Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

NEXRAD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Network of weather radars operated by the NWS
NEXRAD
NEXRAD Radar atFort Dix inNew Jersey
Country of originUnited States
Introduced1988 (1988)
No. built159 in the US, Puerto Rico and Guam plus an additional 3 WSR-88Ds, one in Japan and two in South Korea that are not included in the network
TypeWeather radar
Frequency2,700 to 3,000 MHz (S band)
PRF320 to 1,300 Hz (according to VCP)
Beamwidth0.96° with 2.7 GHz
0.88° with 3.0 GHz
Pulsewidth1.57 to 4.57 μs (according to VCP)
RPM3
Range460 km for reflectivity
230 km for Doppler velocity
Diameter8.54 m (28.0 ft)
Azimuth0 to 360º
Elevation-1° to +20° (operations)
up to +60° (test)
Power750 KW
Other namesWSR-88D

NEXRAD orNexrad (Next-Generation Radar) is a network of 159 high-resolutionS-bandDopplerweather radars operated by theNational Weather Service (NWS), an agency of theNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) within theUnited States Department of Commerce, theFederal Aviation Administration (FAA) within theDepartment of Transportation, and theU.S. Air Force within theDepartment of Defense. Its technical name isWSR-88D (Weather Surveillance Radar, 1988, Doppler).

NEXRAD detectsprecipitation andatmospheric movement orwind. It returnsdata which when processed can be displayed in amosaic map which shows patterns of precipitation and its movement. The radar system operates in two basic modes, selectable by the operator – a slow-scanningclear-air mode for analyzing air movements when there is little or no activity in the area, and aprecipitation mode, with a faster scan for tracking active weather. NEXRAD has an increased emphasis onautomation, including the use ofalgorithms and automated volume scans.

Deployment

[edit]
Testbed of the WSR-88D on display at theNational Severe Storms Laboratory.

In the 1970s, the U.S. Departments of Commerce, Defense, and Transportation, agreed that to better serve their operational needs, the existing national radar network needed to be replaced. The radar network consisted ofWSR-57 developed in 1957, andWSR-74 developed in 1974. Neither system employedDoppler technology, which provides wind speed and direction information.

The Joint Doppler Operational Project (JDOP) was formed in 1976 at theNational Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) to study the usefulness of usingDoppler weather radar to identify severe and tornadicthunderstorms. Tests over the next three years, conducted by the National Weather Service and the Air Weather Service agency of theU.S. Air Force, found that Doppler radar provided much improved early detection of severe thunderstorms. Aworking group that included the JDOP published a paper providing the concepts for the development and operation of a national weather radar network. In 1979, the NEXRAD Joint System Program Office (JSPO) was formed to move forward with the development and deployment of the proposed NEXRAD radar network. That year, the NSSL completed a formal report on developing the NEXRAD system.[1][2]

When the proposal was presented to theReagan administration, two options were considered to build the radar systems: allow corporate bids to build the systems based on the schematics of the previously developed prototype radar or seekcontractors to build their own systems using predetermined specifications. The JSPO group opted to select a contractor to develop and produce the radars that would be used for the national network. Radar systems developed byRaytheon andUnisys were tested during the 1980s. However, it took four years to allow the prospective contractors to develop their proprietary models. Unisys was selected as the contractor, and was awarded a full-scale production contract in January 1990.[1][2]

NEXRAD sites within the Contiguous U.S.
NEXRAD sites in Alaska, Hawaii, U.S. territories, and military bases.

Installation of an operational prototype was completed in the fall of 1990 inNorman, Oklahoma. The first installation of a WSR-88D for operational use in daily forecasting was inSterling, Virginia on June 12, 1992. The last system deployed as part of the installation program was installed inNorth Webster, Indiana on August 30, 1997. In 2011, the newLangley Hill NEXRAD was added at Langley Hill, Washington to better cover the Pacific Coast of that area;[3] other radars also filled gaps in coverage atEvansville, Indiana andFt. Smith, Arkansas, following the initial installations.[citation needed] The site locations were strategically chosen to provide overlapping coverage between radars in case one failed during asevere weather event. Where possible, they were co-located with NWS Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) to permit quick access by maintenance technicians.[4]

The NEXRAD radars incorporated a number of improvements over the radar systems that were previously in use. The new system provided Doppler velocity, improvingtornado prediction ability by detecting rotation present within the storm at different scan angles. It provided improved resolution and sensitivity, enabling operators to see features such ascold fronts,thunderstormgust fronts, andmesoscale to even storm scale features of thunderstorms that had never been visible on radar. The NEXRAD radars also provided volumetric scans of the atmosphere allowing operators to examine the vertical structure of storms and could act aswind profilers by providing detailed wind information for several kilometers above the radar site. The radars also had a much increased range allowing detection of weather events at much greater distances from the radar site.[5]

WSR-88D development, maintenance, and training are coordinated by the NEXRADRadar Operations Center (ROC) located on the grounds of theUniversity of Oklahoma Westheimer Airport (KOUN) in Norman, Oklahoma.[6]

TheUniversity of Louisiana at Monroe inMonroe, Louisiana operates a "WSR-88D clone" radar that is used by local National Weather Service offices inShreveport,Little Rock andJackson to fill gaps in NEXRAD coverage in northeastern Louisiana, southeastern Arkansas and western Mississippi. However, the radar's status as being part of the NEXRAD network is disputed.

Radar properties

[edit]

A standard WSR-88D operates in theS band, at a frequency of around 2800 MHz, with a typical gain around 53 dB using a center-fed parabolic antenna. The pulse repetition frequency (PRF) varies from 318 to 1300 Hz with a maximum power output of 700 kW at Klystron output, although dependent on the volume coverage pattern (VCP) selected by the operator. All NEXRADs have a dish diameter of 9.1 m (30 ft) and an aperture diameter of 8.5 m (28 ft). Using the predetermined VCPs, NEXRADs have a traditional elevation minimum and maximum ranging from 0.1 to 19.5 degrees, although the non-operational minimum and maximum spans from −1 to +45 degrees. Unlike its predecessor, theWSR-74, the antenna can not be manually steered by the operator. WSR-88D Level I data is the recorded output of the digital receiver.[7] Spatial resolution varies with data type and scan angle – level III data has a resolution of 1 km x 1 degree in azimuth, while super-res level II, (implemented in 2008 nationwide), has a resolution of 250m by 0.5 degrees in azimuth below 2.4 degrees in elevation.[8]

Scan strategies

[edit]

The NEXRAD radar system continually refreshes its three-dimensional database via one of several predetermined scan patterns. These patterns have differing PRFs to fit the respective use, but all have a constant resolution. Since the system samples the atmosphere in three dimensions, there are many variables that can be changed, depending on the desired output. With all traditional VCPs, the antenna scans at a maximum of 19.5 degrees in elevation, and a minimum of .5, with some coastal sites scanning as low as .2 or lower. Due to the incomplete elevation coverage, a phenomenon known as "The Cone of Silence" is present with all NEXRAD radars.[9] The term describes the lack of coverage directly above the radar sites.

There are currently seven Volume Coverage Patterns (VCP) available to NWS meteorologists, with an eighth in the process of replacing one of the existing seven. Each VCP is a predefined set of instructions that control antenna rotation speed, elevation angle, transmitter pulse repetition frequency and pulse width. The radar operator chooses from the VCPs based on the type of weather occurring:

  • Clear Air or Light Precipitation: VCP 31, 32, and 35
  • Shallow Precipitation: VCP 35, 112, and 215
  • Non-Tropical Convection: VCP 12, 212, and 215
  • Tropical System Convection: VCP 212, 215, 112, and 121[10][11]
VCPScan time (min)Elevation scansElevation angles (°)UsageSAILS available?
124.2[12]140.5, 0.9, 1.3, 1.8, 2.4, 3.1, 4, 5.1, 6.4, 8, 10, 12.5, 15.6, 19.5Severe weather, including tornadoes, located closer to the radar (within 85 miles for storms traveling up to 55 MPH, but shorter distances for faster-moving precipitation)Yes (up to three per volume scan)[12]
2124.5[13]Severe weather, including tornadoes, over 70 miles away from the radar, or widespread severe convection. Best VCP for MRLE use. Completion time for VCP 212 + 1 SAILS scan is similar to VCP 12 + 2 SAILS scans
1125.5[14]Variant of VCP 212 designed for tropical systems and strong, non-severe wind shear events. Uses a combination of MPDA and SZ-2 to form a contiguous velocity display.[14] MRLE use is not possible with this VCPYes (up to one per volume scan)
2156[11]150.5, 0.9, 1.3, 1,8, 2.4, 3.1, 4, 5.1, 6.4, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16.7, 19.5General-purpose precipitation, including tropical systems capable of producing tornadoes. Most vertical resolution of any VCPYes (up to one per volume scan)
121690.5, 1.5, 2.4, 3.4, 4.3, 6, 9.9, 14.6, 19.5Legacy VCP, originally designed for tropical systems. Has significant gaps in vertical resolution above 6°. Scan strategy ensures 20 rotations in six minutes, heavily wearing antenna mechanical components. Similar completion time to VCP 215. To be replaced by VCP 112No
311050.5, 1.5, 2.4, 3.4, 4.3Long-pulse clear air mode designed for maximum sensitivity. Excellent for detecting light snow or subtle boundaries. Prone to detecting ground clutter. May be prone to detectingvirgaNo
32Short-pulse clear air mode designed for clear air or isolated light rain and/or wintry precipitation. Ideal to use when no precipitation is in the radar range, to reduce wear on antenna mechanical componentsNo
357[11]70.5, 0.9, 1.3, 1,8, 2.4, 3.1, 4, 5.1, 6.4Short-pulse clear air VCP designed for scattered to widespread light to moderate precipitation from non-convective cloudforms, especiallynimbostratus. Not recommended for convection, except for pop-up thundershowers produced byCumulus congestus clouds located 30 miles or more away from the radarYes (up to one per volume scan)

The specific VCP currently in use at each NEXRAD site is available.[15]

Enhancements

[edit]

Super resolution

[edit]

Deployed from March to August 2008 with all level II data,[16] the Super Resolution upgrade permitted the capability of the radar to produce much higher resolution data. Under legacy resolution, the WSR-88D provides reflectivity data at 1 km (0.62 mi) by 1 degree to 460 km (290 mi) range, and velocity data at 0.25 km (0.16 mi) by 1 degree to a range of 230 km (140 mi). Super Resolution provides reflectivity data with a sample size of 0.25 km (0.16 mi) by 0.5 degree, and increase the range of Doppler velocity data to 300 km (190 mi). Initially, the increased resolution is only available in the lower scan elevations. Super resolution makes a compromise of slightly decreasednoise reduction for a large gain in resolution.[17]

The improvement inazimuthal resolution increases the range at which tornadic mesoscale rotations can be detected. This allows for faster lead time on warnings and extends the useful range of the radar. The increased resolution (in both azimuth and range) increases the detail of such rotations, giving a more accurate representation of the storm. Along with providing better detail of detected precipitation and other mesoscale features, Super Resolution also provides additional detail to aid in other severe storm analysis. Super Resolution extends the range of velocity data and provides it faster than before, also allowing for faster lead time on potential tornado detection and subsequent warnings.[18]

Dual polarization

[edit]
See also:Joint Polarization Experiment
Non-Polarimetric Radar
Polarimetric Radar

WSR-88D sites across the nation have been upgraded topolarimetric radar, which adds a verticalpolarization to the traditional horizontally polarized radar waves, in order to more accurately discern what is reflecting the signal. This so-calleddual polarization allows the radar to distinguish between rain, hail, and snow, something the horizontally polarized radars cannot accurately do. Early trials showed that rain,ice pellets, snow, hail, birds, insects, andground clutter all have different signatures with dual polarization, which could mark a significant improvement in forecastingwinter storms and severe thunderstorms.[19] The deployment of the dual polarization capability (Build 12) to NEXRAD sites began in 2010 and was completed by the summer of 2013. The radar atVance Air Force Base inEnid, Oklahoma was the first operational WSR-88D modified to utilize dual polarization technology. The modified radar went into operation on March 3, 2011.[20]

AVSET

[edit]

When the NEXRAD system was initially implemented, the radar automatically scanned all scan angles in a Volume Coverage Pattern, even if the highest scan angles were free of precipitation. As a result, in many cases when severe weather was farther from the radar site, forecasters could not provide as timely severe weather warnings as possible. The Automated Volume Scan Evaluation and Termination (AVSET) algorithm[21] helps solve this problem by immediately ending the volume scan when precipitation returns at higher scan angles drop below a set threshold (around 20 dBZ). This can often allow for more volume scans per hour, improving severe weather detection without the need for hardware upgrades[22][23] AVSET was initially deployed in RPG build 12.3, in Fall of 2011.

SAILS and MESO-SAILS

[edit]
Main article:MESO-SAILS

One of the primary weaknesses of the WSR-88D radar system was the lack of frequency of base (0.5 degree) scans, especially during severe weather. Forecasters, and TV viewers at home, often had access to images that were four or five minutes old, and therefore had inaccurate information. TV viewers at home could be lulled into a false sense of security that a tornado was farther away from them than it really was, endangering residents in the storm's path. The Supplemental Adaptive Intra-Volume Low-Level Scan (SAILS) technique, deployed with Build 14 in the first half of 2014, allows operators the option to run an additional base scan during the middle of a typical volume scan.[24] With one SAILS cut active on VCP 212, base scans occur about once every two and a half minutes, with more frequent updates if AVSET terminates the volume scan early.

Multiple Elevation Scan Option for Supplemental Adaptive Intra-Volume Low-Level Scan (MESO-SAILS) is an enhancement to SAILS, which allows the radar operator to run one, two or three additional base scans during the course of a volume scan, per the operators request.[12] During June 2013, the Radar Operations Center first tested SAILSx2, which adds two additional low-level scans per volume. It was executed for approximately 4.5 hours and during the testing, an Electronics Technician observed the pedestal/antenna assembly's behavior. No excessive wear was noted. Two days later, SAILSx3 was executed, which added 3 additional low-level scans to a volume. During this 1.5 hour test of SAILSx3, a ROC Radar Hardware Engineer accompanied the ROC Electronics Technician to observe the antenna/pedestal assembly. Again, no excessive wear was noted.[25] MESO-SAILS was deployed with Build 16.1, in spring of 2016.

MRLE

[edit]

Mid-Volume Rescan of Low-Level Elevations (colloquially known asMRLE) is a dynamic scanning option for theWSR-88D derived fromMESO-SAILS,[26] a separate scanning option implemented in NEXRAD RPG 14.0, in the Spring of 2014.[27]

Duringquasi-linear convective systems (QLCS), colloquially known as squall lines, the detection ofmesovortices, which generate at 4,000 to 8,000 feet above ground level,[28] is not always possible with SAILS cuts, as the base 0.5 degree scan travels below the formation of mesovortices at closer distances to the radar.MRLE consecutively scans either the two, three or four lowest scan angles during the middle of a typical volume scan, allowing more frequent surveillance of mesovortex formation during QLCS events.[29] MRLE will be deployed on a non-operational basis in RPG 18.0 in spring of 2018, with possible operational deployment with RPG 19.0, if proven useful or of importance.

Deployment was anticipated by theRadar Operations Center to commence in October 2017, along with the RPG 18.0 build, on a non-operational basis. The scanning option will only be available for use with Volume Coverage Patterns 21, 12, 212, and additionally 215.[30] If proven to be significant in terms of warning dissemination, MRLE will deploy operationally nationwide with RPG 18.0, planned for 2018.

Concept

[edit]
Spin-up tornado associated with aQLCS as seen from a nearbyDoppler weather radar, which often goes unseen.

The concept of MRLE derives from the need of more frequent low-level scans duringquasi-linear convective systems (QLCSs). During QLCSs, it is not uncommon for brief and otherwise un-noticeablemesovortices to spawn at points along the line.[31] Due to untimely radar data and time being taken to complete the entire volume, these vortices often spawn without warning or prior notice. With MRLE, the operator has the choice between 2 and 4 low-level scans. UnlikeMESO-SAILS, which scans at one angle and can only do up to 3 low-level scans per volume, MRLE scans at 4 possible angles, and can cut into a volume up to 4 times, depending on the operators choice. The angles are as follows, alongside their respective scan frequencies:

  • MRLEx2 = 0.5° and 0.9° elevations
  • MRLEx3 = 0.5°, 0.9° and 1.3° elevations
  • MRLEx4 = 0.5°, 0.9°, 1.3° and 1.8° elevations[32]

The operator can not use MESO-SAILS alongside MRLE simultaneously. If one is selected while the other is active, the NEXRAD algorithms will automatically set the other "off".

Service Life Extension Program

[edit]

Started on March 13, 2013, the Service Life Extension Program (SLEP), is an extensive effort to keep and maintain the current NEXRAD network in working order for as long as possible. These improvements include signal processor upgrades, pedestal upgrades, transmitter upgrades, and shelter upgrades. The program is anticipated to be finished by 2022, which coincides with the beginnings of a nationwide implementation of multi-function phased array radars (see below).[33]

Coverage gaps

[edit]
NEXRAD coverage below 10,000 feet

WSR-88D has coverage gaps below 10,000 feet (or no coverage at all) in many parts of the United States, often for terrain or budgetary reasons, or remoteness of the area. Such notable gaps include most ofAlaska; several areas ofOregon, including the central and southern coast and much of the area east of the Cascade Mountains; many portions of theRocky Mountains;Pierre, South Dakota; portions ofnorthern Texas; large portions of theNebraska panhandle; theFour Corners region; the area around theNorthwest Angle in Minnesota; an area near the Connecticut River inVermont; and areas near the borders of theOklahoma andTexas Panhandles. Notably, many of these gaps lie inTornado Alley. At least one tornado has gone undetected by WSR-88D as a result of such a coverage gap – an EF1 tornado inLovelady, Texas in April 2014. As a result of the coverage gap, initial reports of tornadic activity were treated with skepticism by the local National Weather Service forecast office.[34][35]

Coverage gaps can also be caused during radar outages, especially in areas with little to no overlapping coverage. For example, a hardware failure on July 16, 2013 resulted in an outage and coverage gap for theAlbany, New York area that lasted through early August.[36]

A coverage gap in North Carolina encouragedSenator Richard Burr to propose S. 2058, also known as the Metropolitan Weather Hazard Protection Act of 2015. The act mandates that any city with a population of 700,000 or more must have Doppler Radar coverage <6,000 feet above ground level.[37] The bill passed theSenate, but died in aHouse committee.[38]

It is not likely that additional WSR-88Ds will be deployed, as the production line was shut down in 1997, and the National Weather Service has an insufficient budget to restart production.[35] In 2011, a known coverage gap was filled when the Langley Hill radar in southwestern Washington was installed. The radar was one of two systems donated to the NEXRAD Program from theU.S. Air Force Keesler AFB Training Center’s NEXRAD Maintenance Course assets. This radar opportunity was spearheaded by a public campaign led byProfessor Cliff Mass at the University of Washington, and likely helped the NWS office inPortland, Oregon issue a timely warning for theManzanita, OR EF-2 tornado in October, 2016.

In 2021, the National Weather Service office inSlidell, Louisiana announced that they would move the office's NEXRAD from the office building in Slidell west toHammond at the end of 2022. Along with a lower elevation angle, the new location would enable lower level monitoring of storm activity in theBaton Rouge area, where the lowest sampling elevation would drop from 4000-6000 feet above the surface to 300-600 feet.[39]

Destroyed radars

[edit]

The NEXRAD site located inCayey, Puerto Rico was destroyed during the passage ofHurricane Maria through the region in September 2017.[40] In addition to a neighboringTerminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) site that was rendered temporarily inoperable but ultimately survived, theDepartment of Defense deployed two short-rangeX-band radars on the island to provide radar coverage until the FAA-maintained NEXRAD site was restored.[41] In June 2018, this NEXRAD radar site was restored to fully operational condition and was reinforced with severallightning rods and secured with a stronger fiberglass dome that included using more than 3,000 bolts.[42]

On August 27, 2020, the NEXRAD radar site located inLake Charles, Louisiana, was destroyed byHurricane Laura as the eye of the Category 4 storm—which packed wind gusts recorded around 135 mph (217 km/h) in the city—passed over the site after it made landfall. NEXRAD radars based in Houston,Shreveport andFort Polk were used to fill gaps in radar coverage within portions of Southwestern Louisiana until the Lake Charles site was rebuilt; the NWS Radar Operations Center also deployed aSMART-R vehicle on loan from theUniversity of Oklahoma to provide supplemental radar data onHurricane Delta in advance of its track into the region (nearly paralleling that of Hurricane Laura) in late October.[43][44][45] Operational service to the Lake Charles NEXRAD radar site was restored in January 2021, following a four-month, $1.65-million reconstruction project that included the replacement of the radome and internal equipment and repairs to the station's radome pedestal, tower, fence and equipment shelters.[46]

On May 24, 2023, the NEXRAD radar site located onGuam, was damaged byTyphoon Mawar as the eye of the Category 4 typhoon passed over the northern end of the island. After initially being restored back into operation, the installation suffered from ongoing issues and, as of April 24, 2024, has been reported as "unserviceable" in NOTAMs.[47] Future plans for restoring weather radar to Guam and the CNMI are unknown.

Future enhancements

[edit]
See also:Advanced Technology Demonstrator

Current NEXRAD system

[edit]

The National Weather Service keeps a list of upcoming improvements to the WSR-88D system.[48]

Multi-function Phased Array Radar (MPAR)

[edit]
Main article:Multifunction Phased Array Radar
Multi-Function Phased Array Radar during installation in Norman, Oklahoma, 2003

Beyond dual-polarization, the advent ofphased array radar will probably be the next major improvement in severe weather detection. Its ability to rapidly scan large areas would give an enormous advantage to radar meteorologists.[49] Its additional ability to track both known and unknown aircraft in three dimensions would allow a phased array network to simultaneously replace the currentAir Route Surveillance Radar network, saving the United States government billions of dollars in maintenance costs.[49][50] The National Severe Storms Laboratory predicts that a phased array system will eventually replace the current network of WSR-88D radar transmitters.[51]

Applications

[edit]

Usage

[edit]

NEXRAD data is used in multiple ways. It is used by National Weather Service meteorologists and (underprovisions of U.S. law) isfreely available to users outside of the NWS, includingresearchers,media, and privatecitizens. The primary goal of NEXRAD data is to aid NWS meteorologists in operationalforecasting. The data allows them to accurately track precipitation and anticipate its development and track. More importantly, it allows the meteorologists to track and anticipate severe weather and tornadoes. Combined with ground reports,tornado andsevere thunderstorm warnings can be issued to alert the public about dangerous storms. NEXRAD data also provides information about rainfall rate and aids inhydrological forecasting. Data is provided to the public in several forms, the most basic form being graphics published to the NWS website. Data is also available in two similar, but different, raw formats. Available directly from the NWS is Level III data, consisting of reduced resolution, low-bandwidth base products as well as many derived, post-processed products; Level II data consists of only the base products, but at their original resolution. Because of the higher bandwidth costs, Level II data is not available directly from the NWS. The NWS distributes this data freely toAmazon Web Services[52][53] and several top-tieruniversities, which in turn distribute the data to private organizations.[54]

Operational locations

[edit]
Map all coordinates usingOpenStreetMapDownload coordinates asKML


List of NEXRAD sites and their coordinates[55]
State
(Abbreviation)
County or EquivalentCity or Place NameICAO Location IdentifierElevation (feet)Data start date
Puerto RicoCayeySan JuanTJUA2,958 feet (902 m)June 27, 1997
MaineAroostookHoultonKCBW860 feet (260 m)January 11, 1996
MaineCumberlandPortlandKGYX474 feet (144 m)March 15, 1995
VermontChittendenBurlingtonKCXX431 feet (131 m)January 13, 1995
MassachusettsBristolBostonKBOX232 feet (71 m)November 21, 1994
New YorkAlbanyAlbanyKENX1,935 feet (590 m)March 16, 1995
New YorkBroomeBinghamtonKBGM1,703 feet (519 m)November 28, 1994
New YorkErieBuffaloKBUF790 feet (240 m)February 23, 1996
New YorkLewisGriffiss Air Force BaseKRMX232 feet (71 m)July 11, 1995
New YorkLewisMontagueKTYX504 feet (154 m)June 10, 1998
New YorkSuffolkNew York CityKOKX199 feet (61 m)September 13, 1993
DelawareSussexDover Air Force BaseKDOX164 feet (50 m)August 15, 1995
New JerseyOceanPhiladelphiaKDIX230 feet (70 m)January 25, 1995
PennsylvaniaAlleghenyPittsburghKPBZ1,266 feet (386 m)August 4, 1994
PennsylvaniaCentreState CollegeKCCX2,486 feet (758 m)January 13, 1995
West VirginiaKanawhaCharlestonKRLX1,213 feet (370 m)August 20, 1994
VirginiaSussexNorfolk/RichmondKAKQ255 feet (78 m)July 23, 1994
VirginiaFloydRoanokeKFCX2,965 feet (904 m)February 13, 1995
VirginiaLoudounSterlingKLWX404 feet (123 m)November 12, 1991
North CarolinaCarteretMorehead CityKMHX145 feet (44 m)June 17, 1994
North CarolinaJohnstonRaleigh/DurhamKRAX462 feet (141 m)May 30, 1994
North CarolinaBrunswickWilmingtonKLTX145 feet (44 m)May 11, 1995
South CarolinaJasperCharlestonKCLX229 feet (70 m)March 20, 1996
South CarolinaLexingtonColumbiaKCAE345 feet (105 m)June 27, 1994
South CarolinaSpartanburgGreerKGSP1,069 feet (326 m)April 19, 1995
GeorgiaFayetteAtlantaKFFC972 feet (296 m)November 9, 1994
GeorgiaLanierMoody Air Force BaseKVAX330 feet (100 m)October 17, 1996
GeorgiaTwiggsRobins Air Force BaseKJGX618 feet (188 m)August 16, 1994
FloridaWaltonEglin Air Force BaseKEVX221 feet (67 m)August 15, 1994
FloridaDuvalJacksonvilleKJAX160 feet (49 m)February 10, 1995
FloridaMonroeKey WestKBYX89 feet (27 m)July 20, 1996
FloridaMelbourneBrevardKMLB149 feet (45 m)October 16, 1991
FloridaMiami-DadeMiamiKAMX111 feet (34 m)August 21, 1993
FloridaLeonTallahasseeKTLH177 feet (54 m)June 16, 1995
FloridaHillsboroughTampaKTBW122 feet (37 m)February 27, 1995
AlabamaShelbyBirminghamKBMX759 feet (231 m)May 9, 1994
AlabamaDaleFort RuckerKEOX537 feet (164 m)March 26, 1996
AlabamaJacksonHuntsvilleKHTX1,859 feet (567 m)July 5, 1997
AlabamaMaconMaxwell Air Force BaseKMXX560 feet (170 m)October 27, 1995
AlabamaMobileMobileKMOB289 feet (88 m)January 12, 1995
MississippiHindsJacksonKJAN361 feet (110 m)June 27, 1994
MississippiRankinJackson/BrandonKDGX609 feet (186 m)February 11, 2003
MississippiMonroeColumbus Air Force BaseKGWX609 feet (186 m)June 2, 1995
TennesseeHamblenMorristownKMRX1,434 feet (437 m)November 29, 1994
TennesseeShelbyMemphisKNQA435 feet (133 m)April 11, 1994
TennesseeWilsonNashvilleKOHX676 feet (206 m)October 13, 1994
KentuckyToddFort CampbellKHPX613 feet (187 m)September 5, 1995
KentuckyBreathittJacksonKJKL1,461 feet (445 m)August 14, 1996
KentuckyHardinLouisvilleKLVX833 feet (254 m)May 6, 1994
KentuckyMcCrackenPaducahKPAH506 feet (154 m)June 2, 1995
OhioClintonWilmingtonKILN1,170 feet (360 m)May 17, 1995
OhioCuyahogaClevelandKCLE860 feet (260 m)January 15, 1995
MichiganOaklandDetroit/PontiacKDTX1,216 feet (371 m)February 20, 1995
MichiganOtsegoGaylordKAPX1,561 feet (476 m)May 23, 1996
MichiganKentGrand RapidsKGRR875 feet (267 m)September 21, 1995
MichiganMarquetteMarquetteKMQT1,525 feet (465 m)October 16, 1995
IndianaGibsonEvansvilleKVWX625 feet (191 m)January 29, 2003
IndianaMarionIndianapolisKIND887 feet (270 m)August 5, 1994
IndianaKosciuskoFort WayneKIWX1,056 feet (322 m)March 6, 1994
IllinoisWillChicagoKLOT760 feet (230 m)August 16, 1993
IllinoisLoganLincolnKILX731 feet (223 m)August 9, 1995
WisconsinBrownGreen BayKGRB823 feet (251 m)June 13, 1995
WisconsinLa CrosseLa CrosseKARX1,357 feet (414 m)July 8, 1996
WisconsinJeffersonMilwaukeeKMKX1,023 feet (312 m)April 27, 1995
MinnesotaSaint LouisDuluthKDLH1,542 feet (470 m)October 5, 1995
MinnesotaCarverMinneapolisKMPX1,101 feet (336 m)May 30, 1995
IowaScottDavenportKDVN851 feet (259 m)January 9, 1995
IowaPolkDes MoinesKDMX1,095 feet (334 m)March 13, 1995
MissouriCassKansas CityKEAX1,092 feet (333 m)April 14, 1994
MissouriGreeneSpringfieldKSGF1,375 feet (419 m)April 24, 1995
MissouriSaint CharlesSaint LouisKSGF722 feet (220 m)August 4, 1992
ArkansasSebastianFort SmithKSRX737 feet (225 m)February 10, 1997
ArkansasPulaskiLittle RockKLZK649 feet (198 m)April 12, 1994
LouisianaVernonFort PolkKPOE473 feet (144 m)June 28, 1995
LouisianaTangipahoaHammondsKHDC144 feet (44 m)March 23, 2024
LouisianaCalcasieuLake CharlesKLCH137 feet (42 m)April 23, 1995
LouisianaCaddoShreveportKSHV387 feet (118 m)August 28, 1995
TexasPotterAmarilloKAMA3,703 feet (1,129 m)January 14, 1994
TexasComalAustin/San AntonioKEWX767 feet (234 m)March 20, 1995
TexasCameronBrownsvilleKBRO88 feet (27 m)May 23, 1995
TexasNuecesCorpus ChristiKCRP142 feet (43 m)June 30, 1996
TexasTarrantDallas/Fort WorthKFWS777 feet (237 m)March 23, 1994
TexasShackelfordDyess Air Force BaseKDYX1,582 feet (482 m)May 5, 1995
New MexicoDoña AnaEl Paso, TexasKEPZ4,218 feet (1,286 m)May 15, 1996
TexasWilliamsonFort HoodKGRK603 feet (184 m)April 21, 1995
TexasGalvestonHoustonKHGX115 feet (35 m)August 25, 1992
TexasKinneyLaughlin Air Force BaseKDFX1,196 feet (365 m)January 26, 1996
TexasLubbockLubbockKLBB3,378 feet (1,030 m)April 1, 1994
TexasMidlandMidland/OdessaKMAF2,962 feet (903 m)June 8, 1995
TexasTom GreenSan AngeloKSJT2,004 feet (611 m)April 7, 1996
OklahomaTillmanAltus Air Force BaseKFDR1,315 feet (401 m)February 15, 1992
OklahomaClevelandOklahoma CityKTLX1,278 feet (390 m)June 5, 1991
OklahomaClevelandNorman (National Severe Storms Laboratory)KOUN1,284 feet (391 m)May 9, 2010
OklahomaClevelandNorman (Radar Operations Center)KCRI1,315 feet (401 m)October 31, 2014
OklahomaRogersTulsaKINX749 feet (228 m)April 18, 1994
OklahomaAlfalfaVance Air Force BaseKVNX1,258 feet (383 m)November 22, 1994
KansasFordDodge CityKDDC2,671 feet (814 m)September 29, 1992
KansasShermanGoodlandKGLD3,716 feet (1,133 m)December 13, 1992
KansasWabaunseeTopekaKTWX1,415 feet (431 m)October 25, 1993
KansasSedgwickWichitaKICT1,400 feet (430 m)November 10, 1992
NebraskaWebsterHastingsKUEX2,057 feet (627 m)October 27, 1994
NebraskaThomasNorth PlatteKLNX3,113 feet (949 m)May 3, 1996
NebraskaDouglasOmahaKOAX1,262 feet (385 m)April 18, 1995
South DakotaBrownAberdeenKABR1,383 feet (422 m)December 1, 1994
South DakotaPenningtonRapid CityKUDX3,195 feet (974 m)January 20, 1996
South DakotaMinnehahaSioux FallsKFSD1,495 feet (456 m)December 7, 1993
North DakotaBurleighBismarckKBIS1,755 feet (535 m)October 18, 1994
North DakotaTraillGrand ForksKMVX1,083 feet (330 m)December 16, 1995
North DakotaMcHenryMinot Air Force BaseKMBX1,590 feet (480 m)July 24, 1995
MontanaYellowstoneBillingsKBLX3,703 feet (1,129 m)December 6, 1995
MontanaValleyGlasgowKGGW2,384 feet (727 m)February 1, 1996
MontanaCascadeGreat FallsKTFX3,805 feet (1,160 m)January 12, 1995
MontanaMissoulaMissoulaKMSX7,978 feet (2,432 m)January 13, 1995
WyomingLaramieCheyenneKCYS6,193 feet (1,888 m)June 7, 1994
WyomingFremontRivertonKRIW5,633 feet (1,717 m)October 2, 1995
ColoradoAdams CountyDenverKFTG5,611 feet (1,710 m)June 19, 1993
ColoradoMesaGrand JunctionKGJX10,101 feet (3,079 m)February 1, 1996
ColoradoPuebloPuebloKPUX5,363 feet (1,635 m)June 13, 1995
New MexicoBernalilloAlbuquerqueKABX5,951 feet (1,814 m)September 14, 1994
New MexicoCurryCannon Air Force BaseKFDX4,698 feet (1,432 m)June 28, 1995
New MexicoOteroHolloman Air Force BaseKHDX4,270 feet (1,300 m)August 24, 1995
ArizonaCoconinoFlagstaffKFSX7,514 feet (2,290 m)January 7, 1996
ArizonaMaricopaPhoenixKIWA1,426 feet (435 m)June 30, 1993
ArizonaPimaTucsonKEMX5,319 feet (1,621 m)October 3, 1995
ArizonaYumaYumaKYUX239 feet (73 m)July 26, 1996
UtahIronCedar CityKICX10,757 feet (3,279 m)September 16, 1996
UtahBox ElderSalt Lake CityKMTX6,594 feet (2,010 m)February 22, 1995
IdahoAdaBoiseKCBX3,172 feet (967 m)January 12, 1994
IdahoBinghamPocatelloKSFX4,539 feet (1,383 m)September 27, 1995
NevadaLanderElkoKLRX6,895 feet (2,102 m)February 4, 1996
NevadaClarkLas VegasKESX4,948 feet (1,508 m)June 14, 1995
NevadaWashoeRenoKRGX8,396 feet (2,559 m)February 24, 1995
CaliforniaButteBeale Air Force BaseKBBX221 feet (67 m)October 22, 1996
CaliforniaSan BernardinoEdwards Air Force BaseKEYX2,873 feet (876 m)August 21, 1995
CaliforniaHumboldtEurekaKBHX2,516 feet (767 m)May 8, 1995
CaliforniaVenturaLos AngelesKVTX2,807 feet (856 m)August 16, 1994
CaliforniaYolo CountySacramentoKDAX144 feet (44 m)January 26, 1994
CaliforniaSan DiegoSan DiegoKNKX1,052 feet (321 m)April 30, 1996
CaliforniaSanta ClaraSan FranciscoKMUX3,550 feet (1,080 m)March 29, 1994
CaliforniaKingsSan Joaquin ValleyKHNX340 feet (100 m)March 21, 1995
CaliforniaOrangeSanta Ana MountainsKSOX3,106 feet (947 m)December 6, 1996
CaliforniaSanta BarbaraVandenberg Air Force BaseKVBX1,354 feet (413 m)November 21, 1995
HawaiiKauaʻiSouth KauaiPHKI340 feet (100 m)January 5, 1996
HawaiiHawaiʻiKamuelaPHKM3,966 feet (1,209 m)July 23, 1998
HawaiiMauiMolokaʻiPHMO1,444 feet (440 m)April 5, 1996
HawaiiHawaiʻiSouth ShorePHWA1,461 feet (445 m)June 19, 1998
OregonJacksonMedfordKMAX7,561 feet (2,305 m)January 18, 1996
OregonUmatillaPendletonKPDT1,580 feet (480 m)April 20, 1996
OregonWashingtonPortlandKRTX1,728 feet (527 m)March 13, 1995
WashingtonGrays HarborLangley HillKLGX366 feet (112 m)August 17, 2011
WashingtonIslandSeattleKATX642 feet (196 m)October 27, 1994
WashingtonSpokaneSpokaneKOTX2,449 feet (746 m)April 10, 1996
AlaskaBethelBethelPABC193 feet (59 m)May 1, 2001
AlaskaFairbanks North StarFairbanksPAPD193 feet (59 m)December 17, 1996
AlaskaKenai PeninsulaAnchoragePAHG356 feet (109 m)September 16, 1996
AlaskaBristol BayKing SalmonPAKC144 feet (44 m)August 26, 1996
AlaskaChugachMiddleton IslandPAIH132 feet (40 m)March 8, 1997
AlaskaNomeNomePAEC90 feet (27 m)March 8, 1997
AlaskaSitkaSitkaPACG272 feet (83 m)May 14, 1997
GuamMangilaoAndersen Air Force BasePGUA386 feet (118 m)May 22, 1995
North Jeolla (South Korea)Kunsan Air BaseRKJK192 feet (59 m)June 18, 1997
Gyeonggi (South Korea)Camp HumphreysRKSG1,521 feet (464 m)March 11, 1996

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^abTimothy D. Crum; Ron L. Alberty (1993)."The WSR-88D and the WSR-88D Operational Support Facility".Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.74 (9): 74.9.Bibcode:1993BAMS...74.1669C.doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1993)074<1669:twatwo>2.0.co;2.
  2. ^abNancy Mathis (2007).Storm Warning: The Story of a Killer Tornado.Touchstone. pp. 92–94.ISBN 978-0-7432-8053-2.
  3. ^Tom Banse (September 29, 2011),New Weather Radar Heralds More Accurate And Timely Storm Warnings,NPR
  4. ^"WSR-88D Radar, Tornado Warnings and Tornado Casualties"(PDF). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2006-11-12.
  5. ^"An Overview of NEXRAD Products Available via UCAR's Unidata Program". Weather Services International. Archived fromthe original on 2008-04-20.
  6. ^"About the Radar Operations Center (ROC)".Radar Operations Center.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  7. ^Prather, Michael J.; Saxion, Darcy S."WSR-88D: Technology Evolution of Level I Data Recording"(PDF).NOAA NWS Radar Operations Center. Retrieved14 September 2019.
  8. ^"NEXRAD Technical Information".www.roc.noaa.gov. Retrieved13 April 2018.
  9. ^"NEXRAD Technical Information".www.roc.noaa.gov. Retrieved13 April 2018.
  10. ^"Technical Implementation Notice 15–49 National Weather Service Headquarters Washington DC". Oct 22, 2015. RetrievedMay 23, 2016.
  11. ^abc"WSR-88D Volume Coverage Pattern (VCP) Improvement Initiatives"(PDF). National Weather Service. Oct 22, 2015. RetrievedMay 23, 2016.
  12. ^abc"MESO-SAILS (Multiple Elevation Scan Option for SAILS) Initial Description Document"(PDF). National Weather Service. RetrievedMay 23, 2016.
  13. ^US Department of Commerce, NOAA."NWS JetStream MAX - Doppler Radar Volume Coverage Patterns (VCPs)".www.weather.gov. Retrieved2019-10-16.
  14. ^ab"Theory and Concept of Operations for Multi-PRF Dealiasing Algorithm's VCP 112"(PDF).National Weather Service. March 19, 2019. RetrievedOctober 16, 2019.
  15. ^"Current VCP in use for each Site".www.roc.noaa.gov. Retrieved25 August 2024.
  16. ^"RPG SW BUILD 10.0 – INCLUDES REPORTING FOR SW 41 RDA".Radar Operations Center. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  17. ^"Build10FAQ".Radar Operations Center. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Archived fromthe original on 2008-07-04.
  18. ^"NEXRAD Product Improvement – Current Status of WSR-88D Open Radar Data Acquisition (ORDA) Program and Plans For The Future"(PDF).American Meteorological Society.
  19. ^"Polarimetric Radar Page".University of Oklahoma. Archived fromthe original on 2018-08-22. Retrieved2003-09-09.
  20. ^"Technical Implementation Notice 10–22 Amended"(PDF).Radar Operations Center. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. March 7, 2011.
  21. ^"Automated Volume Scan Evaluation and Termination (AVSET)"(PDF).National Weather Service. RetrievedMarch 7, 2017.
  22. ^Dennis Mersereau (June 18, 2014)."This One Little Programming Tweak Will Save Thousands of Lives".The Vane.Gawker Media, LLC. Archived fromthe original on June 19, 2014. RetrievedJune 18, 2014.
  23. ^"Use of AVSET at RAH during the 16 November 2011 Tornado Event"(PDF).National Weather Service. RetrievedMarch 7, 2017.
  24. ^"Supplemental Adaptive Intra-Volume Low-Level Scan (SAILS)"(PDF).National Weather Service. October 30, 2012. RetrievedMarch 7, 2017.
  25. ^Chrisman, Joe (January 2014)."Multiple Elevation Scan Option for SAILS (MESO-SAILS)"(PDF).National Weather Service. RetrievedFebruary 27, 2017.
  26. ^"Archived copy"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2017-01-19. Retrieved2017-03-07.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  27. ^"Archived copy"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2017-04-27. Retrieved2017-04-27.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  28. ^Atkins, N. T.; Laurent, M. St (May 2009)."Bow Echo Mesovortices. Part II: Their Genesis"(PDF).Monthly Weather Review. RetrievedFebruary 18, 2017.
  29. ^"General Description Document Mid-Volume Rescan of Low-Level Elevations (MRLE)"(PDF).National Weather Service. May 12, 2016. RetrievedMarch 7, 2017.
  30. ^"New Radar Technology".Roc.noaa.gov. Retrieved2017-04-27.
  31. ^"mwr2650 1514..1532"(PDF).Spc.noaa.gov. Retrieved2017-04-27.
  32. ^"Archived copy"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2017-01-25. Retrieved2017-03-07.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  33. ^"Service Life Extension Program (SLEP)".www.roc.noaa.gov. Retrieved13 April 2018.
  34. ^"Lovelady, Texas: A Case Study of a Tornadic Cell in a Sparse Radar Coverage Environment"(PDF).NWS Southern Region Headquarters. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  35. ^abNick Wiltgen (April 16, 2014)."The Tornado East Texas Never Saw Coming – And Why They May Not See The Next One".The Weather Channel. The Weather Company. Archived fromthe original on January 25, 2017. RetrievedJune 13, 2015.
  36. ^Dennis Mersereau (July 25, 2013)."Storms flying under the radar: when radar gaps and down time turn dangerous".Washington Post.
  37. ^Burr, Richard (September 17, 2015)."S.2058 – To require the Secretary of Commerce to study the coverage gaps of the Next Generation Weather Radar of the National Weather Service and to develop a plan for improving radar coverage and hazardous weather detection and forecasting".United States Congress. RetrievedFebruary 27, 2017.
  38. ^"All Actions S.2058 — 114th Congress (2015–2016)".United States Congress. 2 December 2016. RetrievedMarch 7, 2017.
  39. ^US Department of Commerce, NOAA."KLIX Radar Is Moving!".www.weather.gov. Retrieved2021-08-09.
  40. ^Belles, Jonathan (September 25, 2017)."Puerto Rico Radar Obliterated After It Takes a Direct Hit From Hurricane Maria". The Weather Channel. Retrieved4 March 2018.
  41. ^"Federal collaboration yields radar coverage for Puerto Rico, USVI in wake of Hurricane Maria". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 31 October 2017. Retrieved4 March 2018.
  42. ^Belles, Jonathan (June 18, 2018)."Puerto Rico's Radar Restored 9 Months After Hurricane Maria's Wrath". The Weather Channel. Retrieved13 March 2019.
  43. ^Jonathan Erdman; Jonathan Belles (September 1, 2020)."Hurricane Laura Shredded National Weather Service Radar in Lake Charles, Louisiana".The Weather Channel. The Weather Company. RetrievedJanuary 28, 2021.
  44. ^"LCH radar is going to be down a minute.... #Laura -". Brett Adair. August 27, 2020 – via Twitter.
  45. ^Ron Brackett (October 8, 2020)."With Hurricane Delta Approaching, Loaner Radar To Cover For Lake Charles, Louisiana, Station Destroyed by Laura".The Weather Channel. The Weather Company. RetrievedJanuary 28, 2021.
  46. ^Jan Wesner Childs (January 23, 2021)."Lake Charles Radar Back Online After Hurricane Laura Repairs".The Weather Channel. The Weather Company. RetrievedJanuary 28, 2021.
  47. ^"Current NOTAMS for PGUA".
  48. ^"New Radar Technologies".NWS Radar Operations Center. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2014. RetrievedJune 18, 2014.
  49. ^ab"Multi-Function Phased Array Radar".NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory. Retrieved2017-04-20.
  50. ^"MIT Lincoln Laboratory: FAA Weather Systems: MPAR".www.ll.mit.edu. Archived fromthe original on 2016-06-08. Retrieved2017-04-20.
  51. ^"Weather Research: Weather Radar".National Severe Storms Laboratory. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Archived fromthe original on 2008-05-24.
  52. ^"NEXRAD on AWS".Amazon Web Services, Inc. Retrieved2017-04-20.
  53. ^"New AWS Public Data Set – Real-Time and Archived NEXRAD Weather Data | AWS Blog".aws.amazon.com. 27 October 2015. Retrieved2017-04-20.
  54. ^"Unidata Internet Data Distribution (IDD)".Unidata.
  55. ^"NEXRAD sites and coordinates".noaa.gov.National Climatic Data Center. Archived fromthe original on 2009-05-03. Retrieved13 April 2018.

References

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Map all coordinates usingOpenStreetMapDownload coordinates asKML
Wikimedia Commons has media related toNEXRAD.
Theory of Doppler Weather Radar
Real time data
Research
Earth-based meteorological observation systems andweather stations
General
By region
Worldwide
United States
Military weather radars
Weather surveillance radars
Research radars
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NEXRAD&oldid=1318419737"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp