Mruic orMru–Hkongso is a small group ofSino-Tibetan languages consisting of two languages,Mru andAnu-Hkongso. Their relationship within Sino-Tibetan is unclear.
Peterson & Wright (2009)[1] proposed the nameMru–Hkongso.DeLancey (2021) also uses the nameMru–Hkongso.[2]
On the other hand,Bradley (1997) classifies Mru as part ofLolo-Burmese, based on Löffler's (1966) observations that Mru shares many phonological and lexical resemblances with Lolo-Burmese.[6][7]
TheMru-Hkongso group was first proposed by Peterson & Wright (2009),[1] who do not consider it to be a subgroup ofLolo-Burmese.
Peterson (2017:205)[8] notes that Mru and Hkongso do not have any features characteristic ofKuki-Chin languages that have been identified by VanBik (2009),[9] including lack of thesound changeProto-Tibeto-Burman *s >tʰ, lack of Kuki-Chin-type verb stem alternation, and lack of the singular first person pronoun (1.SG) *kaj which is present in most Kuki-Chin languages.
Peterson (2009)[10] considers Mru-Hkongso to be a separate Tibeto-Burman branch, and notes the following similarities between Mru-Hkongso andBodo–Garo languages.
Peterson (2009)[10] considers the similarities with Bodo–Garo to be due to the possible early split of Mruic from a Tibeto-Burman branch that included Bodo–Garo (see alsoCentral Tibeto-Burman languages andSal languages).
BothMru andHkongso display SVO (subject-verb-object) order instead of the SOV word order typical of most Tibeto-Burman languages.[10][11][12]Bai,Sinitic, andKarenic are the only other Sino-Tibetan language branches with primarily verb-medial (SVO) word order.
^abPeterson, David A. and Jonathan Wright. 2009.Mru-Hkongso: a new Tibeto-Burman grouping. Paper presented at The 42nd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics (ICSTLL 42), Chiang Mai.
^DeLancey, Scott (2021). "Classifying Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan) languages".The Languages and Linguistics of Mainland Southeast Asia. De Gruyter. pp. 207–224.doi:10.1515/9783110558142-012.ISBN978-3-11-055814-2.
^DeLancey, Scott (2015). "Morphological Evidence for a Central Branch of Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan)".Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale.44 (2):122–149.doi:10.1163/19606028-00442p02.
^Löffler, Lorenz G. (1966). "The contribution of Mru to Sino-Tibetan linguistics".Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft.116 (1):118–159.JSTOR43369896.
^Bradley, David (1997)."Tibeto-Burman languages and classification"(PDF).Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, Papers in South East Asian linguistics. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. pp. 1–71.
^Peterson, David. 2017. "On Kuki-Chin subgrouping." In Picus Sizhi Ding and Jamin Pelkey, eds.Sociohistorical linguistics in Southeast Asia: New horizons for Tibeto-Burman studies in honor of David Bradley, 189-209. Leiden: Brill.
^VanBik, Kenneth. 2009.Proto-Kuki-Chin: A Reconstructed Ancestor of the Kuki-Chin Languages. STEDT Monograph 8.ISBN0-944613-47-0.
Language and Social Development Organization. (2019).A Chin dialect survey (Part 1 of 2) [Data set].doi:10.5281/zenodo.3344667 (The 2008-03 Anu-Hkongso Chin survey contains data on both Anu-Hkongso and the Anok, Dawpreng, and Sungma dialects of Mru.)