Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Minnesota Amendment 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Minnesota Amendment 2

November 6, 2012
Voter ID Amendment
Results
Choice
Votes%
Yes1,362,03046.16%
No1,588,75253.84%
Valid votes2,950,782100.00%
Invalid or blank votes00.00%
Total votes2,950,782100.00%

County results
Congressional district results
Precinct results

Yes

  90–100%
  80–90%
  70–80%
  60–70%
  50–60%

No

  90–100%
  80–90%
  70–80%
  60–70%
  50–60%

Other

  Tie
  No data

Results by county
Elections in Minnesota
Presidential elections
Presidential primaries
Senate elections
House of Representatives
Gubernatorial elections
Lieutenant gubernatorial elections
Secretary of State elections
State Auditor elections
Attorney General elections

Minnesota Amendment 2 (also calledVoter ID Amendment[1]) was a proposedlegislatively referred constitutional amendment that was on the ballot on November 6, 2012. If approved, it would have required a form of photographic identification before being permitted to vote in Minnesota municipal, state, and federal elections. However, it was defeated with 53.84% voting against and 46.16% for the measure.[2]

Legislative approval

[edit]

TheMinnesota Legislature approved the amendment for the ballot in April 2012 on essentially aparty-line vote. The amendment was promoted by Rep.Mary Kiffmeyer,R-Big Lake, who had formerly served asMinnesota Secretary of State.[3]

Support and opposition

[edit]

Institutional support for the measure broke down largely by party, withDFL leaders opposing the amendment, andRepublicans supporting it. The two most recent Secretaries of State lined up on opposite sides, with Kiffmeyer pushing for adoption, andMark Ritchie speaking against it.

Opinion polls

[edit]
Date of opinion pollConducted bySample sizeForAgainstUndecided/OtherMargin of errorQuestion
May 2–5, 2011[4]Star Tribune806 adults80%18%2%±4.7%"Please tell me if you would favor or oppose … requiring Minnesota voters to show a photo ID in order to vote."
May 23–24, 2011[5]SurveyUSA552 RV76%18%1% not sure
4% not vote
±3.6%"If an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution were on the ballot, that requires voters to present a photo ID at the polls, would you vote for the amendment? Against the amendment? Or not vote on the measure?"
June 6–8, 2011[6][7]Rasmussen Reports1,000 LV75%18%7%±3%"Should voters be required to show photo identification such as a driver’s license before being allowed to vote?"
January 21–22, 2012[8][9]Public Policy Polling1,236 voters65%30%4%±2.8%"Do you think the Minnesota Constitution should be amended to require that voters present a current and accurate driver's license, state ID, or voter ID card in order to cast a ballot, or not?"
January 31 – February 2, 2012[10]SurveyUSA542 RV70%23%4% not sure
4% not vote
±4%"If an amendment to the Minnesota Constitution were on the ballot that would require voters to show photo I.D.'s in order to vote on Election Day, how would you vote?"
May 31 – June 3, 2012[11]Public Policy Polling973 voters58%34%8%±3.1%"Should the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters?"
July 17–19, 2012[12]SurveyUSA552 LV65%28%4% not sure
2% not vote
±4.1%"An amendment to the Minnesota Constitution on the ballot would require voters to show photo I.D.'s in order to vote on Election Day. Will you vote FOR the amendment? Against the amendment? Or not vote on the measure?"
September 6–9, 2012[13]SurveyUSA551 LV62%31%7%±4.1%"Also on the ballot is a measure about voter identification. It asks: Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?" ?"
September 10–11, 2012[14]Public Policy Polling824 LV56%39%5% not sure±3.4%"Should the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters?"
September 17–19, 2012[15]Mason-Dixon Polling and Research, Inc.800 LV52%44%4%±3.5%"The November ballot will include several proposed constitutional amendments. One asks "Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?"
October 5–8, 2012[16]Public Policy Polling937 LV51%43%6% not sure
0% won't vote
±3.2%"Should the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters?"
October 12–14, 2012[17]SurveyUSA550 LV53%40%7%±4.3%"Also on the ballot is a measure about voter identification. It asks: Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?" "
October 15–21, 2012[18][19]St. Cloud State University Survey600 LV55%39%3% not sure
3% won't vote
±5%"This November Minnesota voters will vote on two proposed amendments to the Minnesota Constitution. One proposed amendment will ask, "Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?" If you were to vote today, would you vote for the amendment, vote against the amendment, or not vote on this issue??"
October 23–25, 2012[20][21]Mason-Dixon Polling and Research, Inc.800 LV53%41%6%±3.5%"The November ballot will include several proposed constitutional amendments. One asks "Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?" If the election were held today, would you vote YES in favor of the amendment NO against the amendment"
October 26–28, 2012[22]SurveyUSA574 LV55%40%5%±4.2%"Also on the ballot is a measure about voter identification. It asks: Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?" "
November 1–3, 2012[23]SurveyUSA556 LV48%48%5%±4.2%"Also on the ballot is a measure about voter identification. It asks: Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?" "
November 2–3, 2012[24]Public Policy Polling1,164 LV46%51%3% not sure
0% won't vote
±2.9%"Should the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters??"

Results

[edit]
Constitutional Amendment 2
Photo identification required for voting
ChoiceVotes%
Referendum failedNo1,588,75253.84
Yes1,362,03046.16
Total votes2,950,782100.00
Source:Minnesota Secretary of State - Results for Constitutional Amendments

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Minnesota voter ID amendment defeated".twincities.com.
  2. ^"Voter ID Amendment".publicradio.org.
  3. ^"Voter ID amendment is now up to Minnesota's voters".startribune.com.
  4. ^MINNESOTA POLL DATA: Vast majority back photo IDs for votingArchived 2012-11-26 at theWayback Machine
  5. ^"SurveyUSA News Poll #18243".www.surveyusa.com.
  6. ^75% Support Showing Photo ID At The PollsArchived 2013-02-09 atarchive.today
  7. ^Reports, Rasmussen."Questions - Elections - June 6-8, 2011 - Rasmussen Reports®".www.rasmussenreports.com.
  8. ^"Minnesota Survey Results"(PDF).publicpolicypolling.com.
  9. ^"Dayton Sees Strong Approval in Minnesota"(PDF).publicpolicypolling.com.
  10. ^"SurveyUSA News Poll #18953".www.surveyusa.com.
  11. ^"Minnesotans' opposition to marriage amendment growing".publicpolicypolling.com.
  12. ^"SurveyUSA Election Poll #19394".www.surveyusa.com.
  13. ^"SurveyUSA Election Poll #19612".www.surveyusa.com.
  14. ^"Minnesota split on marriage amendment".publicpolicypolling.com.
  15. ^"MINNESOTA POLL RESULTS: Voter ID amendment".startribune.com.
  16. ^"Minnesota marriage amendment narrowly trails"(PDF).publicpolicypolling.com.
  17. ^"SurveyUSA Election Poll #19873".www.surveyusa.com.
  18. ^"St. Cloud State poll shows slender lead for opponents of marriage amendment".minnpost.com.
  19. ^"FALL STATEWIDE SURVEY OCTOBER, 2012"(PDF).minnpost.com.
  20. ^"Voter ID amendment: The poll results".startribune.com.
  21. ^"How the poll was conducted".startribune.com.
  22. ^"SurveyUSA Election Poll #20056".www.surveyusa.com.
  23. ^"SurveyUSA Election Poll #20105".www.surveyusa.com.
  24. ^"Obama up 8 in Minnesota, amendments trail for passage"(PDF).publicpolicypolling.com.
General elections
State and federal general elections
Off-year elections
Executive elections
Gubernatorial elections
Lieutenant gubernatorial elections
Secretary of State elections
State Auditor elections
Attorney General elections
Legislative elections
Senate elections
House of Representatives elections
Ballot questions
Presidential elections
Senate elections
Class 1
Class 2
House of Representatives elections
Municipal elections
Minneapolis
General elections
Mayoral elections
City Council elections
Ballot measures
Saint Paul
Mayoral elections
Bloomington
General elections
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Minnesota_Amendment_2&oldid=1313830787"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp