Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Mero site

Coordinates:45°08′24″N87°03′00″W / 45.14000°N 87.05000°W /45.14000; -87.05000
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromMero Site)
Archaeological site in Wisconsin, United States

Mero site
View of the Mero site
Locationin thetown ofLiberty Grove inDoor County, Wisconsin
Coordinates45°08′24″N87°03′00″W / 45.14000°N 87.05000°W /45.14000; -87.05000
Mero site is located in Wisconsin
Mero site
Location inWisconsin
Show map of Wisconsin
Mero site is located in the United States
Mero site
Location in United States
Show map of the United States

TheMero site is astratified, multicomponentprehistoric site located on the south side of Marshall's Point[1] on theDoor Peninsula inDoor County,Wisconsin. It was excavated in 1960 by Ronald and Carol Mason under the auspices of theNeville Public Museum inGreen Bay, Wisconsin, with financial backing from the landowner, Peter Mero.[2]

As of 2016, Marshall's Point is a gated residential community.[3] The privately owned interior of the community is recognized as aWisconsin State Natural Area.[4]

Results of data analysis

[edit]

Excavations at the site yielded Prehistoricartifacts and animal bone.[2]

Three stratified areas were identified at the site:[2]

  • Stratified Area I – cultural deposits from this area dated from theMiddle Woodland period and are designated North Bay I Complex. Artifacts and animal bone were recovered from a buried beach area, and another stratigraphic layer underneath the beach.Late Woodland andUpper Mississippian cultural remains came from the top levels.
  • Stratified Areas II and III – cultural deposits from the lower strata of these areas are designated North Bay II Complex, and the top levels correspond to Late Woodland and Upper Mississippian. Stratigraphic layers were consistent between these two areas but could not be matched with the layers in Stratified Area I.

Additional material from all time periods was also plentiful in the unstratified portions of the site.

Components

[edit]

Several Prehistoric components were present at the site:[2]

  • Middle Woodland – dates to approximately 200 B.C. to A.D. 500 and is characterized by the North Bay I and North Bay II Complexes. The diagnostic artifact is the grit-temperedpottery that is described as very heavily tempered and poorly constructed with rough surface in North Bay I and somewhat smoother and more moderately tempered in North Bay II. Both North Bay I and II have close affinities to the Middle WoodlandHopewell culture.
  • Late Woodland – dates to approximately A.D. 500-1000 and is characterized mainly by Heins Creek Ware pottery, named after the nearby Heins Creek Site also in Door County, Wisconsin, along with other regional Late Woodland pottery types such as Point Sauble Collared and Madison Cord-Impressed. It is thought that the Heins Creek Ware evolved out of the Middle Woodland North Bay Complex. The Madison Cord-Impressed is affiliated with the Late WoodlandEffigy Mound culture. Aradiocarbon date of A.D. 720 was obtained from the Late Woodland deposits at the Heins Creek site and based upon the similarity of pottery between the two sites, that probably dates the Late Woodland component at Mero as well.
  • Upper Mississippian – dates from approximately A.D. 1200-1400 (based upon stratigraphic position and the traits observed on the artifacts) and is the largest component at the site. The characteristic artifact isOneota pottery. Unlike other Oneota components in theAmerican Midwest, more of the pottery is grit-tempered (about 40%) than shell-tempered, rarely has handles, and is rarely decorated. The stratified sequence demonstrates that the incidence of grit temper decreases over time and is replaced by shell temper in the upper strata. Other typical Oneota traits such as arrow shaft straighteners, sherd discs,smoking pipes,storage pits and evidence ofagriculture, are not present at Mero. The component was designated “Mero Complex” (aka Green Bay phase) by Mason, and is considered to have close affinities to the Grand River focus.

Animal remains

[edit]

Remains from several species were recovered from the site. The main species present weredeer,beaver,porcupine,dog,bear,otter,fish (esp.sturgeon,channel catfish, andsmallmouth bass),marten,common loon,fisher andmink.[2] These remains were not modified into tools like the bone tools described in the Artifacts section below, and may be considered food remains or, in the case of the dog and bear, possibly the remains ofceremonial activities. Dog sacrifice and dog meat consumption was observed to have ceremonial andreligious implications in earlyNative American tribes.Bear worship and ceremonialism has also been recorded in the ethnological record.[5]

Artifacts

[edit]
Representative Oneota vessel forms

Pottery artifacts

[edit]

Archaeologists often find pottery to be a very useful tool in analyzing a prehistoric culture. It is usually very plentiful at a site and the details of manufacture and decoration are very sensitive indicators of time, space and culture.[6]

No whole or reconstructable vessels were recovered from the site, so the analysis was based upon examination of rim and body sherds. Due to the large number of very small sherds, an effort was made to convert a raw sherd count into an estimated minimum number of vessels present. This provided a more accurate estimate of the relative proportions of pottery types represented.[2]

11,835 sherds overall were recovered, representing a minimum of 501 vessels. Within the North Bay I and II Complexes, there were 951 sherds representing 59 vessels. For the Late Woodland, there were 2,256 sherds representing 111 vessels. The Upper Mississippian component had 8,628 sherds (of which only 146 were decorated) representing 331 vessels (205 shell-tempered and 126 grit-tempered).[2]

Several pottery types from different time periods were present. Some of them are listed below:[2]

TypeNo. of vesselsTempering MaterialDescriptionCultural affiliation
North Bay cordmarked (North Bay I and II complex)3GritCordmarked to smoothed-over cordmarked surface finish; vertical rim profile; flat to rounded lip; no decorationMiddle Woodland
North Bay plain (North Bay I and II complex)9GritPlain surface; vertical rim profile; no decoration except for lip; lip may be plain or impressed with cord-wrapped objectMiddle Woodland
North Bay dentate stamped (North Bay II complex)7GritPlain surface w/dentate-stamped decoration; rim profile vertical to slightly evertedMiddle Woodland
Becker punctated (North Bay I complex)8GritPlain surface w/punctate decoration; vertical rim profileMiddle Woodland
Dane incised5GritCordmarked surface w/incised decorationEarly to Middle Woodland
Heins Creek cordmarked15GritCordmarked surface; no decoration except rarely on lip; globular vessel form with restricted orifice and vertical to slightly everted rim profileLate Woodland
Heins Creek corded-stamped23GritSurface decorated with discontinuous stamped patterns applied with cord-wrapped stick; globular vessel form with restricted orifice and vertical to slightly everted rim profileLate Woodland
Heins Creek cord-wrapped stick5GritSurface decorated with cord-wrapped stick impressions; globular vessel form with restricted orifice and everted rim profileLate Woodland
Point Sauble collared21GritCord-impressed surface, collared rim, row of punctates beneath collarLate Woodland
Aztalan collared4GritCollar and lip decorated w/twisted cord impressions; vessel body below collar is cordmarked; mouth of vessel is angularLate Woodland
Madison cord-impressed24GritCord-impressed decoration (subdivided into 4 varieties); globular vessel form with restricted orifice and slightly everted rim profileLate Woodland
Oneota331Grit or shellPredominantly plain surfaces, mostly undecorated; decorations when they occur consist of incised or trailed lines sometimes associated with punctates or embossed stamps; lips sometimes notched; handles are rare; most vessel forms are globular jars with restricted orifice and sharply everted rim profile; there are also shallow bowl forms representedUpper Mississippian

Other artifacts

[edit]

Non-pottery artifacts recovered from the site included:[2]

  • Chipped stone artifacts – including 118projectile points,scrapers (subdivided into variants based on manufacturing technique), 82 blanks, 4knives, 8drills, onespokeshave and onehand axe. Of the projectile points, 78 were triangular points and 40 were stemmed and notched.
  • Ground stone artifacts – including 4hammerstones, 12 net sinkers and 3celts.
  • Bone andantler artifacts – including 20 split boneawls, 5 deerulna awls, 4 drifts, 1 decorated/grooved awl, 1 socketed antler projectile point, 1 socketed deermetapodial projectile point, 5matneedles, 5 counters, 11 hair pins and 2toothpendants (one dog and one bear).
  • Copper artifacts – including 1 awl and 1 tanged spatulate knife.

Significance

[edit]

The cultural sequence at the Mero site reveals a long series of occupations from 500 B.C. to A.D. 1400, or almost 2,000 years. The pottery record indicates an in situ evolution from the Middle Woodland North Bay culture to the Late Woodland Heins Creek culture; but after A.D. 1000 there is an intrusive Upper Mississippian presence characterized by Oneota pottery.

The Oneota Mero Complex (aka Green Bay focus) is unique due to its high proportion of grit-tempered pottery and the low incidence of decoration. It is also unique that the site does not have many of the traits usually found in Oneota contexts such as arrow shaft straighteners, smoking pipes, sherd discs, storage pits or evidence of agriculture. The reason may be that the site was not a village but rather a temporary site for a specialized activity such as fishing.[2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Two Stratified Sites on the Door Peninsula of Wisconsin by Ronald J. Mason,Anthropological Papers 26, University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, 1966, Part II: The Mero Site, Section III, Location and Field Procedure, page 29, (also see themap on page vi)
  2. ^abcdefghijMason, Ronald J. (1966).Two Stratified Sites on the Door Peninsula of Wisconsin. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers No, 26.
  3. ^Open House: Luxurious resort home in Door County heads for online auction by David Schuyler,Milwaukee Business Journal, November 2, 2016
  4. ^Marshall's Point (No. 204), Wisconsin State Natural Areas Program
  5. ^Koziarski, Ralph (2017). "Fur-Trade Period Animal Ceremonialism at the Grand Village of the Meskwaki".Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology.42 (1):37–57.doi:10.1080/01461109.2017.1292671.S2CID 164815598.
  6. ^Shepard, Anna (1954).Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 609.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Ronald J. Mason (1966),Two Stratified Sites on the Door Peninsula of Wisconsin, University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers No. 26, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Middle
Mississippian
American Bottom
and Upper Mississippi
Lower Ohio River and
Confluence area
Middle Ohio River
Tennessee and
Cumberland
Central and Lower
Mississippi
South Appalachian
Mississippian
Fort Walton culture
Pensacola culture
Plaquemine
Mississippian
Caddoan
Mississippian
Upper Mississippian
cultures
Oneota
Fort Ancient culture
Culture
Agriculture
Artwork
Languages
Religion
Archaeological
cultures
Archaeological
sites
Human
remains
Miscellaneous
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mero_site&oldid=1281192945"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp