 | This article'stone or style may not reflect theencyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia'sguide to writing better articles for suggestions.(January 2026) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 | |
| Company type | State-owned |
|---|---|
| Industry | Fund management (sovereign wealth fund) |
| Founded | July 18, 2023 |
| Founder | 19th Congress under the administration of PresidentBongbong Marcos |
| Headquarters | ORÉ Central Building,[1]Bonifacio Global City,Taguig, Philippines |
Key people | Secretary of Finance Rafael Consing Jr. (President and CEO) |
| AUM |  US$2.26 billion (2023)[2] |
| Website | www |
TheMaharlika Wealth Fund (MWF), also known as theMaharlika Investment Fund (MIF), is asovereign wealth fund for the Philippines managed by theMaharlika Investment Corporation (MIC).[3] The MIF is the Philippines' first sovereign wealth fund. It will be allocated across a variety of assets, including foreign currencies, fixed-income instruments, domestic and foreign corporate bonds, commercial real estate, and infrastructure projects. The MIF is expected to generate returns that will support the government's economic goals, as outlined in the Medium-Term Fiscal Framework, the eight-point Socioeconomic Agenda, and the Philippine Development Plan.
| Maharlika Investment Fund Act of 2023 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Congress of the Philippines | |
| |
| Citation | Republic Act No. 11954 |
| Territorial extent | Philippines |
| Passed by | House of Representatives of the Philippines |
| Passed | December 15, 2022 |
| Passed by | Senate of the Philippines |
| Passed | May 31, 2023 |
| Signed by | Bongbong Marcos |
| Signed | July 18, 2023 |
| Legislative history | |
| First chamber:House of Representatives of the Philippines | |
| Bill citation | H. No. 6608, 19th Cong. 1st Sess. |
| Introduced | December 12, 2022 |
| First reading | December 12, 2022 |
| Second reading | December 15, 2022 |
| Third reading | December 15, 2022 |
| Voting summary |
|
| Second chamber:Senate of the Philippines | |
| Bill citation | S. No. 2020, 19th Cong., 1st Sess. |
| Second reading | May 30, 2023 |
| Third reading | May 30, 2023 |
| Voting summary |
|
| Status: In force | |
In late November 2022, seven lawmakers in thePhilippine House of Representatives, includingMartin Romualdez andSandro Marcos, filed House Bill No. 6398,[a] proposing the creation of asovereign wealth fund for the Philippines to be known as the Maharlika Wealth Fund (MWF), inspired fromSouth Korea'ssovereign wealth fund. The fund, if established, would be managed by the Maharlika Investments Corporation (MIC).[5][6]PresidentFerdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos, Jr. has backed the establishment of a sovereign wealth fund, believing that it would be advantageous for the country.[7]
After Marcos Jr. certified to theLower House the bill as urgent, it was passed on its third reading in the lower house, with 279 lawmakers voting in favor of passing the bill.[8] Only six lawmakers voted against:Gabriel Bordado (Camarines Sur–3rd,Liberal),Arlene Brosas (Gabriela),France Castro (ACT Teachers),Mujiv Hataman (Basilan–Lone,Liberal),Edcel Lagman (Albay–1st,Liberal), andRaoul Manuel (Kabataan).[9][10] From filing to approval, it took the House of Representatives 17 days to deliberate on the bill.[11]
Around six months later on May 24, 2023, Marcos likewise did the same - certified the creation of the fund as urgent to theUpper House.[12] A week later on May 31, 2023, the body approved the third and final reading with a total of 19 senators voting in favor, one negative (Risa Hontiveros) and one abstention (Nancy Binay).[13] It would need active action of President Marcos' putting of his signature, or[14] passivity of taking inaction on it within 30 days of its official transmittal to his office thus lapsing into, before it becomes law.[15]
A bill that is certified as urgent allows lawmakers to bypass the constitutional rule requiring bills to be passed on three readings on separate days.[11] The president's certification of urgency is typically made to respond to public calamities or emergencies.[16] In February 2023, a petition was filed to the Supreme Court requesting to nullify Marcos's certification of urgency, arguing that it is unconstitutional because no public calamity or emergency was expressly stated in Marcos's letter to the House.[16] This was later dismissed by the Court in May, citing that the petitioners "failed to present to Court any fact establishing the existence of an actual case or controversy ripe for adjudication".[17]
On July 5, 2023, the copy of the bill was transmitted toMalacañang for President Marcos's signature.[18] On July 18, he signed the bill into law as Republic Act No. 11954.[19]
Initially, theGovernment Service Insurance System (GSIS) and theSocial Security System (SSS) were obliged to contribute funds to the MIF under the proposed bill establishing the fund. The two institutions were later dropped as mandatory contributors.[20] However, both the boards of the GSIS and SSS would be permitted to contribute if they approve such a move.[21][22]
Economist Michael Batu said the fund, if managed properly, can help raise money to help the government's programs and achieve development goals.[23] Global Source economist Romeo Bernardo, on the other hand, believes that the proposal is poorly timed and that a sovereign wealth fund would just add to the Philippines' current financial and fiscal risks and raised concern for potential mismanagement, mentioning the1Malaysia Development Berhad scandal.[24]
A group consisting of 12 organizations, namely the Foundation For Economic Freedom, Competitive Currency Forum, Filipina CEO Circle, Financial Executives Institute of the Philippines,Institute of Corporate Directors, Integrity Initiative, Inc.,Makati Business Club, Management Association of the Philippines, Movement for Good Governance, Philippine Women's Economic Network, UP School of Economics Alumni Association and Women's Business Council Philippines, Inc., made a collective statement against the proposal. The group believes that there is no gap or "missing institution" in the Philippine economy that necessitates the creation of a sovereign wealth fund and prescribes the government to focus on the management of the country'sfiscal deficit andpublic debt to avoid impediments to the delivery of public services and to prevent a downgrade of the Philippines'sovereign investment credit rating. It also notes that the Philippine economy has nocommodity-basedsurpluses or surpluses from external trade fromstate-owned enterprises. It also opposed the idea of the GSIS and SSS contributing to the fund.[24]
ThePhilippine Stock Exchange has made its support of the proposal, stating that the "primary mission is to facilitate the flow of capital into more productive and beneficial channels and as a result, contribute to efficient capital formation for the country".[25]
The legislation also met criticisms. Critics see it as a plunder fund as, according to tax expert Raymond Abrea, the fund is "prone to corruption and money laundering".[26] Economists remain skeptical about the bill as it contains provisions that could affect the independent functions of government financial institutions and theBangko Sentral ng Pilipinas.[27] In June 2023,University of the Philippines School of Economics faculty members issued a paper stating that the fund "violates fundamental principles of economics and finance and poses serious risks to the economy and thepublic sector – notwithstanding its proponents' good intentions". They emphasized its unclear purpose even after deliberations at the bicameral Congress, possible encroachment on the budget process, risks to public funds, moral-hazard risks, possible contradiction to other economic plans given its vagueness, red flags in governance structure, and unlikely substantial growth to finance projects as crucial points to consider.[28]
Stressing the moral aspect, philosophy professorJose Mario De Vega notes that the authors of this bill are relatives and friends of the Marcos Jr. administration and adds thatGloria Macapagal Arroyo’s defense of this bill has bolstered his belief that the measure is a sham and dangerous.[29]
.jpg)
On October 12, 2023, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. ordered the suspension of the implementing rules and regulations (IRR) of the laws setting up the Maharlika Investment Fund, claiming that he wanted to further study it "to ensure that the purpose of the fund will be realized for the country's development with safeguards in place for transparency and accountability."[30]
On November 6, 2023, President Marcos Jr. announced that the IRR for the Maharlika Fund has been finalized, and he emphasized that they are pushing to have it operational before year-end.[31] The revised IRR was published by theOfficial Gazette on November 10, 2023.[32]
Rafael Consing Jr. was sworn in as the Maharlika Investment Corporation's president and CEO on November 24, 2023.[33] Four directors were sworn in on December 20, including Vicky Castillo Tan, Andrew Jerome Gan, German Lichauco, and Roman Felipe Reyes.[34]
On January 1, 2024, the Maharlika Investment Corporation held itsinaugural board meeting. Rafael D. Consing, Jr., President, discussed the Fund’s capitalization and identified some potential sectors that may be tapped by the MIF.[35]
On April 18, 2024, Maharlika Investment Corporation unveiled its officiallogo which principally honors theFlag of the Philippines and thePhilippine eagle. The design reflects the themes of rebirth and renewal inspired by"Bagong Pilipinas.”[36]
In January 2025, the MIC invested $350 million into theNational Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP), giving them a 20% stake. With the purchase, the MIC acquired two board seats at both the NGCP and the Synergy Grid and Development Philippines Inc.[37][38]
In February 2025 the MIC joined together with theCharoen Pokphand Group, one of the largest conglomerate inThailand, to start a $1 billion private equity fund.[39][40]
The MIC agreed in February 2025 to provide the Makilala Mining Company Incorporated (MMCI) a $76.4 million bridge loan, which will be used to update the MMCI's feasibility study and Front-End Engineering Design.[41][42]
On September 18, 2023, Senate Minority LeaderKoko Pimentel, representative Ferdinand Gaite (Bayan Muna), and former representativesNeri Colmenares andCarlos Isagani Zarate (Bayan Muna) filed a 56-page petition before theSupreme Court to ask the declaration of Maharlika Investment Fund Act of 2023 as unconstitutional. They claimed that it "entrusts hundreds of billions in public funds to unknown fund managers and an amorphous nine-member Board of Directors."[43]
After the approval of the Maharlika Investment Corporation board, controversy arose[44] on thesalary of its President and CEO, Rafael D. Consing, Jr. A basic pay ofPHP 2.5 million per month (~42,603US Dollars as of prior month official exchange rates[45]) amounting to PHP 30 million per year (US$ 511,247[45]) (before other types of compensation such as bonuses that are normally given to executives) was requested by Consing Jr. which approached theoverall compensation ofBSPGovernorEli M. Remolona, Jr., (which amounted to PHP 35.48 million in 2023). Deliberations on the salary of Consing Jr. have caused significant delay on operations as the proposed salary was rejected. He defended[44] his proposed salary as necessary for the sovereign wealth fund to recruit appropriate staff and to be at-par with the private sector. Government officials countered that the MIC was under the supervision of theGovernance Commission for GOCC as it is a government entity and unlike[46] the Bangko Sentral, was not granted fiscal autonomy.
Consing Jr. would further defend his position, saying that it will "bring in experience and technical expertise" as was needed by the MIC. An item of contention between Consing Jr. and government officials has been Republic Act No. 11954's lack of clarity on the pay of non-technical and highly technical staff. Non-technical staff were understood to have the pay equal to that of other government employees. Consing Jr. argued that highly technical staff should be paid in a way "comparable to the private sector."[44]
To try breaking theimpasse, unnamed government officials have countered with a proposal suggesting a lesser initial salary with a gradual increase upon the accomplishment of investments by the MIC.[44]
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link).jpg)
