 | The article'slead sectionmay need to be rewritten. Please helpimprove the lead and read thelead layout guide.(April 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Migmatite is a compositerock found in medium and high-grade metamorphic environments, commonly withinPrecambriancratonic blocks. It consists of two or more constituents often layered repetitively: one layer is an oldermetamorphic rock that was reconstituted subsequently bypartial melting ("paleosome"), while the alternate layer has apegmatitic,aplitic,granitic or generallyplutonic appearance ("neosome"). Commonly, migmatites occur below deformed metamorphic rocks that represent the base of eroded mountain chains.[1]
Migmatites form under extreme temperature and pressure conditions duringprograde metamorphism, when partial melting occurs in metamorphic paleosome.[2] Componentsexsolved by partial melting are called neosome (meaning ‘new body’), which may or may not be heterogeneous at the microscopic to macroscopic scale. Migmatites often appear as tightly, incoherently folded veins (ptygmatic folds).[3] These form segregations ofleucosome, light-colored granitic components exsolved withinmelanosome, a dark coloredamphibole- andbiotite-rich setting. If present, a mesosome, intermediate in color between a leucosome and melanosome, forms a more or less unmodified remnant of the metamorphic parent rock paleosome. The light-colored components often give the appearance of having been molten and mobilized.
Migmatite is the penultimate member of a sequence of lithology transformations first identified by Lyell, 1837.[4] Lyell had a clear perception of the regionaldiagenesis sequence in sedimentary rocks that remains valid today. It begins 'A' with deposition of unconsolidated sediment (protolith for future metamorphic rocks). As temperature and pressure increase with depth, a protolith passes through a diagenetic sequence from porous sedimentary rock through indurated rocks andphyllites 'A2' to metamorphicschists 'C1' in which the initial sedimentary components can still be discerned. Deeper still, the schists are reconstituted asgneiss 'C2' in which folia of residual minerals alternate with quartzo-feldspathic layers; partial melting continues as small batches of leucosome coalesce to form distinct layers in the neosome, and become recognizable migmatite 'D1'. The resulting leucosome layers instromatic migmatites still retain water and gas[5] in a discontinuous reaction series from the paleosome. Thissupercritical H2O and CO2 content renders the leucosome extremely mobile.
Bowen 1922, p184[6] described the process as being ‘In part due to … reactions between already crystallized mineral components of the rock and the remaining still-moltenmagma, and in part to reactions due to adjustments of equilibrium between the extreme end-stage, highly concentrated, "mother-liquor", which, by selective freezing, has been enriched with the more volatile gases usually termed "mineralizers," among which water figures prominently’. J.J. Sederholm (1926)[7] described rocks of this type, demonstrably of mixed origin, as migmatites. He described the granitising 'ichors' as having properties intermediate between an aqueous solution and a very much diluted magma, with much of it in the gaseous state.
The role of partial melting is demanded by experimental and field evidence. Rocks begin to partially melt when they reach a combination of sufficiently high temperatures (> 650 °C) and pressures (>34MPa). Some rocks have compositions that produce more melt than others at a given temperature, a rock property calledfertility. Some minerals in a sequence will make more melt than others; some do not melt until a higher temperature is reached.[6] If the temperature attained only just surpasses thesolidus, the migmatite will contain a few small patches of melt scattered about in the most fertile rock. Holmquist 1916 called the process whereby metamorphic rocks are transformed intogranulite ‘anatexis’.[8]
The segregation of melt during the prograde part of the metamorphic history (temperature > solidus) involves separating the melt fraction from the residuum, which higher specific gravity causes to accumulate at a lower level. The subsequent migration ofanatectic melt flows down local pressure gradients with little or no crystallization. The network of channels through which the melt moved at this stage may be lost by compression of the melanosome, leaving isolated lenses of leucosome. The melt product gathers in an underlying channel where it becomes subject todifferentiation. Conduction is the principal mechanism of heat transfer in thecontinental crust; where shallow layers have been exhumed or buried rapidly there is a corresponding inflection in thegeothermal gradient. Cooling due to surface exposure is conducted very slowly to deeper rocks so the deeper crust is slow to heat up and slow to cool. Numerical models of crustal heating[9] confirm slow cooling in the deep crust. Therefore, once formed, anatectic melt can exist in the middle and lower crust for a very long period of time. It is squeezed laterally to formsills,laccolithic andlopolithic structures of mobile granulite at depths of c. 10–20 km. In outcrop today only stages of this process arrested during its initial rapid uplift are visible. Wherever the resulting fractionated granulite rises steeply in the crust, water exits from its supercriticality phase, the granulite starts to crystallize, becomes firstly fractionated melt + crystals, then solid rock, whilst still at the conditions of temperature and pressure existing beyond 8 km. Water, carbon dioxide, sulphur dioxide and other elements are exsolved under great pressure from the melt as it exits from supercritical conditions. These components rise rapidly towards the surface and contribute to formation ofmineral deposits,volcanoes,mud volcanoes,geysers andhot springs.[10]
A leucosome is the lightest-colored part of migmatite.[3] Themelanosome is the darker part, and occurs between two leucosomes or, if remnants of the more or less unmodified parent rock (mesosome) are still present, it is arranged in rims around these remnants.[3] When present, the mesosome is intermediate in color between leucosome and melanosome.[3]
The melanosome is a dark,mafic mineral band formed in migmatite which is melting into aeutaxitic texture; often, this leads to the formation ofgranite. The melanosomes form bands withleucosomes, and in that context may be described asschlieren (color banding) ormigmatitic.
Migmatite textures are the product of thermal softening of the metamorphic rocks.Schlieren textures are a particularly common example of granite formation in migmatites, and are often seen inrestitexenoliths and around the margins of S-type granites.
Ptygmatic folds are formed by highly plastic ductile deformation of the gneissic banding, and thus have little or no relationship to a definedfoliation, unlike most regular folds. Ptygmatic folds can occur restricted to compositional zones of the migmatite, for instance in fine-grained shale protoliths versus in coarsegranoblastic sandy protolith.
When a rock undergoes partial melting some minerals will melt (neosome, i.e. newly formed), while others remain solid (paleosome, i.e. older formation). The neosome is composed of lightly colored areas (leucosome) and dark areas (melanosome). The leucosome lies in the center of the layers and is mainly composed of quartz and feldspar. The melanosome is composed ofcordierite,hornblende and biotite and forms the wall zones of the neosome.[2]
In 1795James Hutton made some of the earliest comments on the relationship between gneiss and granite: “If granite be truly stratified, and those strata connected with the other strata of the earth, it can have no claim to originality; and the idea of primitive mountains, of late so much employed by natural philosophers, must vanish, in a more extensive view of the operations of the globe; but it is certain that granite, or a species of the same kind of stone, is thus found stratified. It is the granit feuilletée of M. de Saussure, and, if I mistake not, what is called gneis by the Germans.”[11] The minute penetration of gneiss, schists and sedimentary deposits altered by contact-metamorphism, alternating with granitic materials along the planes of schistosity was described by Michel-Lévy, in his 1887 paper ' Sur l'Origine des Terrains Cristallins Primitifs'. He makes the following observations: “I first drew attention to the phenomenon of intimate penetration, ‘lit par lit’ of eruptive granitic and granulitic rocks that follow the schistosity planes of gneisses and schists ... But in between, in the contact zones Immediately above eruptive rock, quartz and feldspars insert themselves, bed by bed, between the leaves of the micaceous shales; it started from a detrital shale, now we find it definitively transformed into a recent gneiss, very difficult to distinguish from ancient gneiss”.[12]
The coincidence of schistosity with bedding gave rise to the proposals of static or load metamorphism, advanced in 1889 by John Judd and others.[13] In 1894 L. Milch recognized vertical pressure due to the weight of the overlying load to be the controlling factor.[14] In 1896Home and Greenly agreed that granitic intrusions are closely associated with metamorphic processes " the cause which brought about the introduction of the granite also resulted in these high and peculiar types of crystallization ".[15] A later paper ofEdward Greenly in 1903 described the formation of granitic gneisses by solid diffusion, and ascribed the mechanism oflit-par-lit occurrence to the same process. Greenly drew attention to thin and regular seams of injected material, which indicated that these operations took place in hot rocks; also to undisturbed septa of country rocks, which suggested that the expression of the magma occurred by quiet diffusion rather than by forcible injection.[16] In 1907 Sederholm called the migmatite-forming process palingenesis. and (although it specifically included partial melting and dissolution) he considered magma injection and its associated veined and brecciated rocks as fundamental to the process.[17] The upward succession of gneiss, schist and phyllite in the Central European Urgebirge influencedUlrich Grubenmann in 1910 in his formulation of three depth-zones of metamorphism.[18]
Holmquist found high-grade gneisses that contained many small patches and veins of granitic material. Granites were absent nearby, so he interpreted the patches and veins to be collection sites for partial melt exuded from the mica-rich parts of the host gneiss.[19] Holmquist gave these migmatites the name ‘venite’ to emphasize their internal origin and to distinguish them from Sederholm's ‘arterites’. Which also contained veins of injected material. Sederholm later placed more emphasis on the roles of assimilation and the actions of fluids in the formation of migmatites and used the term ‘ichor’, to describe them.
Persuaded by the close connection between migmatization and granites in outcrop, Sederholm considered migmatites to be an intermediary between igneous and metamorphic rocks.[20][21] He thought that the granitic partings in banded gneisses originated through the agency of either melt or a nebulous fluid,the ichor, both derived from nearby granites. An opposing view, proposed by Holmquist, was that the granitic material came from the adjacent country rock, not the granites, and that it was segregated by fluid transport. Holmquist believed that such replacive migmatites were produced during metamorphism at a relatively low metamorphic grade, with partial melting only intervening at high grade. Thus, the modern view of migmatites corresponds closely to Holmquist's concept of ultrametamorphism, and to Sederholm's concept of anatexis, but is far from the concept of palingenesis, or the various metasomatic and subsolidus processes proposed during the granitization debate.[22] Read considered that regionally metamorphosed rocks resulted from the passage of waves or fronts of metasomatizing solutions out from the central granitization core, above which arise the zones of metamorphism.[23]
 | This section needs to beupdated. The reason given is: Any developments since 1973?. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(October 2022) |
The original name for this phenomenon was defined by Sederholm (1923)[24] as a rock with "fragments of older rock cemented by granite", and was regarded by him to be a type of migmatite. There is a close connection between migmatites and the occurrence of ‘explosion breccias’ in schists and phyllites adjacent to diorite and granite intrusions. Rocks matching this description can also be found around igneous intrusive bodies in low-grade or unmetamorphosed country-rocks. Brown (1973) argued that agmatites are not migmatites, and should be called ‘intrusion breccias’ or ‘vent agglomerates’. Reynolds (1951)[25] thought the term ‘agmatite’ ought to be abandoned.
Recent geochronological studies from granulite-facies metamorphic terranes (e.g. Willigers et al. 2001)[26] show that metamorphic temperatures remained above the granite solidus for between 30 and 50 My. This suggests that once formed, anatectic melt can exist in the middle and lower crust for a very long period of time. The resulting granulite is free to move laterally[27] and up along weaknesses in the overburden in directions determined by the pressure gradient.
In areas where it lies beneath a deepeningsedimentary basin, a portion of granulite melt will tend to move laterally beneath the base of previously metamorphosed rocks that have not yet reached the migmatic stage ofanatexis. It will congregate in areas where pressure is lower. The melt will lose its volatile content when it reaches a level where temperature and pressure is less than the supercritical water phase boundary. The melt will crystallize at that level and prevent following melt from reaching that level until persistent following magma pressure pushes the overburden upwards.
 | This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(October 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
For migmatisedargillaceous rocks, the partial orfractional melting would first produce avolatile and incompatible-element enriched rich partial melt ofgranitic composition. Such granites derived fromsedimentary rock protoliths would be termedS-type granite, are typically potassic, sometimes containingleucite, and would be termedadamellite,granite andsyenite. Volcanic equivalents would berhyolite andrhyodacite.
Migmatisedigneous or lower-crustal rocks which melt do so to form a similar graniticI-type granite melt, but with distinctgeochemical signatures and typicallyplagioclase dominant mineralogy formingmonzonite,tonalite andgranodiorite compositions. Volcanic equivalents would bedacite andtrachyte.
It is difficult to meltmafic metamorphic rocks except in the lower mantle, so it is rare to see migmatitic textures in such rocks. However,eclogite andgranulite are roughly equivalent mafic rocks.
TheFinnishpetrologistJakob Sederholm first used the term in 1907 for rocks within theScandinavian craton in southernFinland. The term was derived from theGreek wordμιγμα:migma, meaning a mixture.
Geology portal