 | Some of this article'slisted sourcesmay not bereliable. Please help improve this article by looking for better, more reliable sources. Unreliable citations may be challenged and removed.(December 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Marco Mario Paolo Casagrande (born 7 May 1971) is aFinnish architect,environmental artist,architectural theorist, former mercenary, writer andprofessor ofarchitecture. He graduated fromHelsinki University of Technology department of architecture (2001). Casagrande has been identified as ananarchist architect.[1]
Casagrande was born inTurku, Finland, to a well-off Italian-FinnishCatholic family.[2] He spent his childhood inYlitornio in FinnishLapland, but went to school inKaris, a southern Finland small town, before moving toHelsinki to study architecture.
Casagrande claimed that he volunteered for theBosnian Croat Defence ForcesHVO in 1993 after his service in theFinnish Army. He wrote under thepen name Luca Moconesi a controversial bookMostarin tien liftarit / Hitchhikers on the Road to Mostar (WSOY 1997)[3] about his alleged experiences in theBosnian Civil War, and based on descriptions ofwar crimes committed by the main character in theautobiographical book, he came under suspicion as a possible war criminal.[4] The war crimes listed in the book include the murder of a civilian woman in her home, and plotting to destroy a dam to flood a village with civilian inhabitants. After coming under suspicion he claimed that the book was in fact a work of fiction.
Later Casagrande has expressed views condemning war crimes from a military perspective: "Those troops know that they are doing wrong. This is the very opposite of constructive collectivity and group spirit. Anybody can understand that it is by no measures militarily efficient to go kicking the doors of old people's home." Casagrande has been lecturing in theNational Defence University of Finland since 2006 on courses ofstrategy andleadership.[5]
From the early stages of his career Casagrande started to mix architecture with other disciplines of art and science landing with a series of ecologically conscious architectural installations around the world.[6] After being a finalist in the UK journalArchitectural Review's Emerging Architecture competition (1999)[7] Marco Casagrande and his then partnerSami Rintala were invited to theVenice Biennial 2000. TheNew York Times reporter chose their project "60 Minute Man" as his personal favorite in the Biennale.[8] In the projectCasagrande & Rintala had planted on oak forest in an abandoned barge on top of 60 minutes worth of composted human waste produced by the city of Venice. Casagrande's cross-over architectural work encompasses the realms of architecture, urban andenvironmental planning,environmental art,circuses and otherartistic disciplines.[9]
In search for subconscious architecture, real reality and connection between the modern man and nature. He believes that one shall not be blindfolded by stress, the surroundings of economics, the online access to entertainment or information. What is real is valuable.[10]
Casagrande's works and teaching are moving freely in-between architecture, urban and environmental design and science, environmental art and circus adding up into cross-over architectural thinking ofcommedia dell'architettura, a broad vision of built human environment tied into social drama and environmental awareness.There is no other reality than nature.[6]
Casagrande was nominated as the professor of ecological urban planning in theTaiwan basedTamkang University after the Treasure Hill project, in which Casagrande changed an illegal settlement of urban farmers into an experimental laboratory of environmental urbanism.[11] The overhaul had mixed reactions from the community. In 2017, he was invited-professor at theENSAV : École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Versailles.
Marco Casagrande is the laureate of the European Prize for Architecture 2013,[12] CICA Award of the International Committee of Architectural Critics for conceptual and artistic architecture[13] and UNESCO & Locus Foundation'sGlobal Award for Sustainable Architecture 2015.[14][15]
Casagrande views cities as complex energyorganisms in which different overlapping layers of energy flows are determining the actions of the citizens as well as the development of the city. By mixingenvironmentalism and urban design Casagrande is developing methods of punctual manipulation of the urban energy flows in order to create an ecologically sustainable urban development towards the so-called 3rd Generation City (post industrial city).[16]
Casagrande utilized the tenets of acupuncture: treat the points of blockage and let relief ripple throughout the body. More immediate and sensitive to community needs than traditional institutional forms of large scale urban renewal interventions would not only respond to localized needs, but do so with a knowledge of how citywide systems operated and converged at that single node. Release pressure at strategic points, release pressure for the whole city.[17]
The theory of the Third Generation City views the post industrial urban condition as a machine ruined by nature including human nature and architects asdesign shamans merely interpreting what the bigger nature of the shared mind is transmitting.[18] This organic machine is kept alive through continuous and spontaneous ruining processes performed by citizens, to whom Casagrande refers to as 「anarchist gardeners」 by means ofurban farming,[19] illegal architecture[20] andurban acupuncture.[21] The element of Ruin is viewed as something man-made having become part of nature.[22] The theory is developed in the independent multidisciplinary research centreRuin Academy (2010-).[23]
Third Generation City follows the first generation where humans peacefully coexisted with nature and the second generation built walls and stone structures everywhere in an attempt to shut out nature. In the third generation however, nature, which can never be truly shut out, grows back through the ruins, through the cracks in the wall, sucking human nature back into the wider nature. Third Generation City concentrates on local knowledge and urban acupuncture rather than on centrally governed urban planning.[24] Casagrande describes urban acupuncture as:
[a] cross-over architectural manipulation of the collective sensuous intellect of a city. City is viewed as multi-dimensional sensitive energy-organism, a living environment. Urban acupuncture aims into a touch with this nature.[25] andSensitivity to understand the energy flows of the collectivechi beneath the visual city and reacting on the hot-spots of this chi. Architecture is in the position to produce the acupuncture needles for the urban chi.[26] andA weed will root into the smallest crack in the asphalt and eventually break the city. Urban acupuncture is the weed and the acupuncture point is the crack. The possibility of the impact is total, connecting human nature as part of nature. The theory opens the door for uncontrolled creativity and freedom. Each citizen is enabled to join the creative process, feel free to use city space for any purpose and develop his environment according to his will.[27] The agents of the Third Generation City are sensitive citizens who feel the calling of a sustainable co-operation with the rest of the nature, sensitive citizen who are aware of the destruction that the insensitive modern machine is causing to nature including human nature.[28] Urban acupuncture produces small-scale but socially catalytic interventions into the urban fabric.[29]
Architects’ and designers’ position about organic knowledge is tricky. We are not the ones who carry this collective genetic memory on, but we are in a better position to interpret and negotiate with it, step by step, like a shaman getting answers from the organic side. This can easily go very wrong, when architect starts copyrighting fragments of local knowledge under his ego. I guess often it would be enough to create a platform of accidents for the organic knowledge to surface, start cooking, and finding its own forms and dynamics. Design is not necessarily needed in here, and design should not replace reality – while organic knowledge is close to reality, nature.[30]
Casagrande's works have been selected three times to the Venice Architecture Biennale; years 2000, 2004 and 2006.[31]
Casagrande & Rintala - Marco Casagrande and Sami Rintala - is a Finnish architect and artist group producing architectonic installations 1998–2003 for international venues of contemporary architecture and art. Their works move betweenarchitecture andenvironmental art.[32]
For their landscape installation1000 White Flags (summer 2002), for example, the artists speckled a downhill-skiing range in Koli Nature Park, Finland, with flags made of used sheets from mental hospitals. Casagrande & Rintala here drew attention to the madness of businessmen who cut down ancient forests.[33]
Casagrande & Rintala's workLand(e)scape was awarded in theArchitectural Review's Emerging Architecture Award 1999 competition[7] and chosen for theVenice Biennale 2000.New York Times architecture criticHerbert Muschamp chose their project60 Minute Man his personal favourite of the biennale.[34]
Casagrande & Rintala design and build all their works by themselves. The design process continued during the construction work.
"The work itself usually changes its shape or obtains more layers during the construction process. We keep ourselves open to changes in the work. When it is finding its shape it usually starts to tell us more about itself."[35]
scape%2c_by_Casagrande_%2526_Rintala.jpg)
Land(e)scape (1999), an architecturalinstallation by Finnish architects Casagrande & Rintala, with Marco Casagrande andSami Rintala, in a formerfield inSavonlinna. The work is commenting on the desertion process of the Finnish countryside.
Three of these abandoned barns "were driven," the architects explained, "to the point where they have had to break their primeval union with the soil. Desolate, they have risen on their shanks and are swaying towards the cities of the south."[36]
The work was awarded in theArchitectural Review's Emerging Architecture 1999 competition and selected to theVenice Biennale 2000. Land(e)scape launched the international career of Casagrande & Rintala.[8]
The art work was set on fire by the authors in October 1999.[7]
Land(e)scape represented Finland in the New Trends or Architecture in Europe and Japan 2001 exhibitions.[37]
Redrum (2003) is anarchitectonic installation inAnchorageAlaska byFinnish architectsCasagrande & Rintala. The work is commissioned by Alaska Design Forum.[38]
3Alaska Railroadoil tanks cut into total 12 pieces and turned into atemple structure opposite the Federal Building of Anchorage in the crossing of C-Street and 7th Avenue. The interior is painted bright red in contrast to the rusty and brutal exterior. The floor is made of 3500 kg ofoyster shells, the origin of all Alaskan oil.[39]
"Redrum" is "murder" backwards. The designers intended to comment on the connection of oil, war and environment. Local media described the piece as "a slap in the face to Alaskans".[40]
Potemkin is an architectural park byCasagrande & Rintala for Kuramata village in Japan 2003. A steel made mix between a temple and machine.[41] The work consists indoor and outdoor spaces for post-industrial meditation.[42] Potemkin is commissioned by theEchigo-Tsumari Contemporary Art Triennial 2003.[43]
Potemkin stands as the Acropolis to be the post industrial temple to think of the connection between the modern man and nature. I see Potemkin as a cultivated junk yard situated between the ancient rice fields and the river with a straight axis to the Shinto temple.[44]
The site is a former illegal dumping ground turned into a riverside park.[45] The architecture of the park was drawn on site in 1:1 scale on snow by walking the lines with snow-shoes and then built up when the snow melted.[46]
The park is made out of one inch thick Kawasaki steel and recycled urban and industrial waste. It is 130 meters long and 15 meters wide with a series of outdoor and indoor spaces.[47]
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) -The European Prize for Architecture 2013 European Centre for Architecture, 2013{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - Camp for Oppositional Architecture 2004{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) -Camp for Oppositional Architecture, 2004{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) -3RW Architects: Urban Farmers, 2006
