 | This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
Mit'a (Quechua pronunciation:[ˈmɪˌtʼa])[1][2] was a system mandatory labor service in theInca Empire, as well as in Spain's empirein the Americas.[3] Its close relative, the regionally mandatoryMinka is still in use inQuechua communities today and known asfaena in Spanish.
Mit'a was effectively a form of tribute to the Inca government in the form of labor, i.e. acorvée. Tax labor accounted for much of the Inca state tax revenue;[4] beyond that, it was used for the construction of theroad network, bridges, agricultural terraces, and fortifications in ancient Peru. Military service was also mandatory.
All citizens who could perform labor were required to do so for a set number of days out of a year (the basic meaning of the wordmit'a is a regularturn or aseason). The Inca Empire's wealth meant a family often needed only 65 days to farm; the rest of the year was devoted entirely to themit'a. Mit'a was repurposed by the Spanish Crown in 1573, drafting one-seventh of the adult male population to work in mines.[3]
A relative ofmit'a (federal work) is the modern Quechua system of Minka orfaena, which is mostly applied in small-scale villages. The Minka was adopted during the 1960s on large-scale federal projects ofPeru.
The Incas elaborated creatively on a preexisting system of not only themit'a exchange of labor but also the exchange of the objects of religious veneration of the peoples whom they took into their empire. This exchange ensured proper compliance among conquered peoples. In this instance,wak'as andpaqarinas became significant centers of shared worship and a point of unification of their ethnically and linguistically diverse empire, bringing unity and citizenship to often geographically disparate peoples. That eventually led to a system of pilgrimages throughout all of these various shrines by the indigenous people of the empire prior to the introduction ofCatholicism.
Enormous construction of highways and structures were possible in part only by the use of themit'a. All the people worked for the government for a certain period of time. This labor was free for the Inca Rule. During the Inca period, men were required to work 65 days in the field to provide food for his family. When someone's turn came, he joined the various works that used themit'a. A communal type of elemental provisions and needs was set up in order to care for the families of those who were absent formit'a. People worked in building highways, the construction of homes for the emperor and nobility, monuments, bridges, fields belonging to priests and the emperor, and mines.
All males starting at the age of fifteen were required to participate in themit'a to do public services. This remained mandatory until the age of fifty. However, the Inca rule was flexible on the amount of time one could share on themit'a turn. Overseers were responsible to make sure that a person after fulfilling his duty in themit'a still had enough time to care for his own land and family.
The construction of bridges and oroyas was the responsibility of the local ethnic groups, who divided the work according to themit'a system, with the population divided intohanan andurin orichuq(ichoc) andallawqa(allauca) (upper and lower, left and right). During viceregal times, the Andean method of distributing labor obligations among the ethnic groups was preserved, which permitted the continued maintenance of these public works.[5] The warmit'a took men from theirayllus to serve in the state armies. All labor in the Andean world was performed as a rotational service, whether for maintaining thetampus, roads, bridges or for guarding the storehouses or other such tasks. The craftspeople enjoyed a special status in the Inca state. Although they worked for the state, they did not take part in the agricultural or warmit'a.[6] The agrarianmit'a was distinct from the fishingmit'a, and these labor groups never intervened in each other's occupations. In the señorio of Chincha, the fishermen numbered ten thousand, and went to sea in turns, the rest of the time enjoying themselves by dancing and drinking. The Spaniard criticized them as lazy drunkards because they did not go to sea daily and all at once. The miningmit'a was also fulfilled at the level of ayllus, of the local lord, and, in the last instance, of the state.
The significance of the termmit'a goes beyond that of the system for organizing labor. It contains a certain Andean philosophical concept of eternal repetition. The constellation of the Pleiades, calledcabrillas ('little goats') by the Spaniards, were known asunquy (Quechua for 'disease', Hispanicizedoncoy) during the rainy seasonmit'a, and asqullqa (Quechua for 'storehouse') during the season of harvest and abundance. The seasons were divided into the drymit'a and the rainymit'a. The daymit'a succeeded the nightmit'a in a repetition that reflected an ordering of time that the natives conceptualized as a cyclical organizational system of order and chaos.[7]
During the Inca period people were mostly dependent on the cultivation of their land. All the fields of the Empire were divided into four categories: the Field of the Temple, the Emperor,Kurakas(Curacas), and People. Fields of the people were fields that belonged to the sick, widows, the elderly, wives of the soldiers and that of his own land.
At the beginning of plowing time, people started to work first at the fields of widows, of sick people and of wives of the soldiers under the direction of the village overseers. Then, they worked on their own field. Next, they worked on the Temples fields andKuraka fields and finally, they set to work on the Emperor's fields. While they worked on the Emperor's field, they typically wore their best dress and men and women chanted songs in praise to the Inca.
When people were engaged in war, their fields were cultivated by people engaged inmit'a. That way, soldiers would go to war with their fields and family secured and protected, which enhanced the loyalty and the focus on the part of Incan soldiers.
Under the ViceroyFrancisco de Toledo, communities were required to provide one seventh of their male labor force at any given time for public works, mines and agriculture. The system became an intolerable burden on the Inca communities and abuses were common. Complaints and revolts occurred and new laws were passed byPhilip III but they only had a limited effect. The Inca and Spanishmita's served different purposes. The Incamit'a provided public goods, such as maintenance of road networks and sophisticated irrigation and cropping systems that required intercommunity coordination of labor.[8] The majority of Inca subjects performed theirmit'a obligations in or near their home communities, often in agriculture; service in mines was extremely rare.[9] In contrast, the Spanishmit'a acted as a subsidy to private mining interests and the Spanish nation, which used tax revenues from silver production largely to finance European wars.[10]
A 2021 study in theJournal of Economic History found that the colonial mita system in Peru caused the decimation of the male native-born population.[11]
TheSpanish conquistadors also used the same labor system to supply the workforce they needed for the silver mines, which was the basis of their economy in the colonial period. Under the leadership of Viceroy Francisco de Toledo, who was dispatched to Peru in 1569, themit'a system greatly expanded as Toledo sought to increase silver outputs from thePotosí silver mine.
Toledo recognized that without a steady, reliable and inexpensive source of labor, mining would not be able to grow at the speed that the Spanish crown had requested. Under Toledo's leadership, the firstmit'a recruits arrived inPotosí in 1573 from the regions directly surrounding the Potosi mine. At its peak, recruitment for the Potosimit'a extended to an area that was nearly 200,000 square miles (520,000 km2) and included much of southern Peru and present-day Bolivia.
The conquistadors used the concept ofmit'a to suit their own needs.Mit'a is considered to be the ancient and original version of mandatory state service. The Spanishmit'a system had severe impacts on the native population, which was of able-bodied workers at a time while their communities were experiencing demographic collapse. It also resulted in natives fleeing their communities to evade themit'a. With fewer workers able to work the fields, the farming production went down, resulting in famine and malnutrition for many native communities in the region.
Research byMelissa Dell found that the miningmit'a resulted in negative long-term effects for the regions where it occurred.[12] This included lower levels of education and household consumption, less developed road networks, and a decrease inpublic good provision (due to there being very fewhaciendas, whose owners generally supported greater provision of public goods).[12][13][14]
Themit'a labor tribute is not to be confused with the related Inca policy of deliberate resettlements referred to by theQuechua wordmitma (mitmaq means 'outsider' or 'newcomer') or its Hispanicized forms,mitima ormitimaes (plural). That involved transplanting whole groups of people of Inca background as colonists into new lands inhabited by newly conquered peoples. The aim was to spread awareness of & involvement in Inca systems, and to distribute loyal Inca subjects throughout their empire to limit the threat of localized rebellions.
Mita districts historically achieved lower levels of education, and today, they remain less integrated into road networks. Finally, data from the most recent agricultural census document that residents ofmita districts are substantially more likely to be subsistence farmers sincehaciendas, rural estates with an attached labor force, were banned inmita districts to minimize the competition the state faced in accessing scarcemita labor. It was the hacienda elite that possessed the political connections required to secure public goods such as roads.[15] The hacienda elites were the ones who were lobbying for roads as many haciendas as possible, and empirical evidence links roads to increased market participation and higher household income.[16]
The fact that farmers frommit'a districts do not have greater access to paved roads means that they are unable to transport crops to larger, regional markets. It is unlikely that these farmers simply do not wish to participate in the market. In the case ofPeru, throughout the 1980s,Shining Path, as part of their Maoist ideology, attempted to turn farmers away from commercial farming; their efforts were largely unpopular and met with resistance.[17]
More recently, in 2004, residents ofIlave, amita district, lynched their local mayor, in part for his inability to follow through with promises to pave the town's access road and build a local market. Overall, formermita districts suffer from lower economic performance, as demonstrated by generally lower household consumption and increased rates of stunted growth. Without haciendas to compete with the more exploitative Spanish system,mita districts were subjected to greater economic and health pressures from their labor.Melissa Dell has shown that the repercussions of this disparity have persisted past the end of themita system asmita districts were less integrated with the greater road network.[18]
The only example of re-applying the Inca-styleMit'a in a modern state, as a government policy, occurred in Peru during the twoPopular Action governments under PresidentFernando Belaúnde Terry (1963–1968 and 1980–1985). Under this government, a state institution called "Cooperación Popular" (Popular Cooperation) was launched, strongly inspired by the strategy of labor tribute in the Incanmit'a. During the 10 years this institution operated, more infrastructure projects were accomplished in Peru than in most of the 140-year Republican era (from 1821 to 1963). The results were hundreds of kilometers of roads,aqueducts, communal and municipal works and other infrastructure pieces.[19][20]
The principle of the institution was quite simple: given the rather scarce economic resources of the Peruvian State in the early 1960s, the public works that this institution would do should have been "co-financed" by the beneficiaries, namely through contributions of labor.
In any given public works project in Peru, it is estimated that between 60 and 70% of the cost goes to the acquisition of materials, and the remaining 30–40% are labor costs. Applying the principle of theIncanmit'a, the government fronted the acquisition of goods, and the beneficiaries provided the labor services without salary; this allowed the Peruvian state to save 30–40% for public works during this period – these savings were invested in further public works projects. The beneficiaries in turn contributed their communal workforce in exchange for accelerated development of their communities and the expansion of infrastructure in Peru.
In 1964, the government of theRepublic of Korea became aware of the significant results achieved in Peru, and sent a commission to meet with the Peruvian government. The commission studied the methodology and organization of the Peruvian labor tribute institution and the feasibility of applying it to the Republic of Korea. After a few months in Peru, the commission returned to South Korea and rolled out their own modern version of the Incanmit'a to Korean production systems, including the manufacturing industry. The results obtained in Korea were even more positive than those obtained in Peru due to a different development approach.[citation needed]
Much of the state's economic output was produced through a corvée labor tax
