| Monster-in-Law | |
|---|---|
 Theatrical release poster | |
| Directed by | Robert Luketic |
| Written by | Anya Kochoff |
| Produced by |
|
| Starring | |
| Cinematography | Russell Carpenter |
| Edited by |
|
| Music by | David Newman |
Production companies |
|
| Distributed by |
|
Release dates |
|
Running time | 101 minutes |
| Countries | |
| Language | English |
| Budget | $43 million[2] |
| Box office | $155.4 million[2] |
Monster-in-Law is a 2005romantic comedy film directed byRobert Luketic, written by Anya Kochoff and starringJennifer Lopez,Jane Fonda,Michael Vartan andWanda Sykes. It marked a return to cinema for Fonda, being her first film in 15 years sinceStanley & Iris in 1990. The film was negatively received by critics who praised Fonda's performance but panned the screenplay, and Lopez's performance.Monster-in-Law was a box office success, grossing $155 million on a $43 million budget.
Charlie Cantilini is atemp/dog walker/yoga instructor and aspiring fashion designer fromVenice Beach, California, who meets doctor Kevin Fields. At first, she believes he is gay, but Kevin later asks her out, and she feels she has finally found the right man.
Things start to sour when Kevin introduces Charlie to his mother, Viola, a former newscaster turned talk show host. She was recently replaced by someone much younger, which led to her having a meltdown, attacking a young guest on-air, and being committed for several months.
Loathing Charlie immediately because she is a temp and “going to destroy him,” Viola becomes more distraught when Kevin proposes to her. She fears she will lose her son just as she lost her career. Determined to ruin Kevin and Charlie's relationship, she enlists the help of her loyal assistant, Ruby, and Kevin's vindictive ex-girlfriend, Fiona.
At the engagement party, Fiona kisses Kevin in his dressing room, deeply hurting Charlie, who feels out of place in Kevin’s world, precisely as Viola and Fiona planned. Viola feigns ananxiety attack and moves in with Charlie while Kevin is away for a medical conference, hoping to drive her crazy with her antics.
Charlie soon realizes Viola's plan and retaliates by destroying her bedroom and tampering with her antipsychotic medication (which Viola had replaced with vitamin C tablets). Charlie eventually confronts her, forcing her to move out. Finding no way to stop the wedding, Viola tricks Charlie into eating nuts during the rehearsal dinner. This causes an extreme allergic reaction, which causes Charlie's face to swell. Luckily, it subsides by morning.
On the day of the wedding, Viola turns up wearing an extravagant white dress instead of thepeach-colored one Charlie had specially made for her. This leads to a violent standoff between them, with Viola refusing to accept Charlie and declaring she will never be good enough for Kevin.
Suddenly, Viola's dreadful mother-in-law, Kevin's grandmother Gertrude, arrives, and they have an indignant argument. Gertrude holds Viola responsible for the death of her son, Kevin's father, many years earlier, claiming he died of "terminal disappointment." Gertrude's resentment of Viola resembles Viola's animosity towards Charlie, who decides to back down because she feels the same thing will happen to them in 30 years.
Charlie leaves to tell Kevin the wedding is off, but Ruby finally gets through to Viola. She resents being compared to Gertrude, but Ruby points out that Viola is far worse as Gertrude never tried to poison her, referring to the nuts at the rehearsal dinner. Gertrude also wore black to Viola's wedding because she was "in mourning" for her son, an equally disrespectful mirror of Viola's behavior. When Viola claims she wants her son to be happy, Ruby asks her what made her think he wasn’t.
Viola has an epiphany and ultimately realizes that she wants Charlie to stay. She tells her that she will leave the couple alone if that means her son is happy. Charlie, however, tells Viola that she wants her to be a part of their lives, and they set some boundaries and ground rules.
Charlie and Kevin get married, and Viola (now wearing the peach-colored dress) catches the bouquet when Charlie throws it. As the newlyweds drive away to their honeymoon in Hawaii, Viola and Ruby leave to go out drinking.
As of August 2021[update], the film holds an 19% approval rating onRotten Tomatoes, based on 167 reviews with an average rating of 4.28/10. The website's critical consensus reads, "While Jane Fonda steals the movie in her return to the screen, a tired script and flimsy performances make this borderline comedy fall flat."[3] OnMetacritic the film has a weighted average score of 31 out of 100, based on reviews from 38 critics, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews".[4] Audiences polled byCinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "B+" on an A+ to F scale.[5]
Roger Ebert of theChicago Sun-Times gave the film one out of possible four stars, saying: "You do not keep Jane Fonda offscreen for 15 years, only to bring her back as a specimen of rabid Momism. You write a role for her. It makes sense. It fits her. You like her in it. It gives her a relationship with Jennifer Lopez that could plausibly exist in our time and space. It gives her a son who has not wandered over after theE.R. auditions. And it doesn't supply a supporting character who undercuts every scene she's in by being more on-topic than any of the leads."[6]Joe Morgenstern of theWall Street Journal also panned the movie, and used his review to deride the state of big-budget film-making, writing: "Films like this ... are emblematic ofHollywood's relentless dumbing-down and defining-down of big-screen attractions. There's an audience for such stuff, but little enthusiasm or loyalty. Adult moviegoers are being ignored almost completely during all but the last two or three months of each year, while even the kids who march off to the multiplexes each weekend know they're getting moldy servings of same-old, rather than entertainments that feed their appetite for surprise and delight."[7]Mick LaSalle of theSan Francisco Chronicle was one of the few critics who gave the film a positive review, writing: "It's a crude, obvious comedy, which occasionally clunks, but it's often very funny, as well as being a really shrewd bit of popular entertainment. Its appeal resides in a lot of things, not the least of which is a sophisticated awareness of what an audience brings to it."[8]
The film ran 849 sneak preview screenings on Mother's Day at 4pm, the Sunday before release. New Line's president of domestic distribution David Tuckerman publicly stated his doubts about this strategy but the film achieved 90% attendance and he stated "the marketing department hit a home run."[9] The film became a box-office success debuting at number #1 at the box office during its first weekend and earning $24 million. By the end of its run, the movie earned $83 million at the domestic box office and a worldwide total of $154.7 million, against an estimated production budget of $43 million.[2]
Lopez earned aGolden Raspberry Award nomination forWorst Actress for her performance in the film, but lost toJenny McCarthy forDirty Love.
On October 13, 2014, it was reported thatFox was developing a television series based on the film withAmy B. Harris as creator.[10] In 2021,E! reported that the series "didn't ultimately happen".[11]
