Someeconomic historians use the termmerchant capitalism, a term coined by the German sociologist and economistWerner Sombart in his "The Genesis of Modern Capitalism" in 1902, to refer to the earliest phase in thedevelopment of capitalism as an economic and social system.[1] However, others argue thatmercantilism, which has flourished widely in the world without the emergence of systems like modern capitalism, is not actually capitalist as such.[2]
Merchant capitalism is distinguished from more fully developed capitalism by its focus on simply moving goods from a market where they are cheap to a market where they are expensive (rather than influencing the mode of the production of those goods), the lack ofindustrialization, and ofcommercial finance.Merchant houses were backed by relatively small privatefinanciers acting as intermediaries betweensimple commodity producers and by exchanging debt with each other. Thus, merchant capitalismpreceded thecapitalist mode of production as a form ofcapital accumulation. A process ofprimitive accumulation of capital, upon which commercial finance operations could be based and making application of masswage labor and industrialization possible, was the necessary precondition for the transformation of merchant capitalism into industrial capitalism.[citation needed]
Early forms of merchant capitalism developed in the 9th century, during theIslamic Golden Age, while inmedieval Europe from the 12th century.[3][4][5] The movement towards merchant capitalism across the old municipal and guild system had been apparent in the wool trade as early as the age ofChaucer.[6] In Europe, merchant capitalism became a significant economic force in the 16th century. Themercantile era drew to a close around 1800, giving way toindustrial capitalism. However, merchant capitalism remained entrenched in some parts of the West well into the 19th century, notably theSouthern United States, where the plantation system constrained the development of industrial capitalism (limiting markets for consumer goods) whose political manifestations prevented Northern legislators from passing broad economic packages (e.g.monetary and banking reform, atranscontinental railroad, andincentives for settlement of the American west) to integrate the states' economies and spur the growth of industrial capitalism.[7]