For a first-order PDE, the method of characteristics discovers so calledcharacteristic curves along which the PDE becomes an ODE.[1][2] Once the ODE is found, it can be solved along the characteristic curves and transformed into a solution for the original PDE.
For the sake of simplicity, we initially direct our attention to the case of a function of two independent variablesx andy. Consider aquasilinear PDE of the form[3]
1
For a differentiable function, consider thegraph ofu, which is the set Anormal vector to is given by[4]
Consider the vector field
2
Thedot product of the vector field (2) with the normal vector to at each is
Comparing the right-hand side of the above equation with (1), it is evident the following statements are equivalent:
the right-hand side of the above equation is zero;
the vector field (2) is orthogonal to the normal vectors of at every point;
the vector field (2) is tangent to the surface at every point;
In other words, the graph of the solution to (1) is the union ofintegral curves of the vector field (2). Each integral curve is called acharacteristic curve of the PDE (1) equation and follow as the solutions of thecharacteristic equations:[3]
A parametrization invariant form of theLagrange–Charpit equations is:[5]
Example. The solution to the equation with boundary condition is obtained by drawing all characteristic curves through the boundary condition set.
Consider now a PDE of the form
For this PDE to belinear, the coefficientsai may be functions of the spatial variables only, and independent ofu. For it to be quasilinear,[6]ai may also depend on the value of the function, but not on any derivatives. The distinction between these two cases is inessential for the discussion here.
For a linear or quasilinear PDE, the characteristic curves are given parametrically by
for some univariate functionsof one real variablesatisfying the following system of ordinary differential equations
4
5
Equations (4) and (5) give the characteristics of the PDE.
Proof for quasilinear case
In the quasilinear case, the use of the method of characteristics is justified byGrönwall's inequality. The above equation may be written as
We must distinguish between the solutions to the ODE and the solutions to the PDE, which we do not know are equala priori. Letting capital letters be the solutions to the ODE we find
Examining, we find, upon differentiating thatwhich is the same as
We cannot conclude the above is 0 as we would like, since the PDE only guarantees us that this relationship is satisfied for,,and we do not yet know that.
However, we can see thatsince by the PDE, the last term is 0. This equals
By the triangle inequality, we have
Assuming are at least, we can bound this for small times. Choose a neighborhood around small enough such that arelocally Lipschitz. By continuity, will remain in for small enough. Since, we also have that will be in for small enough by continuity. So, and for. Additionally, for some for by compactness. From this, we find the above is bounded asfor some. It is a straightforward application of Grönwall's Inequality to show that since we have for as long as this inequality holds. We have some interval such that in this interval. Choose the largest such that this is true. Then, by continuity,. Provided the ODE still has a solution in some interval after, we can repeat the argument above to find that in a larger interval. Thus, so long as the ODE has a solution, we have.
where the variablespi are shorthand for the partial derivatives
Let be a curve inR2n+1. Suppose thatu is any solution, and that
The derivatives with respect to of and are written as, and respectively.Along a solution, differentiating (6) with respect tos gives[7]
The second equation follows from applying thechain rule to a solutionu, and the third follows by taking anexterior derivative of the relation. Manipulating these equations gives
where λ is a constant. Writing these equations more symmetrically, one obtains the Lagrange–Charpit equations for the characteristic
Geometrically, the method of characteristics in the fully nonlinear case can be interpreted as requiring that theMonge cone of the differential equation should everywhere be tangent to the graph of the solution.
As an example, consider theadvection equation (this example assumes familiarity with PDE notation, and solutions to basic ODEs).
where is constant and is a function of and. We want to transform this linear first-order PDE into an ODE along the appropriate curve; i.e. something of the form
where is a characteristic line. First, we find
by the chain rule. Now, if we set and we get
which is the left hand side of the PDE we started with. Thus
So, along the characteristic line, the original PDE becomes the ODE. That is to say that along the characteristics, the solution is constant. Thus, where and lie on the same characteristic. Therefore, to determine the general solution, it is enough to find the characteristics by solving the characteristic system of ODEs:
, letting we know,
, letting we know,
, letting we know.
In this case, the characteristic lines are straight lines with slope, and the value of remains constant along any characteristic line.
in whichα denotes amulti-index. The principalsymbol ofP, denotedσP, is the function on thecotangent bundle T∗X defined in these local coordinates by
where theξi are the fiber coordinates on the cotangent bundle induced by the coordinate differentialsdxi. Although this is defined using a particular coordinate system, the transformation law relating theξi and thexi ensures thatσP is a well-defined function on the cotangent bundle.
The functionσP ishomogeneous of degreek in theξ variable. The zeros ofσP, away from the zero section of T∗X, are the characteristics ofP. A hypersurface ofX defined by the equationF(x) = c is called a characteristic hypersurface atx if
Invariantly, a characteristic hypersurface is a hypersurface whoseconormal bundle is in the characteristic set ofP.
Characteristics are also a powerful tool for gaining qualitative insight into a PDE.
One can use the crossings of the characteristics to findshock waves forpotential flow in acompressible fluid. Intuitively, we can think of each characteristic line implying a solution to along itself. Thus, when two characteristics cross, the function becomes multi-valued resulting in a non-physical solution. Physically, this contradiction is removed by the formation of a shock wave, a tangential discontinuity or a weak discontinuity and can result in non-potential flow, violating the initial assumptions.[8]
Characteristics may fail to cover part of the domain of the PDE. This is called ararefaction, and indicates the solution typically exists only in aweak, i.e.integral equation, sense.
The direction of the characteristic lines indicates the flow of values through the solution, as the example above demonstrates. This kind of knowledge is useful when solving PDEs numerically as it can indicate whichfinite difference scheme is best for the problem.
Demidov, S. S. (1982). "The study of partial differential equations of the first order in the 18th and 19th centuries".Archive for History of Exact Sciences.26 (4). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:325–350.doi:10.1007/bf00418753.ISSN0003-9519.
Zauderer, Erich (2006).Partial Differential Equations of Applied Mathematics. Wiley.doi:10.1002/9781118033302.ISBN978-0-471-69073-3.*Polyanin, A. D.; Zaitsev, V. F.; Moussiaux, A. (2002),Handbook of First Order Partial Differential Equations, London: Taylor & Francis,ISBN0-415-27267-X
Polyanin, A. D. (2002),Handbook of Linear Partial Differential Equations for Engineers and Scientists, Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press,ISBN1-58488-299-9
Zachmanoglou, E. C.; Thoe, Dale W. (1986).Introduction to Partial Differential Equations with Applications. New York: Courier Corporation.ISBN0-486-65251-3.