Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Monophthongization of diphthongs in Proto-Slavic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Monophthongization of diphthongs is aProto-Slavicsound change in whichdiphthongs turn intovowels. It is one of the key events in the chronology of the Proto-Slavic language. Themonophthongization of diphthongs restructured the Proto-Slavic language with a strong influence on itsmorphophonology.

The change

[edit]

Proto-Balto-Slavic, the ancestor of Proto-Slavic, possessed three vocalic diphthongs:*ai,*au and*ei. In Proto-Slavic, these were monophthongized as follows, with the subscript indicating whether the vowels trigger thefirst palatalization or thesecond.

  • *ai > *ě₂, *i₂ - Early Slavic *snaigu > *sněgъ > Serbo-Croatian snijeg
  • *au > *u - Early Slavic *saušu > *suxъ > Serbo-Croatian suh
  • *ei > *i₁ - Early Slavic *kreivu > *krivъ > Serbo-Croatian kriv

The fourth Proto-Indo-European vocalic diphthong,*eu, had already become*jau in Proto-Balto-Slavic. It then developed into*ju in Proto-Slavic, following the same development as for*au. The unrounding of older long to Slavic*y had already taken place by the time of the monophthongization; the new*u filled the gap left by it. The first palatalization had also taken place, as the new vowels denoted as*ě₂ and*i₂ did not trigger it.

While most cases of older*ai developed into*ě₂, some inflectional endings appear to have developed*i₂ instead. It is unclear what factors are involved in triggering one reflex versus the other.

  • The o-stem nominative plural (Old Church Slavonicčlověkъ,člověci), reflecting the original Proto-Indo-European pronominal ending*-oy, also seen in Lithuanian-ai.
  • The thematic imperative infix (Old Church Slavonicrešti,rekǫ,reci), reflecting the original Proto-Indo-European infix*-oyh₁-.

Dating

[edit]

George Y. Shevelov dates the monophthongization of diphthongs to the 5th – 7th century AD.[1]Zdzisław Stieber dates the monophthongization of diphthongs to the 5th or 6th century AD.[2]

Toponymy data

[edit]

By the time theSlavic migration to theBalkans began, the monophthongization of diphthongs had not yet taken place, as evidenced by the borrowing of theLatin namePoetovio as the SlavicPtuj.

Subsequent toponyms show the borrowing of the Latin [au] as [ov], which indicates the completion of the process of monophthongization of diphthongs by the time these names were borrowed, for example:[1][2]

  • Latin Lauretum > Serbo-CroatianLovret
  • Latin Lauriana > Serbo-CroatianLovran
  • Latin Tauriana > Serbo-CroatianTovrljane
  • Latin (Lapides) lausiae > Serbo-CroatianLavsa / Lavca

Bibliography

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abJurij Vladimirovič Ševeljev, A Prehistory of Slavic, Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag, 1964.
  2. ^abZdzisław Stieber, Zarys gramatyki porównawczej języków słowiańskich, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 2005.ISBN 83-01-14542-0
History
East Slavic
South Slavic
Eastern
Transitional
Western [ru]
West Slavic
Czech–Slovak
Lechitic
Sorbian
Microlanguages
and dialects
East Slavic
South Slavic
West Slavic
Mixed languages
Constructed
languages
Historical
phonology
Italics indicateextinct languages.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monophthongization_of_diphthongs_in_Proto-Slavic&oldid=1246083917"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp