Please enter your requests at thebottom of the page.Sign your requests with four tildes: ~~~~
Also in your request, please include the following:
The link that you want whitelisted in the section title, like === example.com/help/index.php === .
The Wikipedia page on which you want to use the link
An explanation why it would be useful to the encyclopedia article proper
If the site you're requesting is listed at/Common requests, please include confirmation that you have read the reason why requests regarding the site are commonly denied and that you still desire to proceed with your request
Important: You must provide a full link to the specific web page you want to be whitelisted (leave out thehttp:// from the front; otherwise you will not be able to save your edit to this page). Requests quoting only a domain (i.e. ending in.com or similar with nothing after the/ character) are likely to be denied. If you wish to have a site fully unblocked please visit the relevant section ofMediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist.
Note: Donot request links to be whitelisted where you can reasonably suspect that the material you want to link to is in violation of copyright (seeWP:LINKVIO). Such requests will likely be summarily rejected.
There is no automated notification system in place for the results of requests, and you willnot be notified when your request has a response. You should therefore add this page to your personal watch list, to your notifications through thesubscribe feature, or check back here every few days to see if there is any progress on it; in particular, you should check whether administrators have raised any additional queries or expressed any concerns about the request, as failure to reply to these promptly will generally result in the request being denied.
Completed requests arearchived, additions and removal arelogged. →snippet forlogging: {{/request|1318321561#section_name}}
Note that requests from new or unregistered users are not usually considered.
If you have a source that you would like to add to the spam-whitelist, but you are uncertain that it meets Wikipedia's guideline onreliability, please ask for opinions on theReliable sources noticeboard, to confirm that it does meet that guideline, before submitting your whitelisting request here. In your request, link to the confirming discussion on that noticeboard.
Likewise, if you have an external link that you are uncertain meets Wikipedia's guideline onexternal links, please get confirmation on theExternal links noticeboard before submitting your whitelisting request here.
If your whitelist request falls under one of these two categories, the admins will be more willing to have the source whitelisted if you can achieve consensus at one of the above noticeboards.
Add new entries at thebottom of thispage. Completed requests will be marked with an appropriateIndicator thenarchived.
Instructions to requesters:
Explainwhy the site should be whitelisted.
Explainwhich articles would benefit from the addition of the link.
Provide thespecific link to the page you're requesting be added.
Please use the basic URL so that there is no link (www.google.ca, nothttp://www.google.ca).
Please add a{{LinkSummary|example.org}} (replace example.org with thedomain your specific url resides on, and remove the 'www.' part, and everything following the domain-name). This inserts a set of links that helps in finding relevant information and related discussion on the requested site.
If the above information is not provided, expect your request to be declined.
I am asking a removal of the link from the English Wikipedia spam blacklist. My intent is to cite this source in theSparta Speech article, specifically regarding free market matters discussed in the speech.
Reviewing the blacklist, it appears The London Economic was added in 2020 due to SEO issues, not unreliability. As perWP:BLACKLIST andWP:RS, blacklisting is intended as a last resort against persistent disruption or unreliability, with removal when there is compelling evidence that risk no longer exists or the site is not problematic for reliability. In this case, The London Economic provides coverage relevant to the topic and is not being used for promotion or disruption.Dgw|Talk04:41, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am not a paid editor. The article "Netanyahu: Boycotts isolating Israeli economy" was written byBill Curtis, a political journalist for The London Economic. He regularly writes forThe Big Issue,The Daily Telegraph andMetro. The article is reliable and describes in details theSparta Speech: "I am a supporter of the free market, but we may find ourselves in a situation where our arms industries are blocked." Full speech ishere.Dgw|Talk11:44, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It does seem perverse that we allow sites that have been created specifically to promote a fringe agenda (e.g. econlib) but block new media sites that are actually pretty good sources. But they certainly did spam.Guy(help! -typo?)11:48, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Dorian Gray Wild: I was not implying that you were a paid editor, I was stating that the material was spammed, ánd that they were spamming cases where there was something going on related to reliability (the blacklisting discussion suggested that the material on thelondoneconomic was 'rubbish'). Added toMediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. --Dirk BeetstraTC12:04, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Link requested to be whitelisted:lenta.ru/articles/2023/09/06/icehomeland/
I'm writing a draft about HC Norilsk, a Russian professional hockey club. The link I want to add is an article covering the team's first ever official game.Шахматист2025 (talk)23:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, maybe hypothetical, this may very well have happened. If someone would ask here "I'd like this blacklisted piece (OpIndia, Breitbart, whatever) whitelisted so I can use it in aTemplate:Press on (for example)Talk:Wikipedia and/orWikipedia:Press coverage 2025."
Can you tell me what the response would likely be, or actually was? Let's assume there is no BLP/OUTING etc problem in the particular piece. It's not something I'm going to ask, but the question has come up, and I'm curious what the "reality" is. Breitbart has appeared in those places before the blacklisting, but I'm unaware of any post-blacklisting appearances.Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk)10:35, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That does not sidestep the whitelist, but it does prevent the server of the website from knowing any information about you (InternetArchive) handles the request.Sohom (talk)20:31, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not (completely) true, it is side-stepping; we blacklist redirect sites on sight just for that reason. We don't link to material that is blacklisted, not directly, not indirect (unless it is whitelisted). It is not the point of the blacklist that we do not want the server of the blacklisted site to know your data. Blacklisting is generally done to stop abusive behaviour by individuals, with the material generally, but not always, being useless for improving Wikipedia. With strong community backing, we sometimes also blacklist material not because the linking was abused, but because we, with community consensus, decide we should not link to this material (e.g. WP:RSN discussions that decide that a certain website is so grossly unreliable, doxing sites, copyright violations, etc.). The former situation (spam) is generally fine to 'bypass' through an archive (but we shouldn't), the other ones are not fine directly, not fine through an archive link, they are not fine. Material does not get reliable because it is on an archive.Dirk BeetstraTC05:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gråbergs Gråa Sång We generally whitelist specific links for specific purposes. The example you use, breitbart, is just so often unreliable that 'normal use' would result in a lot of 'bad' references. The whitelist there exists to whitelist a specific link for a specific case, where a case can be made that the link there is suitable for the purpose. There is a lot of non-spam material blacklisted just because by far most of the cases are abuse, misuse or wrong use. Pornhub is not blacklisted for spamming, it is blacklisted for persistent abuse; change.org is not blacklisted for spamming but for persistent soapboxing/misuse issues, breitbart is blacklisted for constant misuse/wrong use (a lot of bad references) - we whitelist all of those if a proper case can be made for its use. For non-mainspace we generally do not whitelist for regular use (use a non-linking url in discussions), but we do sometimes whitelist for Signpost or banner use.Dirk BeetstraTC08:30, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have included this link for now without the https://, which I think is fine for this purpose. But don't want this to be perceived as a sneaky workaround if it's not allowed, so asking here. Fine to decline this request ifFile:Elizabeth Ward.jpg is ok as-is.
@Jonathan Deamer The link without https:// is fine, there is no demand that it is a clickable link. Bigredbook.info was however deemed a personal blog, and in the (far) past concerns of scraping were mentioned on pages on this site. I do have concerns that the image you used is not originally from bigredbook.info, but from somewhere else, and we are supposed to link to the original source (as you do). I am not sure if we need to mention the immediate source at all.Dirk BeetstraTC06:57, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Link requested to be whitelisted:log.fakewhale.xyz/exploring-collective-identity-a-philosophical-journey-with-meriem-bennanis-for-my-best-family/ (November 29, 2024)
Outtake from the Reception section ofBouchra(draft) at AFC, from September 25. From what I've assumed, Fakewhale is an otherwise legit art site (albeit with an occasional aside on the NFT movement).
In case any on board here are asking/wondering,Bouchra is an adult computer-animated film with animal characters, touted as Morocco's first animated feature.Bouchra entered the festival circuit this month; this review dates from the time it was originally screened under the titleFor Aicha at a Milan art facility. --Slgrandson(How's myegg-throwing coleslaw?)19:27, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Slgrandson please notify us when/if the draft is accepted. No use to whitelist a link for something that never ends up in mainspace. (and then, per your comment, I would consider to whitelist the whole domain).Dirk BeetstraTC05:44, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This should be whitelisted so that it can be added back to the "External links" section of the page.This edit removed the website from the "External links" section. When I tried to revert the edit, I received the blacklist warning.Cunard (talk)08:58, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following website is needed on the pageTemplate (C++) andComeau C/C++, from the websitecomeaucomputing.com. This website previously belonged to an organisation named "Comeau Computing" which produced a C++ compiler, known for being the only compiler supporting a very specific feature that was later removed. The website seems to have been sold off to an unrelated blog, however the archived page, which is indeed a relevant/authoritative source on the C++ language, is needed for a citation in that page.24.50.56.74 (talk)21:31, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Link requested to be whitelisted:web.archive.org/web/20030602175841/http://www.comeaucomputing.com/4.0/docs/userman/export.html(without the extraneous space betweenhttp: and//www..24.50.56.74 (talk)22:07, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Beetstra I'm still unable to add these citations to the pagesTemplate (C++) andComeau C/C++ as the filter still blocks it, I had to use a substitute (something likec0meaucomputing.com in the meantime). Could you please check again? Also, how do I mark a website in a citation as usurped?24.50.56.74 (talk)15:44, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Beetstra Can we also add this archive link? I want to cite this one as well. Link requested to be whitelisted:web.archive.org/web/20030422063923/http://www.comeaucomputing.com/4.3.0/minor/win95+/43stuff.txt24.50.56.74 (talk)16:04, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Link requested to be whitelisted:99acres.com/articles/ayodhya-development-authority.html
This is a useful article that talks about the creation of the Ayodhya-Faizabad Development Authority (AFDA), which is now known as the Ayodhya Development Authority (ADA). I have used the article as a cited source atAyodhya Municipal Corporation, and would like to have the url in the citation.-- Toddy1(talk)11:50, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]