This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Logarithmic derivative" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(August 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
| Part of a series of articles about | ||||||
| Calculus | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
| ||||||
Specialized | ||||||
Inmathematics, specifically incalculus andcomplex analysis, thelogarithmic derivative of afunctionf is defined by the formulawheref′ is thederivative off.[1] Intuitively, this is the infinitesimalrelative change inf; that is, the infinitesimal absolute change inf, namelyf′ scaled by the current value off.
Whenf is a functionf(x) of a real variablex, and takesreal, strictlypositive values, this is equal to the derivative oflnf(x), or thenatural logarithm off. This follows directly from thechain rule:[1]
Many properties of the real logarithm also apply to the logarithmic derivative, even when the function doesnot take values in the positive reals. For example, since the logarithm of a product is the sum of the logarithms of the factors, we haveSo for positive-real-valued functions, the logarithmic derivative of a product is the sum of the logarithmic derivatives of the factors. But we can also use theLeibniz law for the derivative of a product to getThus, it is true forany function that the logarithmic derivative of a product is the sum of the logarithmic derivatives of the factors (when they are defined).
Acorollary to this is that the logarithmic derivative of the reciprocal of a function is the negation of the logarithmic derivative of the function:just as the logarithm of the reciprocal of a positive real number is the negation of the logarithm of the number.[citation needed]
More generally, the logarithmic derivative of a quotient is the difference of the logarithmic derivatives of the dividend and the divisor:just as the logarithm of a quotient is the difference of the logarithms of the dividend and the divisor.
Generalising in another direction, the logarithmic derivative of a power (with constant real exponent) is the product of the exponent and the logarithmic derivative of the base:just as the logarithm of a power is the product of the exponent and the logarithm of the base.
Finally, the logarithmic derivative of theexponential function ofu is just the derivative ofu:just as the logarithm of the exponential function of a function is just the original function.
In summary, both derivatives and logarithms have aproduct rule, areciprocal rule, aquotient rule, and apower rule (compare thelist of logarithmic identities); each pair of rules is related through the logarithmic derivative.
Logarithmic derivatives can simplify the computation of derivatives requiring theproduct rule while producing the same result. The procedure is as follows: Suppose thatf(x) =u(x)v(x) and that we wish to computef′(x). Instead of computing it directly asf′ =u′v +v′u, we compute its logarithmic derivative. That is, we compute:
Multiplying through byf computesf′:
This technique is most useful whenf is a product of a large number of factors. This technique makes it possible to computef′ by computing the logarithmic derivative of each factor, summing, and multiplying byf.
For example, we can compute the logarithmic derivative ofto be
The logarithmic derivative idea is closely connected to theintegrating factor method forfirst-order differential equations. Inoperator terms, write and letM denote the operator of multiplication by some given functionG(x). Then can be written (by theproduct rule) as where now denotes the multiplication operator by the logarithmic derivative
In practice we are given an operator such asand wish to solve equationsfor the functionh, givenf. This then reduces to solvingwhich has as solutionwith anyindefinite integral ofF.[citation needed]
The formula as given can be applied more widely; for example iff(z) is ameromorphic function, it makes sense at all complex values ofz at whichf has neither azero nor a pole. Further, at a zero or a pole the logarithmic derivative behaves in a way that is easily analysed in terms of the particular case
withn an integer,n ≠ 0. The logarithmic derivative is thenand one can draw the general conclusion that forf meromorphic, the singularities of the logarithmic derivative off are allsimple poles, withresiduen from a zero of ordern, residue −n from a pole of ordern. Seeargument principle. This information is often exploited incontour integration.[2][3][verification needed]
In the field ofNevanlinna theory, an important lemma states that the proximity function of a logarithmic derivative is small with respect to the Nevanlinna characteristic of the original function, for instance.[4][verification needed]
Behind the use of the logarithmic derivative lie two basic facts aboutGL1, that is, the multiplicative group ofreal numbers or otherfield. Thedifferential operatorisinvariant under dilation (replacingX byaX fora constant). And thedifferential form is likewise invariant. For functionsF into GL1, the formula is therefore apullback of the invariant form.[citation needed]