Themesocolon (the part of the mesentery that attaches the colon to the abdominal wall) was formerly thought to be a fragmented structure, with all named parts—the ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoidmesocolons, themesoappendix, and themesorectum—separately terminating their insertion into the posterior abdominal wall.[2] However, in 2012, newmicroscopic andelectron microscopicexaminations showed the mesocolon to be a single structure derived from theduodenojejunal flexure and extending to the distal mesorectal layer.[2][3] Thus the mesentery is aninternal organ.[4][5]
The mesentery of thesmall intestine arises from theroot of the mesentery (ormesenteric root) and is the part connected with the structures in front of thevertebral column. The root is narrow, about 15 cm long, 20 cm in width, and is directed obliquely from theduodenojejunal flexure at the left side of the secondlumbar vertebra to the rightsacroiliac joint. The root of the mesentery extends from the duodenojejunal flexure to theileocaecal junction. This section of the small intestine is located centrally in the abdominal cavity and lies behind the transverse colon and thegreater omentum.
The mesentery becomes attached to thecolon at the gastrointestinal margin and continues as the several regions of the mesocolon. The parts of the mesocolon take their names from the part of the colon to which they attach. These are the transverse mesocolon attaching to the transverse colon, the sigmoid mesocolon attaching to the sigmoid colon, the mesoappendix attaching to the appendix, and the mesorectum attaching to the upper third of the rectum.
The mesocolon regions were traditionally taught to be separate sections with separate insertions into the posterior abdominal wall. In 2012, the first detailed observational andhistological studies of the mesocolon were undertaken and this revealed several new findings.[6] The study included 109 patients undergoing open, elective, total abdominalcolectomy. Anatomical observations were recorded during the surgery and on the post-operative specimens.
These studies showed that the mesocolon is continuous from the ileocaecal to the rectosigmoid level. It was also shown that a mesenteric confluence occurs at the ileocaecal and rectosigmoid junctions, as well as at thehepatic and splenic flexures and that each confluence involves peritoneal and omental attachments. The proximal rectum was shown to originate at the confluence of the mesorectum and mesosigmoid. A plane occupied by perinephric fascia was shown to separate the entire apposed small intestinal mesentery and the mesocolon from theretroperitoneum. Deep in thepelvis, this fascia coalesces to give rise topresacral fascia.[6]
Flexural anatomy is frequently described as a difficult area. It is simplified when each flexure is considered as being centered on a mesenteric contiguity. The ileocaecal flexure arises at the point where the ileum is continuous with the caecum around the ileocaecal mesenteric flexure. Similarly, thehepatic flexure is formed between the right mesocolon and transverse mesocolon at the mesenteric confluence. The colonic component of the hepatic flexure is draped around this mesenteric confluence. Furthermore, thesplenic flexure is formed by the mesenteric confluence between the transverse and left mesocolon. The colonic component of the splenic flexure occurs lateral to the mesenteric confluence. At every flexure, a continuous peritoneal fold lies outside the colonic/mesocolic complex tethering this to the posterior abdominal wall.[2][6]
Thetransverse mesocolon is that section of the mesentery attached to thetransverse colon that lies between thecolic flexures.
Thesigmoid mesocolon is that region of the mesentery to which thesigmoid colon is attached at the gastrointestinal mesenteric margin.
Themesoappendix is the portion of the mesentery connecting theileum to theappendix. It may extend to the tip of the appendix. It encloses theappendicular artery and vein, as well aslymphatic vessels, nerves, and often alymph node.
Themesorectum is that part attached to the upper third of the rectum.
Understanding the macroscopic structure of the mesenteric organ meant that associated structures—the peritoneal folds and congenital and omental adhesions—could be better appraised. The small intestinal mesenteric fold occurs where the small intestinal mesentery folds onto the posterior abdominal wall and continues laterally as the right mesocolon. During mobilization of the small intestinal mesentery from the posterior abdominal wall, this fold is incised, allowing access to the interface between the small intestinal mesentery and the retroperitoneum. The fold continues at the inferolateral boundary of the ileocaecal junction and turnscephalad as the right paracolic peritoneal fold. This fold is divided during lateral to medial mobilization, permitting the surgeon to serially lift the right colon and associated mesentery off the underlying fascia and retroperitoneum. At the hepatic flexure, the right lateral peritoneal fold turns and continues medially as the hepatocolic peritoneal fold. Division of the fold in this location permits separation of the colonic component of the hepatic flexure and mesocolon off the retroperitoneum.[2][6]
Interposed between the hepatic and splenic flexures, the greater omentum adheres to the transverse colon along a further band or fold of peritoneum. Dissection through this allows access to the cephalad (top) surface of the transverse mesocolon. Focal adhesions frequently tether the greater omentum to the cephalad aspect of the transverse mesocolon. The left colon is associated with a similar anatomic configuration of peritoneal folds; the splenic peritoneal fold is contiguous with the left lateral paracolic peritoneal fold at the splenic flexure. Division of the latter similarly allows for the separation of the left colon and associated mesentery off the underlying fascia and frees it from the retroperitoneum. The left lateral paracolic peritoneal fold continues distally at the lateral aspect of the mobile component of the mesosigmoid.[2][6]
Determination of the macroscopic structure of the mesenteric organ allowed a recent characterisation of the histological and electron microscopic properties.[7] The microscopic structure of the mesocolon and associated fascia is consistent from ileocecal to mesorectal levels. A surfacemesothelium and underlying connective tissue is universally apparent.Adipocytes lobules within the body of the mesocolon are separated by fibroussepta arising from submesothelial connective tissue. Where apposed to the retroperitoneum, two mesothelial layers separate the mesocolon and underlying retroperitoneum. Between these isToldt's fascia, a discrete layer of connective tissue. Lymphatic channels are evident in mesocolic connective tissue and in Toldt's fascia.[7]
Mesentery in red. Dorsal mesentery is the lower part of the circuit. The upper part is ventral mesentery.Abdominal part of digestive tube and its attachment to the primitive or common mesentery. Human embryo of six weeks.Schematic figure of the bursa omentalis, etc. Human embryo of eight weeks.
Theprimitive gut is suspended from the posterior abdominal wall by thedorsal mesentery. The gastrointestinal tract and associated dorsal mesentery are subdivided intoforegut,midgut, andhindgut regions based on the respective blood supply. The foregut is supplied by theceliac trunk, the midgut is supplied by thesuperior mesenteric artery (SMA), and the hindgut is supplied by theinferior mesenteric artery (IMA). This division is established by the fourth week ofdevelopment. After this, the midgut undergoes a period of rapid elongation, forcing it to herniate through thenavel. During herniation, the midgutrotates 90° anti-clockwise around the axis of the SMA and forms the midgut loop. The cranial portion of the loop moves to the right and the caudal portion of the loop moves toward the left. Thisrotation occurs at about the eighth week of development. Thecranial portion of the loop will develop into the jejunum and most of the ileum, while thecaudal part of the loop eventually forms the terminal portion of the ileum, theascending colon and the initial two-thirds of the transverse colon. As the foetus grows larger, the mid-gut loop is drawn back through the umbilicus and undergoes a further 180° rotation, completing a total of 270° rotation. At this point, about 10 weeks, thecaecum lies close to theliver. From here it moves in a cranial to caudal direction to eventually lie in the lower right portion of the abdominal cavity. This process brings the ascending colon to lie vertically in the lateral right portion of the abdominal cavity apposed to the posterior abdominal wall. The descending colon occupies a similar position on the left side.[8][9]
During these topographic changes, the dorsal mesentery undergoes corresponding changes. Most anatomical and embryological textbooks say that after adopting a final position, the ascending and descending mesocolons disappear during embryogenesis.Embryology—An Illustrated Colour Text, "most of the mid-gut retains the original dorsal mesentery, though parts of the duodenum derived from the mid-gut do not. The mesentery associated with the ascending colon and descending colon is resorbed, bringing these parts of the colon into close contact with the body wall."[9] InThe Developing Human, the author states, "the mesentery of the ascending colon fuses with the parietal peritoneum on this wall and disappears; consequently the ascending colon also becomes retroperitoneal".[10] To reconcile these differences, several theories of embryologic mesenteric development—including the "regression" and "sliding" theories—have been proposed, but none has been widely accepted.[9][10]
The portion of thedorsal mesentery that attaches to thegreater curvature of thestomach, is known as thedorsal mesogastrium. The part of the dorsal mesentery that suspends thecolon is termed themesocolon. The dorsal mesogastrium develops into thegreater omentum.
The development of theseptum transversum takes part in the formation of thediaphragm, while the caudal portion into which theliver grows forms theventral mesentery. The part of the ventral mesentery that attaches to thestomach is known as theventral mesogastrium.[11]
Thelesser omentum is formed, by a thinning of themesoderm or ventral mesogastrium, which attaches the stomach andduodenum to the anteriorabdominal wall. By the subsequent growth of the liver, this leaf of mesoderm is divided into two parts – thelesser omentum between the stomach and liver, and thefalciform andcoronary ligaments between the liver and the abdominal wall and diaphragm.[11]
In the adult, the ventral mesentery is the part of theperitoneum closest to thenavel.
Clarifications of the mesenteric anatomy have facilitated a clearer understanding of diseases involving the mesentery, examples of which includemalrotation andCrohn's disease (CD). In CD, the mesentery is frequently thickened, renderinghemostasis challenging. In addition, fat wrapping—creeping fat—involves extension of mesenteric fat over the circumference of contiguous gastrointestinal tract, and this may indicate increased mesothelial plasticity. The relationship between mesenteric derangements and mucosal manifestations in CD points to a pathobiological overlap; some authors say that CD is mainly a mesenteric disorder that secondarily affects the GIT and systemic circulation.[12]
Thrombosis of thesuperior mesenteric vein can causemesenteric ischemia also known asischemic bowel. Mesenteric ischemia can also result from the formation of avolvulus, a twisted loop of the small intestine that when it wraps around itself and also encloses the mesentery too tightly can causeischemia.[13]
The rationalization of mesenteric and peritoneal fold anatomy permits the surgeon to differentiate both from intraperitoneal adhesions—also called congenital adhesions. These are highly variable among patients and occur in several locations. Congenital adhesions occur between the lateral aspect of the peritoneum overlying the mobile component of the mesosigmoid and the parietal peritoneum in the left iliac fossa. During the lateral to the medial approach of mobilizing of the mesosigmoid, these must be divided first before the peritoneum proper can be accessed. Similarly, focal adhesions occur between the undersurface of the greater omentum and the cephalad aspect of the transverse mesocolon. These can be accessed after dividing the peritoneal fold that links the greater omentum and transverse colon. Adhesions here must be divided to separate the greater omentum off the transverse mesocolon, thus allowing access to the lesser sac proper.[2][14]
While the total mesorectal excision (TME) operation has become the surgical gold standard for the management of rectal cancer, this is not so for colon cancer.[2][14]Recently, the surgical principles underpinning TME in rectal cancer have been extrapolated to colonic surgery.[15][16] Total or complete mesocolic excision (CME), use planar surgery and extensive mesenterectomy (high tie) to minimise breach of the mesentery and maximise lymph nodes yield. Application of this T/CME reduces local five-year recurrence rates in colon cancer from 6.5% to 3.6%, while cancer-related five-year survival rates in patients resected for cure increased from 82.1% to 89.1%.[17]
Recent radiologic appraisals of the mesenteric organ have been conducted in the context of the contemporary understanding of mesenteric organ anatomy. When this organ is divided into non-flexural and flexural regions, these can readily be differentiated in most patients on CT imaging. Clarification of the radiological appearance of the human mesentery resonates with the suggestions of Dodds and enables a clearer conceptualization of mesenteric derangements in disease states.[18] This is of immediate relevance in the spread of cancer from colon cancer and perforated diverticular disease, and in pancreatitis where fluid collections in the lesser sac dissect the mesocolon from the retroperitoneum and thereby extend distally within the latter.[19]
The mesentery has been known for thousands of years, however it was unclear whether the mesentery is a single organ, or whether there are several mesenteries.[20][better source needed] The classical anatomical description of the mesocolon is credited to British surgeonSir Frederick Treves in 1885,[21] although a description of the membrane as a single structure dates back to at leastLeonardo da Vinci.[22] Treves is known for performing the firstappendectomy in England in 1888; he was surgeon to bothQueen Victoria andKing Edward VII.[23] He studied the human mesentery and peritoneal folds in 100 cadavers and described the right and left mesocolons as vestigial or absent in the human adult. Accordingly, the small intestinal mesentery, transverse, and sigmoid mesocolons all terminated or attached at their insertions into the posterior abdominal wall.[21][23] These assertions were included in mainstream surgical, anatomical, embryological, and radiologic literature for more than a century.[24][25]
Almost 10 years before Treves, the Austrian anatomistCarl Toldt described the persistence of all portions of the mesocolon into adulthood.[26] Toldt was professor of anatomy in Prague and Vienna; he published his account of the human mesentery in 1879. Toldt identified a fascial plane between the mesocolon and the underlying retroperitoneum, formed by the fusion of the visceral peritoneum of the mesocolon with the parietal peritoneum of the retroperitoneum; this later became known as Toldt's fascia.[26][27]
In 1942, anatomistEdward Congdon also demonstrated that theright and left mesocolons persisted into adulthood and remained separate from the retroperitoneum—extraretroperitoneal.[28] RadiologistWylie J. Dodds described this concept in 1986.[18] Dodds extrapolated that unless the mesocolon remained an extraretroperitoneal structure—separate from the retroperitoneum—only then would the radiologic appearance of the mesentery and peritoneal folds be reconciled with actual anatomy.[18]
Descriptions of the mesocolon by Toldt, Congdon, and Dodds have largely been ignored in mainstream literature until recently. A formal appraisal of the mesenteric organ anatomy was conducted in 2012; it echoed the findings of Toldt, Congdon, and Dodds.[6] The single greatest advance in this regard was the identification of the mesenteric organ as being contiguous, as it spans the gastrointestinal tract from duodenojejunal flexure to mesorectal level.[6]
In 2012 it was discovered that the mesentery was a single organ, which precipitated advancement in colon and rectum surgery[29] and in sciences related toanatomy anddevelopment.
The word "mesentery" and itsNeo-Latin equivalentmesenterium (/ˌmɛzənˈtɛriəm/) use thecombining formsmes- +enteron, ultimately from ancient Greekμεσέντερον (mesenteron), fromμέσος (mésos, "middle") +ἔντερον (énteron, "gut"), yielding "mid-intestine" or "midgut". The adjectival form is "mesenteric" (/ˌmɛzənˈtɛrɪk/).
An improved understanding of mesenteric structure and histology has enabled a formal characterization of mesenteric lymphangiology.[7]Stereologic assessments of the lymphatic vessels demonstrate a rich lymphatic network embedded within the mesenteric connective tissue lattice. On average, vessels occur every 0.14 mm (0.0055 in), and within 0.1 mm (0.0039 in) from the mesocolic surfaces—anterior and posterior. Lymphatic channels have also been identified in Toldt's fascia, though the significance of this is unknown.[7]
^Coffey JC, Sehgal R, Culligan K, et al. (June 2014). "Terminology and nomenclature in colonic surgery: universal application of a rule-based approach derived from updates on mesenteric anatomy".Techniques in Coloproctology.18 (9):789–94.doi:10.1007/s10151-014-1184-2.PMID24968936.S2CID20276149.
^abSehgal, R; Coffey, JC (June 2014). "The development of consensus for complete mesocolic excision (CME) should commence with standardisation of anatomy and related terminology".International Journal of Colorectal Disease.29 (6):763–4.doi:10.1007/s00384-014-1852-8.PMID24676507.S2CID10393183.
^West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, Cairns A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (September 2008). "Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study".The Lancet Oncology.9 (9):857–65.doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70181-5.PMID18667357.
^Søndenaa K, Quirke P, Hohenberger W, et al. (April 2014). "The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a central vascular ligation for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic surgery : proceedings of a consensus conference".International Journal of Colorectal Disease.29 (4):419–28.doi:10.1007/s00384-013-1818-2.PMID24477788.S2CID6464670.
^Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (May 2009). "Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation – technical notes and outcome".Colorectal Disease.11 (4):354–64, discussion 364–5.doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01735.x.PMID19016817.S2CID24215331.
^abcDodds WJ, Darweesh RM, Lawson TL, et al. (December 1986). "The retroperitoneal spaces revisited".AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology.147 (6):1155–61.doi:10.2214/ajr.147.6.1155.PMID3490750.
^Ellis H. The abdomen and pelvis. In: Ellis H, editor. Clinical anatomy: applied anatomy for students and junior doctors. 12th ed. Blackwell Science; 2010. p. 86.
^McMinn RH (1994). "The gastrointestinal tract". In McMinn RH (ed.).Last's anatomy: regional and applied (9th ed.). London: Langman Group. p. 331e42.
^abToldt C (1879). "Bau und wachstumsveranterungen der gekrose des menschlischen darmkanales".Denkschrdmathnaturwissensch.41:1–56.
^Toldt C (1919). "Splanchology – general considerations". In Toldt C; Della Rossa A (eds.).An atlas of human anatomy for students and physicians. Vol. 4. New York: Rebman Company. p. 408.
^Congdon, Edgar D.; Blumberg, Ralph; Henry, William (March 1942). "Fasciae of fusion and elements of the fused enteric mesenteries in the human adult".American Journal of Anatomy.70 (2):251–79.doi:10.1002/aja.1000700204.