The wordLuscinia was used for nightingales and similar birds inClassical Latin (e.g. in the AD70sNaturalis Historia byPliny the Elder), if not earlier.Etymologically, it might be derived fromluscus (Latin for "half-blind", "half-understood" etc.) orclueō (Latin for "to be well-known") + (probably) Latincanō "to sing". Hence, it could be translated as "little-seen [as in the twilight] songster" or "famous songster".[2] The genusLuscinia was introduced by the English naturalistThomas Forster in 1817. Thetype species is thecommon nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos).[3][4]
Delimitation ofLuscinia versus the genusErithacus had been confused for long; species were rather indiscriminately placed in one or the other genus, orLuscinia was entirely merged intoErithacus. The genusLuscinia previously included many more species. A largemolecular phylogenetic study published in 2010 found that the genus did not represent amonophyletic group. Species were therefore reassigned to other genera leaving only three species remaining in the original genus. The same study showed that the white-bellied redstart, previously placed in themonotypicHodgsonius, belonged to the sameclade.[5][6]
TheLuscinia species are stocky small birds, 13–16 cm long with an upright stance and a moderately short frequently cocked tail. They watch forinsects,worms and otherinvertebrates from a low perch, and feed mostly on the ground, hopping, with frequent stops, on their strong legs. They areterritorial during the breeding season, and most occur as far north as to bemigratory.[7]
In the two species named as nightingales, the sexes are similar. They are plain brown above, whitish below with light streaking, and have a rufous tail. In the otherLuscinia species, the male is much brighter than thecryptic, usually brownish-grey female. Males have a dark blue, black or brown back, and red, orange or blue on the throat and upper breast. Several have white or rufous patches on the sides of the tail, giving a pattern recalling that of the closely relatedwheatear (Oenanthe), or some of the less closely relatedMuscicapinae (e.g.red-breasted flycatcher,Ficedula parva). The songs of this genus are often complex and musical, especially in the "typical" nightingales.[7]
The breedinghabitat is typically scrub or forest, and their cupnest is usually constructed low in a bush. The birds can be difficult to see in dense undergrowth, especially if not singing, but they may frequent somewhat more open habitats in their winter quarters.[7]
^abGill, Frank; Donsker, David, eds. (2016)."Chats, Old World flycatchers".World Bird List Version 6.2. International Ornithologists' Union. Retrieved20 May 2016.
^Sangster, G.; Alström, P.; Forsmark, E.; Olsson, U. (2010). "Multi-locus phylogenetic analysis of Old World chats and flycatchers reveals extensive paraphyly at family, subfamily and genus level (Aves: Muscicapidae)".Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.57 (1):380–392.Bibcode:2010MolPE..57..380S.doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.07.008.PMID20656044.
Grimmett, Richard; Inskipp, Carol, Inskipp, Tim & Byers, Clive (1999):Birds of India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.ISBN0-691-04910-6
Hír, János; Kókay, József; Venczel, Márton; Gál, Erika; Kessler, Eugén (2001)."Elõzetes beszámoló a felsõtárkányi "Güdör-kert" n. õslénytani lelõhelykomplex újravizsgálatáról" [A preliminary report on the revised investigation of the paleontological locality-complex "Güdör-kert" at Felsõtárkány, Northern Hungary].Folia Historico Naturalia Musei Matraensis.25:41–64. Archived fromthe original on 2007-12-11. Retrieved2009-05-19. [Hungarian with English abstract].