



Lunar swirls are enigmatic features found across theMoon's surface, which are characterized by having a highalbedo, appearing optically immature (i.e. having the optical characteristics of a relatively youngregolith), and (often) having a sinuous shape. Their curvilinear shape is often accentuated by low albedo regions that wind between the bright swirls. They appear to overlay the lunar surface, superposed on craters and ejecta deposits, but impart no observable topography. Swirls have been identified on thelunar maria and onhighlands - they are not associated with a specific lithologic composition. Swirls on the maria are characterized by strong albedo contrasts and complex, sinuous morphology, whereas those on highland terrain appear less prominent and exhibit simpler shapes, such as single loops or diffuse bright spots.

The lunar swirls are coincident with regions of themagnetic field of the Moon with relatively high strength on a planetary body that lacks, and may never have had, an active core dynamo with which to generate its own magnetic field. Every swirl has an associated magnetic anomaly, but not every magnetic anomaly has an identifiable swirl. Orbital magnetic field mapping by theApollo 15 and16 sub-satellites,Lunar Prospector, andKaguya show regions with a local magnetic field. Because the Moon has no currently active global magnetic field, these regional anomalies are regions of remnant magnetism; their origin remains controversial.[citation needed]
There are three leading models for swirl formation. Each model must address two characteristics of lunar swirls formation, namely that a swirl is optically immature, and that it is associated with magnetic anomaly.
Models for creation of the magnetic anomalies associated with lunar swirls point to the observation that several of the magnetic anomalies areantipodal to the younger, large impact basins on the Moon.[1]
This model argues that the high albedo of the swirls is the result of an impact with a comet. The impact would cause scouring of the top-most surface regolith by the comet’s turbulent flow of gas and dust, which exposed fresh material and redeposited the fine, scoured material in discrete deposits.[2] According to this model, the associated strong magnetic anomalies are the result of magnetization of near-surface materials heated above theCurie temperature through hyper-velocity gas collisions and micro-impacts as the coma impacted the surface. Proponents of the cometary impact model consider the occurrence of many swirls antipodal to the major basins to be coincidental or the result of incomplete mapping of swirl locations.[3][4]
This model argues that swirls are formed because lighter-colored regolith is protected from thesolar wind due to a magnetic anomaly.[5] The swirls represent exposed silicate materials whose albedos have been selectively preserved over time from the effects of space weathering via deflection of solar wind ion bombardment. According to this model, optical maturation of exposed silicate surfaces is a result of solar wind ion bombardment. This model suggests that swirl formation is a continuing process, which began after creation of the magnetic anomaly.
Mathematical simulations conducted in 2018 showed thatlava tubes could have become magnetic as they cooled, which would provide a magnetic field consistent with the observations near the lunar swirls.[6]
This model argues that weak electric fields created by interaction between the crustal magnetic anomalies and the solar wind plasma could attract or repel electrically charged fine dust. High–albedofeldspathic material is the dominant component of the finest particles of lunar soil. Electrostatic movement of dust lofted above the surface during terminator crossings could cause this material to preferentially accumulate and form the bright, looping swirl patterns.[7][8]
Direct magnetic observations of the lunar swirls have been conducted by several lunar spacecraft, includingClementine andLunar Prospector. The results of these observations are inconsistent with the Cometary impact model.[9] Further observations by theLunar Reconnaissance Orbiter support the model that solar wind is being deflected by a magnetic field.[citation needed]
Spectral observations by theMoon Mineralogy Mapper instrument onChandrayaan-1 confirmed that the lighter-colored regions are deficient inhydroxide, which also supports the hypothesis that solar wind is being deflected in the pale areas.[10]
As of 2018[update], aCubeSat mission concept is under study at NASA, with the goal of understanding the formation of the lunar swirls. The proposedBi-sat Observations of the Lunar Atmosphere above Swirls, orBOLAS mission would involve two small satellites connected with a 25 km (16 mi)space tether. The lower CubeSat would orbit at an altitude of six miles above the surface.[11][12]
NASA intends to send arover to Reiner Gamma to obtain in-situ observations of the surface materials there. TheLunar Vertex mission, run by the JHUApplied Physics Laboratory, was selected for flight through thePRISM call for proposals.[13][14] Delivery of the rover for the mission was included in theCLPS CP-11 task order which Intuitive Machines will conduct as theIM-3 mission.[15] AMAPP rover carrying a multispectral microscope will determine coarseness and brightness of surface particles and transmit its data to the lander, which will communicate with Earth-based handlers.[16][17][18]