Inmathematics, ann-group, orn-dimensional higher group, is a special kind ofn-category that generalises the concept ofgroup tohigher-dimensional algebra. Here, may be anynatural number orinfinity. The thesis ofAlexander Grothendieck's studentHoàng Xuân Sính was an in-depth study of2-groups under the moniker 'gr-category'.
The general definition of-group is a matter of ongoing research. However, it is expected that everytopological space will have ahomotopy-group at every point, which will encapsulate thePostnikov tower of the space up to thehomotopy group, or the entire Postnikov tower for.
One of the principal examples of higher groups come from the homotopy types ofEilenberg–MacLane spaces since they are the fundamental building blocks for constructing higher groups, and homotopy types in general. For instance, every group can be turned into an Eilenberg-Maclane space through a simplicial construction,[1] and it behavesfunctorially. This construction gives an equivalence between groups and1-groups. Note that some authors write as, and for anabelian group, is written as.
The definition and many properties of2-groups are already known.2-groups can be described usingcrossed modules and their classifying spaces. Essentially, these are given by a quadruple where are groups with abelian,
agroup homomorphism, and acohomology class. These groups can be encoded as homotopy-types with and, with the action coming from the action of on higher homotopy groups, and coming from thePostnikov tower since there is a fibration
coming from a map. Note that this idea can be used to construct other higher groups with group data having trivial middle groups, where the fibration sequence is now
coming from a map whose homotopy class is an element of.
Another interesting and accessible class of examples which requires homotopy theoretic methods, not accessible to strict groupoids, comes from looking at homotopy3-types of groups.[2] Essentially, these are given by a triple of groups with only the first group being non-abelian, and some additional homotopy theoretic data from the Postnikov tower. If we take this3-group as a homotopy3-type, the existence of universal covers gives us a homotopy type which fits into a fibration sequence
giving a homotopy type with trivial on which acts on. These can be understood explicitly using the previous model of2-groups, shifted up by degree (called delooping). Explicitly, fits into a Postnikov tower with associated Serre fibration
giving where the-bundle comes from a map, giving a cohomology class in. Then, can be reconstructed using a homotopy quotient.
The previous construction gives the general idea of how to consider higher groups in general. For ann-group with groups with the latter bunch being abelian, we can consider the associated homotopy type and first consider the universal cover. Then, this is a space with trivial, making it easier to construct the rest of the homotopy type using the Postnikov tower. Then, the homotopy quotient gives a reconstruction of, showing the data of an-group is a higher group, orsimple space, with trivial such that a group acts on it homotopy theoretically. This observation is reflected in the fact that homotopy types are not realized bysimplicial groups, butsimplicial groupoids[3]pg 295 since the groupoid structure models the homotopy quotient.
Going through the construction of a 4-group is instructive because it gives the general idea for how to construct the groups in general. For simplicity, let's assume is trivial, so the non-trivial groups are. This gives a Postnikov tower
where the first non-trivial map is a fibration with fiber. Again, this is classified by a cohomology class in. Now, to construct from, there is an associated fibration
given by a homotopy class. In principle[4] this cohomology group should be computable using the previous fibration with the Serre spectral sequence with the correct coefficients, namely. Doing this recursively, say for a-group, would require several spectral sequence computations, at worst many spectral sequence computations for an-group.
For acomplex manifold withuniversal cover, and asheaf of abelian groups on, for every there exists[5] canonicalhomomorphisms
giving a technique for relatingn-groups constructed from a complex manifold and sheaf cohomology on. This is particularly applicable forcomplex tori.
Note this is (slightly) distinct from the previous section, because it is about taking cohomology over a space with values in a higher group, giving higher cohomology groups. If we are considering as a homotopy type and assuming thehomotopy hypothesis, then these are the same cohomology groups.