Engraving of a mammoth on a slab of mammoth ivory, from the Upper Paleolithic Mal'ta deposits at Lake Baikal, Siberia.[3][4]
TheMal'ta–Buret' culture (alsoMaltinsko-buretskaya culture) is anarchaeological culture of theUpper Paleolithic (generally dated to 24,000-23,000BP but also sometimes to 15,000 BP).[5] It is located roughly northwest ofLake Baikal, about 90 km to the northwest ofIrkutsk, on the banks of the upperAngara River.
A boy whose remains were found near Mal'ta is usually known by the abbreviationMA-1 (or MA1). Discovered in the 1920s, the remains have been dated to 24,000 BP. According to research published since 2013, MA-1 belonged to the population ofAncient North Eurasians, who were genetically "intermediate between modern western Eurasians and Native Americans, but distant from east Asians",[6] and partial genetic ancestors ofSiberians,Native Americans, and Bronze AgeYamnaya andBotai[7] people of theEurasian steppe.[8][9] In particular, modern-dayNative Americans,Kets,Mansi, andSelkup have been found to harbour a significant amount of ancestry related to MA-1.[10]
Much of what is known about Mal'ta comes from the Russian archaeologistMikhail Gerasimov. Better known later for his contribution to the branch of anthropology known asforensic facial reconstruction, Gerasimov made revolutionary discoveries when he excavated Mal'ta in 1927. Until his findings, the Upper Paleolithic societies of Northern Asia were virtually unknown. Over the remainder of his career, Gerasimov twice more visited Mal'ta to excavate and research the site.
The Mal'ta-Buret' people lived in dwellings built of mammoth bones, similar to those found inUpper Paleolithic Europe.[11]
Mal'ta consists of semi-subterranean houses that were built using large animal bones to assemble the walls, and reindeer antlers covered with animal skins to construct a roof that would protect the inhabitants from the harsh elements of the Siberian weather.[12] These dwellings built from mammoth bones were similar to those found inUpper Paleolithic Western Eurasia, such as in the areas ofFrance,Czechoslovakia, andUkraine.[11]
Evidence seems to indicate that Mal'ta is the most ancient known site in eastern Siberia, with the nearby site of Buret'.[12][13] However, relative dating illustrates some irregularities. The use of flint flaking and the absence of pressure flaking used in the manufacture of tools, as well as the continued use of earlier forms of tools, seem to confirm the fact that the site belongs to the earlyUpper Paleolithic. Yet it lacks typicalskreblos (large side scrapers) that are common in other Siberian Paleolithic sites. Additionally, other common characteristics such as pebble cores, wedge-shaped cores, burins, and composite tools have never been found. The lack of these features, combined with an art style found in only one other nearby site (theVenus of Buret'), make Mal'ta culture unique in Siberia.
There were two main types of art during the Upper Paleolithic: mural art, which was concentrated in Western Europe, and portable art. Portable art, typically some type of carving in ivory tusk or antler, spans the distance across Western Europe into Northern and Central Asia. Artistic remains of expertly carved bone, ivory, and antler objects depicting birds and human females are the most commonly found; these objects are, collectively, the primary source of Mal'ta's acclaim.[12]
In addition to the female statuettes there are bird sculptures depicting swans, geese, and ducks. Through ethnographic analogy comparing the ivory objects and burials at Mal'ta with objects used by 19th and 20th-century Siberian shamans, it has been suggested that they are evidence of a fully developed shamanism.
Also, there are engraved representations on slabs ofmammoth tusk. One is the figure of a mammoth, easily recognizable by the trunk, tusks, and thick legs. Wool also seems to be etched, by the placement of straight lines along the body. Another drawing depicts three snakes with their heads puffed up and turned to the side. It is believed that they were similar to cobras.
Perhaps the best example of Paleolithic portable art is something referred to as "Venus figurines".[12] The Mal'ta boy (dated 24,000 BP) was buried with various artifacts anda Venus figurine.[20] Until they were discovered in Mal'ta, "Venus figurines" were previously found only in Europe.[12] Carved from the ivory tusk of a mammoth, these images were typically highly stylized, and often involved embellished and disproportionate characteristics (typically the breasts or buttocks). It is widely believed that these emphasized features were meant to be symbols of fertility. Around thirty female statuettes of varying shapes have been found in Mal'ta. The wide variety of forms, combined with the realism of the sculptures and the lack of repetitiveness in detail, are definite signs of developed, albeit early, art.
At first glance, what is obvious is that the Mal'ta Venus figurines are of two types: full-figured women with exaggerated forms, and women with a thin, delicate form. Some of the figures are nude, while others have etchings that seem to indicate fur or clothing. Conversely, unlike those found in Europe, some of the Venus figurines from Mal'ta were sculpted with faces. Most of the figurines were tapered at the bottom, and it is believed that this was done to enable them to be stuck into the ground or otherwise placed upright. Placed upright, they could have symbolized the spirits of the dead, akin to "spirit dolls" used nearly worldwide, including in Siberia, among contemporary people.
The Mal'ta figurines garner interest in the western world because they seem to be of the same basic form as European female figurines of roughly the same time period, suggesting some cultural and cultic connection.[12] This similarity between Mal'ta andUpper Paleolithic Europe coincides with other suggested similarities between the two, such as in their tools and dwelling structures.
A 2016 genomic study shows that the Mal'ta people have no genetic connections to theDolní Věstonice people from theGravettian culture. The researchers conclude that the similarity between the figurines may be either due to cultural diffusion or to a coincidence, but not to common ancestry between the populations.[21]
An ivory plaque (front and back) with circular marks, and three snakes[16]
Discussing this easternmost outpost ofPaleolithic culture,Joseph Campbell finishes by commenting on the symbolic forms of the artifacts found there:
We are clearly in apaleolithic province where theserpent,labyrinth, and rebirth themes already constitute a symbolic constellation, joined with the imagery of the sunbird andshaman flight, with the goddess in her classic role ofprotectress of the hearth, mother of man's second birth, andlady of wild things and of the food supply.[22]
MA-1 is the only known example ofbasalY-DNA R* (R-M207*) – that is, the only member of haplogroupR* that did not belong to haplogroupsR1,R2 or secondary subclades of these. Themitochondrial DNA of MA-1 belonged to an unresolved subclade ofhaplogroup U.[25]
The remains of the Mal'ta boy (MA-1) are currently in theHermitage Museum (Saint-Petersburg).
The termAncient North Eurasian (ANE) has been given in genetic literature to an ancestral component that represents descent from the people similar to the Mal'ta–Buret' culture and the closely related population ofAfontova Gora.[10][26]
A people similar to MA1 andAfontova Gora were important genetic contributors to Native Americans, Siberians, Europeans, Caucasians, Central Asians, with smaller contributions to Middle Easterners and some East Asians.[27] Lazaridis et al. (2016) notes "a cline of ANE ancestry across the east-west extent of Eurasia."[27] The "ANE-cline", as observed among Paleolithic Siberian populations and their direct descendants, developed from a sister lineage of Upper Paleolithic Europeans with significant admixture from an earlyEast Eurasian source best represented by Upper Paleolithic East/Southeast Asians.[28][29][30][31][32]
MA1 is also related to two older Upper Paleolithic Siberian individuals found at theYana Rhinoceros Horn Site called Ancient North Siberians (ANS).[33]
Genetic proximity of Mal'ta to otherAncient North Eurasian populations (Yana andAfontova Gora), but also toUst-Ishim,Sunghir and European populations, within a principal component analysis of ancient and present-day individuals from worldwide populations.[34]
^abJeong, Choongwon; Balanovsky, Oleg; Lukianova, Elena; Kahbatkyzy, Nurzhibek; Flegontov, Pavel; Zaporozhchenko, Valery; Immel, Alexander; Wang, Chuan-Chao; Ixan, Olzhas; Khussainova, Elmira; Bekmanov, Bakhytzhan; Zaibert, Victor; Lavryashina, Maria; Pocheshkhova, Elvira; Yusupov, Yuldash; Agdzhoyan, Anastasiya; Sergey, Koshel; Bukin, Andrei; Nymadawa, Pagbajabyn; Churnosov, Michail; Skhalyakho, Roza; Daragan, Denis; Bogunov, Yuri; Bogunova, Anna; Shtrunov, Alexandr; Dubova, Nadezda; Zhabagin, Maxat; Yepiskoposyan, Levon; Churakov, Vladimir; Pislegin, Nikolay; Damba, Larissa; Saroyants, Ludmila; Dibirova, Khadizhat; Artamentova, Lubov; Utevska, Olga; Idrisov, Eldar; Kamenshchikova, Evgeniya; Evseeva, Irina; Metspalu, Mait; Robbeets, Martine; Djansugurova, Leyla; Balanovska, Elena; Schiffels, Stephan; Haak, Wolfgang; Reich, David; Krause, Johannes (23 May 2018). "Characterizing the genetic history of admixture across inner Eurasia".bioRxiv10.1101/327122.Ancient DNA studies have already shown that human populations of this region have dramatically transformed over time. For example, the Upper Paleolithic genomes from the Mal'ta and Afontova Gora archaeological sites in southern Siberia revealed a genetic profile, often referred to as "Ancient North Eurasians (ANE)", which is deeply related to Paleolithic/Mesolithic hunter-gatherers in Europe and also substantially contributed to the gene pools of modern-day Native Americans, Siberians, Europeans and South Asians.
^abDolitsky, Alexander B.; Ackerman, Robert E.; Aigner, Jean S.; Bryan, Alan L.; Dennell, Robin; Guthrie, R. Dale; Hoffecker, John F.; Hopkins, David M.; Lanata, José Luis; Workman, William B. (1985)."Siberian Paleolithic Archaeology: Approaches and Analytic Methods [and Comments and Replies]".Current Anthropology.26 (3):361–378.doi:10.1086/203280.ISSN0011-3204.JSTOR2742734.S2CID147371671.The Upper Paleolithic inhabitants of the European region spanned by France, Czechoslovakia, and the Ukraine led a hunting life resembling that of the people of Mal'ta and Buret' and built similar dwellings of matching construction from the bones of extinct large mammals
^abcdefTedesco, Laura Anne (October 2000)."Mal'ta (ca. 20,000 B.C.)".The Met’s Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. Metropolitan Museum of Art.
^Vallini et al. 2022, Supplementary Information, p. 17: "Paleolithic Siberian populations younger than 40 ky are consistently described as a mix of European and East Asian ancestries".
^Grebenyuk, Pavel S.; Fedorchenko, Alexander Yu.; Dyakonov, Viktor M.; Lebedintsev, Alexander I.; Malyarchuk, Boris A. (2022), Bocharnikov, Vladimir N.; Steblyanskaya, Alina N. (eds.), "Ancient Cultures and Migrations in Northeastern Siberia",Humans in the Siberian Landscapes: Ethnocultural Dynamics and Interaction with Nature and Space, Springer Geography, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 89–133,doi:10.1007/978-3-030-90061-8_4,ISBN978-3-030-90061-8{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
Martynov, Anatoly I,The Ancient Art of Northern Asia, trans. Demitri B. Shimkin and Edith M. Shimkin. Chicago, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1991.