Marxism and the National Question (Russian:Марксизм и национальный вопрос,romanized: Marksizm i natsionalniy vopros) is a short work ofMarxist theory written byJoseph Stalin in January 1913 while living inVienna. First published as apamphlet and frequently reprinted, the essay by the ethnicGeorgian Stalin was regarded as a seminal contribution to Marxist analysis of the nature ofnationality and helped to establish his reputation as an expert on the topic.[1] Stalin would later become the firstPeople's Commissar of Nationalities following the victory of theBolshevik Party in theOctober Revolution of 1917.
Although it did not appear in the various English-language editions of Stalin'sSelected Works, which began to appear in 1928,Marxism and the National Question was widely republished from 1935 as part of the topical collectionMarxism and the National and Colonial Question.
With his thesis reduced to a single line, Stalin concluded, "A nation is a historically constituted, stable community of people, formed on the basis of a common language, territory, economic life, and psychological make-up manifested in a common culture."[2][3] In defining a nation in this manner, Stalin took on the ideas ofOtto Bauer, for whom a nation was primarily a manifestation of character and culture.[4] Lenin had opposed the ideas of Bauer andKarl Renner, and preferred the theories ofKarl Kautsky, which conceived of a nation as territorial.[5][6]
Thus defined, Stalin took aim at the notion of "national–cultural autonomy", charging that the formulation was but a cloaked form of nationalism in socialist garb.[7] Stalin argued that such an approach would lead to the cultural and economic isolation of primitive nationalities and that the path forward should be the unification of various nations and nationalities into a unified stream of higher culture.[8]
The founders of Marxism,Karl Marx andFriedrich Engels, had not written much on nationalism, not even a definition of the word.[9] This led to debates among how to proceed in multinational states like the Russian andAustro-Hungarian Empires.[10]
Ioseb Jughashvili (1878–1953), better known by his Anglicizedparty name Joseph Stalin, was an ethnicGeorgian intellectual and Marxist revolutionary affiliated with theBolshevik wing of theRussian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP). Jughashvili regarded Bolshevik leaderVladimir Lenin (1870–1924) as a role model and intellectual beacon, and the young activist was sometimes jokingly called "Lenin's left foot" by his Georgian comrades.[11] Jughashvili did not just admire the exiled Lenin from afar through correspondence but had even met him personally, with the pair jointly attending the1907 Congress of the RSDLP held in London as part of a 92-member Bolshevik delegation.[12]
From the time he left the seminary (one of the only higher educational channels available to Georgian intellectuals at that time), Jughashvili was a so-called "professional revolutionary", a paid employee of the Bolshevik party organization dedicated full time to revolutionary activity.[13] Prior to 1910, Jughashvili's main political activity took place in theTranscaucasian region of theRussian empire,[14] making a home in theAzerbaijani oil city ofBaku from 1907.[15] Jughashvili helped to organize Marxiststudy circles and worked as an agitator and journalist, writing for the Bolshevik party press.[16] He was a reasonably prolific writer during this period, producing no fewer than 56 articles and leaflets. He also preserved pieces of political correspondence.[a]
Despite the mass of his written output, Stalin's earliest writing was mainly topical and ephemeral, with only a series of newspaper articles written for the Bolshevik press in opposition toanarchism during theRussian Revolution of 1905 gaining permanence through republication as the pamphletAnarchism Or Socialism?[17] This first effort at writing a generalized work of Marxist theory in serial form was incomplete, as it was interrupted early in 1907 by Jughashvili's departure fromTiflis to London for the Bolshevik Congress there and by his subsequent move to Baku.[17] No additional substantial contribution to theory would be made until the writing ofMarxism and the National Question in 1913.
Despite the paucity of substantial writing, Stalin was well regarded by the Bolshevik leaders in exile, and he was co-opted in absentia to the governing Central Committee of the now independent Bolshevik Party at the 1912 Party Conference held inCopenhagen.[18] Jughashvili, now known by his party name "Stalin,"[b] was at the same time named one of four members of a "Russian Bureau" for the day-to-day direction of the activity of the Bolshevik Party within the borders of the Russian empire by the émigré Copenhagen party conference.[18]
The actual writing ofMarxism and the National Question began in November 1912, when Stalin traveled toKraków (then under Austrian rule), to confer with Lenin on Bolshevik party business.[20] Lenin had published an article earlier that same month condemning nationalist fragmentation of the revolutionary movement, holding up as the disintegration of theSocial Democratic Party of Austria into autonomous German, Czech, Polish,Ruthenian, Italian andSlovene groupings as a grim example.[21] Lenin feared a comparable shattering of the RSDLP along national lines and sought to crush theAustro-Marxist slogan of "national–cultural autonomy."[21]
Stalin, as an antinationalist Georgian with no fear of ethnic Russian domination of the RSDLP, was seen both as an expert on the current interrelationship of the various nationalities of Transcaucasia and as a potential national minority voice in favor of the maintenance of a centralized and unified party organization. Stalin was set on the task of writing a lengthy article for publication in the Bolshevik theoretical monthlyProsveshcheniye (Enlightenment) detailing an official position on the matter.[22] Regarding Stalin's assignment to write such an article, Lenin wrote to novelistMaxim Gorky in February 1913:[23]
About nationalism, I fully agree with you that we have to bear down harder. We have here a wonderful Georgian who has undertaken to write a long article forProsveshchenie after gatheringall the Austrian and other materials. We will take care of this matter.[24]
Stalin began work as early as January 1913, though on Lenin's advice, Stalin settled in Vienna to work on the article, as the city was a focal point for the discussion in socialist circles.[25] Lacking a strong knowledge of German, Stalin read Russian translations of key works, and had assistants find material and translate for him.[26]
Marxism and the National Question was completed late in January 1913, with the author signing the work "K. Stalin."[27] The work first appeared in serial form in the Bolshevik magazineProsveshchenie (Enlightenment), with installments appearing in the March, April, and May 1913 issues of that publication.[3] The original title of the work as it appeared in 1913 wasNatsional'nye vopros is Sotsial-Demokratii (The National Question and the Social Democracy).[28] The three articles were combined for republication in pamphlet form asNatsional'nyi vopros i Marksizm (The National Question and Marxism) in 1914.[29]
Marxism and the National Question was not included in any one- or two-volume Russian version of Stalin'sSelected Works (Russian:Вопросы Ленинизма,romanized: Voprosy Leninizma,lit. 'Problems of Leninism'),[30] which first appeared in 1926, or in any English-language translation of this book appearing from 1928 to 1954. However, the work was reprinted as the lead essay in a 1934 Russian topical collection,Marksizm i natsional'no-kolonial'nyi vopros, and its English translations in the following year,Marxism and the National and Colonial Question. Two nearly simultaneous editions appeared in 1935, one published in Moscow and Leningrad by the Co-operative Publishing Society of Foreign Workers in the USSR (forerunner of the officialForeign Languages Publishing House) and another in New York under the imprint ofInternational Publishers. It was also included in the volume two of the collectionWorks (Russian:Сочинения,romanized: Sochineniya). The new title remained in print thereafter, throughout Stalin's lifetime.
Leon Trotsky, a fellow Bolshevik and later opponent of Stalin, would later state that the article was "undoubtedly Stalin's most important — rather his one and only — theoretical work."[31] However he also challenged the authorship of the article, questioning why Stalin did not write anything of "remotely comparable quality either before or after".[32] This speculative charge by Trotsky has found its way into the historical literature, echoed by such Stalin biographers asIsaac Deutscher andBertram D. Wolfe.[29] Other historians paying attention to the question have differed, withRobert H. McNeal concluding that while Lenin "certainly helped form Stalin's ideas on the nationality question before the essay of 1913 was composed" and "probably edited it for republication in 1914," at root "the work remains essentially Stalin's."[33] Stalin biographerRobert C. Tucker concurred that "there is no good reason to credit Lenin—as Trotsky did—with virtual authorship of the work."[34] He added that Stalin "needed little if any assistance in those important sections of the work that dealt with theBund and the national question in the Transcaucasus."[35] HistorianRonald Grigor Suny dismisses the work, noting that as a "defeated opponent" of Stalin, Trotsky was being "ungenerous".[31]
