Martha Nussbaum | |
|---|---|
.jpg) Nussbaum in 2010 | |
| Born | Martha Craven (1947-05-06)May 6, 1947 (age 78) New York City, New York, U.S. |
| Spouse | |
| Awards |
|
| Academic background | |
| Alma mater | New York University (BA) Harvard University (MA,PhD) |
| Thesis | Aristotle's "DE MOTU ANIMALIUM" |
| Doctoral advisor | G. E. L. Owen |
| Influences | |
| Academic work | |
| School or tradition | |
| Institutions | |
| Notable students | Christine Korsgaard |
| Main interests | |
| Notable works |
|
| Notable ideas | Capability approach |
| Influenced | |
Martha Nussbaum (/ˈnʊsbɔːm/;néeCraven; born May 6, 1947) is an American philosopher and the currentErnst Freund Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Ethics at theUniversity of Chicago, where she is jointly appointed in the law school and the philosophy department.
Nussbaum's work has concernedancient Greek andRoman philosophy,political philosophy,existentialism,feminism, and ethics, includinganimal rights. She also holds associate appointments inclassics,divinity, andpolitical science, is a member of the Committee on Southern Asian Studies, and a board member of the Human Rights Program. She previously taught atHarvard andBrown.[3][4]
She has writtenmore than two dozen books, includingThe Fragility of Goodness (1986). She received the 2016Kyoto Prize in Arts and Philosophy, the 2018Berggruen Prize, and the 2021Holberg Prize.[5][6][7] In recent years, she has also been considered a candidate for theNobel Prize in Literature.[8][9]
Nussbaum was born Martha Craven on May 6, 1947, in New York City, the daughter of George Craven, a Philadelphia lawyer, and Betty Warren, an interior designer and homemaker. During her teenage years, Nussbaum attendedThe Baldwin School inBryn Mawr. She described her upbringing as "East CoastWASP elite ... very sterile, very preoccupied with money and status".[10] She would later credit her impatience with "mandarin philosophers" and dedication topublic service as the "repudiation of my own aristocratic upbringing. I don't like anything that sets itself up as an in-group or an elite, whether it is theBloomsbury group orDerrida".[11]
After studying atWellesley College for two years, she dropped out to pursue theatre in New York. She studied theatre andclassics atNew York University, getting a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1969, and gradually moved to philosophy while atHarvard University, where she received a Master of Arts degree in 1972 and a Doctor of Philosophy degree in 1975, studying underG. E. L. Owen.[citation needed]
In the 1970s and early 1980s Nussbaum taught philosophy and classics at Harvard, where she was denied tenure by the Classics Department in 1982.[11] Nussbaum then moved toBrown University, where she taught until 1995 when she joined theUniversity of Chicago Law School faculty. Her 1986 bookThe Fragility of Goodness, on ancient Greek ethics and Greek tragedy, made her a well-known figure throughout the humanities.[12] At Brown, Nussbaum's students included philosopherLinda Martín Alcoff and actor and playwrightTim Blake Nelson.[13] In 1987, she gained public attention due to her critique of fellow philosopherAllan Bloom'sThe Closing of the American Mind.[14] More recent work (Frontiers of Justice) establishes Nussbaum as a theorist of global justice. Nussbaum's work on capabilities has often concerned the unequal freedoms and opportunities of women, and she has developed a distinctive type offeminism, drawing inspiration from the liberal tradition, but emphasizing that liberalism, at its best, entails radical rethinking of gender relations and relations within the family.[15]
Nussbaum's other major area of philosophical work is the emotions. She defended aneo-Stoic account of emotions that holds that they are appraisals that ascribe to things and persons, outside the agent's own control, great significance for the person's own flourishing. On this basis, she has proposed analyses of grief, compassion, and love,[16] and, in a later book, of disgust and shame.[17]
Nussbaum has engaged in debates with other intellectuals, in her academic writings as well as in the pages of semi-popular magazines and book reviews and, in one instance, when testifying as an expert witness in court. She testified in the Colorado bench trial forRomer v. Evans, arguing against the claim that the history of philosophy provides the state with a "compelling interest" in favor of a law that sought to overturn local anti-discrimination laws. A portion of this testimony, dealing with the potential meanings of the termtolmêma in Plato's work, was the subject of controversy, and was called misleading and evenperjurious by critics.[18][19]
She responded to these charges in a lengthy article called "Platonic Love and Colorado Law".[20] Nussbaum used multiple references from Plato'sSymposium and his interactions with Socrates as evidence for her argument. The debate continued with a reply by one of her sternest critics,Robert P. George.[21]
Nussbaum has criticizedNoam Chomsky as being among the leftist intellectuals who hold the belief that "one should not criticize one's friends, that solidarity is more important than ethical correctness". She suggests that one can "trace this line to an old Marxist contempt for bourgeois ethics, but it is loathsome whatever its provenance".[22] Among her academic colleagues whose books she has reviewed critically areAllan Bloom,[23]Harvey Mansfield,[24] andJudith Butler.[25] Other academic debates have been with figures such asJohn Rawls,Richard Posner, andSusan Moller Okin.[26][27][28][29] In January 2019, Nussbaum announced that she would be using a portion of her Berggruen Prize winnings to fund a series of roundtable discussions on controversial issues at the University of Chicago Law School. These discussions will be known as the Martha C. Nussbaum Student Roundtables.[30][31]
Nussbaum is well known for her contributions in developing thecapabilities approach to well-being, alongsideAmartya Sen.[32][33][34] The key question the capabilities approach asks is "What is each person able to do and to be?"[35]: 18 As such, the approach looks at combined capabilities: an individual's developable abilities (internal abilities), freedom, and opportunity.[35] Here, "freedom" refers to the ability of a person to choose one life or another,[34] and opportunity refers to social, political, and/or economic conditions that allow or disallow individual growth.[35]
Nussbaum asserts that all humans (and non-human animals) have a basic right to dignity. To provide human dignity, she states that governments must provide "at least a threshold level": 33–34 of the following capabilities: life; bodily health; bodily integrity; senses, imagination, and thought, emotions; practical reason; affiliation; other species; play; and control over one's environment, including political and material environments.[35][36][37]
Martha Nussbaum was married toAlan Nussbaum from 1969 until they divorced in 1987; during the marriage sheconverted to Judaism and gave birth to her daughter Rachel. Nussbaum's interest in Judaism has continued and deepened; on August 16, 2008, she became abat mitzvah in a service atTemple K. A. M. Isaiah Israel in Chicago'sHyde Park, chanting from theParashah Va-etchanan and theHaftarah Nahamu, and delivering aD'varTorah about the connection between genuine, non-narcissistic consolation and the pursuit ofglobal justice.[38] Nussbaum's daughter Rachel died in 2019 due to a drug-resistant infection following successful transplant surgery.[39] At the time of her death she was a government affairs attorney in the Wildlife Division ofFriends of Animals, a nonprofit organization working for animal welfare. The two women had co-authored four articles about wild animals.[citation needed]
Nussbaum dated and lived withCass Sunstein for more than a decade.[40] They had been engaged to be married.[41] She had previously had a romantic relationship withAmartya Sen.[41]
The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy[42] confronts theethical dilemma that individuals strongly committed tojustice are nevertheless vulnerable to external factors that may deeply compromise or even negate theirhuman flourishing. Discussing literary as well as philosophical texts, Nussbaum seeks to determine the extent to whichreason may enable self-sufficiency. She eventually rejects thePlatonic notion that human goodness can fully protect against peril, siding with thetragic playwrights andAristotle in treating the acknowledgment of vulnerability as a key to realizing the human good.
Her interpretation ofPlato'sSymposium in particular drew considerable attention. Under Nussbaum's consciousness of vulnerability, the re-entrance ofAlcibiades at the end of the dialogue underminesDiotima's account of the ladder of love in its ascent to the non-physical realm of theforms. Alcibiades's presence deflects attention back to physical beauty, sexual passions, and bodily limitations, hence highlighting human fragility.
Fragility brought attention to Nussbaum throughout the humanities. It garnered wide praise in academic reviews,[43][44] and even drew acclaim in the popular media.[45]Camille Paglia creditedFragility with matching "the highest academic standards" of the twentieth century,[46] andThe Times Higher Education called it "a supremely scholarly work".[47] Nussbaum's reputation extended her influence beyond print and into television programs like PBS'sBill Moyers.[48]
Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education[49] appeals to classical Greek texts as a basis for defense and reform of theliberal education. Noting the Greekcynic philosopherDiogenes' aspiration to transcend "local origins and group memberships" in favor of becoming "acitizen of the world", Nussbaum traces the development of this idea through theStoics,Cicero, and eventually theclassical liberalism ofAdam Smith andImmanuel Kant. Nussbaum championsmulticulturalism in the context ofethical universalism, defends scholarly inquiry into race, gender, andhuman sexuality, and further develops the role of literature as narrative imagination into ethical questions.
At the same time, Nussbaum also censured certain scholarly trends. She excoriateddeconstructionistJacques Derrida saying "ontruth [he is] simply not worth studying for someone who has been studyingQuine andPutnam andDavidson". She cites Zhang Longxi, who labels Derrida's analysis ofChinese culture "pernicious" and without "evidence of serious study".[49]: 41 126 More broadly, Nussbaum criticizedMichel Foucault for his "historical incompleteness [and] lack of conceptual clarity", but nevertheless singled him out for providing "the only truly important work to have entered philosophy under the banner of 'postmodernism.'[49]: 40 Nussbaum is even more critical of figures likeAllan Bloom,Roger Kimball, andGeorge Will for what she considers their "shaky" knowledge of non-Western cultures and inaccurate caricatures of today's humanities departments.
The New York Times praisedCultivating Humanity as "a passionate, closely argued defense of multiculturalism" and hailed it as "a formidable, perhaps definitive defense of diversity on American campuses".[50] Nussbaum received the 2002 University of LouisvilleGrawemeyer Award in Education forCultivating Humanity.[51]
Sex and Social Justice argues that sex and sexuality are morally irrelevant distinctions that have been artificially enforced as sources ofsocial hierarchy; thus,feminism andsocial justice have common concerns. Rejecting anti-universalist objections, Nussbaum proposes functional freedoms, or central human capabilities, as a rubric of social justice.[52][clarification needed]
Nussbaum discusses at length the feminist critiques of liberalism itself, including the charge advanced byAlison Jaggar that liberalism demandsethical egoism. Nussbaum notes that liberalism emphasizes respect forothers as individuals, and further argues that Jaggar has elided the distinction betweenindividualism and self-sufficiency. Nussbaum acceptsCatharine MacKinnon's critique of abstract liberalism, assimilating the salience of history and context of group hierarchy and subordination, but concludes that this appeal is rooted in liberalism rather than a critique of it.[53]
Nussbaum condemns the practice offemale genital mutilation, citing deprivation ofnormative human functioning in its risks to health, impact on sexual functioning, violations of dignity, and conditions of non-autonomy. Emphasizing that female genital mutilation is carried out by brute force, its irreversibility, its non-consensual nature, and its links to customs ofmale domination, Nussbaum urges feminists to confront female genital mutilation as an issue of injustice.[54]
Nussbaum also refines the concept of "objectification", as originally advanced byCatharine MacKinnon andAndrea Dworkin. Nussbaum defines the idea of treating as an object with seven qualities:instrumentality, denial of autonomy, inertness,fungibility, violability, ownership, and denial ofsubjectivity. Her characterization of pornography as a tool of objectification puts Nussbaum at odds withsex-positive feminism. At the same time, Nussbaum argues in support of the legalization of prostitution, a position she reiterated in a 2008 essay following theSpitzer scandal, writing: "The idea that we ought to penalize women with few choices by removing one of the ones they do have is grotesque."[55]
Sex and Social Justice was highly praised by critics in the press.Salon declared: "She shows brilliantly how sex is used to deny some people—i.e., women and gay men—social justice."[56]The New York Times praised the work as "elegantly written and carefully argued".[57] Kathryn Trevenen praised Nussbaum's effort to shift feminist concerns toward interconnected transnational efforts, and for explicating a set of universal guidelines to structure an agenda of social justice.[58] Patrick Hopkins singled out for praise Nussbaum's "masterful" chapter on sexual objectification.[59] Radical feminist Andrea Dworkin faulted Nussbaum for "consistent over-intellectualization of emotion, which has the inevitable consequence of mistaking suffering for cruelty".[60]
Hiding from Humanity[61] extends Nussbaum's work inmoral psychology to probe the arguments for including two emotions—shame anddisgust—as legitimate bases for legal judgments. Nussbaum argues that individuals tend to repudiate their bodily imperfection oranimality through the projection of fears about contamination. This cognitive response is in itself irrational, because we cannot transcend the animality of our bodies. Noting howprojective disgust has wrongly justified group subordination (mainly of women, Jews, and homosexuals), Nussbaum ultimately discards disgust as a reliable basis of judgment.
In an interview withReason magazine, Nussbaum elaborated:
Disgust and shame are inherentlyhierarchical; they set up ranks and orders of human beings. They are also inherently connected with restrictions onliberty in areas of non-harmful conduct. For both of these reasons, I believe, anyone who cherishes the key democratic values ofequality and liberty should be deeply suspicious of the appeal to those emotions in the context of law andpublic policy.[62]
Nussbaum's work was received with wide praise.The Boston Globe called her argument "characteristically lucid" and hailed her as "America's most prominent philosopher of public life".[63] Her reviews in national newspapers and magazines garnered unanimous praise.[64] In academic circles, Stefanie A. Lindquist ofVanderbilt University lauded Nussbaum's analysis as a "remarkably wide ranging and nuanced treatise on the interplay between emotions and law".[65]
A prominent exception wasRoger Kimball's review published inThe New Criterion,[66] in which he accused Nussbaum of "fabricating" the renewed prevalence of shame and disgust in public discussions and says she intends to "undermine the inherited moral wisdom of millennia". He rebukes her for "contempt for the opinions of ordinary people" and ultimately accuses Nussbaum herself of "hiding from humanity".
Nussbaum has recently drawn on and extended her work on disgust to produce a new analysis of the legal issues regarding sexual orientation and same-sex conduct. Her bookFrom Disgust to Humanity: Sexual Orientation and the Constitution was published by Oxford University Press in 2009, as part of their "Inalienable Rights" series, edited by Geoffrey Stone.[67]
In her 2010 bookFrom Disgust to Humanity: Sexual Orientation and Constitutional Law, Nussbaum analyzes the role that disgust plays in law and public debate in the United States.[68] The book primarily analyzes constitutional legal issues facing gay and lesbian Americans but also analyzes issues such as anti-miscegenation statutes, segregation, antisemitism and the caste system in India as part of its broader thesis regarding the "politics of disgust".
Nussbaum posits that the fundamental motivation of those advocating legal restrictions against gay and lesbian Americans is a "politics of disgust". These legal restrictions include blockingsexual orientation being protected underanti-discrimination laws (seeRomer v. Evans), sodomy laws against consenting adults (seeLawrence v. Texas), constitutional bans against same-sex marriage (seeCalifornia Proposition 8 (2008)). Nussbaum also argues that legal bans on conducts, such as nude dancing in private clubs, nudity on private beaches, the possession and consumption of alcohol in seclusion, gambling in seclusion or in a private club, which remain on the books, partake of the politics of disgust and should be overturned.[69]
She identifies the "politics of disgust" closely withLord Devlin and his famous opposition to theWolfenden report, which recommended decriminalizing private consensual homosexual acts, on the basis that those things would "disgust the average man". To Devlin, the mere fact some people or act may produce popular emotional reactions of disgust provides an appropriate guide for legislating. She also identifies the 'wisdom of repugnance' as advocated byLeon Kass as another "politics of disgust" school of thought as it claims that disgust "in crucial cases ... repugnance is the emotional expression of deep wisdom, beyond reason's power fully to articulate it".
Nussbaum goes on to explicitly oppose the concept of a disgust-based morality as an appropriate guide for legislating. Nussbaum notes that popular disgust has been used throughout history as a justification for persecution. Drawing upon her earlier work on the relationship between disgust and shame, Nussbaum notes that at various times, racism,antisemitism, andsexism, have all been driven by popular revulsion.[70]
In place of this "politics of disgust", Nussbaum argues for theharm principle fromJohn Stuart Mill as the proper basis for limiting individual liberties. Nussbaum argues the harm principle, which supports the legal ideas ofconsent, theage of majority, andprivacy, protects citizens while the "politics of disgust" is merely an unreliable emotional reaction with no inherent wisdom. Furthermore, Nussbaum argues this "politics of disgust" has denied and continues to deny citizens humanity andequality before the law on no rational grounds and causes palpable social harms to the groups affected.[citation needed]
From Disgust to Humanity earned acclaim from liberal American publications,[71][72][73][74] and prompted interviews inThe New York Times and other magazines.[75][76] It was criticized by a conservative magazine,The American Spectator.[77]
The bookCreating Capabilities, first published in 2011, outlines a unique theory regarding theCapability approach or theHuman development approach. Nussbaum draws on theories of other notable advocates of the Capability approach likeAmartya Sen, but has a distinct approach. She proposes to choose a list of capabilities based on some aspects ofJohn Rawls' concept of "central human capabilities."[78]
Nussbaum's book combines ideas from theCapability approach,development economics, anddistributive justice to substantiate a qualitative theory on capabilities. She criticizes existing economic indicators like GDP as failing to fully account for quality of life and assurance of basic needs, instead rewarding countries with large growth distributed highly unequally across the population.[79] The book also aims to serve as an introduction to the Capability approach more generally; it is accessible to students and newcomers to the material because of the current lack of general knowledge about this approach. Finally, Nussbaum compares her approach with other popular approaches to human development and economic welfare, includingUtilitarianism,Rawlsian Justice, andWelfarism in order to argue why the Capability approach should be prioritized by development economics policymakers.[79]
Nussbaum is a member of theAmerican Academy of Arts and Sciences (1988) and theAmerican Philosophical Society (1996).[80] She is an Academician in the Academy of Finland (2000) and a Corresponding Fellow of the British Academy (2008). She has 66 honorary degrees from colleges and universities across the US, Canada, Europe, Asia, and Latin America, including:[81][82][83][84]
North America
Europe
Middle East
Africa
Latin America
Universidad de los Andes, Colombia
{{cite journal}}:Cite journal requires|journal= (help){{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
| Non-profit organization positions | ||
|---|---|---|
| Preceded by | President of the Human Development and Capability Association 2006–2008 | Succeeded by |
| Awards | ||
| Preceded by | Grawemeyer Award for Education 2002 | Succeeded by |
| Preceded by | ||
| Preceded by | Princess of Asturias Award for Social Sciences 2012 | Succeeded by |
| Preceded by | Kyoto Prize in Arts and Philosophy 2016 | Succeeded by |
| Preceded by | Berggruen Prize 2018 | Succeeded by |
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Academics | |
| People | |
| Other | |
