Marcion of Sinope | |
|---|---|
 Apostle John (left) and (according toEisler) Marcion of Sinope (right), fromMorgan Library MS 748, 11th century[1] | |
| Born | AD 85 |
| Died | AD 160 (aged 75) Roman Anatolia, Roman Empire |
| Notable work | Gospel of Marcion |
| Theological work | |
| Era | Patristic age |
| Tradition or movement | Marcionism |
| Main interests | Dualism,Nontrinitarianism |
Marcion of Sinope (/ˈmɑːrkiən,-siən/;Ancient Greek:Μαρκίων[2][note 1]Σινώπης;c. 85 – c. 160[3]) was atheologian[4] inearly Christianity.[4][5] Marcion preached thatGod had sentJesus Christ, who was distinct from the "vengeful" God (Demiurge) who had created the world.[4][5][6] He considered himself a follower ofPaul the Apostle, whom he believed to have been the only trueapostle of Jesus Christ; his doctrine is calledMarcionism.[4][5][7] Marcion published the earliest record of a canon of New Testament books.[4][8]
Early Church writers such asJustin Martyr,Irenaeus, andTertullian denounced Marcion as aheretic or antichrist,[9] and he was excommunicated by the church ofRome around 144.[10] He published his owncanon ofChristiansacred scriptures,[4][11][12] which contained tenPauline epistles (including theEpistle to the Laodiceans, while excluding thePastoral epistles) and theGospel of Marcion which historically is claimed to be an edited version of theGospel of Luke.[4][13] Some modern scholars, such asMatthias Klinghardt,[14] have theorized thatMarcion's Gospel was the oldest, although this has beencontested.
This made Marcionism a catalyst in the process of thedevelopment of the New Testament canon by forcing theproto-orthodox Church to respond to his canon.[4][15]
 |
Gnostic sects and founders
|
Epiphanius records in hisPanarion (c. 375) that Marcion was born the son of a bishop inPontus (modern-day Turkey), likelyPhilologus of Sinope.[16]Rhodo andTertullian, young men in Marcion's old age, described him as a "mariner" and a "ship-master" respectively. Some time in the late 130s, Marcion traveled to Rome, joined the Roman church, and made a large donation of 200,000sesterces to the congregation there.[10][17] Conflicts with the church of Rome arose and he was eventuallyexcommunicated in 144, his donation being returned to him.[18]
Irenaeus writes that "a certainCerdo, originating from theSimonians, came to Rome underHyginus [...] and taught that the one who was proclaimed as God by the Law and the Prophets is not the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ" (Against Heresies, 1, 27, 1). Also, according to them, Marcion and the GnosticValentinus were companions in Rome.[19]
In 394, Epiphanius claimed that after beginnings as anascetic, Marcion seduced avirgin and was accordingly excommunicated by his father, prompting him to leave his home town.[20] Some scholars have taken this "seduction of a virgin" as a metaphor for Marcion's corruption of the Christian Church, with the Church portrayed as the undefiled virgin,[21] and that Marcion apparently has become "the victim of the historicisation of such a metaphor, even though it contradicts the otherwise firm tradition of his strict sexual probity".[22]: 102 Doubtful is Tertullian's claim inThe Prescription Against Heretics (writtenc. 200) that Marcion professed repentance, and agreed to the conditions granted to him—that he should receive reconciliation if he restored to the Church those whom he had led astray—but that he was prevented from doing so by his death.[23]
The Marcionite church expanded greatly within Marcion's lifetime, becoming a major rival to theother emerging church. After his death, it retained its following and survived Christian controversy and imperial disapproval for several centuries.[24] Several theologians have viewed him as a proto-protestant.[25]
Study of theHebrew Bible, along with received writings circulating in the nascent Church, led Marcion to conclude that many of theteachings of Jesus were incompatible with the actions ofYahweh, characterized as the belligerent god of theHebrew Bible. Marcion responded by developing aditheistic system of belief around the year 144.[note 2] This notion of two gods—a higher transcendent one and a lower world-creator and ruler—allowed Marcion to reconcile his perceived contradictions between ChristianCovenant theology andthe gospel proclaimed by theNew Testament.
In contrast to other leaders of the nascent Christian Church, however, Marcion declared that Christianity was in complete discontinuity withJudaism and entirely opposed to the scriptures of Judaism. Marcion did not claim that these were false. Instead, he asserted that they were entirely true, but were to be read in an absolutely literalistic manner, one which led him to develop an understanding that Yahweh was not the same God spoken of by Jesus. For example, Marcion argued that theGenesis account of Yahweh walking through theGarden of Eden asking where Adam was, proved that Yahweh inhabited a physical body and was withoutuniversal knowledge, attributes wholly incompatible with the Heavenly Father professed by Jesus.
According to Marcion, the God of theOld Testament, whom he called theDemiurge, thecreator of the materialuniverse, is a jealoustribal deity of theJews, whoselaw representslegalisticreciprocal justice and who punishes mankind for its sins through suffering and death. In contrast, the God that Jesus professed is an altogether different being, a universal God of compassion and love who looks upon humanity with benevolence and mercy. Marcion also produced a book titledAntitheses, which is no longer extant,[26] contrasting the Demiurge of the Old Testament with the Heavenly Father of the New Testament.
Marcion held Jesus to be the son of the Heavenly Father but understood theincarnation in adocetic manner, i.e. that Jesus' body was only an imitation of a material body, and consequently denied Jesus' physical and bodily birth, death, and resurrection.
Marcion was the first to codify a Christiancanon. His canon consisted of only eleven books, grouped into two sections: theEvangelikon, a shorter version of the Gospel of Luke, and theApostolikon, a selection of ten epistles of Paul the Apostle, which were also slightly shorter than the canonical text. Early Christians such as Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Epiphanius claimed that Marcion's editions of Luke and the Pauline epistles were intentionally edited by Marcion to match his theological views, and many modern scholars agree.[27] However, some scholars argue that Marcion's texts were not substantially edited by him, and may in some respects represent an earlier version of these texts than the canonical versions.[6][28][29][30] Like theGospel of Mark, the gospel used by Marcion did not contain elements relating to Jesus'sbirth and childhood. Interestingly, it did contain some Jewish elements, and material that challenged Marcion's ditheism—a fact that was utilized by early Christians in their articulations against Marcion.[31]
The centrality of the Pauline epistles in Marcion's canon reflects the fact that Marcion considered Paul to be the correct interpreter and transmitter of Jesus' teachings, in contrast to the Twelve Disciples and the early Jerusalem church.[7] In Marcion's view, the other apostles were under the auspices of the Demiurge.[26]
Marcion is sometimes described as aGnostic philosopher. In some essential respects, Marcion proposed ideas which aligned well with Gnostic thought. Like the Gnostics, he believed that this world was not the creation of the one true God.[32]
However, Marcionism conceptualizes God in a way which cannot be reconciled with broader Gnostic thought. For Gnostics, some human beings are born with a small piece of God's soul lodged within their spirit (akin to the notion of aDivine Spark).[33] God is thus intimately connected to and part of his creation. Salvation lies in turning away from the physical world (which Gnostics regard as an illusion) and embracing the godlike qualities within oneself. Marcion, by contrast, held that the Heavenly Father (the father of Jesus Christ) was an utterly alien God; he had no part in making the world, nor any connection with it.[33] According toBart Ehrman: "Marcion himself should not be thought of as a Gnostic; he held that there were onlytwo gods, not many; he did not think of this world as a cosmic disaster, but as the creation of the Old Testament God; and he did not think divine sparks resided in human bodies that could be set free by understanding the true 'gnosis.' Moreover, hisdocetic view does not appear to have been the typical view of Gnostics."[32]
{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help){{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help).
