Not to be confused with theMerck Group (Merck KGaA), a distinct but historically related company based in Germany.
Merck & Co., Inc.
The current Merck & Co. logo, designed bySteff Geissbuhler ofChermayeff & Geismar in 1992. "MERCK" trade name is used in U.S. and Canada (top); outside these countries "MSD" is used (bottom).
The company's revenues are primarily from cancer treatments, vaccines, and animal health products. In 2024, 46% of the company's revenue, or $29.5 billion, came from sales of Keytruda (pembrolizumab), aPD-1 inhibitor used to treat various types ofcancers, and 13% of the company's revenue, or $8.6 billion, came from sales ofGardasil, anHPV vaccine.[1] In addition, 9% of the company's revenue, or $5.8 billion, came from the sales of animal health products.[1]
In 1891, Merck & Co. was established as the American affiliate ofMerck Group, founded by theMerck family, and the companies are still in trademark disputes in several countries over the right to use the name "Merck".
Merck & Co. traces its origins to its former German parent companyMerck Group, which was established by theMerck family in 1668 whenFriedrich Jacob Merck purchased a pharmacy inDarmstadt.[4][5] In 1827, Merck Group evolved from a pharmacy to a drug manufacturer company with the commercial manufacture ofmorphine.[6] Merck perfected the chemical process of deriving morphine fromopium and later introducedcocaine, used to treat sinus problems and to add to beverages to boost energy levels.[7]
In 1887 a German-born, long-time Merck employee, Theodore Weicker, went to the United States to represent Merck Group.[8] In 1891, with $200,000 received from E. Merck, Weicker started Merck & Co., with headquarters in lower Manhattan. That year George Merck, the 23-year-old son of the then head of E. Merck (and grandson of the founder) joined Weicker in New York.[9][4][5] Merck & Co. operated from 1891 to 1917 as the US subsidiary of theMerck Group.[5]
After the U.S. enteredWorld War I, due to its German connections, Merck & Co. was the subject ofexpropriation under theTrading with the Enemy Act of 1917.[10] The government seized 80 percent of the shares owned by the German parent company and sold it.[11] In 1919, George F. Merck (head of the American branch of the Merck family), in partnership withGoldman Sachs andLehman Brothers, bought the company back at a U.S. government auction for $3.5 million, but Merck & Co. remained a separate company from its former German parent.[12][13] Merck & Co. holds the trademark rights to the "Merck" name in the United States and Canada, while its former parent company retains the rights in the rest of the world; the right to use the Merck name was the subject of litigation between the two companies in 2016.[14][15][16][17]
In 1925,George W. Merck succeeded his father George F. Merck as president. In 1927, the corporation merged with the Powers-Weightman-Rosengarten Company, a Philadelphia quinine manufacturer. George Merck remained president and Frederic Rosengarten became chairman of the board.[18][19] In 1929,H. K. Mulford Company merged with Sharp and Dohme, Inc. and brought vaccine technology, including immunization of cavalry horses in World War I and delivery of a diphtheria antitoxin to Merck & Co.
In 1943,streptomycin was discovered during a Merck-funded research program inSelman Waksman's laboratory atRutgers University. It became the first effective treatment fortuberculosis. At the time of its discovery,sanatoriums for the isolation of tuberculosis-infected people were a ubiquitous feature of cities in developed countries, with 50% dying within 5 years of admission.[20][21] Although Merck's agreement with Rutgers gave it exclusive rights to streptomycin, at Waksman's request the company renegotiated the agreement, returning the rights to the university in exchange for a royalty. The university then set up non-exclusive licenses with seven companies to ensure a reliable supply of the antibiotic.[22]
In the 1950s,thiazide diuretics were developed by Merck scientists Karl H. Beyer, James M. Sprague, John E. Baer, and Frederick C. Novello[23] and led to the marketing of the first drug of this class,chlorothiazide, under the trade name Diuril in 1958.[24] The research leading to the discovery of chlorothiazide, leading to "the saving of untold thousands of lives and the alleviation of the suffering of millions of victims of hypertension" was recognized by a special Public Health Award from the Lasker Foundation in 1975.[25]
In 1953, Merck & Co. merged with Philadelphia-based Sharp & Dohme, Inc., becoming the largest U.S. drugmaker. Sharp and Dohme had acquiredH. K. Mulford Company in 1929, addingsmallpox vaccines to its portfolio.[26][27][28][29][30][4] The combined company kept the trade name Merck in the United States and Canada, and as Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) outside North America.[17]
In 1965, Merck & Co. acquiredCharles Frosst Ltd. ofMontreal (founded 1899), creating Merck-Frosst Canada, Inc., as its Canadian subsidiary and pharmaceutical research facility. Merck & Co. closed this facility in July 2010 but remerged in 2011 as Merck Canada.[31][32]
Maurice Hilleman, a scientist at Merck, developed the firstmumps vaccine in 1967,[33] the firstrubella vaccine in 1969,[34] and the first trivalent measles, mumps, rubella (MMR vaccine) in 1971.[35] The incidence of rubella-associated birth defects fell from up to 10,000 per year in the U.S. to zero in the aftermath of the rubella vaccine's development.[36] Hilleman also developed the firstHepatitis B vaccine and the firstvaricella vaccine, for chickenpox.[37]
The company was incorporated in New Jersey in 1970.John J. Horan became CEO and Chairman in 1976, serving until 1985.[38] Under his leadership, the company's investment in R&D grew threefold, and Merck became the largest pharmaceutical company in the world.[38][39]
In 1979, Merck scientists developedlovastatin (Mevacor), the first drug of thestatin class.[40]
In 1982, the company formed ajoint venture, KBI Inc., withAstraZeneca.[43] During the late 1980s and 1990s, the company also established joint ventures withDuPont to access research and development expertise, and withJohnson & Johnson to sell over-the-counter consumer medications.[citation needed]
In 1985, Merck received approval forimipenem, the first member of thecarbapenem class of antibiotics. Antibiotics of the carbapenem class play an important role in treatment guidelines for certain hospital-acquired and multi-drug resistant infections.[44]P. Roy Vagelos became CEO and Chairman that year, succeeding Horan.[45] Vagelos served until reaching the company's mandatory retirement age in 1994, succeeded byRaymond Gilmartin.[46]
In 1991, Merck's Kelco subsidiary was responsible forvolatile organic compound (VOC) emission pollution in the San Diego area. In 1996 Merck paid $1.8 million for polluting the air. New machines were installed to reduce smog emissions by 680,000 lb (310,000 kg) a year.[47]
In November 1993, Merck & Co. acquired Medco Containment Services for $6 billion.[48][49] Merck & Co. spun Medco off ten years later.[50]
Merck'ssupply chain reduction programme has been referred to as an example of successful change. Merck reduced its number of global suppliers from 40,000 to less than 10,000 during the period from 1992 to 1997.[51]
From 2002 through 2005, the Australian affiliate of Merck paid publishing houseElsevier an undisclosed amount to produce eight issues of a medical journal, theAustralasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine. Although it gave the appearance of being an independent peer-reviewed journal, without any indication that Merck had paid for it, the journal actually reprinted articles that originally appeared in other publications and that were favorable to Merck. The misleading publication came to light in 2009 during a personal injury lawsuit filed over Vioxx; 9 of 29 articles in the journal's second issue referred positively to Vioxx.[53][54] The CEO of Elsevier's Health Sciences Division, Michael Hansen, admitted that the practice was "unacceptable".[55]
In 2005, Gilmartin retired as CEO following Merck's voluntary worldwide withdrawal ofVioxx. Gilmartin's tenure was criticized as abandoning Vagelos' commitment tocorporate social responsibility.[46][56] Former president of manufacturingRichard Clark was named CEO and company president.[57]
In November 2009, Merck & Co. completed a merger withSchering-Plough in a US$41 billion deal.[58][59] Although Merck & Co. was in reality acquiring Schering-Plough, the purchase was declared a "reverse merger", in which "Old" Merck & Co. was renamed Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Schering-Plough renamed as "Merck & Co., Inc.[60] The maneuver was an attempt avoid a "change-of-control" in order to preserve Schering-Plough's rights to marketRemicade. A settlement withJohnson & Johnson was reached in 2011, in which Merck agreed to pay $500 million.[61][62] Merck Sharp & Dohme remains a subsidiary of the Merck & Co. parent.[1]
In October 2013, Merck announced it would cut 8,500 jobs in an attempt to cut $2.5 billion from its costs by 2015. Combined with 7,500 job cuts announced in 2011 and 2012, the layoffs amounted to 20% of its workforce.[64][65]
In August 2014, Merck acquired Idenix Pharmaceuticals for $3.85 billion.[67][68]
In September 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvedPembrolizumab (MK-3475) as a breakthrough therapy for melanoma treatment.[69] In clinical trials, pembrolizumab provided partial tumor regression in about one quarter of patients, many of whom have not seen further progression of their disease in over 6 months of follow-up.[70]
In December 2014, the company acquired Swiss biotechnology company OncoEthix for up to $375 million.[71][72]
Between 2010 and 2015, the company cut around 36,450 jobs.[73] During that time, the company sold its consumer health business toBayer and narrowed the company's focus to immunology, vaccines, diabetes, emerging markets and medicines used in hospitals, like certain antibiotics.[73]
In January 2015, Merck acquiredCubist Pharmaceuticals for $102 per share in cash or about $9.5 billion in total.[74]
In July 2015, Merck andAblynx expanded their 18-month-old immuno-oncology collaboration by four years, generating a potential $4.4 billion in milestone payments for the Abylnx.[75] The company also announced it would spend $95 million up front collaborating with cCAM Biotherapeutics and its early-stage treatment similar to Keytruda. Merck & Co. will bring in CM-24, an antibody designed to block the immune checkpointCEACAM1.[76]
In January 2016, Merck announced two new partnerships; the first with Quartet Medicine and its small molecule pain treatments,[77] the second with Complix investigating intracellular cancer targets,[78] with both collaborations potentially generating up to $595 million and $280 million respectively. Days later the company announced it would acquire IOmet Pharma, with IOmet becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Merck & Co. The acquisition includes IOmetsindoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO),tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO), and dual-acting inhibitors.[79]
In July 2016, the company acquired Afferent Pharmaceuticals, developer of a candidate used to blockP2RX3 receptors, for approximately $1 billion, plus up to $750 million in milestone payments.[80][81]
In April 2017, Merck Animal Health acquired Vallée S.A., a Brazilian animal health product manufacturer.[83]
In September 2017, the company announced it would acquire Rigontec, developer of a candidate to target theretinoic acid-inducible gene I pathway, for $554 million.[84][85]
In October 2017, the company granted the inaugural Merck-AGITG Clinical Research Fellowship in Gastro-Intestinal (GI) Cancer to David Lau, a professional in Melbourne, Australia.[86][87]
In June 2018, Merck acquiredViralytics, an Australian viral cancer drug company, for AUD$502 million.[88]
In 2018, Merck began the submission process for a Biologics License Application to theFood and Drug Administration under the Breakthrough Therapy Designation for an investigational vaccine, called V920, to fight the Zaire strain of theEbola virus.[89]
In April 2019, the company acquired Immune Design for approximately $300 million, gaining access to its immunotherapy programs.[90][91] It also acquired Antelliq Group for $2.4 billion, or $3.7 billion including debt.[92]
In June 2020, Merck acquired Themis Bioscience, a company focused on vaccines and immune-modulation therapies for infectious diseases includingCOVID-19 andcancer.[99][100][101]
Also in June 2020, Merck Animal Health acquired Quantified Ag, a data and analytics company that monitors cattle body temperature and movement in order to detect illness early.[102]
In August 2020, Merck Animal Health acquiredIdentiGEN, engaged in DNA-based animal traceability.[103]
In September 2020, Merck acquired $1 billion ofSeattle Genetics common stock, and agreed to co-develop ladiratuzumab vedotin.[104][105]
In November 2020, Merck announced it would acquire VelosBio for $2.75 billion, developer of VLS-101, anantibody-drug conjugate designed to targetTyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 1 (ROR1) in both hematological and solid tumors. VLS-101 is currently Phase I and Phase II clinical trials.[106] The company also announced it would acquire OncoImmune for $425 million and its phase 3 candidate, CD24Fc, used in the treatment of patients with severe and critical COVID-19.[107][108]
In February 2021, Merck Animal Health acquired PrognostiX Poultry.[109]
In April 2021, Merck acquired Pandion Therapeutics for $1.85 billion, expanding its offering in treating autoimmune diseases.[110][111][112]
In June 2021, the U.S. government agreed to spend $1.2 billion to purchase 1.7 million doses ofMolnupiravir, a Merck product, if it were to be approved by regulators to treatCOVID-19.[113] In October 2021, the company said that the drug reduces the risk of hospitalization or death by around 50% for patients with mild or moderate cases ofCOVID-19 and that it would seekEmergency Use Authorization for the drug.[114]
In July 2021, Robert M. Davis became CEO, succeeding Kenneth Frazier, who became executive chairman.[115][116][117][118]
In September 2022, the company announced it would acquireVence, a livestock management company for an undisclosed sum, incorporating it withinMerck Animal Health.[121]
In December 2022, the company announced a licensing deal with Kelun-Biotech of China whereby it would expand its early cancer pipeline with a set ofantibody-drug conjugates; this follows an earlier agreement between the two companies to co-develop such drugs.[122]
In December 2023, Merck announced it had partnered withOwkin to develop artificial intelligence-powered digital pathology diagnostics that could be used to identify patients suitable for immunotherapies. The aim is to come up with tools that can pre-screen patients with four tumour types for the MSI-H biomarker, namely endometrial, gastric, small intestinal, and biliary cancers.[124]
In January 2024, the company announced it would acquire Harpoon Therapeutics for $680 million.[125] With this purchase, Merck expands its portfolio of oncological drugs. The main positions are HPN328, an activator ofT-cells that is being researched to treat advanced cancer patients associated withDLL3 expression (delta-like ligand 3), an inherentsmall cell lung cancer (SCLC),neuroendocrine tumors, and several other species. Merck's portfolio will also be complemented by T-cell attractions using the patented Harpoon Tri-specific design for T cell activation (TriTAC). According to engineering protein technology, tumor cells are destroyed by the patient's own immune cells, and the ProTriTAC platform works with the TriTAC platform to develop a therapeutic agent that attracts T-cells, but is inactive until it reaches the tumor.[126]
In April 2024, Merck completed the acquisition of Abceutics for $208 million.[127]
In July 2024, Merck completed the acquisition of EyeBio for $3 billion.[128]
In October 2024, Merck announced the acquisition of Modifi Biosciences for $1.3 billion.[129]
Gardasil (HPV vaccine) ($8.5 billion in 2024 revenues) is a vaccine against multiple serotypes ofhuman papillomavirus (HPV), which is responsible for most cases of cervical cancer worldwide.[1]
Adempas/Verquvo (riociguat /vericiguat) ($0.7 billion in 2024 revenues) is used for the treatment ofpulmonary hypertension and to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization in certain patients with heart failure after a recent acute decompensation event.
Isentress (raltegravir) ($0.4 billion in 2024 revenues) is a human immunodeficiency virus integrase inhibitor for the treatment of HIV infection. It is the first anti-HIV compound having this mechanism of action.[135] It is part of one of several first line treatment regimens recommended by theUnited States Department of Health and Human Services.[136]
Remicade (infliximab) ($0.1 billion in 2024 revenues) is a monoclonal antibody directed toward the cytokineTNF-alpha and used for the treatment of a wide range of autoimmune disorders, includingrheumatoid arthritis,Crohn's disease,ankylosing spondylitis,plaque psoriasis, and others. Remicade and other TNF-alpha inhibitors exhibit additive therapeutic effects with methotrexate and improve quality of life. Adverse effects include increased risk of infection and certain cancers.[137] Merck had rights to the drug in certain areas, whileJanssen Biotech had rights in other areas;[61] in 2017, Merck announced a biosimilar to Remicade, Renflexis.[138]
Januvia (sitagliptin) ($1.3 billion in 2024 revenues) is a dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In 2013, Januvia was the second largest selling diabetes drug worldwide.[139] It has been popular due in part because unlike many other diabetes drugs, it causes little or no weight gain and is not associated with hypoglycemic episodes.[140][141] There has been some concern that treatment with Januvia and other DPP-IV inhibitors may be associated with a modestly increased risk of pancreatitis.[142]
Janumet ($1.0 billion in 2024 revenues) is a single pill combination drug containing both Januvia andmetformin.
Merck Foundation - founded in 1957, the foundation has donated over $1 billion to charitable causes to promote health equity. In 2012, the foundation ended its donations to theBoy Scouts of America citing its discrimination against gay people.[143]
Patient assistance programs to offer access to pharmaceuticals to those unable to afford its medications.
Provides funding toHilleman Laboratories, an India-based non-profit research organization dedicated to the development of low-cost vaccines for use in developing countries.[144]
Merck for Mothers prevents maternal mortality.
Merck producesMectizan (ivermectin), an anti-parasitic medicine traditionally used to treatonchocerciasis, solely for donation to people in Africa, Latin America, and Yemen. The donation program has significantly reduced the incidence of the disease.
Thereafter, studies by Merck and by others found an increased risk of heart attack associated withVioxx use when compared with naproxen. Merck adjusted the labeling of Vioxx to reflect possible cardiovascular risks in 2002.[147]
On September 23, 2004, Merck received information about results from aclinical trial it was conducting that included findings of increased risk of heart attacks among Vioxx users who had been using the medication for over eighteen months.[148] On September 28, 2004, Merck notified the FDA that it was voluntarily withdrawing Vioxx from the market, and it publicly announced the withdrawal on September 30. An analysis for the period 1999–2004, based on U.S. Medical Expenditure Survey data, reported that Vioxx was associated with 46,783 heart attacks in the US, and along with the other popularCOX-2 inhibitorCelebrex, an estimated 26,603 deaths from both.[149][150]
About 50,000 people sued Merck, claiming they or their family members had suffered medical problems such as heart attacks or strokes after taking Vioxx.[151] In November 2007, Merck agreed to pay $4.85 billion to settle most of the pending Vioxx lawsuits.[152] The settlement required that claimants provide medical and pharmacy records confirming the occurrence of a heart attack, ischemic stroke, or sudden cardiac death; the receipt of at least 30 Vioxx pills within 60 days prior to the injury or death; and confirmation of Vioxx being used within 14 days of the Vioxx-related event.[153] The settlement was generally viewed by industry analysts and investors as a victory for Merck, considering that original estimates of Merck's liability reached between $10 billion and $25 billion.[152] As of mid-2008, when the plaintiff class had reached the threshold percentage required by Merck to go through with the settlement, plaintiffs had prevailed in only three of the twenty cases that had reached juries, all with relatively small awards.[151]
Merck has refused to consider compensation for Vioxx victims and their families outside the US. This is particularly true in the UK where there are at least 400 victims and the legal protection afforded to the victims and their families is particularly weak.[154]
According to internal e-mail traffic released at a later lawsuit, Merck had a list of doctors critical of Vioxx to be "neutralized" or "discredited". "We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live," wrote an employee. A Stanford Medical School professor said that Merck was engaged in intimidation of researchers and infringement uponacademic freedom.[155]
On May 20, 2008, Merck settled for $58 million with 30 states alleging that Merck engaged in deceptive marketing tactics to promoteVioxx.[156] All its new television pain-advertisements must be vetted by the Food and Drug Administration and changed or delayed upon request until 2018.[157]
Fosamax (alendronate) is abisphosphonate used for the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis and for the prevention of skeletal problems in certain cancers. The American College of Clinical Endocrinology, theAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, theNorth American Menopause Society and the UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group recommend alendronate and certain other bisphosphonates as first line treatments for post-menopausal osteopotosis.[158][159][160] Long-term treatment with bisphosponates produces anti-fracture and bone mineral density effects that persist for 3–5 years after an initial 3–5 years of treatment.[161] Alendronate reduces the risk of hip, vertebral, and wrist fractures by 35-39%.[162][163]
In December 2013, Merck agreed to pay a total of $27.7 million to 1,200 plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit alleging that the company's osteoporosis drug had caused them to develop osteonecrosis of the jaw. Prior to the settlement, Merck had prevailed in 3 of 5 so-called bellwether trials. Approximately 4,000 cases still await adjudication or settlement as of August 2014.[164]
There have also been thousands of lawsuits alleging that Fosamax increased the risk of thigh-bone fractures.[165] In March 2022, Merck defeated approximately 500 lawsuits over Fosamax in New Jersey whenU.S. District JudgeFreda L. Wolfson ruled that the plaintiffs' lawsuit was preempted by federal law.[166] On September 20, 2024, theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit overturned that decision, holding that federal law did not block plaintiffs' state law claims against Merck over Fosamax.[165] As of June 30, 2024, about 3,115 lawsuits over Fosamax were still pending against Merck in both federal and state courts in the United States.[165]
A fraud investigation by theUnited States Department of Justice began in 2000 when allegations were brought in two separate lawsuits filed by whistleblowers under theFalse Claims Act.[167] They alleged that Merck failed to pay proper rebates toMedicaid and other health care programs and paid illegal remuneration to health care providers.[168] On February 7, 2008, Merck agreed to pay more than $650 million to settle charges that it routinely overbilled Medicaid for its most popular medicines. The settlement was one of thelargest pharmaceutical settlements in history. The federal government received more than $360 million, plus 49 states and Washington, DC, received over $290 million. One whistleblower received a $68 million reward. Merck made the settlement without an admission of liability or wrongdoing.[167][169][170]
In 191 of 193 countries, the original Merck company, theMerck Group of Darmstadt, owns the rights to the "Merck" name. In the United States and Canada, the company trades under the name EMD (an abbreviation of Emanuel Merck, Darmstadt), its legal name here saysMerck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and instead of "Merck Group", the "EMD Group" name is used. In the United States and Canada, Merck & Co. holds the rights to the trademark "Merck", while in the rest of the world the company trades under the name MSD (an abbreviation of Merck, Sharp & Dohme) and its legal name says hereMerck Sharp & Dohme LLC., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
In 2015 theMerck Group adopted a new logo and said it will be "much more aggressive" about protecting the brand of "the real Merck".[171] Merck of Darmstadt has initiated litigation against its former subsidiary, Merck & Co. (MSD) of Kenilworth, in several countries over infringing use of the Merck name. In 2016, theHigh Court of Justice in theUnited Kingdom ruled that MSD had breached an agreement with its former parent company and that only Merck of Darmstadt is entitled to use the Merck name in the United Kingdom.[17] The judge also held that MSD's use of "Merck" as part of branding on its global websites were directed to the UK and infringed Merck's trade mark rights in the UK.[172]
In response to the ruling, MSD initiated counter-litigation in the United States in January 2016 by filing a federal lawsuit which accused its former parent company of "infringing on its trademark" through actions that included the increased usage of "Merck KGaA" and "MERCK" in branding in the US as well as on its social media presence. Further Merck & Co. has also accused the Merck Group of federal trademark dilution, unfair competition, false advertising, deceptive trade practices, breach of contract, andcybersquatting. The case came to a head when a research scientist believed he was communicating with Merck & Co regarding a research grant in oncology, when in fact he was talking with the Merck Group. As a result, Merck & Co. asked the federal court to stop the Merck Group from using "Merck" on any products or marketing materials in the United States. As a direct result, Merck & Co is seeking "all monetary gains, profits, and advantages" made by the Merck Group and three-times the damage, plus additional punitive damages.[14]
In April 2020, in the course of litigation of Merck against MSD in Switzerland, theFederal Supreme Court of Switzerland ruled that MSD's use of the "Merck" brand in its global websites could, absentgeotargeting mechanisms, have "commercial effect" in Switzerland and could therefore violate Merck's rights (if any) to the "Merck" brand in Switzerland.[173]
In February 2007, Merck paid $2.3 billion to theInternal Revenue Service to settle a tax dispute over the accounting treatment of transactions between 1993 and 2001.[174]
Sexual dysfunction and suicidal thoughts associated with Propecia
In 2021, an investigation byReuters revealed that Merck's baldness drugPropecia caused persistent sexual dysfunction in men.[175] The drug has been linked to over 700 incidences of suicidal thoughts[176] and 110 deaths.[175] Merck has been receiving reports since 1998, but never included the risks on the label.[175] In 2015, Merck was sued by consumer-rights law firm Hagens Berman over a wrongful death linked to Propecia.[177]
Merck & Co. once usedmethylene chloride, an animal carcinogen on theUnited States Environmental Protection Agency's list of pollutants, as a solvent in some of its manufacturing processes. Merck chemists and engineers subsequently replaced the compound with others having fewer negative environmental effects. Merck has also modified its equipment to protect the environment, installing a distributed control system that coordinates chemical reactions more efficiently and expedites manufacturing by 50 percent, eliminating the need for the disposal and storage of harmful waste. Biological oxygen demand has also been reduced. In 2011, Merck paid a $1.5 million civil penalty to settle alleged violations of federal environmental laws at its pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities inRiverside, Pennsylvania andWest Point, Pennsylvania.[178]
The company spends approximately $10 million per year onlobbying in the United States. Political contributions have mostly been to individuals and organizations associated with theDemocratic Party.[179] The company is a member of many industry advocacy groups and sponsors many industry events.
^Antibacterial Agents. Chemistry, Mode of Action, Mechanisms of Resistance, and Clinical Applications. Anderson RJ, Groundwater PJ, Todd A, Worsely AJ. Wiley (2012).ISBN9780470972458 See Preface material.
^Deacon CF, Mannucci E, Ahrén B (August 2012). "Glycaemic efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as add-on therapy to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes-a review and meta analysis".Diabetes Obes Metab.14 (8):762–7.doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01603.x.PMID22471248.S2CID21833823.
^Vaithianathan R, Hockey PM, Moore TJ, Bates DW (2009). "Iatrogenic effects of COX-2 inhibitors in the US population: findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey".Drug Saf.32 (4):335–43.doi:10.2165/00002018-200932040-00007.PMID19388724.S2CID41806262.
^"Description of Settlement Agreement"(PDF).Vioxx MDL Plaintiffs' Steering Committee Official Vioxx Settlement. November 9, 2007. Archived from the original on July 19, 2008.
^Eriksen EF, Díez-Pérez A, Boonen S (January 2014). "Update on long-term treatment with bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a systematic review".Bone.58:126–35.doi:10.1016/j.bone.2013.09.023.PMID24120384.
^Serrano AJ, Begoña L, Anitua E, Cobos R, Orive G (December 2013). "Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of alendronate and zoledronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis".Gynecol. Endocrinol.29 (12):1005–14.doi:10.3109/09513590.2013.813468.PMID24063695.S2CID20163452.
^Gauthier K, Bai A, Perras C, et al. (2012). "Denosumab, Raloxifene, and Zoledronic Acid for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Clinical Effectiveness and Harms [Internet]".Canada's Drug Agency.PMID24278999.