2011, with less fanfare than “Labour Yes”. Its campaign messages were similar to those of the main No campaign, with most links on its website directing to NotoAV. It seemed likely that Labour voters would decide the result of the referendum, and at that point the No campaign had more Labour members of parliament supporting it than the Yes campaign. However, opinion polls showed Labour supporters almost evenly divided.[18]
The NotoAV campaign attracted criticism in the run up to the referendum, due to its repeated claims that implementing AV would be expensive, due to the necessity of installing electronic voting machines. The claim was denied, both by the opposing campaign and the Electoral Commission and Political Studies Association.[19] In April 2011, cabinet ministerChris Huhne threatened legal action over alleged untruths disseminated by Conservatives opposed to the alternative vote system.[20]
At a Cabinet meeting on 2 May, Huhne was strongly critical of Conservative colleagues about the No2AV campaign material, in particular targeting a key 'No' leaflet showing a newborn baby with the slogan "She needs a maternity unit, not an alternative voting system". However, it was then revealed that this had been developed byDan Hodges, a Labour Party campaigner working for NOtoAV.[21]
On the day of the referendum, it was reported in theNew Statesman that David Blunkett had admitted that the claim that introducing the AV system would be more expensive had been exaggerated.[22]
In May 2011, three days before the referendum vote,The Guardian newspaper released an analysis of the accounts of donations to the campaign, showing that it been funded almost exclusively by Conservative Party donors. 42 of the 53 named donors to the NoToAV campaign were Conservative Party donors, having given between them £18.4 million to the Conservative Party since 2001.[23] Nine were not identifiable from official donor records, another source was identified as official funding from theElectoral Commission, and one was a Labour Party donor, theGMB union.[23] Among the donors to and prominent members of the Conservative Party were seven Conservativepeers, includingLord Sainsbury of Preston Candover, who had donated nearly £3m to the Conservative Party since 2005.[23]Jonathan Wood, who was the biggest shareholder inNorthern Rock bank when it collapsed in 2007 and later tried to suethe then Labour government over itshandling of the bank's nationalization, andLord Fink, the Conservative Party's co-treasurer, British fund manager and former CEO and deputy chairman of theMan Group plc, have both donated £75,000 between them to the campaign in 2011.[23] Stockbroking and corporate finance group Shore Capital donated £25,000, hedge fundOdey Asset Management Group, founded byCrispin Odey in 1991, donated £20,000;Lord Wolfson, chairman of the clothing chainNext plc gave £25,000;John Nash, co-founder of private equity firm Sovereign Capital and chairman of the healthcare companyCare UK, donated £25,000.[23] The figures obtained by theGuardian do not include donations received by the NoToAV campaign prior to the passing of theParliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011 by Parliament in February 2011.[23]