| Mexican Dirty War | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of theCold War | |||||||
 Mexican Army soldiers in the streets in 1968 | |||||||
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
|
| ||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||
| Estimated at least 3,000 people disappeared and executed, 3,000 political prisoners, and 7,000tortured[1]: 8 | |||||||
TheMexican Dirty War (Spanish:Guerra sucia) was the Mexicantheater of theCold War, an internal conflict from the 1960s to the 1980s between the MexicanInstitutional Revolutionary Party (PRI)-ruled government under the presidencies ofGustavo Díaz Ordaz,Luis Echeverría, andJosé López Portillo, which werebacked by the U.S. government, and left-wing student and guerrilla groups.[7][8] During the war, government forces carried out disappearances (estimated at 1,200),[9] systematic torture, and "probableextrajudicial executions".[10]
In the 1960s and 1970s, Mexico was persuaded to be part of bothOperation Intercept[11] andOperation Condor,[12] developed between 1975 and 1978, with the pretext to fight against the cultivation ofopium and marijuana in the "Golden Triangle", particularly inSinaloa.[13] The operation, commanded by General José Hernández Toledo,[14] was a flop with no major drug-lord captures, but many abuses and acts of repression were committed.[15]
The judicial investigation into state crimes against political movements opened only at the end of the 71-year long PRI regime and the accession to power in 2000 ofVicente Fox, who created the Special Prosecutor's Office for Social and Political Movements of the Past (FEMOSPP). Despite revealing much about the conflict's history, the FEMOSPP has been unable to finalize prosecutions against the Dirty War's main instigators.[16]
In the early 1960s, former schoolteachersGenaro Vázquez Rojas andLucio Cabañas created their own "armed rebellion" in Guerrero's mountains. Their rebellion group worked to counter other militant groups not aligned with their goals and committed robberies and kidnappings for ransom of rich people in their region of operation to finance their struggle. During clashes with Mexican government forces, both militias and the government used indiscriminate force, causing civilian collateral damages. In 1971, three major kidnappings of rich people produced "millions of pesos" through ransom for the rebels, who used the money to continue their fight against the government and rich, abusive landowners.[17]
In March 2019, PresidentAndrés Manuel López Obrador publicly released the archives of the defunctFederal Security Directorate, which contain a great amount of previously undisclosed information about the Dirty War and the political persecution by the PRI governments. López Obrador said, "We lived for decades under an authoritarian regime that limited freedoms and persecuted those who struggled for social change", and issued an official apology on behalf of the Mexican State to the victims of the repression. He also said judicial action would be taken against the surviving perpetrators of the repression, and promised that surviving victims would be able to claim compensation.[18][19]
The war was characterized by a backlash against theactive student movement of the late 1960s, which ended in theTlatelolco massacre at a 1968 student rally inMexico City[10] in which 30 to 300 (according to official reports; non-governmental sources claim a death toll in the thousands) students were killed, and in theCorpus Christi massacre, a massacre of student demonstrators in Mexico City on June 10, 1971.[7]
Several mostly independent groups fought the government during this period. Among the most important, theSeptember 23 Communist League was at the forefront of the conflict, active in several cities, drawing heavily fromChristian Socialist andMarxist student organizations. It confronted Mexican security forces, carried out several kidnappings, and attempted to kidnapMargarita López Portillo, the president's sister. InGuerrero, theParty of the Poor, fighting against landholder impunity and oppressive police practices in rural areas, was led by the ex-teacherLucio Cabañas; it carried out ambushes of the army and security forces and abducted Guerrero's governor-elect.[10]
The legalization of left-wing political parties in 1978 along with the amnesty of imprisoned and at-large guerrillas caused a number of combatants to end militant struggle against the government. But some groups continued fighting, and theNational Human Rights Commission says hostilities continued into 1982.[10]
In 2002, a report prepared forVicente Fox, the first president not from theInstitutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) in 71 years, detailed the government's actions from 1964 to 1982. The report states that the Mexican army "kidnapped, tortured, and killed hundreds of rebel suspects" in the period and accuses the Mexican state ofgenocide. TheMexican Special Prosecutor said the report was biased against the military and that it failed to detail crimes committed by rebels, including kidnappings, bank robberies, and assassinations.[10][20] But the general consensus[according to whom?] is that the report accurately assessed the government's culpability. Instead of ensuring the security of innocent civilians,it victimized and killed them.[21][22][23][24][25][26]
1960 marked the beginning of a decade of terror in the region ofGuerrero as the state began to deal with the citizens and peasants there ever more violently.[1]: 46 The state enacted the acts of suppression on Guerrero to keep the numerouspolitical reform movements stifled, as the local people over time grew agitated with how the government wielded its power and meddled with their rights. As the citizens grew more determined to speak out against the government in the 1960s, thePRI increased its terror tactics in the region. The constant stream of violence pushed many guerrillas to consider taking up arms against the PRI.[1]: 46
The rise of guerrilla groups in the 1960s and 1970s gave the state an excuse to focus its resources on suppressing their activities. The army became infamous for its tactics in repressing the rebels in the rural areas, where such practices such as thedeath flights were initiated.[27]
This period of state violence in Guerrero helped to bring about numerous guerrilla organizations. One was theParty of the Poor (PDLP), which was influenced byMarxism and people likeChe Guevara.[28] It tended to focus more on the rural regions like Guerrero, where it would be more likely to find support among the peasants. The PDLP became more violent toward the rich after events such as the 1967Atoyac massacre, where leaders likeLucio Cabañas tried to use the peasants' anger to bring about a revolution.[29]
As the 1960s and 1970s went on, the PDLP gained attention nationwide for acts like kidnapping the prominent PRI leaderRuben Figueroa.[30] This inspired those oppressed by the government, but also marked the organization's decline, as the government began to focus more on taking it out. On December 2, 1974, the army found and killed Cabañas in an attempt to dissolve his movement.[31] Another schoolteacher turned revolutionary,Genaro Vázquez Rojas, founded theNational Revolutionary Civic Association (ACNR) as a response to the government's actions in Guerrero. These two leaders and their movements emerged as the armed phase of the social struggle, which continued long after their deaths.[1]: 42
Torture was one of many tools the PRI used to keep guerrilla groups and political dissidents repressed. While torture was illegal in many countries during this time, the numerousauthoritarian regimes that sprang up from the Cold War used it to great effect. The Mexican state used torture to get information from captured rebels and guerrillas about attacks and plans. This was done at clandestinedetention centers, where guerrillas were sent to before arriving at a legal prison to keep the state's activities secret.[27] Female guerrilla prisoners were often sexually assaulted by their guards. This, combined with other forms of physical and psychological gender-based transgressions, leads some to believe that the state employed this form of gender policing to deter women from breakingsocial and political norms.[32]
The detention and torture of political prisoners became more systematic after the student uprisings in 1968, as the government decided that heavy-handed responses were necessary to deal with the unrest.[clarification needed][33] This stage of violent and public repression of differing ideals resembled the regimes[according to whom?] of theSouthern Cone governments, such asArgentina[citation needed].
Little is known of the extent of the Dirty War's victims, due to its elusive nature.[33] Part of the problem is that since there was no large-scale truth commission to bring justice to the perpetrators and closure for the victim's families, Mexico never had a "Pinochet moment".[1]: 207 Since the early 2000s, NGOs have carried out local investigations, providing some insight into the war's tactics and dynamics and the scale of the crimes. One example, conducted by the Association of Relatives of Victims of Disappearance, Detention and Human Rights Violations in Mexico (AFADEM), documented over 470 disappearances at the hands of state forces during the 1970s just in the municipality of Atoyac.[34] Another problem is the lack of response to the 2006 report byCarillo Prieto, which documented some of the PRI regime's atrocities. Despite this evidence of numerous human rights violations, ex-presidentEcheverria and several other PRI officials had their cases dismissed and became free men.: 207 The government's failure to address these problems has caused tension, as citizens become distrustful of a state that does not address the old regime and its reign of terror.[citation needed]
.svg)
.svg){kind=logo}
{{cite web}}:|author= has generic name (help){{cite web}}:|author= has generic name (help){{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)